implicitly
US /ɪmˈplɪsɪtlɪ/
・UK /ɪm'plɪsɪtlɪ/
B1 中級
adv.副詞絶対的に
Children trust their parents implicitly
adv.副詞暗黙のうちに
The new rules implicitly ban smoking.
動画字幕
T.J. MaxxやHome Depotのような小売業者は、いかに「問題」返品者を静かにターゲットにしているか (How Retailers Like T.J. Maxx And Home Depot Quietly Target 'Problem' Returners)
- you're also implicitly opting into accepting the third-party logistics provider for returns.
- It isn't something you can opt out of because if they have decided to outsource their return logistics to a third party and you're agreeing to purchase from them in that purchase agreement, you're also implicitly opting into accepting the third-party logistics provider for returns.
米国とウクライナ、長年の天然資源取引に署名 | BBC News (US and Ukraine sign long-awaiting natural resources deal | BBC News)
- But I think implicitly, if America has a bigger stake, a bigger financial stake in this country, then they're going to want to protect those interests.
しかし、暗黙のうちに、もしアメリカがこの国により大きな利害関係、より大きな経済的利害関係を持っているのであれば、彼らはその利害関係を守りたいと思うはずだ。
- But I think implicitly, you know, if America has a bigger stake, a bigger financial stake in this country, then they're going to want to protect those interests.
彼は100日では成し遂げなかった。
自己肯定感を高める方法 (How to Learn to Love Oneself More)
- To their enemies, they are implicitly saying: "I want to kill myself more than you ever want to kill me." The solution to all this is a large, naïve word we'll have heard before but which we need to grasp in its life-saving dimension: love.
話が詰まってしまった。
- are implicitly saying: I hate myself more than you ever could. I want to kill myself
と暗黙のうちに言っています。あなたよりも自分を憎んでいる自分を殺したい
なぜ台湾は「親中派」議員のリコールを試みたのか (Why Taiwan Just Tried to Recall “Pro-China” Lawmakers)
- Rather, most senior DPP figures support the status quo, and implicitly claim that Taiwan is already essentially an independent country, so no formal declaration of independence is actually needed.
むしろ、民進党幹部の多くは現状を支持し、台湾はすでに本質的に独立国であり、正式な独立宣言は実際には必要ないと暗に主張している。
- Rather, most senior DPP figures support the status quo and implicitly claim that Taiwan is already essentially an independent country, so no formal declaration of independence is actually needed.
台湾の人々は中国人ではなく台湾人であると認識するようになっており、中国人であると回答した人の割合は90年代前半の約25％から現在は2％に減少し、台湾人であると回答した人の割合は同じ期間に18％から63％に上昇した。
ピーター・ティール：ゼロからイチへ (Peter Thiel: Going from Zero to One)
- But it is also implicitly an anti technological dichotomy, because when we say that we're living in the developed world, we are implicitly saying that we're living in that part of the world where nothing new is going to be done, where things are finished, they're complete.
しかし、それは暗黙のうちに反テクノロジー的な二分法でもあります。なぜなら、私たちが先進国に住んでいると言うとき、私たちは暗黙のうちに、新しいことは何も行われず、物事は完了し、完成した、世界のその部分に住んでいると言っているからです。
- But it is also implicitly an anti-technological dichotomy.
そして、私たちはこのかなり暗い未来像を持っているのです。
書籍01 - ノートルダム・ド・パリ (ヴィクトル・ユーゴー原作) オーディオブック (第1-6章) (Book 01 - The Hunchback of Notre Dame Audiobook by Victor Hugo (Chs 1-6))
- Personages, all of whom bore, written on their brows, that Maximilian of Austria had done well in trusting implicitly, as the manifest ran, in their sense, valor, experience, loyalty, and
"それは見て非常に楽しいものでした。の日常それはのために特別に作られた道徳です。
- "trusting implicitly," as the manifest ran,
マニフェストが実行されたとして、"暗黙的に信頼して"
ワシントンにおけるアメとムチ：反トラスト内部告発者とFCPAの時効延長 (Carrots and Sticks in Washington: Antitrust Whistleblowers and an FCPA SOL Extension)
- Matt, in listening to this part of our podcast, it also strikes me that when we talked about the SD&Y Southern District of New York declination program, I think we at least implicitly recognized this was a very big carrot.
マット、このポッドキャストの部分を聞いて、SD&Yニューヨーク南部地区の訴追見送りプログラムについて話したとき、それが非常に大きなニンジンだったと、少なくとも暗黙のうちに認識していたことに気づきました。
- Matt, in listening to this part of our podcast, it also strikes me that when we talked about the SD&Y, Southern District of New York declination program, I think we at least implicitly recognized this was a very big carrot.
それで、これらすべてが本当に一つの方向に向かっているのかもしれません。
自己認識の欠如がもたらす危険 (The Dangers of Missing a Sense of Self)
- I supposed to like? Not what do I approve of, but what is it good to approve of? Not what do I find funny, but when should I laugh? When we watch them carefully, we may notice rapid almost arbitrary shifts in their views. They love this artist or jacket or political opinion, but in fact no, they prefer another one and then another. They are implicitly constantly calling out to a world which puzzles and terrifies them. Who should I be? What is it right to think? These poor souls tend to be the products of very particular sorts of childhood. When little, they will have faced environments in which their uniqueness was never a matter of concern to their self-absorbed caregivers. Mother or father were never able to push their needs aside for a time to drop to their level and ask, who is this extraordinary new member of the human race whom I have helped to create? What are their particular inclinations and loves and hates? What do they have to tell me? They were far too perturbed and fragile for such self-abnegation. They couldn't attune to the child and so the child could not, in turn, attune to themselves. For we can only find out what we think if, in the early days, someone was sufficiently patient to facilitate our own process of self-discovery, if someone didn't shout over us and say, don't be ridiculous when we ventured forth an opinion, or didn't use all the resources of adulthood to insist that their way was the only way. The self-less child will have had to cope with an egotist who simply coerced them to follow an already predetermined agenda. These are the books you need to think are amazing. The only way to be a good boy or girl is to win at this kind of sport or that school subject and later to be a banker or a vet and so on, all without in any way bothering to check in on how this might have felt to the small person biologically programmed to adore and revere them. From this was drawn a moral. Survival depends on compliance. The price of existing is the sacrifice of one's real identity. Self-less people can be deeply charming. Their manner can be exquisitely polite and mellifluous. They are built to work out what we like and to reflect it back to us. They aren't merely pretending to go along with what we think for a few minutes. They genuinely seek out our worldview and lose themselves in it. But these people also pose grave dangers. For no one forgoes their sense of self without storing up a significant degree of rage and dissatisfaction. Yet this can never emerge cleanly because the candid expression of their needs was never something that these selfless people were allowed to practice. The first we're liable to learn about a problem they have with us is when it's become unmanageable. We can be most at risk if we fall in love with these elusive, beguiling, shapeshifting people. At first, it's our tastes they want to understand. It's the books and places and foods we like that seem especially interesting to them. We can allow ourselves a dangerous moment of self-indulgence. We're made to feel marvellous and aren't suspicious enough to wonder why.
何が好きなんだ？何を認めるかではなく、何を認めるのが良いのか？何が面白いかではなく、いつ笑えばいいのか？彼らを注意深く観察していると、ほとんど恣意的に近い急激な見解の変化に気づくことがある。彼らはこのアーティストやジャケットや政治的意見を愛しているが、実際はそうではなく、別のものを好み、また別のものを好む。彼らは、自分たちを当惑させ、恐怖させる世界に対して、暗黙のうちに常に呼びかけているのだ。私はどうあるべきか？何を考えるのが正しいのか？このような哀れな魂は、非常に特殊な子供時代の産物である傾向がある。幼
- Until at some point, the wind changes. Our beloved without a self starts a new job, develops different friends and starts to hang out with a crowd they take to be superior. What replaces their approval of us isn't just gentle disinterest. It will probably be disdain. We become as repulsive to them as we were once extraordinary. They may say, you don't really know me or you expect me to be perfect. They feel trapped by the very borrowed identity they once sought out so avidly from us. There is considerable anger in their system because they know that someone has quashed their true self. They simply forget that it wasn't us. They know implicitly that they've been prevented from becoming who they are and hold us responsible for stifling them. They may say, with an early adolescent level of scorn, you're controlling me, when what they really mean is, I don't know who I am, I've surrendered control to you and now can't work out what to think. Or, more profoundly, I can't determine the line between being loved and being controlled because a parent who was meant to do the former was more interested in the latter. We can find ourselves dropped like a stone. And yet ironically, we may have been very right for them, they just didn't know enough about who they were to trust their original instincts. The best we can do for people who have been denied a self is to signal that we aren't, as their parents once were, only there to foist yet another set of views on them. We won't demand that they echo us. We want to be curious about someone they've never yet been allowed to discover. We're keen to do a very eerie and unparalleled thing. Get to know them properly.
風向きが変わるまでは。自分というものを持たない最愛の人は、新しい仕事を始め、違う友人を作り、自分より優れていると思われる人たちと付き合い始める。彼らの私たちへの承認に代わるものは、穏やかな無関心だけではない。おそらく軽蔑だろう。私たちは、かつて非凡であったように、彼らから反感を買うようになる。彼らは言うかもしれない、あなたは私のことを本当に知らない、あるいは私に完璧であることを期待している、と。彼らは、かつて私たちから熱心に求めた借り物のアイデンティティそのものに囚われていると感じている。誰かが本当の自分