Name: シリア戦争 あなたが知らされていないこと (The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T04:38:05.000Z
Duration: 17 min 14 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

In this video we're going to show you evidence

基礎受動態

that the syrian government was framed in the chemical weapons

We're going to explain why they were framed

and we're going to propose a course of action.

The use of chemical weapons on civilians in the syrian conflict was a crime against humanity.

As such it should be the subject of a real, criminal investigation

and those responsible should be brought to justice.

however if the US and NATO have their way, that's not going to happen.

In their book, a simple accusation is as good as a conviction

and therefore there's no point providing any real evidence!

Let's just skip right to the missile strike, shall we?

This isn't really surprising to anyone who's been paying attention lately

The United States has had Syria and Iran in their crosshairs for a long time.

The plans for these wars have been in the works for over a decade.

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: . About ten days after 9/11 I went through the Pentagon

to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in.

He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second."

I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says.

"We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq."

This was on or about the 20th of September.

I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?"

He said "I guess they don't know what else to do."

So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said

"No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq."

He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but -

- we've got a good military and we can take down governments" and he said

"I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan.

I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said "Oh, it's worse than that."

He reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper and he said, "I just got this down from upstairs"

-- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries-

- in five years starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

There are three primary psychological techniques that the powers that be in any given era use

to build up the public support needed to take the country to war.

1. Create the impression that the aggresor is actually acting in self defense or in defense of a helpless nation.

This can be done by exaggerating the danger posed by an enemy, fabricating an attack and blaming it on the enemy

or by intentionally provoking the enemy into a response.

2. Build up a crusade mythology, one that presents the aggressors as fighting for a higher ideal,

or for the good of all humanity. In our current era the meme of “Spreading Democracy”, “Fighting Terrorism”

or "Defending human rights" are the most commonly used.

3. De-humanize the enemy. War is mass murder,

therefore presenting the enemy as evil, barbaric, or subhuman

is essential unless you want your citizens and your soldiers questioning the morality of their actions.

This pattern is often supported and augmented by a sense of cultural or racial superiority,

the way Islamophobia is capitalized on to build moral support for this phony war on terror is a perfect example.

The U.S. government has a long illustrious history of using these techniques,

and they keep using them because they work.

PATRICK CLAWSON: I frankly think that Crisis initiation is really tough.

And it’s very hard for me to see how the United States

Which leads me to conclude that if in fact compromise does not come by

that the traditional way that America gets to war is... what would be best for U.S. interests?

Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II

as David mentioned, you may recall he had to wait for Pearl Harbor.

Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I

You may recall had to wait for the Lusitania episode.

Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam,

you may recall he had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode.

We didn’t go to war with Spain until the Maine exploded.

And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the federal army until Ft. Sumter was attacked.

Which was why he ordered the commander at Ft. Sumter to do exactly that thing

which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.

So if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war...

… One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions.

I mentioned that explosion on August 17th

72
00:04:35,836 --> 00:04:37,847
We could step up the pressure.

I mean look people, Iranian submarines periodically go down. Someday one of them might not come up.

We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure; I’m not advocating that.

But I’m just suggesting that this is not an either or proposition

–tyou know, it's just hat sanctions has to succeed or other things.

We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.

United States has been trying to get Iran under it's thumb for a long time.

In 1953 the CIA and the UK's MI6 organized a coup to topple the democratically elected prime minister of Iran

They then installed the Shah as their puppet. The Shah, who also just happened to be brutal dictator,

ruled until 1979 when he was overthrown during the Iranian revolution.

so they tried to take Iran down by arming and funding Saddam Hussein against the Iranians.

also referred to as the first Persian Gulf War which lasted from 1980 to 1988.

The U.S. continued its support for Iraq even though they knew full well

that he was using chemical weapons against the Iranians.

This now declassified top secret memo from Nov. 4, 1983 documents chemical weapons use by Iraq,

Here's a second memo, written on Feb. 24, 1984 to the director of Central Intelligence

predicting that Iraq will use nerve agents against Iran.

Note that the source of these documents is "Foreign Policy Magazine"

which is an extremely pro-establishment publication by any standards.

In spite of this, friendly diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Saddam continued.

This video of Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President Ronald Reagan meeting with Saddam,

was taken on December 20, 1983, which was after the first memo.

字幕リスト動画再生

シリア戦争あなたが知らされていないこと (The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told)

episode

pattern

compromise

evidence

シリア戦争 あなたが知らされていないこと (The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told)

episode

pattern

compromise

evidence

シリア戦争あなたが知らされていないこと (The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told)