字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント THE OSCARS IN MEMORIAM SEGMENT. THE RIGHT NAME WAS USED IN THE GRAPHIC BUT UNFORTUNATELY THEY USED THE WRONG PHOTO SO AND IMAGE OF JAN CHAPMAN WAS MISTAKENLY CHOSEN TO REPRESENT JANET PATTERSON, THE AUSTRALIAN COSTUME DESIGNER BUT AFTER WINNER AND FOUR-TIME ACADEMY AWARD NOMINATED LAST YEAR. HERE IS THE GRAPHIC IN QUESTION THAT THEY USE DURING THE SEGMENT AND AGAIN, THAT IS THE WRONG PHOTO, HERE IS THE CORRECT PHOTO OF THE WOMAN THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE USED. SHE'S IN THE MIDDLE. THEY DID WORK ON ONE MOVIE TOGETHER. THEY WERE FRIENDS. EXACTLY. LET ME READ YOU A QUOTE FROM JAN CHAPMAN. SHE WAS VERY UPSET ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED I WAS DEVASTATING BY THE USE OF MY IMAGE IN PLACE OF MY GREAT FRIEND AND LONGTIME COLLABORATOR JANET PATTERSON. I HAD URGED HER AGENCY TO TAKE ANY PHOTOGRAPH WHICH MIGHT BE USED IN UNDERSTAND THAT THEY WERE TOLD THAT THE ACADEMY HAD IT COVERED. I AM ALIVE AND WELL AND AN ACTIVE PRODUCER. IT IS JUST TOO BAD. IT'S TOO BAD FOR THE ACADEMY BECAUSE THAT MISTAKE, WHICH WOULD BE EXCUSED, NOT EXCUSED BY UNDERSTOOD IN A DIFFERENT YEAR, NOW IT IS THE SECOND THING AND THEREFORE, BECOMES A BIGGER MOMENT. IF YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BAD THAT THEY READ THE WRONG BEST PICTURE, THEY KILLED THE WRONG PERSON. WE AT TCM, WE DO IN IN MEMORIAM AND IT IS BEAUTIFUL. ITíS INCREDIBLY WELL PRODUCED AND I WOULD SAY IT IS BETTER THAN THE ACADEMIES. WE ARE NOT LIMITED BY TIME SO WE CAN GO A LITTLE LONGERÖ LONG BUT IT IS BEAUTIFUL. THEY INCLUDED MY FATHER BACK IN 2015. IT WAS PETER. THE ACADEMY LEFT OUT, OBVIOUSLY EVERY YEAR THEY LEAVE PEOPLE OUT BUT THEY LEFT OUT ROBERT VAUGHN WHO WAS AN OSCAR NOMINEE AND A SIGNIFICANT ACTOR. NOT A BIT PLAYER BUT A MAJOR SUPPORTING ACTOR FOR A LONG TIME. IT JUST FEELS LIKE THERE IS NO WAY THEY HAD A CONVERSATION WHERE THEY DECIDED TO LEAVE ROBERT VAUGHN OFF, SEEMS EVER GOT BUT I DON'T KNOW. EVERY YEAR, IT'S INCREDIBLY HARD AND THEN NITPICKING AFTER THE SHOW, IT IS A LIVE THREE-HOUR EVENT THAT ISN'T A SPORTING EVENT. AND NOT A DEBATE. IT IS HARD TO PRODUCE. THAT'S WHY THE JIMMY KIMMEL QUESTION BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET 100. YOUR BEST GRADE IS AN 86 OWN PEOPLE GET 83'S THE CRITICS THE NEXT DAY LIKE IT WAS HORRIBLE. JOHN STUART WAS HORRIBLE. JIMMY CRIMP KIMMEL CRUSHED IT. YEAH IT WAS GREAT INITIAL MOVING AND IT WAS A REALLY GREAT SHOW. IT KIND OF FELL APART AT THE END BUT IN FALLING APART, IT BECAME GREATER. ANOTHER WAY JAN CHAPMAN CAN LOOK AT IT IS, NO, JAN CHAPMAN IS ALIVE. SHE'S ALIVE. NONE OF THE PEOPLE ARE NAMED JANE CHAPMAN. JAN. YES, SHE'S ALIVE. OKAY, FINALLY ON JAN THOUGHT THAT IS A BAD MISTAKE. WE MAKE MISTAKES ALL OF THE TIME. WE DO PRODUCTIONS. WE HAVEN'T KILLED ANYONE YET. WE DO LIVE PRODUCTIONS EVERY DAY. NOT ONCE A YEAR AND NOW WITH THE RESOURCES THEY HAVE AT THE OSCARS. I FEELING OF SOMETHING LIKE THIS, DOUBLE AND TRIPLE CHECK WITH EVERY IMAGE AND EVERY NAME THAT YOU USE AND I GET IT, SO MANY PEOPLE DIED IN 2016 SO I CAN UNDERSTAND IF THEY ACCIDENTALLY LET SOMEONE OFFER FORGOT SOMEONE, BUT THIS TAKES IT TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL. I'M JUST SURPRISED THAT THIS THING WITH ALIVE WHEN HE DID THE PERFORMANCE. WAY, WAS A BUT WE. STING IS ALIVE, BOWIE IS DEAD. THEY'LL MOST RAN GEORGE MICHAEL'S PICTURE INSTEAD. FINALLY, TO JAN. IT'S OKAY, TO BE DEVASTATED. THIS DOESN'T ACTUALLY CHANGE WHETHER YOU ARE ALIVE OR NOT, IT IS GOING TO BE OKAY. BUT MY PICTURE AS THEY USED A MEARS. PRINCE PASSED AWAY AND THEY SHOWED MY PICTURE THAT I WOULD BE LIKE THAT'S ME. I'M ACTUALLY STILL ALIVE. YEAH THOUGHT AGAIN, IT IS GOING TO BE OKAY. NOT FOR JANET PETERSON, BUT FOR EVERYONE ELSE. JANET HAS ACTUALLY PASSED AWAY, BUT FOR HER FRIEND, THE GOOD NEWS IS YOU ARE STILL ALIVE. AND AN ACTIVE PRODUCER. THAT'S WHAT SHE'S MORE WORRIED ABOUT. BY THE WAY, JAN, BELIEVE ME, THIS IS GOING TO HELP YOUR CAREER MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
A2 初級 米 アカデミー賞「In Memorium」のプロデューサー、彼女は死んでいないと語る (Producer From Oscars 'In Memorium' Says She's Not Dead) 30 3 Darren に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語