Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Williams of Trafford) (Con)

  • My Lords, it gives me great pleasure to open this International Women’s Day debatefor

  • the fourth year running, I think. International Women’s Day provides us with the perfect

  • opportunity to come together, to celebrate the remarkable achievements of women and to

  • commemorate the great progress we have made and continue to make. Around the world today,

  • women and men will be marking this celebratory occasion in various ways. There will be events

  • in local communities, discussions in places of work, arts performances in schools and

  • debates across countries, much like the one taking place today in your LordshipsHouse,

  • and it is a privilege to be just one part of these celebrations.

  • We have come a long way in a short time and we should celebrate all that we have accomplished.

  • Last year, in particular, was an outstanding year for women’s progress, and I want to

  • highlight some of our incredible achievements. We allocated £5 million of funding to mark

  • the centenary of voting rights for women. This money funded over 300 projects that raised

  • awareness of this crucial milestone and encouraged more women, in particular, to participate

  • in democracy, building a diverse political system that reflects the nation it serves.

  • For example, the Courage Calls event built on the Ask Her to Stand model, featuring workshops

  • hosted by parliamentary experts and discussions with serving MPs, and providing help and guidance

  • for 350 women to get on that crucial first rung of the political ladder. I hope to see

  • some of the women who participated enter Parliament as sitting MPs one day.

  • There was the Centenary Cities fund, allocated to seven towns and cities to celebrate their

  • suffrage history. These cities hosted a range of exciting projects to celebrate as well

  • as remember those individuals who helped to make votes for women a reality. Let me give

  • your Lordships a taste of what was on offer. In Manchester, we had cycle rides through

  • history, touching on the lives of some of the women who made important contributions

  • to the cause of women’s suffrage. In Nottingham we had banner-making workshops, encouraging

  • people of all ages to celebrate the anniversary of the Representation of the People Act 1918.

  • In Bristol we had the Black Women 100 event, which unearthed stories about the incredible

  • women of colour who fought for the right to vote in the early 20th century. This is just

  • the tip of the iceberg. I know that in Leeds, Bolton, Leicester and London there were hundreds,

  • if not thousands, of other events, which took place as part of the celebrations.

  • Of course, we had the statue of Millicent Fawcettthe first statue of a woman to stand

  • in Parliament Squareand the statue of Emmeline Pankhurst in my home city of Manchester. It

  • was a huge privilege to be part of the unveiling, and what made it so special and so significant

  • for me was the fact that my daughter was watching from the building opposite, where she works.

  • I know she wished to work for her employer due to its proven track record on gender equality,

  • which makes me incredibly proud of her. I am certain that all these statues will serve

  • as a reminder to all us of the courage of our foremothers, and will inspire future generations

  • of women and girls to come.

  • In November, we hosted Women MPs of the World. More than 100 female MPs from across the world

  • participated, and we witnessed history as the House of Commons Chamber, for the first

  • time ever, was filled solely with women. It was a herculean task to pull it off. I must

  • pay tribute to the right honourable Member for Camberwell and Peckham. It started as

  • her idea and evolved into a collaborative effort of two political parties, three government

  • departments and three arm’s-length bodies to fly in around 100 female MPs from around

  • the world to participate in receptions, plenary sessions and workshops here in Westminster.

  • It demonstrated the power the House has when we all pull together.

  • Last year’s work has left a lasting legacy that will undoubtedly provide greater opportunities

  • and influence for women in our society. But the fight for equality did not stop last year.

  • We need to carry forward the momentum from the centenary year to make sure that our progress

  • towards gender equality does not stall.

  • We know that inequality still persists across the world. Globally, one in three girls or

  • women has been beaten or sexually abused in her lifetime. Every two minutes a woman dies

  • in pregnancy or childbirth. Over 200 million women living in 30 countries have undergone

  • female genital mutilation. In the UK, we know that women are much more likely to have time

  • out for caring, with lasting impacts on pay and progression. Nearly 90% of those not working

  • due to caring for home and family are women. The gender pay gap still stands at 17.9%.

  • Until we have true economic, social and gender parity, we will never be equal.

  • This year’s theme for International Women’s Day isBalance for Better”. With that

  • in mind, I want to look to the future. I want to talk about what the Government are doing

  • to ensure we have better balance in our society and how we are delivering for women and girls.

  • Yesterday, the Government published the refreshed violence against women and girls strategy,

  • which sets out how we are going further and faster in our response to these terrible crimes.

  • Much has changed in the three years since the Ending Violence against Women and Girls

  • strategy was published. We have a better understanding of the effects on victims and have seen increased

  • public awareness through the #MeToo and Time’s Up campaigns, which is welcome.

  • The refreshed strategy will implement a review of the criminal justice response to rape and

  • serious sexual violence, which is crucial to ensuring that victims and survivors see

  • the justice they so desperately need. I welcome increased reporting of these crimes, which

  • shows that more victims have the confidence to come forward, but we must ensure that the

  • police, the Crown Prosecution Service and the response through the courts are as robust

  • and effective as can be. We will also develop guidance for providers and commissioners on

  • best practice in supporting LGBT victims of VAWG, as well as reviewing our national statement

  • of expectations to ensure that VAWG services delivered locally are as effective as they

  • can be. Sadly, violence is something that touches many of our lives. We must do all

  • we can across government, working with statutory agencies and specialist third-sector organisations,

  • to support victims and bring perpetrators to justice.

  • Later this spring, we will publish our gender equality and economic empowerment strategy,

  • setting out our plans to address the persistent gender-based barriers that womenand menface

  • across the country at every stage of their lives. The strategy will focus on four key

  • themes: entry and progression in the workplace, especially for those far from the labour market

  • or in low-paid, low-skilled work; optimal choice over parental leave and childcare;

  • economic well-being in later life; and attitudes and social norms about the roles that men

  • and women play.

  • My right honourable friend the Minister for Women and Equalities shared her emerging thinking

  • about the strategy with a wide range of stakeholders on Monday this week. She set out that a key

  • theme will be tackling the financial fragility that impacts on some vulnerable women and

  • girls. As a compelling example of this, she announced that she will be convening an expert

  • cross-sectoral task force to find sustainable ways to address period poverty in the UK,

  • along with UK aid support for projects tackling period poverty and stigma globally.

  • The gender pay gap reporting deadline for year two is less than a month away. Our world-leading

  • legislation meant that, for the first time last year, over 10,000 employers reported

  • their gender pay gap, providing an unprecedented level of transparency, driving board-level

  • discussions and pushing employers to take real action to close the gap. In fact, Bloomberg

  • liked our model so much it has integrated our key measures into its gender equality

  • index for investors.

  • Reporting is just the start; it is crucial that employers use their gender pay gap data

  • to identify the barriers to women’s recruitment and progression, and take action to break

  • down these barriers. We had 100% compliance last year and we expect the same this year.

  • We saw the gender pay gap fall to its lowest level ever of 17.9%, but it will take until

  • 2052 at this rate

  • Baroness Thornton (Lab) We will not be here any more.

  • Baroness Williams of Trafford No, we will notto eradicate it completely

  • in the UK, and much longer globally. We have to do better.

  • We have committed £5 million in funding to help people return to work after time out

  • for caring and to find jobs that use their valuable skills and experience. In addition

  • to the initial £5 million fund we established for returners in 2017, a further £500,000

  • has been provided to support those with additional barriers to participating in the labour market.

  • This may include people with complex needs or multiple barriers, such as substance abuse

  • or homelessness. We have gone even further, and an additional £100,000 of funding has

  • been announced to support those people with little or no work history. We have also launched

  • best practice guidance and a toolkit to help employers run effective returner programmes.

  • We urge them to make the most of these publicly available resources.

  • Gender equality is a global issue. I recently attended a gathering in Spain of Ministers

  • from across Europe. While we are leaving the European Union, we are clear that we will

  • continue to work with partners in Europe and across the world to ensure that women and

  • girls have the same rights and opportunities as their male counterparts.

  • I conclude by saying again that I am proud to participate in today’s debate with so

  • many staunch advocates of gender equality. I am proud to be part of this Government,

  • and it is an honour to be part of the work we are doing and will continue to do to fight

  • for gender equality across the UK and the world. We are making great progress and it

  • is only right that we celebrate how far we have come. Now, all I ask of you is to keep

  • working together, especially in these challenging times, to think about how we can balance for

  • better, and how we can ensure that gender equality becomes a reality sooner rather than

  • later. I beg to move.

  • Baroness Gale (Lab) My Lordsand Baronesses—I thank the Minister

  • for bringing this debate before us. It is as she feels: it is a privilege to be speaking

  • in this debate, albeit late on a Thursday afternoon as last business. Perhaps we could

  • have a much better time for our debate next year. This year’s theme isBalance for

  • Betterand as we consider the UK’s role in advancing gender equality globally, we

  • must face up to the challenges that remain so as to tip the scales, which are currently

  • weighted towards men. Whether it is about intimidation in public life, gender-based

  • violence or equal pay, only by tackling those issues can a truly better balance be found.

  • Increasing the number of women in public life is about improving decisions and outcomesand,

  • more importantly, having our elected institutions look like the people they represent. According

  • to the United Nations, only 24% of all national parliamentarians are women. In the UK, for

  • example, 32% of the Members of the House of Commons are women, while the figure for the

  • House of Lords is 26%, for the Welsh Assembly 47%, for the Scottish Parliament 35% and,

  • in Northern Ireland, 32%. I am proud to say that the Welsh Assembly is the best in the

  • United Kingdom, and that if we can do it in Wales we can do it anywhere. That is a challenge

  • to the rest of the country.

  • The voice of women in the UK was lost when the coalition Government disbanded the Women’s

  • National Commission in 2010. Although the Government said at that time that its work

  • would be taken in house, with the Government Equalities Office having the responsibility,

  • nothing is now heard from it. It cannot possibly be doing the work that the WNC was carrying

  • out. Can the Minister tell the House what is happening in this field? The WNC was an

  • asset to the United Kingdom, comprising over 650 women’s organisations and providing

  • different Governments over a 40-year period with a great link to women. If this Government

  • are not prepared to establish a new WNC, I can guarantee that the next Labour Government

  • will do so. We will provide a strong, independent voice for women’s organisations in the United

  • Kingdom; it will be women’s voice to Government on a whole range of issues.

  • Women in politics face an extraordinary amount of abuse online and offline, partly because

  • they speak up but also simply because they are women. Online abuse can affect women’s

  • human rights to safety and freedom of expression. Social media companies must do more to protect

  • female users, but this abuse undoubtedly comes from the sexism that still exists in our society

  • and that can manifest in even more violent ways. Sadly, many women in public life have

  • been victims of this violence. I pay tribute to my former colleague, Jo Cox, who was killed

  • just because she was serving the people of her constituency. We think of her today. As

  • we call for more women to enter public life, we must always remember those who have paid

  • the ultimate price.

  • When talking about the UK’s role in advancing gender equality globally, we cannot ignore

  • the biggest domestic issue of the day. It is difficult to talk about the idea of a global

  • Britain while we leave our most important international institution, the European Union.

  • The EU has been credited with advancing women’s rights and gender equality. According to the

  • Equality and Human Rights Commission, Brexit could lead to equality protections falling

  • behind those in the EU, as well as existing ones being removed. The Government continue

  • to leave no deal on the table, which would be catastrophic not only for the economy but

  • for equality. The Government’s own impact assessment revealed that no deal would leave

  • the UK’s economy up to 9% smaller. The Women’s Budget Group said that such a downturn would

  • disproportionately impact on women. However, there would be many other consequences. A

  • no-deal Brexit would leave hard-earned women’s rights at the whim of future Governments,

  • without the protection of an international court. A hard border in Ireland could mean

  • women travelling to access safe abortions facing increased checks, costs and delays.

  • Will the Minister explain how women will be protected in the event of an economic downturn

  • resulting from a no-deal Brexit?

  • Another dividing line between the sexes remains gender economic inequality. Eurostat ranks

  • the UK as having the fifth worst gender pay gap in the EU, 2.77% higher than the OECD

  • average. The Office for National Statistics found that the gender pay gap among all UK

  • employees is 18%. More must be done to close this gap. The Minister spoke about this in

  • her opening remarks but I do not think we can wait until 2050, I think it was, when

  • we will not be around to see that. Let us hope we can get a move on.

  • Gender-based violence remains a major public health issue and a violation of women’s

  • human rights. Women fleeing conflict are left in extremely vulnerable positions. The development

  • charity International Rescue Committee states that,

  • girls living in crisis-affected communitiesare at increased risk of gender-based

  • violenceincluding sexual violence and exploitation, intimate partner violence and

  • early and forced marriage”.

  • The UK must lead the global effort to protect and empower these women but we must make sure

  • that this protection extends to women at home. It is a well-known fact that, on average,

  • two women are killed every week in England and Wales by a partner or ex-partner. Unfortunately,

  • the Government’s austerity programme and the cuts to funding for women’s refuges

  • have left many women with no safe place to go. Women’s Aid found that one in six referrals

  • to a refuge were declined, owing to a lack of space or capacity to support the survivor.

  • I met a remarkable woman recently: Charlotte Kneer, who is CEO of a women’s refuge. She

  • is a survivor of domestic abuse and took part in a Channel 4 documentary on the women’s

  • refuge she now runs. It was calledSafe at Last: Inside a Women’s Refugeand

  • it was the first time such a film has been made. Charlotte allowed Channel 4 access to

  • the refuge mainly to highlight the lack of funding but also to show what work is carried

  • out. The staff were absolutely amazing and so dedicated, but they are very worried that

  • it may have to close owing to a lack of funding. I recommend that noble Lords watch this documentary

  • and, if possible, that it be shown in Parliament. I would be really happy to facilitate that.

  • Will the Minister meet Charlotte to hear directly from her of the difficulties that women’s

  • refuges are undergoing? The Government need to ensure that local government has enough

  • funds to support women’s refuges, so that no woman is turned away. When a woman is turned

  • away and must return to an abusive relationship, she is risking her life.

  • I look forward to the domestic abuse Bill coming to your LordshipsHouse and I welcome

  • the Government establishing a Joint Committee to consider it. The Minister has reassured

  • me that when the Bill is passed, the Government will ratify the Istanbul convention. If so,

  • they will need to provide all the resources necessary to ensure the work can be carried

  • out effectively. Can she explain how the role of the domestic abuse commissioner will operate

  • in practice, and how do the Government plan to guarantee the commissioner’s independence?

  • A better balance of women’s voices, ideas, rights and protections and a fairer distribution

  • of wealth, as per equal pay, can only make the world a better place for women and girls.

  • Gender inequality continues to hold women and girls back. We cannot allow women to be

  • short-changed in the workplace. We cannot allow women to lose their jobs in a no-deal

  • Brexit. We cannot allow violence to be used as a weapon against women and girls and, when

  • we consider the UK’s role in advancing gender equality globally, we should not settle for

  • anything less than the UK becoming a leader in equality. I give the House an assurance

  • that that will be the aim of a Labour Government, and I look forward to the day when there is

  • a “Balance for Betterin the lives of girls and women globally.

  • Baroness Hussein-Ece (LD) My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing

  • this important debate and pay tribute to the Government’s work in advancing women’s

  • equality and rights globally, building on the work of successive Governments and the

  • incredible work that has taken place around the world. It is a pleasure to follow the

  • noble Baroness, Lady Gale, and I pay tribute to all the work she has done as well.

  • I come to this as somebody who has been involved in gender equality and working with women,

  • particularly women from ethnic minority communities, for many decades. I founded the first domestic

  • violence project for Turkish, Kurdish and Middle Eastern women 25 years ago, and I am

  • proud that it is still going from strength to strength. Many of the women who initially

  • came there for support have gone on to become empowered women, much more in control of their

  • lives, and to help other women. That has been something that has followed down the track

  • and been successful.

  • My contribution today is on the public discourse on black and minority ethnic women, particularly

  • Muslim women. I want to touch on this because I have become increasingly concerned that

  • narratives and stereotypes persist that Muslim women are either victimssubjugated, oppressed,

  • controlled by their families and unable to speak Englishor, at the same time, blamed

  • for bringing up children who become radicalised. My contribution may not be popular but it

  • needs to be said, because I have become increasingly uncomfortable. I have been at various events

  • this week with other women from Muslim backgroundsyounger, empowered and educated womenwho are fed

  • up with this narrative that persists.

  • For example, whenever there are Questions in your LordshipsHouse that refer to Muslim

  • women, they are inevitably about forced marriage, FGM or child brides. They are never about

  • anything positive. I recognise that these things exist, but this is not the only dimension

  • in which we should look at women from these backgrounds. We are missing the opportunity

  • to support and empower Muslim women if we stereotype them and put them in a box of oppressed

  • women. I come from a Muslim background. My mother was a Muslim woman and I can tell you

  • nobody ever controlled my mother; she barely took suggestions, let alone instructions.

  • That is the line of women I come from and I know many women like that from other communities.

  • I want to touch on some facts. British Muslim women face various layers of discrimination.

  • They are women, they are an ethnic minority and they are Muslim. A 2015 study found that

  • 35% of Muslim women are employed, compared to 69% of all women, but we are told that

  • Muslim women are not allowed to work. But they do want to work. Some 16% of Muslim women

  • are always looking for workthat number has probably gone upcompared to 5% of the

  • rest of the female population. Looking at the figures, Muslim girls and women are doing

  • extremely well in exams and schools, and going on to further education. They are pushing

  • at the door, wanting to get into more professional jobs, from which they have traditionally been

  • excluded. They want to be part of, and integrate into, British society. Let us accept that

  • that is what we all are; I am one of those who is part of British society. There is no

  • other, and Muslim women need our support to reach their empowerment.

  • Many factors directly impact on Muslim women. Forty-six per cent of the Muslim population

  • live in the most deprived areas of the country. That has an impact and we must recognise it.

  • There is strong evidence that Muslim men and women are being held back in the workplace

  • by Islamophobia, racism and discrimination, and they are less likely to be in full-time

  • work, not for want of trying.

  • I was looking at recent research from the Government’s Social Mobility Commission.

  • Professor Jacqueline Stevenson of Sheffield Hallam University, which led the research,

  • said:

  • Muslims are being excluded, discriminated against or failed, at all stages of their

  • transition from education to employmentTaken together, these contributory factors have

  • profound implications for social mobility”.

  • Academics cite similar problems. Students face stereotypes and low expectations from

  • teachers. There are fewer positive role models in the classroom. Young Muslims routinely

  • fear becoming targets of bullying and harassment and feel forced to work, as one put it, “10

  • times as hardas their white counterparts to get on and be accepted.

  • I come to headscarves, because this is such a big issue. There is an obsession with what

  • women wear. Women wearing headscarves face particular discrimination. I do not know why

  • what a woman wears should be of such consequence, particularly to men, but apparently it is.

  • It is a controversial and emotive subject, and it is sad that the previous Foreign Secretary

  • likened Muslim women in niqabs toletterboxesandbank robbers”, which led to an increase

  • in abuse and attacks on women. That was unfortunate.

  • We need our political and civic leaders to act responsibly in the public discourse. We

  • need to stop this narrative that Muslim women are all victims who need saving or figures

  • of fun. Let us not tolerate this casual racism. We need more positive role models, and it

  • is very positive, as the Minister mentioned, that we now have eight Muslim women MPs in

  • the other place. That is a record number and it is great, but we need more. We need more

  • here as well. We need more BME teachers. We need more role models, because schools and

  • pupils are losing out on the talents and skills of BME teachers, who are unable to advance

  • their careers.

  • As I said, however, women and girls are doing better. If we value the contribution of all

  • women in our society and are serious about BME women and men feeling valued and integrating

  • into our society, we must create a level playing field, and dispel the outdated narrative that

  • women from different communities are all oppressed and simply need saving.

  • I shall close with this. BME women are now leading in the media, the arts, business and

  • sport. I meet so many talented young women, who have come here from around the country

  • and are doing so well. Let us celebrate this and ensure that these women’s voices are

  • heard, celebrated, valued and encouraged. TheBalance for Better”, the theme of

  • International Women’s Day, can be achieved only with the efforts of men and women in

  • positions of influence to give all women a strong voice in our society.

  • The Lord Bishop of Portsmouth My Lords, I rise with some caution, conscious

  • of the considerable risks as a man speaking on International Women’s Day. But dwelling

  • in ambiguity is perhaps the lot of those occupying these Benches. I am acutely aware, for instance,

  • that as a Lord spiritual speaking on defence matters, I interest myself in swords and in

  • ploughshares.

  • It was sporting those two hats that I recently watched the RAF’s current recruitment advertisement.

  • Its images depict the reality of women in a service in which every role is open to everyone.

  • We see women readying themselves for combat, as engineers and pilots. The voiceover, alas,

  • articulates a more familiar reality, in which women are told, predominantly by men, that

  • their concerns centre on lip gloss, skincare and the contents of their wardrobe. The disparity

  • between voice and image strikingly expresses the distance travelled, but also the many

  • miles we have yet to traverse. I sensed some of this while listening to this week’s Questions

  • and debates in your LordshipsHouse. We have reflected this week on FGM, on consent,

  • on pay and abuse, on how much has been done, on how much we want to do and on how much

  • there is to do.

  • I cannot avoid reflecting that the same is true of the Church. Next Tuesday sees the

  • 25th anniversary of the ordination of women to the priesthood in the Church of England.

  • The fruits of the hundreds of women who have followed their call are all around us, including

  • in this House, with the right reverend Prelates the Bishop of Gloucester, the Bishop of Newcastle

  • and the Bishop of London sitting on these Benchesshortly to be joined by the Bishop

  • of Derby. In the College of Bishops, women represented around half of appointments made

  • between 2014 and 2018. Among the clergy, I was particularly struck by the comments from

  • a first-year ordinand, Hannah Barr, at a recent anniversary service at Lambeth Palace. She

  • said that, in preparing for priestly ministry, she stood on the shoulders of giants, inspired

  • by the first great generations of women in ordained ministry. They have made the Church

  • better; they have made society better; they were, and are, pioneers.

  • We can look to the promise of the years to come. At Ripon College Cuddesdon, where I

  • serve as chair of governors, half the academic staff are women. On Cuddesdon’s different

  • pathways to ordination, we see a clear majority of women. The same is true of a subset of

  • that group, the ordinands on my own diocese’s training programme, the Portsmouth Pathway.

  • That pattern is replicated more widely.

  • And yet. Your Lordships might have noticed that I refrained from describing women in

  • ordained ministry aswomen priests”, nor would I describe female colleagues on

  • these Benches aswomen bishops”. That risks suggesting that there are priests and

  • bishopsand then there are women priests and women bishops. No. There are priests and

  • there are bishops, all of whom have been obedient to their call. Similarly on numbers, a majority

  • in training does not translate into equality. We are decades from that. Even at that distant

  • point, much will depend on who sits where.

  • Our culture, in the Church and in society, has some distance to travel before we can

  • confidently say that we are inclusive. As one ordinand, Jo Winn-Smith, put it, equality

  • happens only when men start doing what women do, not when women do what men do.

  • We have much about which we must be humble, perhaps even penitent. I wonder therefore

  • whether this is a moment for celebration; it is rather more an occasion to mark, to

  • take note.

  • I end with this thought. Christians, or more exactly theologians, are fond of the word

  • eschatology”. I risk the ire of those same theologians for grossly simplifying a

  • complex notion, but we might say that eschatology is interested in progress towards the end

  • time and anticipates that timethe time when all things are made new. That is a helpful

  • concept for today’s debate. There is progress, yes, but we have much more progress to make

  • before we reach one particular eschatological moment. That is our arrival in another country,

  • a country in which we find it no longer necessary to mark International Women’s Day or the

  • anniversary of the ordination of women. In that other country, equality is so embedded

  • in our lives, our practices and our very beliefs that what is right is what is normal, unexceptional

  • and natural. We are still far from that New Jerusalem.

  • Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Con) My Lords, it is clear that many women around

  • the world still lack equal rights and empowerment opportunities. They face discrimination and

  • violence. As parliamentarians, what can we do individually to change that? One way is

  • to be an active member of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. All of us here today are automatically

  • members of that by virtue of being parliamentarians. The IPU feels strongly about achieving gender

  • equality, recognising the link between democracy and the equal participation of men and women

  • in parliaments and civil society.

  • Travelling overseas with the British group of the IPU or taking part here in the inward

  • programmes for overseas parliamentarians gives us all the opportunity to work for gender

  • equality. We can demonstrate the advantages of the progress already made here in the UK

  • and support the work of DfID in developing countries. We have made good progress in the

  • UK, but we have much more to learnwe can do thatfrom other countries to make gender

  • equality a reality worldwide.

  • In the February recess, I took part in the IPU visit to Ethiopia, together with the noble

  • Baroness, Lady Barker, and Pauline Latham MP. Our objective was to strengthen the relationship

  • between the UK and Ethiopia at a time of political change and reform. In his first year in office,

  • the new Prime Minister, Abiy Ahmed, has appointed women to 50% of Cabinet positions, appointed

  • the first ever female President, appointed a woman as Speaker of the House of the Federation

  • and put a woman at the head of the Supreme Court.

  • Despite these changes and Abiy’s determination to carry out widespread reforms rapidly, many

  • worry that they will not sufficiently address the deep-seated bias against women in the

  • country, which is near the bottom of the UN rankings on gender equality in sub-Saharan

  • Africa. DfID’s annual budget in Ethiopia is £300 million. That is its largest budget

  • in Africa and its second-largest worldwide.

  • The Ethiopian Government have used international aid and their own resources to lift millions

  • out of poverty over the past decade, but it remains a country with enormous development

  • needs. It still has high rates of chronic childhood malnutrition and maternal mortality.

  • That, combined with female genital mutilation and early marriage, leads to acute gender

  • inequalities.

  • I was therefore keen to learn about DflD’s work on education and health. Access to both

  • transforms the lives of girls and women. We visited a UK aid-supported elementary school

  • and health centre built on the same site in Ada’a district. One of the barriers to girls

  • attendance at school has been a lack of access to water and toilet facilities. DflD’s water

  • and sanitation strategy is vital. DfID also gives financial and technical support to the

  • health centre to procure essential maternal and child health medicines, including vaccines

  • and family planning aids. The centre is staffed by a clinical officer, nurses, midwives and

  • auxiliary health workers, and there is an ambulance to bring mothers to the health centre

  • to give birth.

  • Against this background of genuine improvement in reducing maternal and child mortality,

  • much more needs to be done. At our DflD pre-brief in Addis, Pauline Latham asked the officials

  • what work was currently being done by DflD to eradicate FGM. She had visited Ethiopia

  • a few years ago with the Commons Select Committee and seen DflD’s work on FGM projects. It

  • was having some success. But the surprising answer to her question was that DflD officials

  • were not aware of any UK development aid-assisted projects on FGM in Ethiopia now. I hope that

  • that is not the case. Can my noble friend the Minister outline the current work of DflD

  • or DflD-funded projects to eradicate FGM in Ethiopia? If that work really has stopped,

  • why is that, given that FGM is still so prevalent?

  • DflD’s programme in Ethiopia remains vital to the country’s development and for improving

  • the prospects for women and girls. We can do much to assist progress there towards gender

  • equality, but at the same time we can learn how we can make even better progress ourselves

  • and practise what we preach.

  • Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) My Lords, this time last year we held two

  • debates. In addition to our regular one on International Women’s Day, the other, in

  • February, was around the role of women in public life, recognising not only the centenary

  • of the Representation of the People Act but also 60 years since women were first made

  • life Peers. As my noble friend said in her introductory remarks, last year was a big

  • year for those of us involved with and concerned about encouraging and supporting more women

  • into public life. Looking back, it feels a bit like two steps forward and one step backperhaps

  • even one step forward and two steps back.

  • There were many highlights of the year. We marched in the usual International Women’s

  • Day march, but a very special memory were the processions in June when tens of thousands

  • of women and girls, wearing violet, green and white scarves, came together in Belfast,

  • Cardiff, Edinburgh and London as part of a celebratory mass participation artwork. It

  • was a beautiful day and a very joyous event. The unveiling of the Millicent Fawcett statue

  • in Parliament Square was another highlight. I was lucky enough to be in a front-row seat

  • and, with our second woman Prime Minister unveiling the statue, we all felt uplifted

  • and hopeful about the future. The summer was full of Pankhurst parties and EqualiTeasrather

  • too many cups of tea and cakes, to be honest.

  • November saw a great #AskHerToStand event, with around 250 MPs inviting women from their

  • constituencies to an inspiring day at Westminster. A huge effort, it was organised by 50:50 Parliament

  • and supported by the Fawcett Society, of which I am now pleased to be a trustee. As my noble

  • friend Lady Williams said, Parliament hosted an international Women MPs of the World conference

  • where, for the first time ever, elected women from more than 100 countries across the world

  • were welcomed to sit on our green Benches by senior women MPs from all sides of the

  • House, sharing both best practice and challenges.

  • The Centenary Action Group, which has organised a coalition of more than 40 women’s groups,

  • has become a powerful lobby organisation, and 50:50 Parliament, the only organisation

  • committed to the simple aim of a balanced Parliament, run by the indefatigable Frances

  • Scott, has been a game changer for those of us from all parties campaigning to get more

  • women into Parliament. She runs it on a shoe-string but with incredible energy. I urge my noble

  • friend to look inside the pockets of the GEO to see whether some funding might be made

  • possible for 50:50. It would help to increase its capacity and outreach work.

  • All this activity and a full year of asking women to stand has culminated in a substantial

  • increase in the number of women starting their journeys towards public life, probably in

  • all political parties but certainly for us in the Conservative Party, where I understand

  • that between 400 and 500 additional women are now in the pipeline. In August, our Conservative

  • Party chairman, Brandon Lewis, announced his ambition to increase the number of women on

  • the candidates list from around 30% to 50%. He admitted that this would not be easy but

  • confirmed that he personally would work tirelessly to make it happen. I look forward to working

  • with him to achieve this increase.

  • So a year of activity and optimismand yet. Is it two steps forward, or one step forward

  • and two back? The vile and violent assault on women parliamentarians, especially in another

  • place, has increased exponentially. This puts women off even starting their journey. I recently

  • heard of one elected woman in a senior role in public life who is being harassed by a

  • group of men who resent her position and are doing what they can to drive her out. Apparently,

  • she is a “difficult womanwho needstaking down a peg or two”. Really? Nothing about

  • doing the job competently or welljust what appears to be good, old-fashioned misogyny.

  • Both Labour and the Conservative Party have lost women MPs to the Independent Group, taking

  • us in the Conservative Party back down to below 20% of MPs. To put it another way, four

  • out of five Conservative MPs are still men. This is disappointing.

  • But there are events and organisations to celebrate this year. The Conservative Women’s

  • Organisation, the oldest political women’s organisation in the worldformerly chaired

  • by my noble friends Lady Seccombe, Lady Anelay, Lady Byford and Lady Hodgson, inspirational

  • role models allstarts its centenary celebrations at this weekend’s conference. We look forward

  • to the unveiling of Nancy Astor’s statue in Plymouth to commemorate the centenary of

  • her election as the first woman MP, and a Conservative to boot.

  • The 90th anniversary of the first general election with full voting equality will fall

  • in May. The credit for that, as I am sure noble Lords will be aware, lies with Stanley

  • Baldwin. In 1927, he said:

  • democracy is incomplete and lop-sided until it is representative of the whole people,

  • and the responsibility rests alike on men and women”.

  • In 1928, he extended that franchise to all women over 21, overcoming strong opposition

  • in his Cabinet, led by Mr Churchill, who thought thatflapperswould find socialism irresistible.

  • Mrs Pankhurst, a friend of Baldwin, who was adopted as official Conservative candidate

  • for Whitechapel in 1926, sadly died before the 1929 election, at which she would have

  • proudly displayed the Tory colours.

  • Finally, I have a word of advice for those considering starting their journey into this

  • building. If you do not buy a ticket, you will not win the lottery. Get going. Who knows

  • where it may take you?

  • Baroness Donaghy (Lab) My Lords, I thank the Minister for initiating

  • this debate. One of the key ingredients for advancing gender equality is leadership, and

  • I believe that the noble Baroness has shown that in spades.

  • When I first started on the road to try to advance gender equality, more than 50 years

  • ago, I hoped we might have gone further down the road than we have. We seem to have won

  • the right to work twice as hard as men, all the while multitaskingthe right to be knackered.

  • I want to talk about two things. The first is that macroeconomics do not take women’s

  • contributions sufficiently into account. Secondly, I want to give examples of how inspiring women

  • keep me going.

  • Almost all macroeconomics is male based. Women’s unpaid care work is a crucial and often neglected

  • consideration in the design of economic policies and reforms. One report of a conference run

  • by the Women’s Budget Group highlights how unpaid work,

  • unjustly absorbs economic shocks and often compensates for austerity measures”.

  • In other words, it is women who pick up the pieces during periods of austerity, and the

  • Government must accept some responsibility for this. The disproportionate burden of unpaid

  • work on women and girls creates a barrier to access to decent jobs and promotion prospects.

  • There may be more women in employment than ever before, but many have been displaced

  • from secure public sector jobs into temporary work, the informal economy or underemployment.

  • This increases their financial insecurity and widens both the wage gap and the gender

  • gap. Importantly, many have few opportunities to participate in decisions that directly

  • or indirectly affect their living conditions and those of their families and communities.

  • All economic policy changes should be subject to a gender equality impact assessment. The

  • failure to take account of the full range of contributions made by women means that

  • the impact of austerity measures is not taken fully into account. Local government is a

  • case in point. Central government funding fell by nearly 50% between 2010 and 2018,

  • and this has had a devastating effect on local services mainly used by women: adult social

  • care, domestic violence refuges, childcare. It has also led to more job losses for women

  • in public services.

  • In the last year, there have been two reports from UN experts highlighting the devastating

  • impact austerity is having on women’s rights. Combine the austerity measures with the obscene

  • gap between rich and poor and the result is disillusionment with traditional social democratic

  • parties and fertile ground for extremism or populism or both.

  • I turn to how women in leadership can be a vital element in encouraging and motivating

  • others. I have time to mention only three. Watching Julia Gillard, when she was Prime

  • Minister of Australia, in total control at the Dispatch Box in Canberraand yet finding

  • time to see me immediately after Question Timewas inspiring. She is now leading global

  • education projects and inspiring many more.

  • Su Patel from USDAW, the shopworkersunion, who chaired this year’s TUC Women’s Conference,

  • has said:

  • We are underrepresented in decision-making structuresand overrepresented in poverty

  • statistics”.

  • Gina Martin told the Sunday Mirror:

  • “I’m just an ordinary working-class girl from the North

  • and, she went on, “if I can change the law, anyone can”. As many noble Lords will know,

  • she was at a festival when someone photographed under her skirt. She reported it to the police,

  • who told her it was not a crime. When she posted a picture of the two perpetrators on

  • Facebook, she was told to take it down because it was harassment. She felt so violated that

  • she started an online petition to make upskirtingas it is calledillegal. She said:

  • Eighteen months later, I watched the law being changed at the House of Lords, tears

  • streaming down my face. People who take violating pictures up skirts can now be sent to prison

  • for up to two years”.

  • That is a case of actions speaking louder than words. Let us renew ourselves for another

  • year of fighting for gender equality.

  • Baroness Seccombe (Con) My Lords, each year in this debate many noble

  • Lords speak of their experiences and share uplifting stories. They also speak of traumatic

  • situations and practices they have witnessed around the worldand very troubling some

  • of those events are. I thought that this year I would concentrate on the good fortune that

  • we have as women living at this time in this country, and be thankful for the changes that

  • have taken and are taking place.

  • When I was first married and became involved in politics in the 1950s, life was very different

  • from today. Many married women did not take paid employment, for various reasons; some

  • institutions did not employ married women, and some women felt that, as their income

  • was added to their husband’s, there was no pointhe paid tax on it and, as noble

  • Lords can imagine, difficulties often arose. Women were unable to open a building society

  • account or to buy any item on hire purchase without their husband signing the document.

  • I believe that one of the most important emancipations for women has been the implementation of legislation

  • in 1990 for the independent taxation of husband and wife, changing a woman from being a chattel,

  • and in the process often saving many a woman from being chained to an abusive husband.

  • Women began to take a greater interest and role in public life, and over the years flexed

  • their muscles to improve the lives of women in the workplace. Despite legislation, the

  • gender gap has still not been eliminated and, as we heard from the Minister, it is likely

  • to be a long time before it can be. It can at best be assessed as work in progress.

  • I am proud that the Conservative Party has had two women Prime Ministers, setting the

  • aspiration for all women candidates. Baroness Young blazed the trail as Leader of this House

  • nearly 40 years ago. I understand that we must set the goal of equal male and female

  • representation in the other place, and we are very slowly getting there. I believe that

  • preferential treatment is not the way forward. There are, however, so many well-qualified

  • women out there who should be elected, and we must continue to promote and assist them.

  • Headway is being made. Women2Win is a brilliant association, and my noble friend Lady Jenkin

  • of Kennington deserves much praise for being an inspiration to us all by always working

  • for others.

  • Brexit has absorbed our nation and taken some matters of urgency off the agenda for now.

  • We must resolve Brexit and return to normality so that we can deal with our national problems.

  • There is so much to do, but we will get there.

  • In this debate we have heard of the dire situations of many women across the world who know what

  • real poverty is. They value education for their children and will go to all possible

  • lengths to get them there. I congratulate the Government on giving us a buoyant economy

  • so that this country can spend 0.7% of its GNP funding aid to enable developing countries

  • to grow their economies.

  • Last year we celebrated the centenary of the first partial emancipation of women, and I

  • am so happy that we were able to ensure that Emmeline Pankhurst remains in her rightful

  • place close to Parliament. Along with her colleagues, she was certainly someone who

  • fought constantly throughout her life for the status of women. She and all of them have

  • been an inspiration. She certainly deserves to have such recognition.

  • In no way am I complacent, but I believe that once a year it is right to be grateful for

  • the progress across the world and to be thankful for our own situation in which we take so

  • much for granted. During this next year we will face an exciting future and, I hope,

  • a time when we will all come together and be proud of our country and what we stand

  • for. I hope we will be an example that others, particularly developing nations, will feel

  • they wish to emulate.

  • Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (LD) My Lords, there are some debates in your Lordships

  • House that are remarkable by their gender divide. Today's debate has 35 speakers, of

  • whom about 85% are women; I do not think it is any the poorer for that, and I am honoured

  • to take part in it and see many whom I have come to regard as friends on other Benches.

  • When we have a debate in the House on defence, weapons or war

  • Lord West of Spithead (Lab) My Lords, perhaps I may

  • Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer I was going to mention the noble Lord in a

  • minute. Would he wait?

  • Lord West of Spithead I will wait until I am mentioned.

  • Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer When we have a debate in this House on defence,

  • weapons or war, the inverse is true. At a political level, even in 2019, wars, weapons

  • and even naviesthe noble Lord, Lord West, is representing the Navy, as everare regarded

  • as a man’s area. Nowhere is this starker than in the area of nuclear weapons.

  • Lord West of Spithead Part of the reason why there are not more

  • men herethis has been said alreadyis that the debate was unfortunately timed for

  • a Thursday. I would have spoken, but I cannot be here at the end of the debate. On the Navy,

  • 30 years ago I carried out a study into the employment of women at sea; it was remarkable

  • at that stage how women were considered as nothing. I said that they should go to sea,

  • but it still took time for that to happen.

  • Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer I thank the noble Lord for his contribution.

  • He slightly proves my point.

  • Yet nuclear weapons, including our own Trident system, specifically target civilians; they

  • target cities and women and children as a so-called deterrent.

  • I will use my time today to ask the Minister whether there is a correlation between the

  • lack of women involved and the fact that not only have nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament

  • talks largely stalled, but we are now likely to be heading into a new nuclear arms race.

  • That truly terrifying prospect was highlighted by the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford,

  • when he talked of the evidence that the International Relations Committee had heard that,

  • we were on the verge of a terrifying new arms race and the possible spread of tactical

  • nuclear weapons, and that the limits on nuclear warfare that the world has hung on to since

  • Hiroshima are now slipping away and could leave our cities in smoking ruins”.—[Official

  • Report, 27/2/19; col. 253.]

  • Your Lordships will remember that back in 2000 the UN passed Security Council Resolution

  • 1325 on women, peace and security, to encourage greater female representation on disarmament

  • bodies. That has not happened to the degree that was hoped for then. One of the women

  • to see this first hand is the United Nations High Representative for Disarmament Affairs,

  • Her Excellency Ms Izumi Nakamitsu. As frequently the only woman at high-level talks, she says:

  • More perspectives could help to find new approaches to break stalemate”.

  • Many noble Lords will have heard of the Doomsday Clock, which moves nearer to midnight according

  • to the threats. Right now it is at two minutes to midnight because of nuclear war and climate

  • change.

  • I am sure that noble Lords will agree that, the moment you have children, the existential

  • threats to the future take on a new urgency. Back in the early 1980s, when the US was planning

  • to, and did, put nuclear-armed cruise missiles in the UK, the women of Greenham Common were

  • so movedHelen John in particular, who was their leaderthat they raised public awareness,

  • putting the issue firmly in front of politicians and the public. Taking part in thering

  • the baseat Easter made me aware of the power of women acting together to address

  • this terrifying threat to humanity. We need that power again. Of course we need it for

  • climate change, and Greta Thunberg is doing a great job with the much younger generation;

  • Spring Uprising in Bristol is looking at that. However, the threat from nuclear weapons has

  • not taken on the urgency that it needs to prompt the same sort of action among the young.

  • We need nuclear weapon use or possession banned. It will not happen in my lifetime, but the

  • first step was taken with last year’s UN ban treaty, which was signed by 122 countriessadly,

  • not the UK. When it is ratified, it will make the possession or use of nuclear weapons illegal.

  • As we start on the first steps of this process, if humanity and the world as we know it are

  • to enter the 22nd century, we need women to be far more involved. Men have not had the

  • impetus or the will to achieve nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Women are good negotiators;

  • we are realists and we invest emotionally in the future. Women must become involved

  • in the nuclear disarmament effort at every leveland fast.

  • Baroness Bull (CB) My Lords, it is a great pleasure to speak

  • among so many inspirational womenand menas we mark International Women’s Day. It is

  • always a privilege to rise in this Chamber, but never more so than in this debate today.

  • Given the barriers women face to participation in both political and leadership roles, I

  • am acutely aware of the privilege we hold as women Peers within your LordshipsHouse.

  • Female representation in Parliament is just one of many advances for women over the last

  • century. Educational attainment, workforce participation, control of reproduction, and

  • anti-discrimination laws are all evidence of the scale of change, here in the UK and

  • in countries around the globe. But all these gains have failed to translate into equality

  • in terms of leadership. Across the world, women make up just a quarter of parliamentarians,

  • news media leaders and judges. Just 15% of corporate board seats are occupied by women

  • and only in healthcare, education and the non-profit sector does female corporate leadership

  • exceed 40%. Change is happening, but it is at a snail’s pace. A lack of consistent

  • data makes global progress hard to track, but analysis of LinkedIn data found that over

  • the decade to 2017, the proportion of female leaders increased by just 2% across 12 industry

  • sectors.

  • Therefore, despite all the advances in gender equality that we celebrate, it is clear that

  • women still face significant barriers in progressing to leadership roles. Some of these are embedded

  • in law: in at least 100 economies worldwide, women face gender-based job restrictions,

  • and in 18 countries, husbands can still legally prevent wives working. Some 59% of countries

  • have no law against workplace sexual harassment. More often, though, the barriers are embedded

  • in culture and customsthose unstated norms that conspire to exclude women or prevent

  • them accessing the influential networks that offer a leg up on the ladder to the top.

  • Alongside this, we read that women’s educational choices can leave them less prepared than

  • men to prosper in the workplace. In a wide range of economies, women’s access to technology

  • is limited, so they lack proficiency in what is becoming the critical skillset of the future.

  • As we know, women are more likely to carry domestic and caring responsibilities, which

  • leaves them more likely to seek part-time or flexible working.

  • As we have heard, when women rise to leadership, they continue to face challenge, marginalisation

  • and hostility. We have seen horrific examples of this over recent months in the UK, but

  • this is a worldwide concern. Of 55 female parliamentarians from 39 countries surveyed

  • by the Inter-Parliamentary Union in 2016, almost half reported threats of death, rape

  • or violence.

  • In parallel to this overt hostility is a more insidious form of assault. Blair Williams

  • at the Australian National University wrote her PhD thesis on the ways in which media

  • representation had reinforced gendered and sexist stereotypes in the three weeks following

  • the elections to power of Margaret Thatcher in 1979 and Theresa May in 2016. Analysis

  • of newspaper coverage revealed that, far from having moved on in the years between the UK’s

  • two female Prime Ministers, references to appearance, clothing and gender had doubled

  • in some areas of the press. Both women were repeatedly compared to head girls, a term

  • that infantilises women and denigrates their skills and success. An over-emphasis on handbags

  • and kitten heels is just one of the not-so-subtle ways in which the media undermine female political

  • leaders at every turn and, in doing so, undermine women as a whole.

  • Perhaps it is not surprising that across the four areas on which the 2018 Global Gender

  • Gap Index reports, the major disparity was in political empowerment. Just 17 of the 149

  • countries assessed have female heads of state; and on average, only 18% of Ministers and,

  • as we have heard, 24% of parliamentarians across the world are women.

  • Why does this matter? I do not need to tell you, but I will: in short, because women’s

  • political leadership results in better outcomes for women and girls, which means better outcomes

  • for society more broadly. Research indicates that women work harder at communicating with

  • their constituents, and there is a correlation between female representation and higher expenditure

  • on social issues. A 2018 study found that when women are signatories to peace agreements,

  • they are more likely to be implemented and to have longer-lasting effects.

  • There are plenty of quantifiable arguments for women’s political empowerment, but even

  • without them, its justification is irrefutable. Women make up half the world’s population,

  • yet their voices are still not equal in the places where decisions are made. The prediction

  • is that it will be 107 years before this particular gender gap is closed. On the eve of International

  • Women’s Day, does not the Minister agree with me that 107 years is far too long for

  • us all to wait?

  • Baroness Berridge (Con) My Lords, today is the day to celebrate progress

  • while recognising that there is more to do. I thank the researchers in the Library for

  • providing me with a favourite number: 228. I am only the 228th woman to have been appointed

  • under the Life Peerages Act since 1958. I find this sobering when I think of the centuries

  • of history in this Chamber. Many barriers still exist, but like my noble friend Lady

  • Seccombe, I count myself fortunate to have been born at this time and in this country,

  • where I can own property, start a business or charity, votein most electionsand

  • speak my views freely. As a lawyer by profession, I know that there are a growing number of

  • role models. Twenty-five per cent of the Supreme Court judiciary, including its president,

  • are now women. Overseas, the testimony of the former Attorney-General of Canada, Jody

  • Wilson-Raybould, defending prosecutorial independence against interference by the Prime Minister,

  • should be standard viewing for all law students.

  • Injustices still exist, however. The problem of forced marriage led the coalition Government

  • to take the positive step of making it a crime. There are cases where the victims are men,

  • but 77% of the victims are women. To make this criminal law effective, the Government

  • changed the definition of marriage to any religious or civil ceremony, whether or not

  • legally binding. Some women are brave enough to give evidence against their husbands and

  • perhaps other family members, and successfully secure a criminal conviction, proving beyond

  • reasonable doubt that there was a forced marriage. But they are left without a remedy in the

  • civil court to get their share of matrimonial assets, as the woman is not viewed in the

  • civil law as married. Our law is therefore contradictory: she is married for some purposes

  • but not for others. It is not the crime of forced cohabitation; it is the crime of forced

  • marriage. This irrational situation will last until a victim of forced marriage attains

  • a media profile because, having no claim on his assetshis house, business and, probably

  • most likely, pensionends up claiming universal credit. I would be grateful if my noble friend

  • could arrange a further meeting to discuss this gap in our law.

  • Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, said Martin Luther King. As a

  • state comprehensive girl from factory-working parents, this lofty quote compels me to raise

  • one of the lastperhaps the lastbastion of direct discrimination against women in

  • UK law. I call it theLady Mary Crawley problem”, because Downton Abbey was in search

  • of a male heir as women could not, and still cannot, inherit. When we changed the law for

  • the monarchy, part of Her Majesty’s Government’s reasons for not getting rid of this discriminatory

  • law was that it meant,

  • disinheritance of individuals with legitimate expectations to inherit an hereditary peerage”.—[Official

  • Report, 11/9/15; col. 1633.]

  • Men cannot possibly rely on legitimate expectations created by direct discrimination against women

  • to prevent law reform. I pay tribute to the work of DaughtersRights and wish to place

  • on record that, like many other Members of this House, I do not vote in any hereditary

  • Peer by-elections where there are no women on the ballot paper. This law directly affects

  • the gender balance in this Chamber; I would be grateful to hear the Government’s view

  • on this matter.

  • Finally, like the noble Baroness, Lady Hussein-Ece, I want to address briefly the double discrimination

  • that many women face: additional barriers and prejudice against women from black and

  • minority-ethnic communities. I support the recommendation made outside the Chamber by

  • my noble friend Lady McGregor- Smith that companies should publish their data on this

  • matter. The next logical step from a gender pay gap reporting requirement is publishing

  • the ethnicity pay gap. However, this issue concerns not just business but the charitable

  • and social investment sectors. I discovered that the UK has the fastest-growing social

  • investment market in the world, worth £2.3 billion and growing at 17% a year, but BME

  • women are sadly the least likely to hold a directorship, representing only 2.8% of such

  • positions. I am surprised that charities are also underperforming, with 62% of the UK’s

  • largest charities having all-white boards of trustees, despite black people being the

  • ethnic group most likely to volunteer each month. Surely there should be some reporting

  • requirement to make such boards justify this absence of diversity. I hope my noble friend

  • the Minister will raise this with the noble Baroness, Lady Stowell, the chair of the Charity

  • Commission.

  • Today, I will finish work, as I often do, walking past the statue of Emmeline Pankhurst.

  • Thank God for her life, but today I will also be grateful for her part in enabling me to

  • be female life Peer number 228.

  • Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Lab) My Lords, these contributions are very brief.

  • I know that many of us would love to talk about a much larger range of women’s activities

  • and contributions across the world.

  • Today, I will limit myself to talking about a very small part of a commission I have chaired

  • for the past 18 months, which last week published a report looking into the experiences of the

  • most disadvantaged women in this country. They have experienced violence and abuse,

  • chronic poverty and what has become, for them, a punitive benefits system that often compounds

  • their problems. Without support, many such women go on to develop mental health problems

  • and use drugs or alcohol to cope with trauma and abuse. That often leads them into a downward

  • spiral, with some of them even facing the criminal justice system at some stage.

  • The commission looked into the experiences of our most disadvantaged women. As I said,

  • many of them develop a range of other problems. It is estimated that one in 20 women in Englandequivalent

  • to about 1.2 million womenhave experienced extensive physical and sexual violence throughout

  • their lives. More than half of these have a common mental health disorder; one in three

  • of them has an alcohol problem; and one in five has been homeless. We worked extensively

  • with them. One of our greatest experiences was being able to pick up and train these

  • women with lived experiences”, as they are known, as peer researchers. They then

  • interviewed 18 women in their own localities who were suffering from these sorts of disadvantages.

  • They were a joy to work with, and I will come back to this.

  • Many women who come to this country expect to be safe and protected. They have heard

  • us talk in positive terms about what advantages we have as women. However, their experience

  • when they get here is far from that. Hearing from some of them made me feel ashamed. I

  • want to give just two examples of where we really must address the needs of women who

  • do not have settled migration status.

  • We were told that the hostile environment had led to women in abusive relationships

  • without settled status fearing to report what was happening to them. They were scared to

  • go and seek help. Often, the abusive partners would say that they would be deported if they

  • did so. Safe pathways to reporting violence against women and girls should be created

  • for all women, not only those of us who are confident about our position in this society.

  • The second example is that of the whole issue of having no recourse to public funds. This

  • affects people who do not have settled status. Too many are denied support, which means they

  • are unable to access help and support. They are unable to go to a refuge and they are

  • unable to access alternative accommodation. They do not have any money and they are certainly

  • not going to be taken on by landlords. As I say, even many refuges will deny access

  • for that reason. They are unable to get treatment for health conditions or for what has happened

  • to them as a result of abuse. We have to look very carefully at abolishing the rule for

  • women in this position.

  • There are some really good and practical recommendations in the reportalthough I would say thatwhich

  • is entitled Breaking Down the Barriers. I do not have time to go into them all and I

  • hope that noble Lords will take the opportunity to read at least the executive summary.

  • At both the local and the national level we have to make sure that services and NGOs can

  • work across the silos and meet the needs of individual women. We have to use and employ

  • women with lived experience. As I say, they are a real inspiration. They are the ones

  • who know what it is like and are therefore the best first contact with other women. We

  • also have to extend the use of trauma-informed work. Too many women present but no one understands

  • or recognises the consequences of abuse, so they are pushed from pillar to post, from

  • service to service, and no one deals with the essential first thing: that they have

  • experienced trauma as the result of violence and abuse. We have much to do on this, but

  • it can be done. I hope that we will all work towards making a change.

  • Baroness Meyer (Con) My Lords, it is a great honour to speak in

  • celebration of International Women’s Day. It has a special personal meaning for me.

  • On this day 102 years ago, my mother was born in St Petersburg in Russia. She lived for

  • 100 years and two weeks. When I think of her life’s journey, I am reminded of women’s

  • resilience and courage. I am also reminded of the many misfortunes that women of that

  • generation had to endure and overcome.

  • For the first 30 years of her life, hardship and danger were my mother’s travelling companions:

  • from Russia on the eve of the revolution, through the years of civil war in Siberia,

  • exile in war-torn China, tragedy during World War II in Indochina, where her first husband

  • was killed by the Japanese when she was nine months pregnant, to sanctuary at last in Paris

  • and London. When I think of her life, I remind myself how lucky my generation was to have

  • been born in this country when we were. Yet we had our own strugglesand we too needed

  • more than a few drops of determination to overcome them. Those of us who decided to

  • forge a career in the 1970s and 1980s could be confronted by an often intimidating and

  • hostile world dominated by men, many of whom saw the arrival of women as a threat to the

  • natural order.

  • While at university, I decided to become a commodity broker in the City; I was one of

  • the first women to do so and I enjoyed it enormously. But to get there and stay there,

  • I had to run the gauntlet of harassment, molestation and abuse, some of which would make you blush

  • today. The view then was that if you wanted to make it in a man’s world, you had to

  • pay this price and shut up. Thankfully, today that kind of behaviour is considered totally

  • unacceptable and often illegal. This is surely something for all of usmen and womento

  • celebrate. It is an example to the world. This Conservative Government can be proud

  • that female employment is at a record high and the gender pay gap at a record low.

  • But there is no room for complacency. Some men will always resist the equal treatment

  • of women. Power too often goes to the heads of men who wield it, leading to abuse and

  • bullyingwe have seen gross examples in the pressso the struggle goes on. Eradicating

  • misogyny is challenge enough, but we need to move beyond that. More women should be

  • positively encouraged and helped to become politicians, CEOs, firefighters, surgeons

  • or train driverswhatever they want to dowith equal opportunities and equal rights. That

  • should also embrace women who want to stay at home as wives and mothers, if that is their

  • choice, without being judged as second-rate by their female peers. The challenge for women

  • today is to get the balance right and not to let the pendulum swing too far in the other

  • direction.

  • Let me explain what I mean. I have a confession to make: I like men. I have two sons, two

  • stepsons and a husband. I do not want to emasculate men, bludgeon them into submission or turn

  • them into our enemies. I do not want them to be afraid of paying me a compliment, opening

  • a door or entering a lift alone with me. What I want above all is for the vast majority

  • of decent men to be on our sideto work with us. We do not want to wage a gender war,

  • nor do I believe it necessary. What we want is to be respected for what we are and who

  • we are. In turn, we need to do the same and respect the majority of men. So let us include

  • them in our fight. I see very few men here today, and I hope that next year the debate

  • will be earlier so that more men can participate. After all, we are allwomen and menone

  • humanity. This is how I have watched my sons and stepsons grow upto cherish and respect

  • women as their equals, to enjoy their company and, if it is their choice, to love them.

  • Lord Hussain (LD) My Lords, I am pleased to take part in the

  • International Women’s Day debate, which is to recognise and celebrate women’s achievements

  • as well as highlighting the challenges they face across the world.

  • I wish to speak about the plight of Kashmiri women who are living under some of the most

  • difficult conditions in the world. The daily lives of the women of Kashmir are controlled

  • by occupying military forces. They do not know when the Indian Army or some other paramilitary

  • force will force their way into their homes, harass them, rape them, beat up family members

  • and take away the men, some of whom will come back alive with torture scars; the bodies

  • of some of the others may be found weeks or months later on roadsides, and others may

  • not be seen again.

  • The termhalf-widowsis commonly used in Indian-occupied Kashmir for the wives of

  • men who have gone missing. According to the Guardian of 10 October 2010, while authorities

  • in Kashmir estimate the missing number to be approximately 4,000, the Association of

  • Disappeared Persons estimates that there are between 8,000 to 10,000 missing people in

  • the region. The number of publicly announced and reported half-widows in the Kashmir valley

  • is between 2,000 and 2,500. Along with the plight of 6,000 orphansthe children of

  • half-widows who are affected deeply by the conflictthis issue adds much to the crisis.

  • True data and numbers for both half-orphans and half-widows are thought to be much higher.

  • According to a detailed report of 2007 by the award-winning Kashmiri-based journalist

  • Haroon Marani, the primary concern of a family is to find their missing person. They move

  • from one police station to another; from one army camp to another, and so on. It takes

  • months and years to find out.

  • On pellet gun victims, according to a report on French news channel France 24, on 30 November

  • 2018, India introduced officialnon-lethal” 12-gauge pellet shotguns in Kashmir in 2010.

  • Reliable aggregate data about the number of injuries and blindings from the pellet guns

  • is hard to come by. Government data from 2017 revealed that the weapon killed 13 people

  • and injured more than 6,000 in eight months alone, including nearly 800 with eye injuries.

  • The Central Reserve Police Force, the Indian paramilitary deployed in Kashmir, told a court

  • in 2016 that it fired about 1.3 million pellets in just 32 days.

  • Amnesty International has urged the Indian Government to ban the use of pellet guns,

  • and lawyers and other rights groups have appealed to courts, to little avail so far. US-based

  • Physicians for Human Rights has called their useinherently inaccurate”, “indiscriminate

  • and potentially,

  • lethal to humans at close range”.

  • There is an estimated figure of between 10,000 to 12,000 women being raped in the last three

  • decades by the security forces. According to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner

  • for Human Rights report of April 2018:

  • Authorities have failed to independently investigate and prosecute allegations of sexual

  • violence by security forces personnel. There is no record of allegations of sexual violence

  • by security forces being prosecuted in a civilian court

  • One significant case that illustrates the state’s failure to investigate and prosecute

  • allegations of sexual violence and addressing impunity for sexual crimes in Kashmir is the

  • Kunan-Poshpora mass rape, which took place 27 years ago and for which attempts to seek

  • justice have been denied and blocked over the years by the authorities at different

  • levels.

  • According to survivors and a local administration official, on the night of 23 February 1991,

  • soldiers from the 4 Rajputana Rifles regiment of the Indian Army gang-raped around 23 women

  • of Kunan and Poshpora villages of Kupwara district. The Indian Army and Government of

  • India have denied the allegations”.

  • The special rapporteur states that:

  • Information received through both written and oral testimonies highlighted the use of

  • mass rape, allegedly by members of the State security forces, as well as acts of enforced

  • disappearance, killings and acts of torture and ill-treatment, which were used to intimidate

  • and to counteract political opposition and insurgencyshe wasnot informed of

  • any measures to ensure accountability and redress for victims’”.

  • Women in Indian-occupied Kashmir are living lives under siege and constant surveillance

  • whether in public or in their own homes. According to the UN Human Rights Council, they have

  • lived for many decades under the mercy of the security forces, which operate with complete

  • impunity. These women fear for themselves and their children, brothers, husbands and

  • fathers day and night. They are suffering from grave physical and mental traumas. They

  • are in dire need of help.

  • As many noble Lords know, I have stood on these Benches of your LordshipsHouse many

  • times and pleaded for justice and protection for Kashmiri women, but I am disappointed

  • to say that I have not seen our Government taking any action at any level in this regard.

  • As a permanent member of the UN Security Council and the head of the Commonwealth, Britain

  • has huge responsibility for human rights globally

  • Noble Lords Order.

  • Lord Hussain Government Ministers are very touchy about

  • it. Let me finish.

  • Noble Lords Order!

  • Lord Hussain Sorry. Can I have one minute please?

  • Baroness Goldie (Con) My Lords, everyone has been very good about

  • trying to observe the advisory time limit. I know Members have undertakings at the end

  • of this debate, so if the noble Lord would respect the time limit and bring his remarks

  • to a close, that would be very helpful. I am sorry: you are well in excess of the advisory

  • time limit at the moment and other Members have to be taken into account.

  • Lord Hussain We simply cannot turn a blind eye to the appalling

  • and horrendous conditions that Kashmiri women are having to live under. May I ask the Minister

  • whether she believes that the dignity, honour and respect of a Kashmiri woman is any different

  • from that of a British or European woman? May I also ask what she is prepared to do

  • to help the women of Kashmir live a normal life without fear? What will the Government

  • do to raise these issues with the Indian Government?

  • Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Con) My Lords, sadly there is still no country

  • in the world where there is true gender equality in political, economic and social terms. International

  • Women’s Day this year, with its themeBalance for Better”, gives us a chance to take stock

  • and celebrate the successes but also to identify the challenges that remain at home and abroad.

  • As my noble friend Lady Jenkin mentioned, I, and several of my noble friends, began

  • political life in the Conservative Women’s Organisation. On Saturday, I will be attending

  • the CWO centenary conference. I pay special tribute to my noble friend Lady Seccombe,

  • who was Conservative vice-chairman for women for 10 years. Many of us owe our political

  • careers to her encouragement and mentoring. She has made a real difference to so many

  • on our side.

  • This morning we had the Third Reading of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration

  • etc) Bill, which I have helped my honourable friend Tim Loughton MP progress through this

  • House. It will bring in simple but important changes for women. Since 1837 there has been

  • provision for only the father’s name on a marriage certificate, and the Bill will

  • enable mothers to witness marriage certificates too. It also requires the Government to prepare

  • a report on how the law should be changed to permit the registration of pregnancy losses

  • before 24 weeks, which cannot be registered as stillbirths under the Births and Deaths

  • Registration Act 1953, and a report on whether coroners should be able to investigate late

  • stillbirths, which would support the current work by the Department of Health and Social

  • Care to improve maternity safety in the UK.

  • Next week, I and many other women from around the world will head to the UN in New York

  • for the Commission on the Status of Women meeting. This year’s theme is access to

  • public services and sustainable infrastructure for gender equality and the empowerment of

  • women and girls. The CSW meeting is the second largest of the year at the UN, yet almost

  • nothing is heard about it in the media. Although the CSW is enormously welcome, can the Minister

  • please tell us how the UK will work with others to improve the impact that the CSW makes across

  • the world? In many countries, women desperately need international support.

  • I co-chair and run the APPG on Women, Peace and Security, and last autumn we greatly welcomed

  • the UK’s fourth national action plan on UN Security Council Resolution 1325. I also

  • congratulate our Ministry of Defence on launching JSP 1325, the policy on human security in

  • military operations. This is vital in protecting civilians, especially women and children.

  • However, there is still much more work to be done. Eighteen years after the adoption

  • of UNSCR 1325, why are Syrian women not allowed at the peace table? We should not have to

  • justify women being included in peace processes; we should ask the men there to justify their

  • exclusion. As we look at tentative peace processes in Yemen and Afghanistan, where are the women?

  • You cannot have peace that excludes half the population. How can we, in the UK, exert global

  • influence to make sure that women are included?

  • The Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative, launched by William Haguenow

  • my noble friend Lord Haguein 2012, brought to global attention the fact that rape is

  • used today as a weapon of war. This initiative was always going to be a marathon, not a sprint,

  • and we must ensure that focus on this important issue is not lost. Its relevance is seen in

  • the conflicts raging today, with the high levels of sexual violence committed by Daesh

  • against the Yazidis and the terrible stories coming from the Rohingya camp at Cox’s Bazar.

  • Can the Minister please update us on the plans for the PSVI international conference that

  • the UK will host this year, five years on from the unforgettable 2014 global summit?

  • There are always many inspirational meetings around International Women’s Day, but the

  • one that will remain with me this year was the APPG on Human Rights on Tuesday, when

  • we heard from two journalistswomen human rights defendersZaina Erhaim from Syria,

  • and Nurcan Baysal, who is Kurdish and from Turkey. Listening to them was truly humbling.

  • We should never forget that there are many women around the world who, in spite of constant

  • threat, continue to stand up fearlessly for what they believe in. As we safely celebrate

  • International Women’s Day here in the Palace of Westminster, we must hold out our hands

  • to them and offer our heartfelt help and support.

  • Baroness Blackstone (Ind Lab) My Lords, each year when International Women’s

  • Day comes round, we can celebrate the extraordinary contributions that women have made both nationally

  • and internationally. We can also celebrate the fact that in many aspects of women’s

  • lives there are improvements over what went before. However, we cannot be complacent and

  • assume that gender equality is just a few years away. It is not. On present progress,

  • it could be a century or more before the gap is closed, according to the World Economic

  • Forum.

  • Last year, the UNDP reported:

  • The disadvantages facing women and girls are a major source of inequality and one of

  • the greatest barriers to human development progress”.

  • In considering those barriers, I want to focus on the sexual and reproductive health of women

  • and girls in poor, developing countries. Unless this is addressed, millions of young women

  • will not achieve their potential as fully engaged citizens and many will suffer horribly.

  • The subject of this debate is the UK’s role in advancing gender equality globally, and

  • it is my contention that there can be few areas more worthy of our attention and our

  • commitment to securing a better life for women and girls than this one.

  • One source of vulnerability is the lack of education. In spite of huge advances in access

  • to education in many countries, girls are still more likely than boys to leave secondary

  • education before completing it. Girls with poor levels of literacy, and who lack the

  • capacity to obtain secure employment, are likely to become victims of sexual abuse and

  • exploitation, and to be trafficked. They are also more likely to be pushed into very early

  • marriage. Extending the education of girls must be part of a preventive strategy to promote

  • improvement in the lives of young women in poor countries, and countries where there

  • is a prevailing culture that fails to recognise the rights of women.

  • One of the most horrific statistics I have seen for a long time is that in South Sudan,

  • where 72% of children are out of school, a girl is more likely to die in childbirth than

  • to complete secondary education. According to the UN, in 2017, an estimated 21% of women

  • aged 20 to 24 were married or in an informal union before the age of 18, and one in three

  • girls aged 15 to 19 have been subjected to FGM in the 30 countries where it is most concentrated.

  • Very early marriage and FGM run the risks of problems in childbirth. Both need to be

  • prevented. New laws specifying a minimum age for marriage of, say, 18 would be of great

  • value. Better information about the risks of giving birth at too young an age is needed,

  • and better access to contraceptive services is vital. If a young girl becomes pregnant,

  • she will need to obtain antenatal care to identify whether she is at risk and likely

  • to need specialist help during childbirth. Advice should be available on access to safe

  • abortion, where it is legal.

  • In remote, rural areas, and in countries where there is conflict, it is especially important

  • to try to provide these services through development aid programmes. Can the Minister say what

  • priority DfID is giving to these services? I ask this against the fact that the leading

  • cause of death for 15 to 19 year-olds globally is complications from pregnancy and childbirth.

  • Around 11% of all births worldwide are to girls aged 15 to 19. According to the UN Population

  • Division, one or two countries have an adolescent birth rate as high as 200 births per 1,000

  • girls of this age, compared with a global average of 44 births per 1,000 girls.

  • While, overall, maternal mortality has declined, there are still far too many preventable deaths,

  • especially of adolescents. The involvement of DfID in the sexual and reproductive health

  • and rights agenda is very welcome, but I would like to raise two or three points for clarification

  • about how it is taking its work forward. First, can it more clearly articulate its vision

  • in this area and give greater priority to the neglected areas of safe abortion and the

  • care of at-risk adolescents before and during childbirth? Secondly, when it articulates

  • its vision for comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights, can it translate them into

  • concrete measures in all DfID country plans, ensuring that fragile and conflict-affected

  • areas are included? Thirdly, will DfID ensure that family planning is given high priority

  • in its programmes, and support national Governments in sustaining the supply and distribution

  • of contraceptives?

  • In conclusion, I hope that the needs of girls and women who are still suffering from a denial

  • of access to good reproductive healthcare will remain central to the UK’s programmes

  • under DfID, as well as to overseas development aid financed by other departments. Even if

  • it will not be achieved in my lifetime, I want my daughter and granddaughters on some

  • future International Women’s Day to be able to celebrate global equality in the provision

  • of sexual and reproductive health rights. We still have a long way to go.

  • Baroness Newlove (Con) My Lords, the theme for International Women’s

  • Day—“Think Equal, Build Smart, Innovate for Change”—puts innovation by, and for,

  • women and girls at the heart of efforts to achieve a gender balance. As the UN Women

  • website says:

  • Achieving a gender-equal world requires social innovations that work for both women

  • and men and leave no one behind. From urban planning that focuses on community safety

  • to e-learning platforms that take classrooms to women and girls, affordable and quality

  • childcare centres, and technology shaped by women, innovation can take the race for gender

  • equality to its finishing line by 2030”.

  • We heard a different figure from the Minister at the beginning of this debate, but I know

  • that we can achieve the fifth sustainable development goal: gender equality.

  • It begins with making sure that women’s and girlsneeds and, more importantly,

  • their experiences and voices, are integrated at the very inception of new technology and

  • innovations. It means building smart solutions that go beyond acknowledging the gender gap

  • to address the needs of men and women equally. Of course, ultimately, it means innovations

  • that disrupt business as usual by paying attention to how and by whom technology is used and

  • accessed, and ensuring that women and girls play a pivotal role in emerging industries.

  • Global youth organisations, such as World Merit, are proudly operating from the UK and

  • driving this agenda forward with great results. I had the great pleasure of speaking to more

  • than 200 young people worldwide and being in a room full of good vibestogether as

  • one, as they said. There was no gender divide in that room; teamwork thrived.

  • I thought about how I could add my experience as VictimsCommissioner for England and

  • Wales to this debate, even though my work does not reach outside those countries. I

  • think this plays a part and we need to bring victimsvoices into this Chamber. As Melinda

  • Gates said:

  • “A woman with a voice is, by definition, a strong woman. But the search to find that

  • voice can be remarkably difficult”.

  • As VictimsCommissioner, I travel up and down the country, meeting victims and survivors

  • of horrendous crimes of domestic abuse, sexual abuse and rape, sitting with them face to

  • face and hearing them tell their stories, which come from the darkest placesplaces

  • where they were so brutally trodden down by their abusive partners, who said that they

  • loved them. I stand here today as the proud mother of three beautiful young daughters,

  • who are all psychologically damaged because they witnessed every kick and punch of their

  • father’s brutal murder. As Melinda Gates said, searching for that voice is remarkably

  • difficult.

  • I stand here to say that, listening to how all the victims of domestic abuse, sexual

  • abuse and rape across our country survive, and hearing the passion in their voices, creating

  • a life for the next generation is so important. We need to have that message in this country

  • as well as globally. This is such an important debate. I am sad that we are at the end of

  • the list; it is typical that women are at the end, but we have a voice. We should have

  • a two-day debate on this, like the ones we have on Brexit at the moment. I believe in

  • coming together as one, because we all have a part to play in making our words come to

  • life, and because our needs and words and our fight for the next generation are so important.

  • Lord Loomba (CB) My Lords, it is a pleasure to be taking part

  • in this debate today and I thank the noble Baroness for ensuring that we have the opportunity

  • to speak ahead of International Women’s Day tomorrow.

  • We are all aware that women all over the world face a huge number of problems, including

  • violence, sexual harassment, abortion laws, pay and pension gaps, FGM, trafficking, modern

  • slavery and other human rights violations. However, there is one issue that has not been

  • highlighted much, and that is that of widows. I declare my interest as the founder and chairman

  • trustee of the Loomba Foundation.

  • There are estimated to be 258 million widows around the world. Sadly, their number is increasing

  • every day due to conflicts in many countries, including Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria,

  • South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic and, more

  • recently, Venezuela and some South American countries. Widows and their daughters in conflict

  • zones face extremes of abuse and violence, including sexual violence. Both conflict-afflicted

  • mothers and daughters are vulnerable to traffickers, sexual slavery, forcedtemporary remarriage

  • and modern-day slavery.

  • Then there is the question ofhalf widows”. There are uncounted millions of wives of men

  • forcibly disappeared or missing. In Colombia 86,000 are missing, and in Sri Lanka 40,000.

  • In Syria and Iraq there are uncounted missing husbands, sons and brothers. In so many conflict

  • zones men go missing or lie unidentified in mass graves. These women are in limbo, unable

  • to have any closure, their status so ambiguous.

  • These women, widows, half widows and their daughters need help if we want to achieve

  • gender equality as well as the sustainable development goals by 2030. I was extremely

  • pleased when the noble Lord, Lord Bates, called a meeting in his office last month, inviting

  • a few organisations that work for widows to discuss and understand the problems that widows

  • face across the world, especially in developing countries. It was a constructive meeting and

  • I truly appreciate the initiative taken by him.

  • Gender balance is not just a theme but a way of life that we should all aspire to achieve

  • around the world. We need to make an extra effort in developing countries and fragile

  • states suffering from conflict where the input into civil life from the female population

  • is often very limited. Empowerment of women, especially marginalised widows who are doubly

  • discriminated against, will not only help them but improve the lives of many more people

  • in their communities who are living through conflict and strife.

  • I urge the Minister to set up a specialist unit in the Department for International Development

  • to focus on widows and their issues. We really need to address this issue and to provide

  • skills training to widows and their unmarried daughters so that they can become self-reliant,

  • earn money, educate their children, support their family and lead a life of dignity and

  • equality.

  • Baroness Crawley (Lab) My Lords, just before I came into the Chamber

  • this afternoon, I heard the very sad news that the principal of my old college, Sister

  • Dorothy Bell, has died. I want to put on record that she was strong, compassionate, very funny

  • and a great supporter of other women. She was a person I will never forget. She is now

  • in Hansardand, I am sure, in heaven.

  • I am delighted to be taking part in this year’s Lords debate to celebrate International Women’s

  • Day. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Williams of Trafford, for setting out the many positive

  • initiatives that the Government have put forward or are supporting, especially on violence

  • against women. However, like my noble friend Lady Gale I am dismayed that this might be

  • the last such debate with us as members of the European Union, which has been the bedrock

  • of women’s and family rights legislation for four decades.

  • We discuss the Irish backstop a great deal in this House, but the EU’s historic backstop

  • in the protection of women’s workplace rights is a story still to be told. EU law underpins

  • the Equality Act 2010, including rights to equal treatment for part-time workers, the

  • majority of them women; to health and safety protection for pregnant workers; and to maternity

  • leave, emergency time off for dependants, and parental leave. As chair of the Women’s

  • Rights Committee in the European Parliament in the early 1990s when this country signed

  • up to the maternity leave directive, I am inclined to take these issues personally.

  • The TUC, the BMA and others have written to us setting out their concerns that while the

  • Government have committed to maintaining equality rights and transposing other rights into UK

  • law upon withdrawal from the EU, those rights could become vulnerable to amendment, narrower

  • interpretation and weaker enforcement following Brexit. So for me, Brexit is no good for women.

  • It is inspiring to think that debates such as ours today are taking place in Parliaments

  • all around the world this weekfrom countries where voting rights for women are over a century

  • old to those where women have only just won the vote. As I understand it, one of the themes

  • this year is the need to highlight the gender digital divide. That divide is highlighted

  • in the research by our own excellent Lords Library for this debate, which says that an

  • analysis of world labour markets in 2018 by the World Economic Forum,

  • focused specifically on the gender gap in artificial intelligenceIt found that,

  • globally, 22% of AI professionals were female, compared to 78% who were male. This produced

  • a gender gap of 72%; the WEF stated this remained constant anddoes not at present indicate

  • a positive future trend’. The study ranked the UK 10th globally for its AI talent pool,

  • with 20% female”.

  • Three worrying future trends come out of these figures. First, the AI skills gender gap may

  • exacerbate the gender gaps in economic participation and opportunity for women, as AI represents

  • an increasingly in-demand skillset. Secondly, the AI skills gender gap implies that general-purpose

  • technology across various fields is being developed without women’s talent, so limiting

  • its innovative and inclusive capacity. Thirdly, the low integration of women into artificial

  • intelligence talent pools represents such a missed opportunity in a sector where there

  • is insufficient supply of adequately qualified talent. Some estimates tell us that by 2030,

  • up to 9 million people’s jobs will be replaced by AI. It is the future, whether we like it

  • or not, and not enough women and girls are creating that future. I would like to hear

  • what the noble Baroness, Lady Vere, has to say—I am sure she is as concerned as we

  • are about these figuresand what she believes the Government can do about it.

  • Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-Afl) My Lords, I too thank the Minister for bringing

  • this important debate before us and for her opening remarks. It was Rosa Parks who said

  • that,

  • knowing what must be done does away with fear”,

  • and her quiet determination not to give up her seat on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama,

  • in 1955 was the catalyst for the civil rights movement. It is perhaps not a coincidence

  • that it was a womanindeed, a black womanwho symbolically gave birth to one of the greatest

  • ever freedom and equality movements. Gender and race often go hand in hand in the struggle

  • for equality. Since Montgomery, much has been said and done about these issues but there

  • is still more to be achieved. As Rosa Parks said, we need to act on what we know must

  • be done.

  • One of the strongest female role models in my life was my mother, who came to Britain

  • from Jamaica. She worked as an auxiliary nurse. She used to tell me, “John, being black

  • is not a profession. Make sure you get a good education”. Once, in sheer desperation,

  • when I was about 10, I retorted, “Mum, youre just picking on me because I’m black”.

  • That argument failed to resonate with my mother. I cannot think why.

  • There are numerous women of colour who have historically overcome the obstacles of racism

  • and issues connected to gender. They include Mary Seacole, the Crimean War nurse, and the

  • black suffragette, Sarah Parker Remond. Although overdue, last year the first statue of a woman

  • was unveiled in Parliament Square, alongside a line-up of male leaders. This was of the

  • suffragette campaigner Millicent Fawcett. Will the Minister explain what plans the Government

  • have to ensure that more women are represented in this way in our public places?

  • As we celebrate the centenary of women in Parliament, my American wife Laura was keen

  • to remind me that the first woman to take her seat as an MP in the House of Commons,

  • in 1919, was Nancy Astor, originally from the United States. Turning to more recent

  • times, as a journalist I interviewed some inspirational women from BME communitiesfor

  • example, Dame Kelly Holmes, who overcame a challenging upbringing, rose through the ranks

  • in the Army and won two Olympic gold medals, and the Reverend Rose Hudson-Wilkin, who came

  • to England from Jamaica as a child. As noble Lords know, she is now chaplain to the Queen

  • and performs that role brilliantly in the House of Commons.

  • Although 20% of small and medium-sized companies are run by women, there is still so much untapped

  • business talent among women, especially BME women. As we all know, most corporate boards

  • are still mainly male and white. So my next question for the Minister is: what plans do

  • the Government have to encourage an increase in women company directors?

  • There are other ongoing issues, such as the pay gap between women’s and men’s earnings,

  • and the cost of childcare. When I was a district councillor in the Midlands in the 1980s, I

  • remember a lady complaining to me that her take-home pay was so low that it would not

  • even take her home. I am not sure that much has changed for women in low-paid jobs. According

  • to the Women in Work Index report by PricewaterhouseCoopers last year, the closure of the gender pay gap

  • would produce a £90 billion boost to the UK economy. In the developing world it is

  • widely recognised that empowering women is an important step to driving economic growth.

  • What plans do the Government have to help reduce the gender pay gap?

  • Between 2015 and 2016, according to the same report, the UK fell from 14th to 15th place

  • in a ranking of 33 OECD countries, based on five key indicators of female economic empowerment.

  • As the fifth-richest economy in the world, surely we can do better than that, so my next

  • question for the Minister is: what plans do the Government have to address this backward

  • step? We are going backwards.

  • There is still a need for more women in science, technology, engineering and as university

  • vice-chancellors. I say this as a former chancellor of Bournemouth University, which had at the

  • time one of the few female vice-chancellors. Women-led businesses contribute about £82

  • billion of gross value to the British economy. I acknowledge that the Government try to support

  • first-time business owners. There is the broadband challenge fund, for example, but its budget

  • is modest and it is linked to only 13 localities. What will the Government do to expand that

  • project?

  • I suggest that one of the most inspirational women role models in the world is our sovereign,

  • the Queen. For the last 67 years we have had a female Head of State. Let us not forget

  • that. She has continued to conduct herself with dignity and poise throughout, during

  • smooth and rough times.

  • Lastly, we must not forget that women making a contribution to an economy is not new. There

  • were prominent women business leaders in the Bible, over 2,000 years ago. For example,

  • in the Book of Acts, Lydia ran a fashion company, Priscilla owned an up-market residence franchise

  • and Queen Candace governed her nation’s economy. There was also Deborah, in the Book

  • of Judges, who was the nation’s chief lawyer. There are many more examples. Those biblical

  • heroines and women of today show that women are a real voice, not just an echo.

  • Baroness Redfern (Con) My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady

  • Williams of Trafford, for moving the Motion to mark International Women’s Day. I am

  • proud to take part.

  • Tackling injustices such as the gender pay gap is part of building a country that works

  • for everyone. It is simply good business sense to recognise the enormous potential of women

  • and to take action to support and help progress female talent.

  • The target for women to make up 33% of FTSE 100 boards by 2020 is ambitious, but it is

  • part of a commitment to drive forward workplace equality and to look for opportunities to

  • demolish barriers. Many of the UK’s top companies are already leading the way in making

  • sure that everyone’s contributions to the workplace are valued equally.

  • However, the gender pay gap is not going to close on its own. BAME women, disabled women

  • and younger women are still woefully underrepresented and have experienced significant discrimination

  • over the past years. Sciences and gender equality are both vital for the achievement of the

  • internationally agreed development goals, including the 2030 agenda for sustainable

  • development. In many cases, long-standing bias and gender stereotypes are still steering

  • girls and women away from science-related fields.

  • Women’s employment continues to be on the rise in traditionally male-dominated STEM

  • fields. In 2018, the head engineers at Google, Adobe, Lockheed Martin, Apple, SpaceX and

  • General Motors were breaking barriers not only as women in STEM but as women from diverse

  • racial backgrounds. However, women are still deeply underrepresented.

  • Last year saw women breaking the Nobel prize barriers, with Professor Donna Strickland

  • becoming the first woman in 55 years to win the Nobel Prize in Physics, joining a very

  • small group which includes Marie Curie. Professor Frances Arnold shared joint honours in the

  • Nobel Prize in Chemistry, the fifth woman ever to win the award. What role models they

  • are to aspire to. Studies continue to confirm that girls and women have just as much natural

  • aptitude as men when it comes to STEM subjects.

  • The message is getting clearer. Girls and women are getting the message that they belong

  • as much as boys and men in computer science, where no one should be told that they cannot.

  • The number of computer science jobs is projected to grow by 15% to 20% through to 2020, but

  • it is thought that the majority of these positions will be filled by men.

  • As STEM-related industries on the whole add more than 1.7 million jobs in the coming years,

  • we do not want a notable absence of women in the field. At a time when technology continues

  • rapidly to transform the way we live, we can and should work to empower more young women

  • to take an active role in that transformation, to encourage young women to be challenging

  • and confident and to look past everything when entering a male-dominated field, with

  • aspirations of making their own individual mark.

  • The lack of visible female role models continues to be a major problem, so we have to raise

  • the interest in STEM subjects at every stage of the STEM skills pipeline. To do so earlier

  • and earlier, even at primary school, would intrigue young, inquiring minds and help them

  • think about futures in the tech industry, for the tech industry stands ready to turn

  • pink.

  • It is not only about the enticement of pay; it is also about what female talent can bring

  • to STEM and the impact on STEM itself. The UK and the world are ready for women, and

  • will change. It is about stating the fact: “You can be what you want to be”. The

  • race is on.

  • Baroness Rock (Con) My Lords, it is an honour to contribute to

  • this important debate and I too thank my noble friend the Minister. I am very privileged

  • to be a founding ambassador of Women Supporting Women for the Prince’s Trust. We are committed

  • to supporting and inspiring young women to build their own futures through skills, education

  • and employment, and female employment is, as we have heard, at a record high. This is

  • worthy of celebration and, to be clear, we are celebrating fairness first and foremost,

  • but we are also celebrating the means by which we can capitalise on the economic opportunity

  • that empowering women gives us: that businesses with more women in senior positions perform

  • better. McKinsey has estimated that bridging the gender gap completely would add £150

  • billion to the UK economy by 2025.

  • Today I shall focus on a specific and vital aspect of our economy: technology. I sayaspect

  • quite deliberately, because technology is not a sector, it is everywhere. It will change

  • every industry and impact every business. It is the means by which we will stay competitive

  • and future-proof our economy. If we do not deliver gender equality and opportunity in

  • tech, we are missing the biggest opportunity of all. Economic opportunity and a sense of

  • fairness should pervade our attitude to female economic empowerment, but there is another

  • area that I would like to touch on: tackling inherent gender bias in applications of technology

  • that impact every aspect of our economy and society. If we do not, because tech is the

  • ultimate means to more productive ends, all these ends will have gender bias baked in.

  • We have heard about bias in recruitmentit is no different in tech than in other industries.

  • But what if the algorithms that assist with recruitment and candidate screening are written

  • by men and effectively for men? Then, we will simply see current cohorts replicate themselves

  • and a perpetual cycle repeated. Artificial intelligence is just that: it is artificial

  • and the artifice comes from people who create the algorithms, who code the inputs into the

  • black boxes that spit out outputs. The data on which these algorithms are trained and

  • developed will itself reflect historic biases, so this is about getting female coders developing

  • the AI of the future and making sure that we take steps to address biases in the data

  • they all work with. The noble Baroness, Lady Crawley, eloquently raised many of the issues

  • associated with artificial intelligence.

  • What, then, can be done about it? In short, we can choose to have a responsible approach

  • to algorithms and the principles of human conduct that govern them. There are a few

  • emerging initiatives that should give us all hope. I was fortunate to be part of the House

  • of Lords Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence. We specifically addressed algorithmic bias

  • in our report, saying that,

  • developers set the parameters for machine learning algorithms, and the choices they

  • make will intrinsically reflect the developersbeliefs, assumptions and prejudices. The main

  • ways to address these kinds of biases are to ensure that developers are drawn from diverse

  • gender, ethnic and socio-economic backgrounds, and are aware of, and adhere to, ethical codes

  • of conduct”.

  • This is a simple, analogue solution to a very complex digital problem. If the people who

  • write the algorithms are reflective of the community, their outcomes are likely to be

  • just.

  • While the Government did not accept in full our recommendation to use the Industrial Strategy

  • Challenge Fund to address this diversity issue, I am confident that it is an agenda we can

  • deliver againstthrough the world’s first Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, an

  • advisory body dedicated to strengthening and improving the UK’s use of data and artificial

  • intelligence. I am fortunate to be a member of the board and we see algorithmic bias as

  • one of our first priorities. Through this work, we have the opportunity not just to

  • address the risks of exacerbating unfairness, but to harness the power of these systems

  • in the cause of diversity, tackle bias and increase opportunity for all. The centre will

  • bring together expertise from across sectors and society but also, importantly, listen

  • intently to the public voice and ensure that our governance of these transformative technologies

  • reflects our society’s values.

  • Technology creates new opportunities for our economy, but also poses new challenges. I

  • am confident that if we act decisively to address gender bias in tech, we will reap

  • all the economic benefits that technology and female economic empowerment can bring,

  • as well as all the societal benefits.

  • Baroness Flather (CB) My Lords, I have just come back from my annual

  • visit to India. I have been going to India for many years, just to see what has changedwhat

  • has got better, what has got worse. I was very distressed this time. Things have not

  • got better, and they do not seem to be getting better, particularly in relation to women.

  • I now feel very strongly that I do not want to go back again, because things are so bad.

  • Seeing how difficult women’s lives were was personally hurtful to me.

  • India has the largest number of poor people in the world, and noble Lords can imagine

  • who are the poorest of the poor: it is always the women. It is said that men spend 37% of

  • their earnings on their families, and the rest they need to enjoy themselves. As noble

  • Lords can imagine, earning more does not help much; men still give their families only what

  • they wish to give them.

  • India is a country of Indias. We must not think of it as one large, cohesive country,

  • because it is not. Each state has its own culture, food and dresssome of us can even

  • tell which state a person is from. Having said that, the north is much worse for women

  • than the south. In the south, they still have some respect for women and do not do the sort

  • of things that are done to women in the north. Mumbai is much better for women than Delhi.

  • Delhi is pretty bad; there are a lot of rapes and attacks on women, and very few people

  • are caught because, as we all know, it is never considered the top priority. This sort

  • of thing is very distressing.

  • Modi, the present Prime Minister who will be facing an election soon, said that he would

  • work on making women’s lives better. He has not done very much. He reduced the abortion

  • of girl babies in his state of Gujarat by quite a bit, but it is still happening in

  • the northern provinces. It is rife. In Haryana, there are 12% more boys than girls. What some

  • do there is even more horrible: they buy a girlNepali or Bangladeshi or somethingand

  • when one man has had a baby with her he passes her on to another man to have a baby. Sometimes

  • when you think about women’s lives, things are so bad that you cannot actually stay sane.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Seccombe, said that we are very fortunate to live in this country.

  • We should realise that. I hope all the women who live here know that, because they complain

  • all the time; I call it the British diseasemoan, moan, moan all the time, whether it is about

  • the weather or whatever else. Yes, we are better off here; there is no question about

  • that. In that poor country, there has just been the wedding of a very rich man’s daughter.

  • The wedding cards cost 100,000 rupees, which could have fed several families for a whole

  • year. This man spent so much money on his daughter’s wedding, and to me it is an obscenity.

  • How could he do that? In our culture, when you have a wedding, you go and feed the poor

  • at the same timethat is what you do. He did not feed a single person. All these things

  • together have put me off going back.

  • There is another issue in Haryana. If a girl and boy marry without parental permission,

  • the parentsagents find them in one of the big cities and kill them. It is just so

  • bad. I have set up a charity, which is not showing any success, called Women Matter.

  • By visiting a lot of projects, I have discovered that if a woman earns even a small amount

  • of money, she changes: she changes; her family changes; her status changes; everything changes.

  • And it is very quickit does not take years, but weeks. Suddenly she is somebody, because

  • now she can bring in money. The whole idea is to try to get companies to employ poor

  • womennot the educated onesand give them a little training if necessary. If women are

  • very hungry, they train very quickly. That is what I am trying to do, at the moment a

  • little unsuccessfully.

  • On Muslim girls and boys, I want to say to the noble Baroness, Lady Hussein-Ece, that

  • I used to teach immigrant women, and there is no question but that the girls learn more

  • quickly and assiduously. But those are the girls born here, or who are at least very

  • young when they come here; the ones who come as wives have a different problem. Boys do

  • not do anything, because they are little princeswhy should they bother? Why the men are so much

  • more important than the women, always and everywhere, is another issue.

  • I will say one last word about faith or religion. Religions have not supported women. I do not

  • know how your Lordships feel about it—I am looking at the clock and am finishingbut

  • they have not supported women. If they had supported women, it would have been a lot

  • better for us.

  • Baroness Finn (Con) My Lords, I thank the Minister for bringing

  • forward today’s debate and for giving us the opportunity to celebrate International

  • Women’s Day. It is humbling, as ever, to follow in the footsteps of such inspiring

  • women on this important day. But in this august Chamber, which has seen debates on and the

  • passage of many important Bills that further the cause of gender equality, it is perhaps

  • time to recognise the limits of legislation in getting us where we need to be.

  • I say this on the 100th anniversary of the sex disqualification Act, which opened up

  • the professions and universities to women. It was an essential step, but not nearly sufficient

  • when it comes to true equality of opportunity across the gender divide. What we now see

  • is a system where the letter of the law is gender neutral but, in practice, we are a

  • long way from declaring victory. For a start, we cannot legislate away a sexist culture.

  • The law protects us in extremis but not from everyday casual sexism. It happens to all

  • of us. Only recently, as I insisted on a particular detail in a contract, my boss was asked, “How

  • do you put up with her?” In a man, it is seen as attention to detail but in a woman,

  • it iswhat?—nagging or being bossy.

  • I have long argued against a narrow focus on quotas, preferring merit and persuasion,

  • but the time has come to ask who is deciding the merit. We need to stop playing by male

  • rules and unpick the male bias that pervades every aspect of our economy and society. The

  • Hampton-Alexander review into improving gender balance in the FTSE leadership found that

  • merit was codedmale”. Briefs to recruit people to senior positions are written for

  • men. Concerns were often raised that women lacked City experience because they were less

  • well-known on the networking circuit. Similarly, in a recent book called Invisible Women, it

  • was found that everything from crash test dummies, to office heating settings, to medicine

  • dosage, is all coded for men.

  • We now live in an age where female qualities are better understood and recognised. In the

  • magnificently titled book Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders?, the author highlights

  • the bias towards confidence, and even self-absorption, as qualities. This blocks opportunities for

  • women, and indeed for men who do not obviously exhibit those qualities.

  • The question is not whether male and female brains are different, but why society still

  • insists on labelling male brains as better. My daughter, studying physics at university,

  • was recently appalled at the treatment by male students of a top female lecturer. They

  • repeatedly interrupted her, questioning her analysis and intelligence in a way they simply

  • did not do with male professors. This is not an isolated incident. Studies show that students

  • appear to evaluate women poorly simply because they are women.

  • Top companies know the benefits that ensue from more gender diversity, not least in financial

  • performance, but despite some excellent progress there remains a profound sense of inertia.

  • Indeed, the Hampton-Alexander review demonstrates that, even with the facts on superior performance

  • and the prospect of more transparency and disclosure, listed companies can and do continue

  • to resist change.

  • In a debate last year in this Chamber on women in public life, the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy,

  • made the point that we have tried tomake niceand adjust our demands to the male

  • norm, but it is time to structurally re-engineer our whole society. Only then will we be able

  • to unpack inbuilt cultural gender bias that the law cannot reach. The noble Baroness’s

  • speech resonated in so many ways. Countless times, I have been told not to make a fuss,

  • but we need to be less complacent and continue to fight. She finished her remarks by calling

  • for quotas and all-women shortlists. In the face of the evidence and the lack of progress,

  • that is harder to resist. We need to stop messing around and take this agenda seriously.

  • It is worth making a fuss. Until and unless we do so, women will be behind for another

  • century, and that is simply unacceptable.

  • Lord Griffiths of Burry Port (Lab) My Lords, this afternoon’s debate marks

  • the culmination of a week of questions addressed to the Government on the role and rights of

  • women and the restrictions they face in our communities, our nation and the world. I hesitated

  • long and hard before adding my name to the speaker’s list. I felt that I should just

  • listen rather than speak on such a day and on such a subject. But my wife counts the

  • Pankhurst sisters among her forebears. “Put your name down”, she said, and I did. I

  • congratulate all those who are contributing to our deliberations and, in the end, I am

  • delighted to be counted among their number.

  • The Library briefing for this debate identifies key issues and addresses them, in the main,

  • by means of statistics. This allows us to look quantitatively at various aspects of

  • the situations faced by women: domestic violence, representation in the boardroom and senior

  • management, the gender pay gap, our educational system, health, and participation in leadership

  • and political life. This approach allows us to build an evidence-based picture, to spot

  • trends and to measure successor the lack of itin efforts to build a world of equal

  • opportunity, equal rights and equal rewards. It offers a vital tool as we move forward.

  • The last thing we need today is to be damned with faint notes of paternalism: some nice,

  • comforting, cheap words from someone like me about solidarity and support for the strugglegood,

  • high-minded things such as that. I want to stand in solidarity and want keenly to offer

  • support, but I would prefer that to be measured by what I do rather than by what I might choose

  • to say. My reason for adding my voice to that of so many others today may be thought somewhat

  • strange. It is self-interest that has driven me to speak. I am tired of being part of a

  • culture, and heir to a history, of patriarchal domination. As a 21st-century man, I am weary

  • of feeling imprisoned within a stereotype: that of male power, trapped on the wrong side

  • of all those statistics, part of an unfair and unjustifiable system. I long for continuing

  • and accelerating progress in the journey towards gender equality, certainly for its own sake

  • but also, undeniably, because the freedoms that will thus be enjoyed by women will bring

  • consequential freedoms to men.

  • As a white man, I could put forward an almost identical case for race equality. As a heterosexual

  • man, I could do the same for justice for people of all sexual identities. As a Christian,

  • I long for the extirpation of all that smells of anti-Semitism or Islamophobia. As a relatively

  • well-off person, I must fight the corner of the dispossessed and marginalised. Progress

  • in any of those fields of endeavour will inevitably bring benefits to me too. The freedom of others

  • is the best possible guarantee of something approaching freedom for me. Is it selfish?

  • I suppose so. Is it motivating? Definitely.

  • Let me bow out by borrowing some lines from the poet John Donne. The relevant lines for

  • the point I am trying to make will be obvious, but I have left in two or three words that

  • are superfluous to my argument but not without their importance at this time. We all know

  • the original words anyway. No person is an island; everyone is a piece of the continent,

  • a part of the main, and,

  • if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less”—

  • those were the words I spoke of, in case your Lordshipshad not guessed. Any person’s

  • inequality diminishes me because I am involved in humankind. And therefore never send to

  • know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for me.

  • I am more than grateful for the opportunity to speak on a day such as this and on such

  • a noble subject. I express the hope that I might be a beneficiary of all the progress

  • aspired to by those who have contributed thus far to this debate.

  • Lord Crisp (CB) It is a great pleasure to speak in this debate.

  • As other noble Lords have said, it is an occasion for both celebration and publicising what

  • more needs to be done, and an opportunity for renewing the energy for and commitment

  • to more advocacy and change. This area is enormous, so I will talk specifically about

  • health, and just a part of it. To start with, let me say that health is a field in which

  • women play by far the largest role—a fact that is not always, if ever, recognised and

  • acknowledged.

  • I will start at the celebratory end by congratulating Dr Roopa Dhatt and her colleagues at Women

  • in Global Health and its sister organisation, Women Leaders in Global Health. Women in Global

  • Health aims for gender equality in global health leadership in order to achieve better

  • global health. Leadership in health globally is largely male but, as Women in Global Health

  • argues, many excellent and well-qualified women are simply not recognised. Women in

  • Global Health works to increase their visibility and opportunities for inclusion in leadership

  • at all levels everywhere. It advocates for organisations to adopt gender-equal leadership,

  • draw leaders from the entire talent pool and address the inefficiencies caused by gender

  • inequality that weaken global health. It is great to see Women in Global Health growing

  • in membership and influence, and it is very important to note that gender balance in the

  • way it describes it is fundamental to improving health globally.

  • Let me widen this out by talking about nursing. Nursing is not a gendered profession, but

  • about 80% of nurses globally are women. Incidentally, although this is not my main point, nursing

  • needs to attract more men. It is one of the few fields in which there will be enormous

  • growth in future years, and we need to involve the whole population. The All-Party Parliamentary

  • Group on Global Health recently reviewed nursing globally and found, across all countries,

  • a systematic undervaluing of nurses—a devaluing, reallyand an underutilisation in the sense

  • of nurses being well trained but not being able to work to the top of their potential—“to

  • the top of their licence”, as the Americans might put it.

  • In our survey, we read comments like, “We are invisible”, “We are taken for granted

  • and kept downandWe are seen as just nice women doing what doctors tell us”.

  • They are not seen as truly trained professionals or allowed to work as such. Evidence suggests

  • that this is happening partly because most nurses are womenhow women are treated in

  • particular countries seems to be reflected in the way nurses are treated thereand

  • partly because they are not doctors and there is some territorialism about who does what.

  • Whatever the cause, this is a most extraordinary waste of talent, passion and commitmentand,

  • frankly, resources, if the largest part of our global workforce is unable to work to

  • its full potential and contribute fully.

  • Moreover, as our report, Triple Impactwhich came out of that studyshows, if you develop

  • nursing, you do not just improve health and promote gender equality, you also promote

  • the economy. For example, in African countries you involve more women in the cash economy.

  • As my noble friend Lady Flather said, when women have money in their pockets, they are

  • more likely to spend it effectively and for the benefit of a wider range of people. So

  • there are three big wins from promoting and developing nursing, which is why my noble

  • friend Lady Watkins and I set up Nursing Now, to improve health globally by raising the

  • profile and status of nursing.

  • I have three questions on what the UK can do to advance gender equality globally. First,

  • what are the Government doing to support the aims and work of women in global health? Secondly,

  • what are the Government doing to raise the status and profile of nursing in the way that

  • I have describedbeyond their very welcome support for the campaign Nursing Now that

  • Ministers have already pledged? Finally, perhaps I may raise a domestic issue. Noble Lords

  • will know that the majority of carers in this country are women and that almost all of them

  • are on zero-hours contracts. It would be interesting to know whether the Government recognise this

  • as a problem, and, if so, what they will do about it.

  • Baroness Helic (Con) My Lords, I declare my interests as set out

  • in the register. It is an honour to speak in the debate today. First, I pay tribute

  • to our Prime Minister and to the Minister and her team here for their commitment to

  • women’s rights and gender equality. I welcome the Government’s commitment to ensuring

  • that the victims of gender-based violence are supported, that the perpetrators are brought

  • to justice, and that everything possible is done to prevent these crimes happening in

  • the first place.

  • I also particularly welcome the Government’s commitment to tackling domestic violence and

  • the introduction of the Domestic Violence Bill. I am sure that every one of us here

  • either knows or is aware of someone who has been a victim of domestic violence. We are

  • all aware of the tendency to avoid talking about this behaviour, even when we see it

  • and recognise it. We have to break that taboo and stigma in order to support families who

  • endure this despicable, shameful and pathetic behaviour in all its manifestations, and strengthen

  • our laws and institutions accordingly.

  • Our willingness to confront entrenched gender violence and harassment in our own society

  • should be matched by an equal determination to defend the rights of the most vulnerable

  • women in the world. Indeed, the test of our commitment to women’s rights is how we behave

  • as a country in the most challenging situations. I will raise three issues in that regard.

  • Two months ago, the United States envoy for the Afghan conflict, Zalmay Khalilzad, announced

  • that a framework for a peace agreement had been agreed with the Taliban. The US would

  • withdraw its troops and, in return, the Taliban would undertake to prevent Afghanistan being

  • used by terrorists for attacks on other countries. There are many unanswered questions, and great

  • concern that the women of Afghanistan are once again in the sights of the Taliban. The

  • negotiator for the Taliban has said explicitly that the Taliban rejects the constitution

  • of Afghanistan which enshrines the principle of equal rights for men and women and Afghan

  • women’s right to education, political participation and economic opportunity. Our Government have

  • welcomed theprogressmade by the US special representative, but I hope that this

  • support is not unqualified.

  • Afghan women’s groups from across the 34 provinces have recently come together to issue

  • a declaration stating:

  • We, Afghan women, request the Government negotiating team to fully defend our rightful

  • and legitimate demands ... at every stage of the peace process, and prevent any type

  • of compromise that undermines the achievements of women”.

  • They go on to say that they expect the international community to,

  • firmly adhere to their commitments to protecting democratic, civil and human rights”,

  • in Afghanistan. I look to the Minster to give assurances that our Government will listen

  • to Afghan women, that we will uphold their right to be formally involved in negotiations,

  • in keeping with UN Security Council Resolution 1325, and that we will not support any peace

  • agreement that does not protect their hard-won rights and freedoms.

  • My second point relates to our ally in the Gulf, Saudi Arabia, which announced this week

  • that 10 women’s rights activists who were detained last year, and reportedly tortured,

  • will be put on trial forundermining the state’s security”. Our Foreign Secretary

  • has hailed Britain’s “strategic partnershipwith Saudi Arabia. Perhaps the Minister could

  • ask the Foreign Secretary to urge ourstrategic partnerto release these women activists

  • rather than put them through a show trial. What does it say about a country when it fears

  • journalists and women, and what does it say about us if we place our strategic partnership

  • with any country above such vital, non-negotiable principles of human rights?

  • Finally, I welcome the Government’s commitment to hosting a review conference in November

  • this year on the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative, and I congratulate

  • my noble friend Lord Ahmad on his personal leadership and commitment to this. I also

  • welcome the news that Her Royal Highness the Countess of Wessex is to support the initiative.

  • I hope that the Government will soon set out ambitious goals for that conference.

  • As the Minister will be aware, sexual and gender-based violence is endemic in situations

  • of conflict, disaster and human displacement, yet programmes for countering it are routinely

  • underfunded and insufficiently prioritised in humanitarian responses. I therefore renew

  • my call on the UK Government to commit to dedicating a fixed minimum proportion of the

  • international development budget to this purpose. I believe that this would make a huge difference,

  • particularly if other countries could be persuaded to do the same.

  • Let me finish by expressing my respect for our female parliamentarians, from all parties,

  • who have suffered vicious online abuse, including sexist and anti-Semitic hatred. I applaud

  • their courage. We need more outspoken and principled women in public life.

  • Baroness Burt of Solihull (LD) My Lords, how do you summarise that lot? I

  • thought I would group them today, but you cannot group these speechesthey are too

  • individual, and of course they reflect the individuals who made them. It has been a privilege

  • to sit here and listen to some of the really erudite and sometimes quite passionate things

  • that people have said.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Williams of Trafford, started off by talking about the £5 million

  • given for events last year. I ask her: what about this year? Can the Government perhaps

  • find another £5 million down the back of the sofa? I hope we may be able to do something

  • like that again this year.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Gale, talked about the voting system in Wales being the best

  • in the UK. Of course, it is not the first past the post system, which works against

  • so many different minority groups in this country. If it were the additional member

  • system and we got fair votes, we could have a more representative and wider democracy.

  • Baroness Gale I am sorry to intervene on the noble Baroness,

  • but the fact is that most women in the Welsh Assembly got elected under the first past

  • the post system. The PR system did not magically bring more women into politics.

  • Baroness Burt of Solihull I am grateful for that intervention. I do

  • not think it destroys the point I was making, but I congratulate those women.

  • My noble friend Lady Hussein-Ece focused her commentsvery rightly, I am sureon BAME

  • women, particularly Muslim women. She made the valid point that Muslim women are not

  • all victims. There are some hugely educated, talented women who can thrive, make a superb

  • contribution and enrich our society.

  • I particular loved the comments of the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Portsmouth,

  • who said we are not to talk about female bishops because they are all bishops. It does not

  • make any difference; they are bishops who happen to be women. I had already written

  • downfemale bishops”, then I quickly scrubbed it out. He talked about it not all

  • being about women doing what men do. We had a lot of people talking about women in STEM

  • and doing men’s occupations, but he rightly said that it is also about men doing what

  • women do. When we are all doing a similar kind of job, using the talents we undoubtedly

  • have, we will get a much fairer society.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Anelay of St Johns, talked about the Inter-Parliamentary Union

  • and the situation in Ethiopia. She said there is still hopeparticularly with the actions

  • of the brave Prime Ministerand still problems to deal with, but that progress is being made,

  • albeit slowly. That is always the way; progress always seems to be slow.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Jenkin, talked about the 50:50 movement, #AskHerToStand, and the

  • successes and setbacks in the Conservative Party. I pay tribute to the hard work of many

  • Conservative women and the efforts they have made in their own party. There are champions

  • in the other parties too, of course; other champions are available.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Donaghy, referred to winning the right to work far harder than

  • the men. She is not the only one who is knackered. I am also knackered after trying to accommodate

  • all the wise words that we have heard during the debate. I am sure the Minister will wish

  • to comment on the importance of gender equality impact assessments for all new legislation.

  • The noble Baronesses, Lady Seccombe and Lady Bull, talked about how lucky we are to be

  • who we are and where we are at the time we are in, and referred to giving a hand-up to

  • our sisters elsewhere in the world who are not so fortunate. The noble Baroness, Lady

  • Bull, said we are lucky, yes, but we still face challenges at home and in the world.

  • Like my noble friend Lady Hussein-Ece, she said that we are not what we wear; that we

  • do not need to be judged by whether we are wearing a scarf or by the way we are dressed.

  • However, it is the way of the world, unfortunately.

  • My noble friend Lady Miller referred to the role of women in war and in peace and the

  • fact that there is a direct ratio between women’s involvement and the degree of danger

  • and fear, particularly of nuclear attack. She related inspirational stories about the

  • Greenham Common women all working together.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Berridge, has a magic number—228—the number of women Peers.

  • I have a magic number too—167. I was the 167th woman ever to be elected to the British

  • Parliament, which really puts matters into context.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong of Hill Top, referred to women who do not have settled

  • status—a hugely important areahaving no recourse to public funds and the help that

  • all abused women should receive regardless of their status.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Meyer, gave an inspiring description of her brilliant mother—a Russian

  • exile who faced great tragedyand she also referred to how lucky we are.

  • My noble friend Lord Hussain, referred to the plight of Kashmiri women and described

  • a harrowing picture of half-widows, their search for their missing men and mass rape.

  • It is a terrible situation and I commend him for the work he does.

  • I also commend the noble Lord, Lord Loomba, and the work of the Loomba Foundation and

  • the importance of the priority given to women all over the world.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Hodgson of Abinger, asked where the women are in the peace process.

  • It is wrong to exclude 50% of us from the process; we are the peaceful 50%.

  • I realise that I have now had seven minutes. There have been many other wonderful contributionspeople

  • have sat here for a long time todayand I particularly enjoyed those of the noble

  • Baronesses, Lady Crawley, Lady Redfern and Lady Rock, and the noble Lord, Lord Taylor

  • of Warwick, in talking about the economic impact of women. We can work together to create

  • better chances for women. If men are allowed to write all the algorithms we will get what

  • they planned for, and we do not need that.

  • I finish by again referring to the words of the noble Baroness, Lady Williams, on this

  • year’s theme—“Balance for Better”—and government planning for great things, including

  • on period poverty, on which I have campaigned for a while.

  • It occurred to me that we have a very special talent as women: we are very good at working

  • together. Shame on us if we do not work together and make sure that we use our combined talent

  • across parties, for no party and for all parties to achieve success for us and our male counterparts—I

  • particularly loved the contribution by the noble Lord, Lord Crisp, which was well worth

  • listening toso let us get on with it. We can do this together.

  • Baroness Thornton I agree with the noble Baronessit was great

  • to start the debate with the excellent opening speech by the noble Baroness, Lady Williams.

  • She mentioned things we need to celebrate in the past year: the anniversary of the Sex

  • Disqualification (Removal) Act, which allowed women to become barristers, solicitors, jurors

  • and magistrates, and of Nancy Astor taking her seat, and the unveiling of the Fawcett

  • statue in Parliament Square, which was a wonderful event.

  • I am sure we can expect a stirring closure to this debate from the noble Baroness, Lady

  • Vere, who I hope I can regard as a sister on this day, particularly since I know that

  • when she was a parliamentary candidate some years ago she surprised some of us by saying

  • that she was a reluctant champion of women, that she did not object to being a “Cameron

  • Cutie”—I have to tell the House that I really objected to being called a “Blair’s

  • Babeall those years agoand that feminism did not resonate with her. She also said that

  • she thought it was all a bit of a left-wing agenda. I like to think that since then, she

  • has joined the ranks of the feminists on her own Benches in your LordshipsHouse who

  • are so effective and who certainly, and quite rightly, do not concede feminist ground to

  • us lefties.

  • We have had inspiring speakers. I thank the many organisations which sent briefings, and

  • the Library for its brief. My noble friend Lady Gale kicked off on this side by covering

  • a great deal of ground about celebration and the challenges. The noble Baroness, Lady Hussein-Ece,

  • was right to raise stereotypes of, and to call out casual racism against, Muslim women.

  • I think her mum and mine were probably cut from the same cloth. The right reverend Prelate

  • the Bishop of Portsmouth gave a most welcome address. I agree with him that all bishops

  • are bishops and all vicars are vicars; our ranks have a recently ordained deacon.

  • I cannot mention everybody, but there were some great contributions from the noble Baronesses,

  • Lady Meyer, Lady Hodgson, Lady Rock, Lady Anelay and Lady Jenkin, who is undoubtedly

  • a leader. I have been led by her from time to time on various issues—I am very happy

  • about thatand I think it quite likely that the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, and I were

  • at Greenham Common at the same time.

  • My noble friend Lady Donaghy was completely right, and I agree with her about the right

  • to be knackered—I have been in the Chamber for about six and a half hours today. The

  • noble Baroness, Lady Berridge, talked about discrimination and primogeniture, although

  • it is not an issue that is very high on the agenda. It is, as it were, from-the-top discrimination.

  • My noble friend Lady Armstrong was right to talk about access to support for the most

  • vulnerable women. My noble friends Lady Blackstone, Lady Crawley and Lord Griffiths made different

  • contributionsfor example, on the part that the European Union has played in protecting

  • women’s rights. My noble friend Lord Griffiths can take back to his wife our thanks that

  • she told him to put his name down for this debate.

  • While the noble Baroness, Lady Jenkin, was talking, I was reminded that I met and became

  • a very close friend of a woman called Rosemary Pockley. It was the first time that I had

  • ever spoken to a woman in the Conservative Party whom I regarded as a feminist and a

  • sister. She made me aware of the struggles that Conservative women have had in their

  • party, and they sometimes felt even worse than the ones that we were having in the Labour

  • Party at around the same time. I want to pay tribute to Rosemary because she was a great

  • friend and a great sister.

  • I want to say a little about the importance of our own body for equality, the EHRC, and

  • its recent report based on the largest ever review of women’s rights and gender equality

  • in the UK. As noble Lords will know, the commission is the regulatory body responsible for enforcing

  • the Equality Act 2010, and we are accredited by the United Nations as an “A status

  • national human rights institution.

  • The commission’s duties are to reduce inequality, eliminate discrimination, and promote and

  • protect human rights. Its biggest review of women’s rights and gender equality threw

  • up a whole range of issues. It says quite clearly that important progress has been made

  • in some areasfor example, forced marriage has been criminalised and shared parental

  • leave has been introducedbut that there remains a range of areas where significant

  • challenges face women and girls. The evidence and recommendations have informed the UK’s

  • submission to the United Nations review of our progress on women’s rights. This review

  • takes place across the world every four to five years. I gather that the United Nations

  • is expected to issue its recommendations to the UK Government on Monday 11 March; I look

  • forward to seeing them.

  • The recommendations include things that we all need to be aware of. For instance, according

  • to the section on just and fair conditions at work, pregnant women, new mothers and women

  • of childbearing age are still routinely discriminated against in the workplace. My colleagues on

  • the Front Bench in the CommonsDawn Butler and her teamhave been highlighting this

  • issue vigorously for a while. The research shows that 11% of mothers reported that they

  • were either dismissed or made compulsorily redundant when others in their workplace were

  • not, or that they were treated so poorly that they felt they had to leave their job.

  • The EHRC recommends that the UK Government should introduce a mandatory duty on employers

  • to take reasonable steps to protect workers from harassment and victimisation, ensuring

  • that flexible working is offered. They should also make it mandatory for employers to publish

  • the narrative that goes with, for example, the gender pay gap within their companies,

  • and support employers in collecting the necessary data for them to begin closing pay gaps affecting

  • ethnic-minority and disabled women. I hope that the Minister will support those recommendations

  • from our own commission.

  • I turn to the subject of gender-based violence. Despite signing the Istanbul convention on

  • 8 June 2012, the UK has still not achieved ratification and has been criticised for a

  • lack of accountability and oversight of its violence against women and girls strategy.

  • Are urgent steps in place to ratify the Istanbul convention and, once it is ratified, will

  • sufficient resources be dedicated to central, devolved and local authorities to ensure its

  • effective implementation?

  • The EHRC recommends that the UK Government should mitigate the impact of welfare reforms

  • on lone-parent families, the majority of whom are women, by uprating benefits, reversing

  • the two-child limit on child tax credits and ensuring that work coaches are trained to

  • deliver tailored employment support.

  • I turn to the public sector equality duty, which underpins much of the work and was introduced

  • in the 2010 Act. Does the Minister acknowledge that the commission is proposing a new approach

  • to the PSED to ensure that public bodies and government departments focus on the key inequalities

  • affecting those affected by their functions? This would review and amend the specific duties

  • underpinning the PSED to ensure that public bodies are required to focus on them.

  • I also highlight the recommendation to incorporate CEDAW into domestic law, so that individuals

  • can effectively challenge rights violations by using the domestic legal system and access

  • a domestic remedy for alleged breaches of CEDAW and other United Nations rights. There

  • are many other recommendations, all of which, coming as they do from our domestic Equality

  • and Human Rights Commission, we need to be listening to very carefully.

  • Finally I join with the noble Baroness, Lady Burt, in her request for some money for parties

  • and events.

  • Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Con) My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have

  • contributed today. It is indeed true: I regard myself as a champion of equality, albeit a

  • reluctant one as I am rather irritated that we still need to have these debates. I truly

  • wish that was not the case. In the olden days I did not like the wordfeministbecause

  • people used to tell me what to think and I do not like being told what to think. So I

  • am very happy to be a sister, but perhaps I will not quite put on the T-shirt.

  • We have heard some powerful and moving messages from across the Chamber today. I cannot emphasise

  • enough how important it is that we continue to discuss and debate gender equality to ensure

  • that this issue gets the attention it deserves. We will be back the same time next year, but

  • earlier in the day.

  • I have to cover education, employment, women’s leadershipparticularly in public and civic

  • lifediscrimination, Brexit, the tragedy of violence against women and international

  • considerations in 20 minutes. I do not have a hope. Therefore, if I cannot do justice

  • to the questions asked by noble Lords, I will of course write. In fact, I very much look

  • forward to that letter as it will give me an opportunity to go into more detail than

  • I am able to do today.

  • I turn first to employment and education, which is a thread that runs through everything.

  • Women can be empowered only if they are educated and gainfully employed so that they can have

  • their own income. This was mentioned by so many noble Lords. Working from the top—I

  • do not plan to address peerages; I am thinking more of women on boardsthis issue has been

  • around for many years. I was going to cite all the figures. It is true that we have made

  • progress with women on boards, but not nearly enough. I am disappointed that these figures

  • are not better. I recognise the restrictions of the pipeline and the other things that

  • feed into our ability to get women on to boards, but I also find the paucity of women in executive

  • roles very disheartening. I hope that in a few yearstime we will return to this and

  • find that the numbers look much better than they do now.

  • The gender pay gap was covered by my noble friend Lady Williams of Trafford so I will

  • not go into it in great detail. But it is worth remembering that reporting is just the

  • start. We said that we would start noting how companies are doing on the gender pay

  • gap. It is crucial now that employers use gender pay gap data to identify the barriers

  • to women’s recruitment and progression. They must take action to break down those

  • barriers; otherwise, what on earth is the point of reporting all this data? We have

  • published evidence-based guidance on practical actions that employers can take to close the

  • gap, alongside help to diagnose it: to figure out why their gaps are happening in the first

  • place.

  • I turn to the speeches by my noble friend Lady Rock and the noble Baroness, Lady Crawley.

  • On the gamut of tech and AI, was it not absolutely fascinating to hear about the algorithms written

  • by men and how rubbish they are, as they do only one thing whereas we need them to cover

  • everybody? There was some comment about what the Government can do. We are doing many things

  • to make sure that the technology space becomes more diverse. We are supporting a scheme called

  • the Tech Talent Charter. It is a private sector initiative designed to promote diversity in

  • the tech workforce. The signatories to the charter pledge to implement recruitment and

  • retention practices that will address the gender imbalance in tech roles. Some 290 companies

  • are signed up to it, from international tech giants through to start-up SMEs and charities.

  • All government departments have agreed to adopt the charter; DCMS was the first to sign

  • up. This is one of the many tangible things we can do to get more women interested in

  • tech and to make sure women are there to sort out our algorithms for us, because clearly

  • they will not sort themselves out.

  • Another point to mention is that we are supporting female entrepreneurs. That is important. We

  • have heard before that women often struggle to get loans from banks or equity from VC

  • funds. The government-backed start-up loan system is providing funding and support to

  • new entrepreneurs. Some 39% of loans go to women, so it is not quite 50%, but it could

  • be worse. That is £450 million, which is a fair amount of money, and I wish those women

  • great success.

  • Baroness Burt of Solihull Is the Minister aware of the statistic from

  • the British BankersAssociation which shows that less than 1% of venture capital funding

  • goes to women? Is that not shameful? Should we not do something about it?

  • Baroness Vere of Norbiton I was not aware of that statistic. I knew

  • the figure was low, but I did not realise it was that low. That is shocking. We certainly

  • should look at that, but the British venture capital industry needs to take a long hard

  • look at itself and figure it out, because it has significant funds and clearly women

  • can make a great success of these companies. We should all call on it to look at that and

  • make sure that the imbalance is sorted out.

  • In her speech, my noble friend Lady Redfern reminded us of some great female role models

  • in the STEM sector. However, if we are to get the pipeline sorted out, we have to get

  • young girls interested in the first place, early on, from primary school onwards. It

  • is very important that they start at school, then get to college and university and are

  • still doing STEM subjects. We announced substantial spending commitments in the 2017 Autumn Budget

  • on maths, digital and technical education and we are funding programmes, such as the

  • advanced maths premium, to increase the take-up of maths, computing and physics and to support

  • better teaching of maths, science and computing in schools. To address the gender imbalance

  • in computing, we are launching a computing pilot programme this year, to improve girls

  • participation in computing as part of an £84 million investment to improve the teaching

  • of computing in schools. This is essential for the AI issue that we talked about earlier.

  • These things all build up together and should lead to greater success for women and girls

  • in this area.

  • I was taken by the point raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Donaghy. I agree with her that

  • not everything is great. Women are almost three times more likely than men to be working

  • part-time, which is associated with zero pay progression. Women are around 65% more likely

  • than men to be earning the national living wage. We all want to change these things.

  • Now that we know what we are aiming for, I hope these figures will improve.

  • But how do we improve them? As my noble friend Lady Williams stated in her speech, the Government

  • Equalities Office is working incredibly hard across departments at the moment on the female

  • economic empowerment strategy. My noble friend outlined what this strategy hopes to achieve,

  • so I will not dwell on it too much at this stage. However, I would like to talk about

  • the Women’s National Commission, which the noble Baroness, Lady Gale, mentioned. She

  • is right: it was disbanded in 2010. We do not have any plans to replace it at this time.

  • However, the Government are very clear that the voice of women should be better heard

  • by policymakers, and not just on a committee sitting in a room somewhere, but across government.

  • The Government Equalities Office is doing a significant programme of work to make sure

  • that women’s voices are better heard by policymakers. It is important that the Government

  • really understand the issues that impact on women from every walk of life, and across

  • every part of the Government’s agenda.

  • I will briefly pick up some issues mentioned by the noble Lord, Lord Crisp. He focused

  • on the status of workers, nurses and carers on zero-hours contracts. To focus on the latter,

  • zero-hours contracts cause a great amount of angst and can be quite controversial, but

  • we know that many people working on zero-hours contracts, whether in the adult social care

  • sector or elsewhere, value their flexibility. For some, it is an attractive feature of such

  • a job. However, we are well aware that, for others, fixed contracts with definite hours

  • are preferable. There is an organisation called Skills for Care, which is a workforce development

  • organisation for the adult social care workforce funded by the Department of Health and Social

  • Care. It provides advice to employers on how to attract and retain the most excellent staff

  • with the benefits of offering a choice of different employment contracts.

  • Finally, on employment and education, my noble friends Lady Meyer and Lady Finn mentioned

  • sexual harassment in the workplace. I am sure there is not a female in this Room who has

  • not had something rather unpleasant happen to them in the workplace. We take this extremely

  • seriously. We are committed to ending any harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence

  • that women might face. The UK has some of the strongest workplace protections in the

  • world, including explicit protection against sexual harassment in the workplace under the

  • Equality Act 2010. The Government will consult this summer to explore whether these should

  • be further strengthened.

  • I turn to international issues, because there was a significant amount of interest on those

  • issues and I want to make sure that I cover them where I can. My noble friend Lady Hodgson

  • started by talking about the Commission on the Status of Women and how the Government

  • can help it be more impactful. This is the biggest annual international event on gender

  • equality. It has produced some of the most impactful milestones in the history of women’s

  • empowerment, including the convention on the elimination of all forms of violence against

  • women and the Beijing Platform for Action. We are looking forward to the 25th anniversary

  • of the Beijing Declaration next year. We will be working with like-minded countries to ensure

  • that the CSW sets an ambitious programme of work for the next five years.

  • My noble friend Lady Hodgson also mentioned support for human rights defenders. The FCO

  • and DfID strongly support the vital role that they and civil society organisations play

  • in supporting sustainable development. For example, on international Human Rights Day

  • in December, the Secretary of State for International Development spoke at an Amnesty International

  • UK event to highlight the work of five inspiring female human rights defenders.

  • The noble Lord, Lord Crisp, mentioned the work of women in global health. This is absolutely

  • critical. The Government appreciate that, without good health, nothing else can possibly

  • follow. DfID supports developing countries to achieve international development target

  • 3.8 on universal health coverage. This means ensuring that everyone, everywhere can access

  • quality essential health services for prevention and care without suffering financial hardship.

  • Investment in health workers, the majority of whom are women, is essential to achieve

  • this. DfID invests in nursing and the broader health workforce through bilateral country

  • programmes, multilateral partners and global initiatives such as the Global Fund to Fight

  • AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

  • Furthermore on the subject of health, the noble Baroness, Lady Blackstone, made a very

  • wide-ranging speech about sexual and reproductive health. The UK leads the world in our long-term

  • support for comprehensive sexual reproductive health and rights. We are the largest donor

  • to the United Nations Population Fund and the second-largest bilateral donor on family

  • planning. In 2017 the UK committed to spend an average of £225 million per year over

  • the next five years on family planning. To illustrate what this means, we estimate that

  • every year our investment will support nearly 20 million total users of contraception. It

  • will prevent 6 million unintended pregnancies and so prevent more than 3 million abortions,

  • many of which would be unsafe. It will save the lives of more than 6,000 women every year.

  • My noble friend Lady Anelay turned our attention to Ethiopia and FGM. Noble Lords will know

  • that the UK has long supported the end of FGM, particularly through our financial support.

  • The flagship programme currently in place comes to an end this year, but in 2018 we

  • announced a programme with a further £50 million of UK aid, which again will be the

  • single biggest investment worldwide to date by any international donor. This programme

  • will continue to tackle FGM across the most affected countries in Africa. We are currently

  • in the early stages of competitive tendering, so we are not yet aware of where that programme

  • will cover. Of course I cannot prejudge its conclusion today, but I am sure that the results

  • of that tendering will be available very soon.

  • My noble friends Lady Helic and Lady Hodgson spoke about the Preventing Sexual Violence

  • in Conflict Initiativean absolutely critical and long-term thing, which we must continue

  • to pressure on. We are committed to securing justice for survivors and breaking the culture

  • of impunity by holding the perpetrators to account. The next PSVI conference will take

  • place in November 2019. It is a three-day survivor-centred event and will celebrate

  • progress, address remaining challenges and secure further commitments. It aims to focus

  • on: accountability challenges; support for children born of rape; ensuring service provision

  • for all survivors; and working with militaries, faiths and the media.

  • The noble Lord, Lord Hussain, mentioned Kashmir. The UK Government are concerned by any allegations

  • of human rights violations and abuses. Our position is that any allegations must be investigated

  • thoroughly, promptly and transparently. We noted the concerns raised in the report by

  • the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in June 2018 and continue to

  • encourage all states, including India and Pakistan, to uphold human rights.

  • My noble friend Lady Helic mentioned peace in Afghanistan and of course we agree with

  • her entirely. We continue to press for peace negotiations to be inclusive and representative

  • of Afghan society by including women’s participation. We also believe that any political settlement

  • in Afghanistan should respect the rights of all Afghans, and that includes women.

  • The role of women in peace was also mentioned by my noble friend Lady Hodgson and the noble

  • Baroness, Lady Miller. The UK is strengthening partnerships with organisations that share

  • our interest in building women’s capacity to participate in mediation processes, including

  • the UN, other multilaterals and women’s mediation networks. But the UK has a National

  • Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, which is jointly owned by the Ministry of

  • Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and DfID. It sets out how the UK Government

  • will integrate a gender perspective into their work to build security and stability overseas,

  • protect the human rights of women and girls and promote their meaningful participation

  • in conflict prevention and resolution.

  • I turn briefly to an issue on which I will certainly write to the noble Baroness, Lady

  • Thornton. We obviously look forward to the report that will come from CEDAW. The UK was

  • examined by the CEDAW committee on 26 February in Geneva and it will issue its conclusion,

  • observations and recommendations later this month. We will of course consider its recommendations

  • fully. If I can provide her with any more information, I certainly will.

  • On violence against women and girls, and domestic abuse, my noble friend Lady Williams opened

  • with a strong review of where we are but perhaps I may put a few markers down on specific things.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Gale, asked about the DA commissioner and whether that person

  • could be independent. The commissioner will provide public leadership on domestic abuse

  • issues and play a key role in overseeing the provision of services in England. Their day-to-day

  • independence from Ministers will be particularly important when called upon to identify local

  • areas where service provision is insufficient.

  • The noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, asked about the Istanbul convention and its ratification.

  • I believe that, if the domestic abuse Bill is passed, it will ratify the Istanbul convention.

  • I have 30 seconds to cover public service, recognition of great leaders and Brexit. Well,

  • Brexit is out of the window. We have had so many interesting speeches today on the representation

  • of women. So many Members of your LordshipsHouse, despite not being elected themselves,

  • have been very involved in getting others elected to the other place, to councils and

  • elsewhere. We are clear that politics must be representative. We have to do whatever

  • we can to make sure that we have the right sort of diversity.

  • It is also quite a rough and tough world out there at the moment. I do not know whether

  • any noble Lord has seen the video of Amber Rudd reading out some of the abuse that she

  • has got on Twitter. It is appalling and shocking, and we must fight back against those things.

  • It is not normal: people should not be speaking in that way, whether in person or anonymously.

  • Sadly, I must conclude, but I promise that my letter will be a very good one. Once again,

  • I thank all noble Lords. It has been an excellent debate. This House works best when we work

  • together, as noted by the noble Baroness, Lady Burt. So let us do just that. Perhaps,

  • as noted by my noble friend Lady Finn, we can structurally re-engineer our whole societybut

  • I do not want to start a gender war, as noted by my noble friend Lady Meyer. So what must

  • we do? We must march on. We know what needs to be done and I beg to move.

The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Williams of Trafford) (Con)

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

国際女性デー2019|貴族院 (International Women's Day 2019 | House of Lords)

  • 7 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語