ALERT.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM TONIGHT

INTRODUCING A NEW RESOLUTION

CONDEMNING THE HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES, THEIR

CLOSED-DOOR, ILLEGITIMATE,

UNCONSTITUTIONAL IMPEACHMENT

INQUIRY, HE JOINS US NOW IS MORE

PAID SENATOR, I'M GLAD TO SEE

THIS HAPPEN.

EVERY REPUBLICAN THAT WAS THERE

VOTED FOR IT YET YESTERDAY.

DEMOCRAT SHUT IT DOWN.

NEVER BEFORE HAS THIS HAPPENED

IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

CLOSED DOORS.

THEY WON'T EVEN LET A REPUBLICAN

READ A TRANSCRIPT WITHOUT A

REMINDER, AND GOD FORBID THEY

GET A COPY OF IT.

>> YEAH, SO THIS RESOLUTION PUTS

THE SENATE ON RECORD CONDEMNING

THE HOUSE FOR THE FUTURE OF THE

PRESIDENCY.

WE CANNOT ALLOW FUTURE

PRESIDENTS AND THIS PRESIDENT TO

BE IMPEACHED BASED ON AN INQUIRY

IN THE HOUSE THAT'S NEVER BEEN

VOTED UPON THAT DOES NOT ALLOW

THE PRESIDENT AND THE WITNESS

AGAINST HIM TO CALL WHEN IT'S ON

HIS BEHALF AND CROSS-EXAMINE

PEOPLE WHO ARE ACCUSING HIM OF

MISDEEDS.

ALL I'M ASKING IS GIVE

DONALD TRUMP THE SAME RIGHTS AS

RICHARD AND RICHARD NIXON AND

BILL CLINTON HAD WHEN IT COMES

TO IMPEACHMENT.

I'M INSISTING THAT DONALD TRUMP

BE GIVEN THE SAME RIGHTS THAT

ANY AMERICAN HAS AT WHEN YOU'RE

GIVING A PARKING TICKET TO

CONFRONT THE WITNESSES AGAINST

YOU, CAN'T BE BASED ON HEARSAY,

AND HERE'S THE POINT OF

RESOLUTION.

ANY IMPEACHMENT VOTE BASED ON

THIS PROCESS, TO ME, IS

ILLEGITIMATE, IS

UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AND SHOULD BE

DISMISSED IN SENATE WITHOUT A

TRIAL.

>> Sean: OKAY.

NOW.

SO LET'S WALK THROUGH HOW DO I

GET STUNNED AT HOW DO YOU

DISMISS IT WITHOUT A TRIAL?

ALL OF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS

TRUE.

NEW JOINT GETTING NEWT GINGRICH

JOINS US IN A MINUTE.

AND HE WILL EXPLAIN EVERY

DETAIL.

YOU SAID THE CORNER OF AMERICA

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, C

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, A

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, L

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, N

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, E

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, T

IS DURO STUDENTS, DUE PROCESS, E

ACCUSATIONS AGAINST YOU.

NONE OF THAT IS HAPPENING IN THE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND

WHERE ARE YOUR FELLOW SENATORS?

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM SIGN

YOUR LETTER.

>> IT'S GOING TO BE A RESOLUTION

BE IT I WOULD HOPE TO HAVE A

VOTE ON IT.

I HOPE --

IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE 100.

COULD YOU IMAGINE IF REPUBLICANS

WERE DOING THIS TO THE

DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT?

DOES OPENING BY BILL TAYLOR

TODAY, EVERYBODY IS BREATHLESS.

HERE'S THE QUESTION.

WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT OF

UKRAINE DENY THERE IS A QUID PRO

QUO?

WHAT DO YOU KNOW THAT HE DOESN'T

KNOW?

WHY DID THE PRESIDENT OF THE

UKRAINE'S EGG DURING THE, I

DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS FUNDED AND

THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE, THE

ALLEGED VICTIM, DENIES THERE

IS A QUID PRO QUO, HE DIDN'T

FEEL THREATENED BY THE PRESIDENT

OF THE UNITED STATES.

THAT ONLY HAPPENS IF YOU CAN

CONFRONT THE WITNESSES AGAINST

YOU.

THIS PROCESS IN THE HOUSE IS

BEING CONDUCTED BEHIND CLOSED

DOORS, REPUBLICANS ARE BEING

SHUT OUT, AND IF YOU HAD AN

INQUIRY VOTE, THAT ALLOWS

REPUBLICANS AND A PRESIDENT TO

CALL WITNESSES AND TO CONFRONT

PEOPLE ACCUSING THE PRESIDENT OF

MISDEEDS.

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED WITH

CLINTON, THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED

WITH NIXON AND ANDREW JOHNSON.

THIS IS UN-AMERICAN AT ITS

CORPORATE WITH THE HOUSE OF

REPRESENTATIVES IS DOING IS A

PROCESS, OF POLITICAL REVENGE.

IT IS ALIEN TO AMERICAN DUE

PROCESS.

IT SHOULD BE DISMISSED QUICKLY

IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE SO

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THEY

IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT BASED ON

THIS CLOSED-DOOR,

BEHIND-THE-SCENES, LACK OF DUE

PROCESS, INQUIRY?

WE SHOULD DISMISS IT WITHOUT A

TRIAL BECAUSE IT'S ILLEGITIMATE

ON ITS FACE AND IF IT IS ALLOWED

TO STAND, THERE IS NO PROTECTION

FOR FUTURE PRESIDENTS.

>> Sean: WHEN THE PRESIDENT

SAYS, AND WE WENT OVER THIS,

WHEN THE PRESIDENT SAYS CAN YOU

DO ME A FAVOR?

WE HAVE IDENTIFIED HUNDREDS OF

TIMES THAT HAPPENS TO BE ONE OF

THE PRESIDENT'S TRANSITION

PHRASES AND WE HAVE THE

TAPE.

CAN YOU DO ME A FAVOR.

MANY TALKS ABOUT THE 2016

ELECTION INTERFERENCE OF UKRAINE

CONFIRMED BY POLITICO, 2017,

JANUARY.

IT ISN'T ALSO ONE OF HIS

CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES, HIS SWORN

OATH, TO FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE

LAWS OF THE LAND AND I JUST

HEARD EVERYONE SO UPSET ABOUT

ELECTION INTERFERENCE AND TROMP

AND RUSSIA, I WOULD THINK THEY

WOULD BE ON BOARD WANTING TO

HELP TRUMP GET TO THE TRUTH BUT

THAT'S NOT THE CASE, IS IT?

>> NOT WANTED DEMOCRAT HAS

SUGGESTED THE PRESIDENT IS

TREATED UNFAIRLY WHEN IT

VIOLATES EVERY BASIC PRINCIPLE O

VIOLATES EVERY BASIC PRINCIPLE F

VIOLATES EVERY BASIC PRINCIPLE D

VIOLATES EVERY BASIC PRINCIPLE E

PROCESS.

WE GAVE ABOUT $400 MILLION HERE

TO THE UKRAINE AND IN AID AND

HERE'S THE QUESTION.

IS THE POLITICO ARTICLE ACCURATE

IS?

IS SOMEBODY LOOKING AT THE DNC

INVOLVEMENT IN 2016 AS THEY

LOOKED AT TROND AND RUSSIA?

SOMEBODY NEEDS TO DO THAT.

SO IT'S NOT ON FOUNDED FOR THE

PRESIDENT TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT

UKRAINE INTERFERENCE AND IN OUR

ELECTION IF HE BELIEVES THE

POLITICO ARTICLE BUT HERE'S THE

POINT.

WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE

IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT OF

THE UNITED STATES, DESTROYING A

MANDATE FROM THE PEOPLE, A

POLITICAL DEATH SENTENCE, AND HE

IS NOT ENTITLED TO KNOW WHO IS

ACCUSES ARE.

HE CAN'T CALL A WITNESS ON HIS

BEHALF AND HE CAN'T

CROSS-EXAMINE THOSE WHO ARE