HARRIS?

>> Harris: TREY YINGST,

THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE.

DEMOCRATS ARE REPORTEDLY

PLANNING TO ISSUE A WAVE OF

SUBPOENAS IN THEIR IMPEACHMENT

PUSH AS PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS HE

WOULD COOPERATE IF HE GETS A

FAIR SHAKE GRADE AND PREDICTS

THAT THE FIGHT WILL END UP

BEFORE THE NATION'S HIGHEST

COURT.

>> HE WROTE A LETTER YESTERDAY,

AND IT PROBABLY ENDS UP BEING A

BIG SUPREME COURT FACE.

MAYBE IT GOES A LONG TIME.

BUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS

BEEN TREATED UNBELIEVABLY GLADLY

AND UNFAIRLY BY THE DEMOCRATS.

>> Harris: TURNED TO ME NOW,

FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR

ROBERT RAY, WHO SERVED AS

INDEPENDENT COUNSEL DURING THE

WHITEWATER INVESTIGATION.

ROBERT, GOOD TO SEE YOU TODAY.

>> NICE TO BE WITH YOU.

>> Harris: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

TODAY IN TERMS OF DEMOCRATS NOW

CALLING FOR A FULL VOTE ON THE

HOUSE, AND SAYING WHAT THEY WILL

DO IF THEY DON'T HAVE THE

WITNESSES THAT THEY NEED.

I WILL PLAY A BIT OF THOUGHT BUT

I WANT TO FIRST GET YOUR

REACTION TO THE NEWS.

>> I THINK THERE IS MERIT IN

THAT.

I'VE BEEN SAYING FOR A LONG

TIME, THEIR POSITION LEGALLY IN

THE CASES THAT ARE PENDING

BEFORE MOST OF THE DISTRICT

COURT AND THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA WOULD BE ENHANCED IF

THERE IS AN IMPEACHMENT BOAST IN

THE HOUSE.

BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO SUGGEST THEY

WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL FACTUAL

AMMUNITION TO BE ABLE TO SAY IF

THE ACTION OF THE ENTIRE BODY

AND PRECEDENTS THAT WILL ALLOW

THEM A BETTER ARGUMENT TO

GET ACCESS, AMONG OTHER THINGS,

TO GRAND JURY MATERIAL.

>> Harris: 'S OF THE MOST

VOCAL VOICE ON THIS SO FAR IS

CONGRESSMAN GARAMENDI OF

CALIFORNIA, WHO CALLED FOR THIS

FOR A HOUSEBOAT, THINK

SPEAKER PELOSI DEFINITELY HAS

THE VOTES TO GET AN IMPEACHMENT

INQUIRY THROUGH THE HOUSE.

AND IT OPENS UP THE LEGAL

PROCESS TO MAKE IT FAIR.

BUT THEN HE ISSUED A THREAT TO

THOSE WITNESSES THAT DO GET

CALLED.

HE SAYS HE HAS A SOLUTION IF

THEY DON'T TALK.

>> I THINK IT'S TIME TO CALL IN

THE ARSENAL, MARCH THEM UP TO A

JAIL, WHICH DO YOU HAPPEN TO

HAVE AND ONE OF THE ROOMS OF THE

CAPITAL.

LET THEM SIT THERE AND COOL OFF

FOR A WHILE.

I WOULD USE THE FULL POWER AND

AMONG THAT IS THE QUESTION OF

INHERENT RIGHTS OF THE CONGRESS

HOLD PEOPLE.

I THINK WE HAVE TO BE PREPARED

TO GO ALL OUT ON THIS.

>> Harris: WOW, PUTTING

WITNESSES BEHIND BARS IF THEY

DON'T TALK.

HOW DOES THAT PLAY LEGALLY?

>> I DON'T KNOW, BECAUSE I DON'T

WANT TO SUGGEST THAT'S AN IDLE

THREAT.

ON THE OTHER HAND, THE EXECUTIVE

BRANCH HAS FAR MORE RESOURCES AT

ITS DISPOSAL.

>> Harris: LIKE WHAT?

>> IN TERMS OF PROTECTING

WITNESSES, IF THE EXECUTIVE

BRANCH DOESN'T WANT TO DELIVER

UP WITNESSES TO THE CONGRESS.

LOOK, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS

THE FBI, IT HAS ALL THE

RESOURCES OF ALL THE EXECUTIVE

DEPARTMENTS.

>> Harris: WHAT ABOUT THE U.S.

SUPREME COURT?

THE PRESIDENT SAYING IT COULD

END UP THERE.

>> ON PORTIONS OF THIS HE MAY

WELL BE RIGHT.

THERE ARE ISSUES ABOUT, FOR

EXAMPLE, ACCESS TO GRAND JURY

MATERIAL.

THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE IS

ACTUALLY THE SUBJECT OF A

PENDING PETITION BEFORE THE

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,

THAT MAY RESULT IN THE

SUPREME COURT REVIEWING THAT

ISSUE.

THERE ARE ISSUES CURRENTLY

PENDING WITH REGARD TO ACCESS TO

THE PRESIDENT'S TAX RETURNS IN

CONNECTION WITH WITH, DIRECTLY

IT ALSO INDIRECTLY, REGARDING

THE EMOLUMENTS CASES THAT ARE

PENDING BEFORE THREE CIRCUIT

COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES.

ANY ONE OF WHICH MAY ULTIMATELY

BE RIGHT EVENTUALLY FOR REVIEW Y

THE SUPREME COURT.

SO THE PRESENT IS RIGHT IN PART

ABOUT THAT.

THERE'S QUESTIONS ABOUT THE

INDEPENDENCY OF THIS IMPEACHMENT

INQUIRY, AND THE EFFORTS BY THE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT

MAY WELL LEAD FOR THE SUPREME

COURT.

>> Harris: RIGHT, AND WE KNOW

WITH THE NEW APARTMENTS ON THE

SUPREME COURT THAT COULD LOOK

LIKE POLITICALLY FROM THE

PRESIDENT.

WE DON'T HAVE TEA LEAVES AT THIS

POINT.

>> NOR DID WE KNOW WHEN THAT

WOULD MAKE IT THERE.

EVEN IF THESE ARE DEALT WITH ON

AN EMERGENCY BASIS, AFTER SAY TO

YOURSELF, HOW LONG WOULD THAT

TAKE BEFORE THERE WOULD BE A

DECISION AND CORRECTION WITH

THOSE MATTERS?

>> Harris: DEMOCRATS THINK

IT'S ALL TIPPED OFF BY THAT FOLK

ARE BETWEEN OUR PRESIDENT AND

UKRAINE'S PRESIDENT.

THIS HITTING THE WIRES JUST

MOMENTS AGO.

"THE U.K. AND PRESIDENT SAYS NOT

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOT

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOY

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOH

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOE

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOU

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOT

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS

SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TO"

OF THE DEMOCRATS RUNNING OUT OF

WITNESSES AT THIS POINT?

IT BE A WITNESS.

>> OF COURSE, AND THAT MAY WELL

BE THE RESULT.

CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO COMPEL

A WITNESS WHO IS A UKRAINIAN

NATIONAL AND WORKS FOR THE

UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT TO SIMPLY

GET ON A PLANE AND COME TO

WASHINGTON TO TESTIFY BEFORE A

HOUSE COMMITTEE.

ONLY IF UKRAINE VOLUNTARILY

DELIVERED THAT PERSON OF THE

UNITED STATES WITH THE HOUSE

HAVE ANY EXERCISE AND ABILITY OR