ADMISSION, YESTERDAY CONFIRMED

THAT THREE SEPARATE UFO VIDEOS

RELEASED BY "THE NEW YORK TIMES"

IN 2017 AND ON THE SHOW WERE

ACTUALLY GENUINE.

THEY DO SHOW A REAL PHENOMENON

MAY BE CANNOT EXPLAIN AND AFFECT

OUR UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICS

THAT CANNOT BE EXPLAINED.

AND ALSO A LETTER TO CONGRESSMAN

WALKER AND UFO SIGHTINGS THEY

TAKE SERIOUSLY WORKING TO

INVESTIGATE THEM.

THE BRITISH JOURNALIST, HE JOINS

US TONIGHT TO EXPLAIN THE

SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS.

NICK, THIS DOES SEEM LIKE A

CHANGE IN THE WAY THAT THE

PENTAGON ALWAYS DESCRIBES THIS

PHENOMENON.

>> YES, IT IS.

UP UNTIL THIS POINT, THE NAVY

HAS HAD VERY LITTLE.

IN FACT THEY LEFT THE DOOR OPEN

SOMETIMES.

ALMOST IMPLIED THAT WE MIGHT BE

DEALING WITH COMMERCIAL DRONES

OR EVEN BALLOONS, BUT NOW WHAT

THEY HAVE DONE, THEY HAVE TURNED

AROUND AND NUMBER ONE, THIS IS

REAL.

NUMBER TWO COMPANY, THIS IS

UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA.

THAT IS THE PHRASE THEY HAVE

USED.

PREVIOUSLY THEY HAVE SAID

ADVANCED, UNKNOWN AIRCRAFT BUT

NOW THEY ARE SAYING UNIDENTIFIED

AERIAL PHENOMENON.

THAT IS A TERM BORROWED FROM THE

BRITISH GOVERNMENT, WE USE IT

FOR THE MINISTRY DEFENSE AND WE

MEANT UFOs.

>> Sean: DOME XP TO THE U.S.

GOVERNMENT ADMITTING THEY HAVE

NO IDEA WHAT THESE THINGS ARE AD

NO IDEA WHAT THESE THINGS ARE AT

NO IDEA WHAT THESE THINGS ARE AR

NO IDEA WHAT THESE THINGS ARE AE

NOT SOME RUSSIAN SUPER PLAIN, AD

NOBODY'S PAYING ATTENTION TO THI

NOBODY'S PAYING ATTENTION TO TH.

THIS SEEMS LIKE A WATERSHED

MOMENT.

WE HAVE ALL THIS TAPE OF OBJECTS

DEFYING THE KNOWN LAWS OF

PHYSICS RIGHT NEXT TO U.S.

MILITARY AND WHY IS THIS NOT

PAGE ONE NEWS EVERYWHERE?

>> WELL, IT IT SHOULD BE

ABSOLUTELY.

THESE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS THAT

MANY OF THESE UFOs HAVE BEEN

INTERACTING WITH, OBVIOUSLY,

THESE ARE BILLION-DOLLAR ASSETS.

AND IT IS THE OFFICIAL POSITION

OF THE MOST POWERFUL NAVY IN THE

WORLD, FRANKLY A LITTLE MORE

THAN WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS.

I DON'T THINK THAT IS GOOD

ENOUGH.

I THINK CLEARLY PEOPLE LIKE MARK

WALKER DON'T THINK SO EITHER.

I WOULD URGE HIM TO GET THE

CLASSIFIED BRIEFING THAT OTHERS

SCIENTISTS HAVE RECEIVED AND

WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF NOT WANTING

TO DIVULGE CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION, BUT MAYBE SOME OF

THESE CENTERS CAN STEP FORWARD

AND AT LEAST GIVE US A CLUE WITH

WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH HERE.

>> Tucker: SO IT TURNS OUT IT

WASN'T A WEATHER BALLOON.

THEY HAVE BEEN TELLING US THAT

FOR 50 YEARS, IT IS A WEATHER

BALLOON.

IT'S NOT A WEATHER BALLOON, IS

IT?

>> ABSOLUTELY NOT.

SOMEONE IN THE PENTAGON MUST

HAVE -- THEY SAY WE DON'T WANT

TO HYPOTHESIZE ABOUT THIS, THAT

IS FINE, BUT THERE MUST BE IN

THE PENTAGON A BEST ASSESSMENT.

THERE MUST BE A VIEW OF WHAT

THEY ARE ROLLING OUT.

WE SHOULD BE TOLD.

>> Tucker: THERE IS OBVIOUSLY

SOME REASON THEY ARE NOT TELLING

US AND 15 SECONDS HYPOTHESIZE

WHAT THAT REASON MIGHT BE.

>> SOME SECRET TOO TERRIBLE TO

BE TOLD, BUT I THINK WE SHOULD

BE TOLD OR AT LEAST WE SHOULD BE

HINTED AT.

>> Tucker: YEAH, OR MAYBE NOT

COME I DON'T KNOW.

THEY HAVE BEEN LYING ABOUT IT