字幕表 動画を再生する
[train passing]
♪ piano background music ♪
(Alan) Non-destructive testing covers
a wide range of techniques
used in industry and science.
And the samples are evaluated
in terms of their material properties
without causing any damage
and is therefore often carried out
in the workplace.
(Steve) Non-destructive testing
is extremely important to industry
because it allows the component
to be used after it's been tested.
OK, what we've got here is
Dye Penetrant Testing,
a very, very simple test
and it's used to detect open pores or
cracks that break the surface.
This is quite important because
if these defects go undetected
it could lead to some catastrophic
failure and potentially deaths.
We've got the dye.
We've got cleaning fluid. OK.
And we've also got some developer
like a talcum powder substance.
It's a very, very simple
technique to do so
you'd be using it in aerospace,
you'd be using it in railways,
you'd be using it in heavy industry.
The uses are pretty much limitless.
So first we need to clean the sample
to get rid of any grease or dirt.
[spray hisses]
And then we're ready
to apply the penetrant.
[spray hisses]
And then you've got to give it
sufficient time for the penetrant
to seep in to any
surface breaking defects.
The finer the defect
you're trying to detect,
the longer you need to leave it.
OK, so this has been sat for about
20-30 minutes, and it should be
sufficient time for
the penetrating media
to seep into any open voids.
OK. So the next stage of this
is we've got to wipe off
any excess penetrant.
Get a rag, some of the cleaner.
Spray the cleaner onto the rag
and then just wipe off any excess.
Nice and simple.
The next section is
to get the developer...
and we give the surface
a nice, liberal, even coating.
[spray hisses]
OK, so we've left this sample
10 minutes to develop,
and what we can see is there's a crack
emanating down the middle
of this sample. You can see that,
all the red that's coming out.
You can also see it
round these holes and
round the edges that's just where
we didn't clean inside the holes
and inside the edges
so that penetrant is then being
sucked back into the developer.
What we've got here
is one that came in from testing.
This is a real life component.
This is the bottom of a glass mould,
and on the back of that we've done
a Dye Penetrant Test and you can see
about 4 nice fine cracks than run
all the way through that specimen.
OK, so that's Dye Penetrant Testing.
A very nice cheap and quick way
of detecting defects without damaging
the actual component or material.
OK, the next test we're going to do is
Magnetic Particle Inspection.
And for that, we need a fluid
containing some magnetic particles,
we need a background contraster,
and we need a cleaner.
We also need a magnet.
Now we've got an electromagnet here.
You can also use permanent magnets,
although the difficulty is taking them
off if you've got nice strong magnets.
So the advantage of this technique over
Dye Penetrant Testing is that you can
detect slightly sub-surface defects.
The main disadvantage is that you've
got to be able to magnetise the
materials so non-magnetic materials
you can't test using
Magnetic Particle Inspection testing.
So the first thing we need to do is
clean the sample.
[spray hisses]
And then the next stage is to spray on
your contrasting background.
And then give it a nice, even coating.
[spray hisses]
And then we need to leave it to dry
before we can apply the ink
and the electromagnet.
OK, the sample's now dry so we need to
bring the sample in contact with the
electromagnet.
I'll need to make sure
we get good contact there.
Turn on, to magnetise the sample
and we spray on the magnetic ink.
[spray hisses]
So what's happening here is
we're inducing a magnetic field
into the material,
if there's defects within the material
those can deviate the lines of
magnetic field
and that's where the magnetic ink
that we sprayed on will congregate.
And that's what we can see here.
If we'd have been testing
this component in industry,
because we've identified these cracks,
which are detrimental to the component,
we'd just probably throw it away.
If we didn't see any cracks,
if it was deemed as good,
then we'd have to make sure that
we cleaned it off so that any materials
on here that might want to contaminate
the component for further work
or its service life.
OK, just to recap then, the
Dye Penetrant Test allows us to detect
surface breaking defects.
The Magnetic Particle Inspection allows
us to detect slightly sub-surface
defects, and what we've got here is
Ultrasonics. And that allows us to look
right inside the material.
OK, so this is us sample,
this is us ultrasonic probe,
and this is where we can see the signal
coming back and detect any
potential differences in the material.
So this is exactly the same sort
of technique you'll see in hospital,
maybe looking at babies, maybe looking
at kidney stones, that sort of thing.
OK, first of all we need to put on
a couplant. And this is something that
excludes air from the sample
and the probe.
Sound doesn't travel very well
through air, so we need to exclude
as much of it as possible.
Once we've got the couplant on,
we pop us probe on top and then
give it a wiggle round to exclude
any air. OK. So the width of this
screen is the equivalent of
100mm depth. Now at the end of this
screen you can see there's a spike
there, and that's the reflection
from the back wall of the sample.
As we traverse along this sample,
what we'll start to see...
is... a spike appearing at about
45mm there. Which is a reflection
from this top surface here.
As we continue to traverse, we get a
reflection at about 15mm and what
that is is a defect 15mm down from
the surface.
Again, continuing the traverse,
because that's only a small defect
that disappears whereas we're still
detecting this defect that's 45mm down.
If we carry on traversing across,
eventually the one at 45mm disappears
and then we start getting the back wall
signal reappearing at 100mm.
What makes ultrasonic testing different
to some of the other non-destructive
testing techniques you've seen is that
it can detect defects, maybe
gas as little bubbles or tiny cracks
within the material but those could be
meters away from the surface
of the material. And that makes it
a very powerful technique.
(Alan) This is a Scanning Electron Microscope.
This is the most sophisticated bit of
equipment we have in the
Materials Research Institute.
The Scanning Electron Microscope
enables us to do two or three things
that we haven't been able to do with
optical microscopy. The first is we can
now look at material at very high
magnification.
An optical microscope will only go
up to about 1000 times magnification.
With the electron microscope, we could
be looking at 500,000-800,000 times
magnification.
It's no good just making things bigger
if you can't then resolve the detail.
The electron microscope gives us
extremely good resolution
at very high magnification.
It's actually made up of some
very small, simple ideas
which if you bring them all together
make it into an incredibly sophisticated
piece of equipment.
At the top of the column
there's a tungsten filament.
That filament is heated up
and that gives off electrons.
The electrons come down the column.
They're focused by the electromagnets
onto the surface of the sample
and there they do two things.
One is that they create the image that
we see on the screen and the other is
that they allow us to do some chemical
analysis of the sample if we need to.
Basically put, the electrons hit into
the surface of our sample fairly hard
and knock out electrons
from the surface which are
characteristic of the element which
the sample is made from.
With this bit of equipment, we can
really get to almost the atomic level
to say what's controlling
and influencing the material behaviour.
As a Materials Engineer I love this
piece of equipment because we can do
so many incredible things with it.
We can use it to develop new materials,
we can use it to enhance existing
materials and we can even use it to
solve crimes in Forensic Engineering.
Forensic Engineering uses the
fundamentals of maths, physics and
some inorganic chemistry to inform and
augment legal argument.
A classic forensic investigation that
we get involved in here is where
there's been a road traffic incident.
Two cars have collided. One claims that
it's the other car's fault because he
didn't have his lights on and therefore
they couldn't see it. The police bring
the broken lamps to us and ask us
if we can establish whether the lamp
was illuminated just prior
to the collision.
And we can do that,
using our electron microscope.
So the chamber's now evacuated.
We've turned the electron beam on.
Let's have a look and see what we can
see in the electron microscope.
What we can see here is the tungsten
filament removed from the vehicle
and the first thing we notice is that
there are these globules
on the surface.
When we do the chemical analysis
of those globules we identify them
as silica and that silica is from the
glass bulb which broke
during the collision and showered down
onto the filament.
The fact that they're globular tells us
that this filament must have been hot
when that glass landed on its surface.
The filament being hot tells us that
the filament was illuminated
and therefore the motorist who was
driving this car was not guilty of
driving without their lights on.