Name: シアターはどこへ行ったのか？クラッシュコースシアター#18 (Where Did Theater Go? Crash Course Theater #18)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T08:13:30.000Z
Duration: 13 min 26 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

This is Crash Course Theater, and remember how we said it was gonna take a bunch of buzzkill Puritans to end this huge

flowering of art and culture and awesomeness? Well, here they are. Today

we're gonna be talking about objections to theatre in Renaissance England and how the theaters eventually closed. But good news,

they reopen two decades later with smutty comedy and expurgated Shakespeare and also women on stage

sometimes wearing pants. What a time to have been alive.

As you remember from our episodes on classical theater, Puritans didn't invent hating on theater, a phenomenon we call anti-

The father of anti-theatricalism, as far as recorded history goes, is

that Plato in "The Republic," Plato says that he wouldn't have any poets in his ideal Kingdom because poetry is a false

distracts people from philosophy. Please also note though, that Plato wrote his own philosophy in

Anyway, while the Greeks the Romans and the early Christians all had problems with theater and those who performed it to some degree

there ain't no anti-theatricalist like a Puritan anti-theatricalist. Think of the thing that you hate the most in the world and then

multiply that hate by a lot more loathing and

You probably still don't hate the theater like the Puritans did. Let's see some examples

This first is from Elizabeth's reign. A letter sent by the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London in

1597, which called for all plays to be cancelled. Plays, he wrote, "are a special cause of corrupting the youth,

but unchaste matters, lascivious devices, shifts of cozenage and other lewd and ungodly practices."

He also went on to say that they make people lazy and criminal and give them black death,

which, I mean, I've worked with some flat footed lighting technicians

but no one with the pestilence. Other Puritans came along and started writing some long and unhinged pamphlets.

They said that plays taught people how to sin, that they made men effeminate-

remember all of those boy actors dressed as spunky heroines in pants? Yeah, the Puritans did not love that- and surprise, surprise,

that plays went against God. And, here's something for the irony fans;

remember how theater was used to jazz up church services not so long before this?

Well, some Protestant English critics objected to Renaissance theater because it emerged from liturgical drama

Popish. Not religious enough, or too religious.

It's almost like the nature of theater isn't the problem here. The greatest example of an anti-theatrical text is probably William Prynne's

against the theater published in 1632. How bananas is this book?

"Histriomastix: the players scourge, or actor's tragedy divided into two parts, wherein it is largely

evidenced, by diverse arguments that popular stage plays are sinful heathenish lewd ungodly spectacles and most pernicious

corruptions and that the profession of play poets of stage players together with the pending acting and frequenting of stage plays are unlawful infamous and

misbeseeming Christians." Abridged, people.

This is the abridged title. Yeesh. Somewhere in those thousand pages Prynne mentioned that women actors are

notorious whores and maybe you're thinking:

what women actors? Prynne claimed he was talking about a troupe of French actresses who had visited London in

1629 and had been booed and pippin-pelted off the stage. That means that they got apples tossed at them.

But hey also, remember how court masks featured noble women including the queen, Henrietta Maria?

The nobles remembered, and when the court read Prynne's book he was put on trial for

seditious libel, because you kinda can't imply that the queen is a whore and not maybe get your own thousand page book thrown at you.

But okay, Prynne's work wasn't the final dramatic nail in the theaters coffin;

what did it? Well, it starts with Charles I. King of England,

Scotland, and Ireland and hubby to Henrietta Maria. Charles I had worse problems than men seditiously libeling his wife.

His main problem was money. Wars did not come cheap and

he fought lots of them and I'm sure all of those Inigo Jones sets and nymph costumes didn't help things either.

He and Parliament, which was largely puritanical, used to fight all the time about his military spending. So, he kept

he disbanded it all together and decided to go it alone, levying some unpopular taxes to keep everything afloat.

And that went okay, until 1640, when he needed money to fight against the Scots.

He reconvened Parliament and then dissolved it again, and then reconvened it again and the House of Commons

basically passed a bill telling the King that he was a royal pain in the neck. Then Ireland

rebelled- here is where we get back to theatre. Civil War now fully underway, the puritanical

Parliament used the conflict as an excuse to ban theater, mostly on religious grounds. In 1642,

they passed an edict which read, "Public sports do not well agree with public calamities, nor

humiliation, this being an exercise of sad and pious

solemnity, and the other being spectacles of pleasure too commonly expressing lascivious mirth and levity.

It is therefore thought fit and ordained by the Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled

that while these sad causes and set times of humiliation do continue

public stage plays shall cease and be forborn." Basically,

In 1647 parliament published another edict threatening punishment for anyone who put on a play. The next year they passed a law saying

actors should be apprehended as criminals and theatres should be demolished. An actor caught acting once was whipped, twice,

treated as an incorrigible rogue, which actually sounds fine, but

probably it was awful. Anyone found attending a play would be fined five shillings

which was a mint then, and in 1649, a few months after they beheaded Charles I, the Puritan

Parliamentarians appointed a provost marshal who was tasked with imprisoning all ballad singers and shutting down stage plays. No

Sort of. Public performances were semi-secretly held until the king was beheaded

but they really dried up after that. Late in the 1650's, the playwright William Davenant

basically invented English language opera because musical performances hadn't been

specifically forbidden. He was like, look, everybody's singing all the time!

This definitely isn't a play. No, no, not at all.

Otherwise, performances were small and clandestine, held in private homes, tennis courts, and inns, and this would be the case for

the leader of the Commonwealth, died. His son lost the confidence of the military, the Royalists started rising up again, and in

1660, Charles II was restored to the throne.

Almost immediately, he started licensing theater companies and helping theaters reopen. In London,

there were two main companies. One, led by William Davenant, the opera guy, and the other led by Thomas Killigrew.

Descendants of these companies basically had a lock on spoken drama in London until

1843. At first, the restoration theater relied on old plays. Tragic comedies were popular, especially those by Beaumont and Fletcher.

Shakespeare was almost immediately revived, but with a difference. Remember those tragedies where everyone died and it was very moving?

into it. After that whole civil war thing

people wanted happy endings, not a stage full of corpses.

So, playwrights rewrote Shakespeare. Suddenly, Juliet gets to wake up before Romeo kills himself.