Name: なぜ女性と同じくらい男性が多いのか？ (Why Are There As Many Males As Females?)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T07:58:07.000Z
Duration: 5 min 54 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

Evolution is all about reproduction, right?

程度の副詞

So try to explain this: Male elephant seals
are pretty unlucky in love.

Just four percent of males can account for
eighty-eight percent of mating.

The other 96% of male elephant seals just
use up resources and don't contribute anything

Yet even though it would be a lot more efficient
to have just a few males, and a bunch of females,

roughly equal numbers of each sex are born
every season.

We see this in almost every animal species
on Earth.

Why do most animals, from eagles to armadillos
to blue whales to us, make equal numbers of

INTRO
The equal ratio of sexes is so common in nature,

most people never wonder why it is that way.

And it's worth pausing here for a second
to make clear we're talking about biological

You probably learned that when male (XY) and
female (XX) chromosomes shuffle and combine,

But this just tells us how it IS, not why
it is this way rather than some other way,

and in biology that's really what we want
to know.

If getting your genes from one generation
to the next is the whole point of evolution,

then you'd think the best strategy would
be to put a lot of eggs into the female basket.

Sperm are really cheap to produce, so males
make...a lot of them, and animal males typically

So you get a situation in which you only need
a few males to keep a population churning

This seems like the ideal situation not just
for elephant seals, but for many animal species.

Yet elephant seals produce both sexes in equal
number, and the result is a whole lot of mooching

As far as evolutionary strategies go, this
one seems like a loser.

Fittest, in biology, means makes-the-most-offspring,
and 96% of elephant seal males get a big zero

Let's start with a hypothetical population
of purple people-eaters, in which out of every

10 purple-people-eating babies born, 9 are
female and 1 is a male.

When it comes to making adorable people-eating
babies, every male will get to mate about

If every mating results in two new purple
people-eaters, then in the next generation,

each male's genes are carried on by 18 offspring,
but each female–on average–gets their

When we count up the “fitness” score,
every male in this population has 9 times

If, through the random chance of evolution,
one muncher manages to change in a way that

it produces say, 9 male kids for every female
kid, those offspring would have a huge advantage.

WIth this genetic change, one of these new
males would produce roughly four and a half

times more grandchildren than a male without
the change.

This new mutation will spread like gangbusters
and in a few generations, you'd have more

males than females in the whole purple people
eater population.

But at this point, the mutation causing 90%
male offspring would no longer be an advantage.

The environment has changed, and now females
are the rarer sex.

Now, any parent with a mutation that results
in extra FEMALE offspring would be favored.

Then THAT mutation would spread until the
sex ratio moves BACK towards more females.

Repeat this whole process and we move back
towards more males...then more females...

The population would be in a constant see-saw
towards one sex or the other until, finally,

a mutation arises that results in an equal
ratio of offspring.

That magic 50:50 sex ratio is the only one
that is evolutionarily stable… and that,

right there, is why we see it again and again
and again…

Of course, the 50:50 ratio isn't just about
numbers of offspring.

It's really about how much time and resources
parents invest in offspring.

We see 50:50 sex ratios whenever parents invest
the equally in their male and female children.

If investment is unequal, like, if females
require twice the parental care of males,

you'd expect to see twice as many males
born than females.

Sure, here each male has less chance to pass
on their genes, but they cost half as much

Australian brushtail possum moms, for example,
invest more resources in their daughters,

so when these resources are scarce, they have
more male offspring.

Like everything in biology, there are lots
of weird exceptions to this, but it's amazing

how universal the 50:50 rule actually is.

You see it in species where parents care for
their babies and where they don't, when

You even see it in species where one sex dies
a lot more than the other.

It shows us the incredible power of natural
selection to shape the characteristics of

After all, if love is a battlefield, at least
each side is evenly matched.