Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Hi welcome to mental floss video today we're gonna talk about language

  • everything from Bhutanese to Navi and I'm not kidding about that let's get started.

  • A polyglot is someone who has mastered multiple languages and one

  • famous polyglot is Ziad Fazah who allegedly knows over 50 languages he was

  • born in 1954 in Monrovia, Liberia. According to one source he learned

  • almost all of those languages while he was a teenager picking up three to four

  • every three months. He has since written books about language in, get this,

  • various languages because if ya got it, flaunt it. During the 1990s Fazah's name

  • appeared in the Guinness Book of World Records for the number of languages he

  • knew. That is no longer the case. Back then he apparently knew somewhere

  • between 54 and 56 the number lately some sources claim is up to 59.

  • Just to give you a sense of what that means according to The Economist an

  • english-speaking adult knows the meaning of about thirty thousand words but to be

  • fluent in a foreign language someone might know one-tenth of that. That would

  • give Ziad a vocabulary of like one hundred and seventy seven thousand total

  • words. That's a lot. If you're getting skeptical your instincts are totally

  • correct. Many people started to find holes in Fazah's supposed knowledge

  • over the years. Like the bloggers ardent agnostic noticed that on the back of one

  • of phases books he listed Dzongkha and Bhutanese as languages he knows but

  • those are synonyms so his counting one has to there.

  • But he really got busted on the Chilean show viva el lunes in 1997. People asked him

  • questions in multiple languages he was supposed to know including Finnish,

  • Chinese, and Greek. He answered some incorrectly others got answers in the

  • wrong language. He contends that the TV show tricked him and edited his answers

  • but no matter what it was a disaster. You might be wondering how many languages

  • can one person actually speak. Well, it's complicated. There's not really a good

  • test for this kind of thing except for putting a person on a Chilean talk show.

  • And there are many historical legends of polyglots that now seem unrealistic. One

  • of the more modern examples though is Dr. Kenneth Hale who passed away in 2001.

  • According to his New York Times obituary he'd mastered over 50 languages. What am

  • i doing with my life?!

  • Certain grammar and vocabulary rules can just feel impossible to remember so

  • we're gonna do a quick refresher for you. But it's important to note here that

  • language is constantly changing especially informal language so a lot

  • of these are formal rules that sometimes fade away. But we're gonna talk about

  • that too. All right let's start with who and whom. You should use who when you're

  • talking about the subject of a sentence like in the question "who did this?" who is

  • clearly the subject. And whom is the object of a verb or a preposition so

  • you'd say "for whom do I vote?" or" whom do I vote for?" if you want to end a sentence

  • with a preposition which by the way I think is fine. Also with quantifiers like

  • "all of" or "many of" those should come before whom not who. If you want to check

  • to make sure you're doing this right you should be able to substitute who with he

  • and whom with him or her. But this is a perfect example of a pretty formal rule

  • that doesn't always apply like we don't often say "whom" out loud you're more

  • likely to hear "who" or even "that" but for formal writing you may want to know the

  • difference if only because it's nice to know the rules when breaking them.

  • Moving on, lay or lie. Oh I mean, I still can't do lay or lie. Okay, they're both present tense.

  • You use lay when a *subject* is putting down an object like I the subject lay

  • down my Suicide Squad blu-ray *object* it just isn't as good on DVD you miss some

  • of the details of Harley Quinn's makeup. Lie is when the subject is the thing in the

  • horizontal position like "I just watched Suicide Squad and now I need to lie down

  • to try to process all of the metaphorical resonances." The past tense

  • of lay is laid. The past tense of lie unhelpfully is lay. Then there are the

  • past participles which are respectively laid and lain. Really, it's just cruel.

  • Okay let's move on to "whether" vs "if". This is another one that doesn't apply

  • often in casual language but formally you want to use if when you have a

  • conditional sentence. So that would be something like "Watch Suicide Squad if

  • you want to see the best movie of 2014." What's that? it came out in 2016?

  • Years are so long now! You should use whether when you're trying to state that

  • there are two options like "Kylie didn't know whether Kendall or Kourtney would

  • call but she knew one of them would call because they always do." There are two

  • clear possibilities there. Compare that to "Kylie didn't know if Kendall or

  • Kourtney would call" that sentence leaves three options open.

  • Kendall will call. Kourtney will call. Or neither will call which seems very

  • unlikely. Whether is also often used after prepositions, before infinitive

  • verbs, and to start clauses. The definition of irony has been annoying everyone for

  • years so let's talk about it. There are a few different types of irony but the one

  • that probably gives us the most trouble is situational irony. That's when

  • someone's intended result gets a reversal like a famous example of this

  • is at the end of The Wizard of Oz after a long journey they all learned that

  • they had what they were seeking all along like Dorothy was already able to

  • get home. That is the formal meaning so there are a lot of people who say that

  • irony is not a coincidence or a paradox and that that Alanis Morissette song is

  • full of things that aren't ironic which is the only irony in it. But according to

  • Merriam-Webster people have been using the term imprecisely for almost 100

  • years at least. So using it to mean coincidence isn't necessarily wrong it's

  • just a more modern usage. "That" and "which" is a very controversial one but the AP

  • style guide says to use that for clauses that are essential to the meaning of a

  • sentence and which if the clause is adding more information but isn't

  • essential. Here's how I do it. If I think to myself I would like there to be a

  • comma there I use which and otherwise I use that. An example "Kristen Stewart

  • received an MTV Movie Award comma which she dropped." The which clause is adding

  • information but it isn't changing the meaning. Whereas "All of the MTV Movie

  • Awards that have been dropped are dented" wouldn't be true without the "that have

  • been dropped" part. But that rule isn't super strict either like I would argue

  • that you can also say "Kristen Stewart received an MTV Movie Award that she

  • dropped" if you don't feel like using a comma. I will however defer on this issue

  • to merriam-webster which claims that for non-restrictive clauses you should

  • definitely use which but for restrictive ones you can make a stylistic choice and

  • use either which or that.

  • As thatprevious list showed you language is constantly changing including words so what is the route word needs to take in

  • order to get into the dictionary? After it's coined people start to use the word

  • in conversation as well as writing. Usage spreads from there.

  • Lexicographers are the people paying attention to that proliferation. They're

  • the ones who write and edit dictionaries so a merriam-webster lexicographer will

  • notice words in popular websites books journals and even comic strips.

  • And they're not just looking for new words they're also looking for new spellings

  • and meanings of older words. Oxford English Dictionary's have over 250

  • specialists who do similar research. Their reading program of recruited

  • readers has been around since 1857. My, how has language changed since then.

  • But things are probably a little easier now lexicographers will typically put words

  • into a searchable database alongside the context of how it's being used as well

  • as the source but eventually these huge databases need to get narrowed down into

  • a dictionary length book. That's when some more specific criteria comes in.

  • The three criteria that merriam-webster cites are frequent use, widespread use,

  • and meaningful use. Someone called a definer makes that decision which is

  • then looked over by more high-ranking teammates but after that the word is in!

  • Get me a definer! I got some words I can add to the dictionary! Oxford English

  • used to wait two to three years before putting it in a print dictionary to make

  • sure a word and its meaning were sustainable. Nowadays words and meanings

  • can become really important and well-known even quicker than that.

  • Let's do a quick list of some little-known terms for language related phenomena.

  • An acrolect is a specific type of dialect. it's the most prestigious version of a

  • language or the closest you can get to speaking it in the languages standard.

  • When every letter of an alphabet fits into one sentence or phrase that's a

  • pangram or hollow alphabetic sentence. Pangram came from Greek words meaning

  • all and letter. A lipogram is usually a longer phrase and it's one in which the

  • writer has intentionally left out one or more letters. Ghost words appear in the

  • dictionary but they haven't actually been used or established. Often this is

  • because the people writing the dictionary made a mistake at some point

  • and then it kept getting republished. Crutch words are ones like actually,

  • basically, and like. They're filler words or phrases that we use for emphasis or to

  • give ourselves a little break to figure out the rest of the sentence.

  • Uuuuum, everyone has a favorite. You use a pidgin when you're trying to communicate with

  • someone who doesn't speak the same language as you. It's usually a simple

  • amalgamation of two languages. merriam-webster cites an example from

  • National Geographic "many cats and their human companions seem to develop a

  • pidgin language in order to communicate better." Morphology is a field of study in

  • linguistics. It looks at how words are formed primarily focused on things like

  • inflection and language structure. There's also morphology and biology but

  • that's different. Another subject in linguistics is phonology which is all

  • about how speech and sound are organized in language. And contronyms are words

  • that can mean their exact opposite. Left can mean you're gone or you're the only one remaining.

  • Now knowing all of the complicated facets of the English

  • language maybe you want to create your own. That's what James Cameron enlisted

  • Dr. Paul Frommer to do leading up to the filming of Avatar. Yeah, we're talking

  • about Na'vi. Hey, listen. I just want you to have a game plan in case Mr. Cameron

  • approaches you to invent a language for his next film. You're welcome. Dr. Frommer

  • has a PhD in linguistics and was a professor at University of Southern

  • California. James Cameron wanted him to design an entire language for the

  • characters in his fil.m Cameron had already created about 30 words which

  • Frommer said had kind of a Polynesian vibe. From there Frommer needed to decide

  • on rules for new sounds and phrases in Na'vi. He came up with 1,000 words in the

  • four years he worked on the film's language up to 2009. According to Frommer

  • there are three ways to come up with new vocabulary words. One: make 'em up.

  • Two: take them from other languages which is uncommon in Na'vi. Or Three: combine parts

  • already in the language. The Na'vi word for computer is the words for metallic

  • and brain combined for instance. A couple other distinguishing features of Na'vi:

  • no voiced stops which means no B, D, or hard G. Also the ejectives K, P, and T

  • are each followed by an X. To make that sound you have to basically produce a

  • big breath. And of course because the Na'vi have four fingers per hand their

  • number system is base-8 rather than base ten like ours. I know it is a surprising

  • amount of work for a film that used Papyrus as its

  • subtitle font. As for the future of Na'vi Frommer has said "there's a translation of

  • Hamlet into Klingon so if Na'vi ever achieved anything close

  • to that I'd be absolutely delighted." There are people who are translating the

  • Bible into Na'vi so who knows. Thanks for watching Mental Floss video which is

  • made with the help of all of these nice people. Please subscribe to our channel

  • if you'd like to see more scatterbrained videos and don't forget to be awesome!

Hi welcome to mental floss video today we're gonna talk about language

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

英語やその他の言語について知っておくべきことがすべて!- メンタルフロス散漫 (Everything You Need to Know About English and Other Languages! - Mental Floss Scatterbrained)

  • 111 11
    Samuel に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語