字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント really offsets its pleasure to welcome to the program having impose writer and author I love rise of the warrior cop a radley Balko Radley welcome to the program I'm a quarter tank I'm am so I Radley let's start we give us a little bit %uh vay a historical context when did the the cop start to rise to becoming a a warrior well I think it goes back to the late sixties actually I turned experience in civil unrest a.m. you US I in really the precipitating incident was probably the watts riots 1965 in LA I the headed the the in San inspector at the LAPD I'm about to become is cheap daryl gates I was in charge I'll LAPD's reaction to the rights and he was alarms that I because the department do we have an act that way of responding axes kind so the emergency situation to read lives in the risk I and active shooter is a riot I'll hostage takings no emergency type situation I came up with this idea I to turn the military I military hat the no special forces I schemes that I could respond quickly %ah who are no be highly-trained specialized I anchored years you would use overwhelming force too quickly I defuse a violent situation on so we put together this what this team any color they are Joaquin and he I initially babe responsibility was interesting man actually I did not it's a great partner did not like the idea is that it tried to close to art greeting the line between I the tactical police and the military that week to decide respect than the last I hear whether legal news he took over the gate got the green light to go ahead with this idea after a couple high-profile raid on one on the black panthers one on the and the Liberation Army ever nationally televised and I really can't have propelled this idea joaquim into the popular culture and by the nineteen seventies pretty much every large city in the country I had one we the thing about the seventies knowing that the early the first decade or so what is that they were they were always reserved for the and emergency situations where you're you're using by one to defuse an alright already violent situation and your saving lives better are your risk hospital in the nineteen eighties that we started the biking a converge with the drug war and we started the a massive massive increase and E uses why %uh mostly to serve warrant on people suspected drug crime and no hear you're using violence are you actually creating beilin but there was none before you're not using violence to you know de-escalate something you know and already violent situation I and your YouTube what actually is an investigative tool I'll know we force walking for use with people who know when the processor committing crimes so there's no question about that ill I but by in the 80's 90's & not until today what is overwhelmingly used against people who you're not only a haven't been convicted of any crime I but has have you been charged and the police are still in the evidence-gathering stated their investigation and that's really where nope and most the a my criticism in the book comes I it's not an anti squat worker and by copyright even at look at the policies that really a behind this shift from using what emerges education use in a more proactively and and then as an investigative cool in it seems to me to do that the the Serta the the culture around swat if if you if you can call it that his sort have bled into the the police department I mean I remember in the early eighties I N in in my hometown Massachusetts having some SWAT guy come to our classroom or something and the a the the IDS what was just very it seem compartmentalized that it was a very specific group of police I who on the force who had access to the year and had access to the training and it seems on some level that that that serve comparte the I don't wanna collar firewall but it whatever it was it seems like that wall has sort of maybe in some respects just disappeared totally yeah and I think that's a larger story here that this culture of I'll militarization as let out be on the swat teams I and it really affected I a lot of police departments across the country are more and more widespread way in I mean you know it isn't just the paramilitary tactics but it's also a mindset I'm along with the explosions a the number use a SWAT teams we seen I you know politicians that constantly told police officers at the fight more surprising was on drugs and crime on terrorism I and you know please allow to respond to switch from the traditional police blues what they call BTU's are battle dress uniforms this know they've they've adopted more military look I and yes you can see this in you know the the the way that police officers approached their jobs I if you take a copy for a min you know soldiers clothing and give them soldiers weapons and in a minute soldiers tactic for men and about on the street and tom is fighting a war that's going to have I you know an impact on the way he approaches jobs in the way because the job really interact with the community that he serves to tell us a little bit about what that impact is when the the rubber meets the road because I i think that I think that dynamic I love you know you start dressing someone like a a member the paramilitary organization they're gonna start to feel like they're a member of the paramilitary organization mean what are the implications are that in terms of policing get what I mean in addition to just that you know the explosion in the number swat teams but I i think you know he's getting a lot of I if you get a police discussion board online you know to see a lot of fun iterations that the phrase a base with Becca I'll do whatever have to do to get home safely at night I any luck that is a a battlefield mentality right I'm gonna do whatever I have to do to get home safe I that is not not a far cry from protected protect and serve or keep the peace I'm there is a the police officers are are told every day that their job is I you know extremely dangerous and and getting more dangerous impact I noted certainly important research job in mind the journalist but did the job does not mean not that usually not in the top 15 or 20 most dangerous jobs in the country I in a vacuum it a cup car accident I the odds are they results are being killed murdered on the job about the same as I being murdered by living and most large cities in the US I'll so you know this isn't the no I I diminish the fact that some police officers accident on the job the problem with this is that your the job last year also been a pressure that I'll acid say your with officers substance or 1960 I into the comment is it up with others every day that I you know their job is extremely dangerous in every interaction with the president could be their last I you encourage them to start seeing citizen as blacks and every citizen as a potential threat and person who you know mate people the one who prevent them from going home at night and that really fosters a a are you know an antagonistic relationship again between cops in in the community I'm you see this with other stop snitching movement that kinda bubbled up in a number city and you know what do you think that movement and I understand people who find it you know repugnant the idea that people will cooperate with police even in a murder investigation for example com you don't understand gonna behind it and it's pretty remarkable that there are entire no communities in this country where a residential community I your could be more than they fear the people the police are supposed to be protecting them from and I think we need to look at you know why that is the know you can blame it on the pop culture if you want but I not think there is something more and a fundamentalist a connection that is it goes back to again this shit and releasing them be seen in the last generation or so so was it i mean i i know that you really focus on on the drug war as being sort of the the catalyst or I should say the maybe the fuel that the that was added to the sort of a fire that had bedded begun in terms of creating swat teams I just outlined for us sort of how that other drug war evolved in what up what laws that came in that sorta followed I guess on a parallel track or maybe I am a one that should have drove this the this change in police culture yet you know the good word again in the next administration and when he declared war on drugs I'll by you know the address what but what phenomenon was basically trip being born same time but is it a bit easier to transfer repair love one another throughout the nineteen seventy I nixon you know did have out is like no not grade I but it was applied to you I corner out across basic up to our you know I in street clothes or and no contorted uniform is once wattenberg in the israeli early on it was really going the reagan administration every the be used for our team for drug raid take often other couple reasons for that one is a Iranian really kinda blurred the line between police and military know by the National Guard to start writing the drug war at one point even tried to bring active-duty troops and start conducting searches and making arrests I'm I will one few bad idea accident at didn't become policy I do in nineteen eighties but know he created these joint we joint task force's that I encourage cooperation between the military and police in domestically of the drug interdiction efforts I and then certainly make I military equipment available we apartment across the country and the you know this is a policy that continued ever since then what we've seen is literally millions of people agreement that was designed for use on a battlefield I has been given to you domestic release for use on American streets and American neighborhoods and against American citizen you were talking paying and our personnel carriers and helicopters & Gun bayonet I and you know this is I this has been going on for you know 30 five years now there's never really been any no public debate over public discussion about whether it's appropriate are building the that reagan began has continued ever sent to be created the inside federal anti-drug grant and you know we have a history in this country of a determining criminal justice law enforcement power Libya the local official side they now decide what laws are could be a priority in I didn't know enforce laws in a way to reflect community standards and community values and any expectation and I really be unacceptable we saw during reagan & again a container centers are more heavily federal influence on in I in local policing and pick the weather gonna sit through this grant I'm and even tho governments are taking you free money available to police department Arbor catches you know our are rules are a requirement that you nor is get this money your record and more drug police they were or the score these grants are only going to go a toward drug policing ok you it makes every drug rafter complicated how much a I minimal corneal ulcer drugs in order to get these grand now no drug we can become a much higher priority so you got other year that you got for free I this artist walking million people lucky man reserved for in wafer wanna be emergency type situation but you know that at quite interpreted for I or you could certainly use walking out on drug raids now and there's all this money that comes with that and and I just watching Black Star generate revenue for the police department up to what a difficult decision after logically second the missus really happy she's walking object to be routinely use I to serve drug weren't our search warrants in drug cases talk to talk about how I these these drug cases can actually generate revenue for a police department we gonna get the federal grants that I mention that but only got a good goalie at the represents walking out to arrest murder a suspected murder others no federal money that comes with that is an obstacle the to gray you know a couple people suspected of dealing or I you know smoking pot a enter make the arrest obvious federal money that that is attached to that cabinet also asset forfeiture I which is the out the civil at for Twitter which says that know if you rate a place and you can make even a loose connection between any kasher no car how and any kind of drug activity the police and then feat that property I and it's up to the properties all turn out to crew that they are on the property legitimately and basically a prove a negative I and you know you but but property owner actually never even need to be charged with a crime and the police are able to the owner can't prove they are legitimately and everything about something you all did your at the PRU you bought them a Roman legitimately are difficult that would be I the push for me to keep it and ready to go back to the park and this is almost always tried to Truckee there are some other crime but property comes with a smoke the drug cases again there's another incentive you know and a SWAT team out on these programs in how much also I am did the did sort of the a war on terror add to this because it seems to me that there was just a tremendous amount of money that was earmarked for a for homeland security as it were which a he again it's one of those situations where win what's interesting is that mean is this money a necessarily earmarked to the to buy equipment or is it is it up to the discretion of police departments as to whether or not they can simply add a couple love I love police officers I mean I know that I Indu give clinton some praise in the book for I the community pre policing programs adnan and and rightfully criticism for for other aspects that I he expanded under under under his presidency but how much discretion particularly when it comes all this terrorism funds is there for the police department's to say hire another cop as opposed to getting a an armored personnel carrier what we're talking about a couple them programs here and the community policing program that started during economist racin I'm you're crazy in print the program the book but actually it's a fact was was fairly pernicious I and you touched on the problem which is that there's no oversight with these grant how the gift ban want to check leave other federal government I is up to the individual Chris Carman and so look at community policing is this idea to capture the space in our communities and guess what beacon I and you know that be apart the communities that they serve and creditors know kinda occupying force basically and it's a good time and place a a more effective I better approach to policing the problem is again a there was no oversight and so a couple other investigations actually found that from Greece a computer taking the money for community policing and you think that sucks watching I would just for be peri-operative community policing I in fact I a criminologist up to cracka the criminologist at the Eastern Kentucky University the conservative Police Department connector tunnel at least I sheriffs and police chiefs actually considered swat teams and more active what seems a part of the community policing strategy I which is not at all the intent the gramm or no the Quinn administration on the started it because the other problems with the oversight I you talk about the attack Sarah grant and because what we see after September 11 PC the departmental Department of Homeland Security start contact enemies checks out to police departments across the country art by military year again you know somebody's some the grants are a some of them are earmarked specifically I for people to hire more cops 30 its report security I but what we are seeing is a lot of these grants are going specifically could buy military-type here I armored personnel carriers for example or no out I more powerful weapons and guns and weapons prickly agencies and you're probably regret if you go back to the pentagon program can get away that well equipment that already existed you know sitting in a warehouse where I'm thx grant for going to buy new equipment between I they've given rise to a cottage industry now that has sprung up artist for basically just to cash the CHS grand I and produce this new battle great equipment on C you got this industry now that is wholly reliant on the Graham and you know NL inevitably how they're gonna spoken a lobbying office in DC Inc lobby to make sure that these programs continue and expand I and you know it's all gonna syrup heartbeat of itself I and now you've created what you might call a cleese industrial complex little little brother the military about doctor complex kinda in the murder that scary thing about that is you know once that are in place in the end up in rolling it can be really difficult to I trolling it is back it so well i mean i i don't wanna jump to head cuz I wanna talk about what the implications are for this I mean immunity you know and i know i don't want to say that well I mean the question here is is then could this this move in with him what is problematic about the the sort of the police setting themselves up in a a much more adversarial role but to the community then they should and I think we can see that I mean it seems to me that we can see that manifested in a couple areas a minute you know you know a program like stop and frisk at least how it's been a implemented in New York would you see that as something that has emanated out I love the the culture that has grown up around I A that is an offshoot of this culture that has grown up around policing sure yeah and you know I me know par problem there too did you have these police officers who are from outside the community coming into these communities usually no you need the color I and know basically harassing people nurses in an article today about a guy who had been stopping stop on first over 50 time I and never action and charged with a crime can't you just look suspicious I so yeah I mean I think that is part of the other going to stop the presses also it at heart but gun control program I so it the it it players I think to progressive misguided progressive ideas on on law and order as well as conservative ideas law-and-order I and I definitely think that that that that are evident you know it it creates a very antagonistic relationship between police incident and I mean you know it's very hard to stop and frisk is this idea that you know everybody is a potential threat anybody to be carrying a gun there for the police should be stopping in searching anyone looks the least bit suspicious that I you know New Yorker your Bloomberg and Kelly would argue that maybe York safe a I don't know you know crime has dropped across the country over the same period including that he's been didn't you stop and frisk so on the idea that that's behind in their crime drop I think you know I'm quite look it up a lot of other other evidence how much you see I mean we we also have been particularly in New York put a but I imagine is well across the country a convergence a love a.m. have sort of the the the national security state in terms of spying particularly at the New Yorker Police Department working hand in hand with the have enough I could call this guy CIA liaison he was sort of polling to two paychecks as simultaneously but we know the stories I love the New York Police Department spying on a Muslim students throughout the Northeast and the in beyond I'm where you fit that in to the your your your thesis year one man you know the government does have a a national security is a legitimate function on the government operate ethically neatly very careful love what's going on here i mean no telling that right at remember right after the September 11 attacks are the following: February during the Super Bowl %uh the White House a the opposite National Drug Control Policy air this commercial the basic that big attempted hi casual drug use I do I terrorism I and this was a very I you know me in the the completely intentional I and know if you can the government right off the bat was trying to type the drug war to the war on terror across because terrorism a good thing the people most creative at the time i'ma three senior kinda complacent the two issues a now ever since their BBC in washington Post book on long series on a kind as to on you how r are are anti drug interdiction efforts in Afghanistan are a army in the war on terror victims were worsening soldiers out there to burn I opium fields while you know farmers watches to US troops that their livelihood aflame I in it you know hurting our relations over there concerning our ability is actually fine terrorist I'm see the know all across public policy I'm the I'll the well I just because an essay stuff coming to pick up Elise yeah we found that we learn that the DEA I was trying to get its hands on all this and that they did and ordered lunch truck investigations got to be very careful about the company in a few that and I'm I have water problems with the the the NYPD spying programs and the CIA inculcation all that but I you know you have to do you support that as a and legitimate function government I it very very quickly become bleed over into a more routine orkut law enforcement I so did I think initially wary about what's going on but don't they could also we should I understand that once government that the circle powers even if it in the context of limiting its national security it isn't long before find other expenses as well and in one of those examples I think I've that that lead to is the the the response to the Occupy movements at least in in in New York and certainly other cities across the country you've got I am met a just should have E the the I mean I think people can remember this site a love sort of these robocop a cops a you know storming eighty a public park as it were I am in and I imagine that's also a part of what is problematic is that again there if this is bleeding over right i mean it's a mission creep in some respects yeah in this is another a separate narrative that go through the book is buttressed by the way government response protest and goes back to the Occupy other side and back by the TTL protest Seattle in 1999 in the way the city responded to those protests which was know the city basically came out expecting computation you know the cops came out in their I problem copper dark better care however you wanna call whatever you want to call it %ah and I interviewed the chief a a police in Seattle a kind on Stamper in the book I and you know he got know it was better to be over-prepared and prepare for computation band to regret not being prepared I into something is right but you know a there's a better way to handle that and I also interviewed Jerry Wilson which she can be seen early seventies intern occurred a lot of civil unrest country between DC and did a very different approach a will that you know he was always quick is uniformed cops on the front line the guys in a traditional college Blues in fact he would come back a lot on frontline I and knows that you have the right school had ready and yet to be repaired he said he would put them on buses and pokémon on side streets I his approach weather is lot he was again if you go into a protest expecting computation that's what you're going to get i'm ok we show up dressed like at I both they and the protesters are starting from a point a you know something bad is about to happen I and distemper to his credit today as his response to those protests data was the biggest mistake of his career I could he said he see now that has become the template but that's how every city not respond the protest I he after that a broken heart that he was know he himself was responsible for that I and knowing the the inherent irony here is that I you know the the more important the event I you know the more influential be I decision-makers more consequential decisions they're going to be making I the more likely it is that the protesters are going to be put as far away from you and as possible and that in a lot pretty much the opposite of what the person I'm a supposed to be all about you know it's got to be about I being able to be heard and being able to I have your complaint I you know heard by the people who are making the decision we can do it you know this way we respond process is seems to be incorrect contravention a no evidence person and because be about wilson's an interesting character because he also I he also resisted the the the know knock I am from raids as well right i mean pride heey not E go ahead but yes although the party that nixon this is one nixon through our pet policies that he pushed through a in 1970 and know this team the interesting thing about tonight great is that it wasn't something that police chiefs were clamoring for more than a criminologist were saying we should have I did this with the idea of a 28-year-old Senate staffer I who was looking for issues that nixon could use in the sixty eight campaign to basically exploit suburban wat fears about black urban crock I so they came up with this idea well you know we should captured should be able to no breakdown people's doors without knocking when occur suspected drug crime them we made it tough on them in and the nixon persist through and they were to build one apply to federal narcotics officers across the country the other applied I just DC congress has jurisdiction over around Washington DC just the drug police in DC and Wilson a didn't want it he said you know we don't need this week I its intrusive it it violates no civil rights a civil liberties and it's just not necessary you know we can drug policing without are you know people toward middle the night I'm interesting thing is that I you know a lot of other states have no not bill similar to the nixon bill and across the federal agents were using it left and right across the country %uh in DC refuse and and crime actually went down in the sea I while mexico's president while another and the rest of the country now you know I don't I don't think I Jerry Martin's refusal to use no not great is the reason why crime in downtown DC operate I think it the more broadly his approach to policing which is more community oriented approach where he had copped out walking be he the stroke to recruit police officers from within the city for that you know that work people who were part of the community they were policing grew up in those communities I really seem to you know to have an effect the other extreme thing about the no not bills is that the federal bill happened as I said your federal narcotics officers were written down doors left and right after school ask I but there are a few cases where they got the wrong house I became national news and the New York Times investigation AP did investigation and they found actually dozens and dozens of these instances where we federal narc had knock down the wrong door great how about a warrant your terrorize people there are a few deft I and really a fascinating thing happened to the congress held hearings may brought in the victim to these rates have to cry and actually repeal both laws at night it happen other law the federal government liable for any botched you know raid on the run how I and know their it was the time show that no your gonna I did nixon drug war in and all it is I country humanizing year drug offenders that congress will still capable shame and about not being able to reflecting decide that maybe this particular party has gone too far I'm not great within and then comes back in the nineteen eighties with a vengeance and we are we seeing hundreds and hundreds of these no not rate on our house and innocent people getting killed and in congress hasn't given it a second thought and know that a little blip in it reelected really surprised when I found in my research I had no idea that happened yeah I mean is this meet ultimately is this story because we also have I think over that time as well over the past 30 years the Supreme Court sort of loosening the restrictions on I am on the the requirements for flipper for texting civil liberties particularly in terms of well in addition I wish to say in terms OVA of police work I mean so from do we have you know these I think there is a natural tendency i mean going back I in another life I was in a situation where I played a cop on the streets of New York and I was wearing the uniform for a week on the streets of New York City I basically without much oversight it and I'll tell you when I it it certainly dramatically changed my attitude I was I found myself my jaywalking in stopping our cars in Kalin bike messengers to get off the street i mean I can only imagine when you I have that IMEI I think back to that time and how how radically it changed my perspective on I'm just what was happening around me and interviews that I did with police officers in the run-up to the RNC in 2004 in New York City and they were being told that this was gonna be like Seattle Times 10 and they were gonna be a anarchists in here with and is a and they were really should have worked up into a fervor above like this is gonna be a Warn we've got to get into these trenches so on one hand we have I think a culture that is susceptible to this type of thing I we've had programs that have sort of played into their culture but you've cited examples of times where I we seen federal government pulled back on that d what what is the solution here to this I mean how do we redirect I am police departments around the country from being certif ok cause I military or outfits to going back to a a a a more integrated sensor up their role in the community well I that's the million-dollar question I guess um you know I think there are number a a specific policies that we could repeal that would help and one is you know these giveaway that military equipment checks to buy more military equipment the incentives to federal grants because strictly toward drug policing I and your let's go back to leading crime be crime policy be decided on a more local level about all these Inc onto an intranet I'll you know I think what you find is that lease with the devote a lot more time to solving crimes with you know actual victim band concert no crimes were every whatever all the parties concerned like a drug crime for example I'm let me but let me ask a lot in terms of like the locality I mean you've you know we have we it seems to me that we have I am localities that could go one way or another I mean you cite Wilson in his policing as being radically different than a guy like gates let's say some yeah is it it came what could we also just say you know one instead of giving you these funds for are buying new gear we're gonna give you these funds to adding I am cops to your force and so you can feel the security of having numbers on some level doesn't actually have to be in terms of firepower yeah I i mean i think the problem about with with the federal grant so the money is fungible and now you can get the car a low-carbon money to hire more cops and then they can you know they can take whatever money they were going to use our cops I and move that to yeah more aggressive policing I you know I I do see your point about at night ahead you know I don't think we can completely leave out the up to local level I think no I i between a very robust I civil rights division within the party the justice and I think I think I think local police initially should be able to dictate no while economic priority and you know what strategy policing strategies are going to use I that said yeah that's practical civil rights Liberty I think now I think the problem just let me to do that Obama's been a little better than bush America like stop it could be a lot better and I think that should be Leslie priority just bomb making sure that Police Department and actually and prosecutors that matter are protecting are observing how people civil rights and civil liberties and and not abusing them I'm when I mean that in terms of a specific a policies or you can just kinda attitude changes I in general the between a yes please you need to be more precise and know kinda a kicking ass and taking names asks him to be de-emphasized I'll get on the book review: look at police recruiting video video that conducted high schools and colleges the to get new cops I you know the images aren't typically cops you know we're telling our helicopters and tackling people and kicking down doors and shooting at people and you know that's the very first step in the process your I mean this is I you are appealing to people who look at those images and think that's what I want to do every day I course know that not want cock should be doing everyday I you know that that the after completing a much more a that we won every size are much more mundane and secure you go back to because I school be back between with a high school with who you know what find a job involving those activities appealing I you know most accurate decided that one of the last people you want to become a police officer %uh no real idea for putting up w talk about the the power you felt when you're a cop I in New York I mean I was actually not good at playing a cop but the hague away when you're playing a character whiny at the venom a more powerful testament to that mean if you look at the Stanford Prison Experiment example where pingback: seventies the professor no got a random group didn't fun one to be prison guard military prisoners in ended up having the spending experiment after just a few days because the guard started using the prisoners actually he played the role the warden me down even himself you know taking a very antagonistic you toward the prisoners new for completely randomly assigned role argue that the program experience experiments where is on fears rested minister-elect electric shocks the people are and no they weren't actually shocked that they were actors on the other and were no screaming in agony I am taiwan tears were told to keep giving the shock may continue to give them I mean this you know these companies should be taught a police academy clinically result does need to be aware a what that kinda power in duty or psychology and and the way that you view other people I and I think too often we you know we emphasize the quite that lease office space we emphasize they are I you know the dangers of the job but we don't I we don't teach enough two police officers about what that kinda our can do to you emotionally and it's your psychology I let me know appears to be taught at least on me that I could it be you know retired I often I I because few months ago and 12 the guy who teaches a use-of-force classes the police agencies across the country and he said what denise brown and class 10 to 15 years that I was really disturbing that I lotteries courses not what it is but that he's observer they don't talk so much I there's very little and this isn't the escalation now as a Realtor on you know how to talk your way out our talk somebody down because know a lot of these classes now focus on how to justify whatever force you after you've used it %uh basically how to write a police report that no exonerate you for whatever course you just you I left really kinda telling I mean that that that we've gone know that even the training has gone away from preventing police file and to finding ways to justify it after the fact I into this is Alton larger cultural stuff that I think be chained and that's a very difficult thing to do but natty again it starts with policy and it starts with a no electing public officials who understand these things and that you know we're going to implement policies that not emphasize the right aspect for police work the in the end in this maybe I mean I think you know this may be where you serve the the ideological perspectives on which we we approach this serve diverge on some level because you know a.m. I mean I it seems to me counting on police departments around the the country on their own are with the hopes that in each of those police departments that we find in each locality are going to have this level love I love me maybe it's too the grandioso worded saying enlightenment seems to me far more far-fetched then simply saying on a a federal level if we can incentivize people to buy more gear by giving them money and setting up a system with incentives to do this I mean you say that you know that the that federal funding is fungible but that means that that on the local level they're making the decision to to make it that fungible it seems to me there's gotta be aid mechanism coming out of congress and a where we can have a ATA a focal point of saying any broader sense that culturally speaking we won a different culture of police work in this country and then incentivizing in providing the funds to a to gear training towards that to gear to a hiring in expenditures on a local level in that manner I mean obviously the you not gonna have the feds run every police department but if if the federal government can incentivize the through the drug war in through anti-terrorism policies too much sir dove buffing up love these police departments it seems they could also do the reverse yeah well in theory they could but I i mean if you look at a I mean who in congress is going to stand up and say we should give our police department less money to fight the war on terror or to fight the war on drugs i mean no i i put on the book that not at the federal level and it's been a bipartisan rush to insanity and both parties are are guilty of trying to outdo one another I can't say whether is actually some concern in action going on politically it at the state level pml-n just for state and country to pass case what transparency build if we make call the police to least agencies I have a SWAT team stayed issue these reports were very detailed reports on how often they use this watching what purpose and whether shots were fired in so for them we're seeing others a bill Michigan Legislature the campaign after the film a under are a couple artist the new to other going against a bill that will go in part an actual attempt to put the restrictions on the use of the SWAT teams I'm so I mean I think you know that at the more I read the more local level people are more politicians are more accountable to I'll you how people steel about their police departments think it you know when you book your Congressman your voting for I you don't they keep I think most of us know farrakhan ballpark member congress thinking that that's going to affect how are police our local police officers be okay for actual how to prioritize lot I think it's usually be we consider that a much more local issue certainly congress clinton did pretty well I really mean from a political standpoint run for president on their community policing whether or not it actually I was executed in the way that it was sold to us but I mean from a political standpoint I mean I agree obviously a you know one doesn't necessarily have to operate to the exclusion I love above the other in you know in but think about anything but the community policing thing was not mean the reason why I was popular with even you know very far left progressive politicians is not because it was me including my getting it an anecdote that illustrate this point I I actually a I just taken the form on capitol hill that was sponsored by a congressman Bobby Scott shortly after that democrats to cover congress in as sometime in mid-2010 from the exact year but forgive my you must feel on please militarization and I you at the time the bush administration was actually trying to phase out the COPS program I'm not you know because they're cared about militarization but just you know they were they were trying to say that a lot of programs I and you know I testified about you know to the so I talked about the militarization problem during the Q&A I someone asked about the COPS program and I think we should no refund it because communicating with a great idea I and no I said you're right it is a great idea but I pointed out that because there were no restrictions on how these cops grants for use but me out the agencies across the country were using starts walking congressman Scott chairman of the crime subcommittee said are you telling me that our community policing Grantsburg are being used to start walking and I said yesterday said the concert not well-intended all we all had a good laugh about how ridiculous that was I'm yeah six months later as Scott presents his budget proposal to the leadership which makes it into the base with the house democrats budget I and a brief under the COPS program at 100 percent level that it was during the Clinton administration with no restrictions on how to grant could be used by local police department so you know it's not as if they didn't know I but you know when it comes right down to it I Republican or Democrat every politician bikes because out that press release saying you know I just secured five hundred thousand dollars in federal money heart our local euros in goodwill I and if you're the one who stands up and says you know I a week but I refuse to result but there's no way I'm going to let them spend it on a SWAT team or I'm not gonna let them use it to buy I'm more high-powered weapons know congressman do that love the be adulation a yes from securing the granted nobody wants to look I mean republicans wanna be law and order party now the democrats are I you know due to the police union so there's really no political sign up for either other to party at a national level the noted click implementing these reforms are to talk about out they couldn't make onto or I just lastly when you see the announcement by a holder yesterday regarding mandatory the minimum sentencing for for nonviolent drug users I mean in granted we're not talking about a huge cohort of people the most I think the the vast majority of people who go to jail under these offenses are are I'd doing so under and state lies opposed federal but is this the type to think that we need to see happen in terms of changing the culture that so that maybe we get to the point where a politician see some value in saying we're sending this money a back to the district but we're also gonna make sure its restricted in in how it can be used what I think so to accept that we are going to get these grants then yes we need to put restrictions on other years and at speculation still mean want to talk about the book is you can't really talk about whether police shooting like officer police officers firing the gun the people have gone up or down because even other stuff federal requirement that every PC that day there it's just not in force nobody nobody's made the effort to actually enforce the requirement I and you know everybody thinks in the country get federal money in some way or another in there there's no reason why we can't hey if you're gonna take this money you have to be more accountable and transparent yep together let us know how your swatching let us know how many times your results fire their guns and no honey and bee document had I'll you know that should be here yeah I agree and I think we probably disagree on whether these don't want to be going out at all because the PR yeah I think we should attacks I restrictions on out to you to make sure that unit to accept the weekend i used in the right way and that I'm you know that that they begins going to keep apartment more transparent accountability accountable I'm not a good thing are you encouraged by I am by holder's announcement I mean at least in terms of love if not for its immediate practical facts but at least in terms of maybe this assertive 30 some-odd forty-some odd year now I am a drug war is adding to see some disintegration I think I'm more encouraged by the symbolism than the practical effect I mean you know the idea that but the Attorney General can get up and pray other than the older said this week I is encouraging undersecretaries I've talk to say that there's not going to be a the actual practical effect in terms of you're using the the a population incarcerated people or you really reducing the way mandatory minimums are used are changing as to where the years but just to the extent that can happen other that turns out to get up and say that no other immediate no political backlash I is encouraging and also listen i even on the right you're seeing a lot of movement toward your reform in recognizing the problems that mass incarceration I a group like right on crime which I you know a lot of through marquee conservative names are finally starting to say a no better we've gone too far underwritten personally think I'll me think that discussion is right person change unfortunately most the people who are making noises at places like that how to block this where they can do so you know what I and political without will to political statement but I think you know there's a lesson about your listeners who are concerned about the stuff I would say that that that there has to be I mean politicians are not going to I most part voluntarily come out for reform in say that no our police have too much power I they're only gonna start to to now moves to these changes yes it becomes a political liability for them not to %uh say that you know you know political content all no correctly on marijuana a you know healthy majority country now supports legalizing marijuana not such as medically but outward I by know congress I think it's like I 45 percent I not because there's you know they're still the sense that there's a lot of political risk in coming out to legalize I and there's they don't really see any liability just keeping quiet about it some people until people start you know voting on these issues and you know writing your congressman saying you know why you you should be using no war terms they're talking about leaving our community until this they feel like there's actual supply ability: to them I propping up the status quo in in keeping the way they've been going I think it can be difficult to persuade any politicians to change them are these are known for their a courage political courage for the most part right now I think it's rare but sadly it's a it's only politicians they can really rain in their police forces yeah that's where a word whether response I mean that's what's going on with the changes in common and that's what have we got here and I I'm like the book The and it's not an anti couple to condemn if anything it's an anti-politician book i mean they're really going to cut the policies that got us here radley Balko I the book is rising the warrior koppel put a link on now majority .fm thanks so much for your time today
B1 中級 米 戦士コップ」の台頭(ラドリー・バルコとの共演 (Rise of the "Warrior Cop" (with Radley Balko)) 306 12 黃柏堯 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語