Name: ケインズの経済学の無知についてのハイエック (Hayek on Keynes's Ignorance of Economics)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T04:30:31.000Z
Duration: 5 min 7 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

未来形

how do you think he will rank in the history of economic theory or thought

過去形

as a man with a great many ideas who knew very little economics

see he knew nothing but Marshallian economics

he was completely unaware of what was going on elseware

he even knew very little about nineteenth century economic history his

interests were very largely guided by aesthetic appeal

even about its scientific literature he was a really great expert on the

that you say that John Maynard Keynes really did not know the economic literature

even within the English tradition he did know very little of the

great monetary writers of the nineteenth century

he would know nothing about Henry Thornton

he knew a little about Ricardo of course the famous things but

he could have found any number of antecedents of his

inflationary ideas in the 1820's and 1830's

and when I told him about it it was all new to him

was he sheepish?                                             oh no not in the least

he was much too self assured                       and amused?

what other people could have said about the subject was not frightfully important

at the end well not in the end there was a period just after he had written the General Theory where

he was so convinced he had re-done the whole science

that he was rather contemptuous of anything which had been done before

and did he maintain that confidence to the end

I can't say because I said before we'd almost stopped talking economics

his general history of ideas and so on we were

I don't want you to get the impression that I underestimated him

as a brain he was one of the most intelligent and most original

but economics was just a sideline for him

but economics was not really his main interest- well his own economics

was he was convinced he could recreate the subject

Two Kinds of Minds you wrote in Encounter some years ago

well curiously enough I would say Keynes was rather my type of mind

he is certainly could not have been described as a master of his subject

contained everything one needs to know about the subject

arrogance of Cambridge economics about and they thought they were the centre of

the world and if you have learned Cambridge economics there is nothing else worth learning

I'm interested in your earlier comment about the fact

that here is a man of immense intelligence

and yet was not an economist and i'm not clear whether you mean

he didn't have the kind of mind that excels in economics just as

mathematics say you can find people who are brilliant but who given mathematics

but do you mean he didn't have the kind of mind that makes for first rate

oh he had I mean if he had given his whole mind

he had never thought about the theory of capital

he was very shaky even on the theory of  of international trade

he was well informed on contemporary monetary theory but even there

he did not know such things as Henry Thornton or Wicksell

and of course his great effect was he did not read any foreign language except french

the whole german literature was inaccessible to him

he did curiously enough review Mises book on money but

later admitting that in german he could only understand what he knew already

what he had known before he read the book

字幕リスト動画再生

ケインズの経済学の無知についてのハイエック (Hayek on Keynes's Ignorance of Economics)

literally

absolutely

period

encounter