Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • The problem I see with online dating is that it always automatically involves this aspect

  • of self-commodification or self-manipulation. When you date online you have to present yourself

  • there in a certain way putting forward certain qualities. You present an image of yourself.

  • You focus on your ideal of how other people should perceive you. But I think that’s

  • not how love functions even at the very simple level. And so called I think the English term

  • is endearing foibles, elementary ingredient on love. You cannot ever fall in love with

  • the perfect person. There must be some tiny small disturbing element and it is only through

  • noticing this element that you say but in spite of that imperfection I love him or her.

  • This is why a funny story. They made in Europe, not in the United States some decades ago

  • when the two big modeling stars were Claudia Schiffer and Cindy Crawford. They made in

  • France I think a big opinion poll like whom would you prefer to live with. Cindy Crawford

  • won. You know why? Because of that birth, that particular small mole here, whatever,

  • birthmark.

  • The idea was Claudia Schiffer is too perfect. There must be some tiny element of imperfection.

  • And now let me tell you a totally crazy personal experience which happened to me. I was talking

  • once in a faraway country somewhere in Latin America. Of course I will not say where. A

  • still very attractive lady sexually, late thirties, who told me of a strange thing that

  • happened to her. She told me that when her last lover saw her naked before making love

  • that he told her if you were just to lose three, four pounds your body would have been

  • perfect. And I told her just don’t lost three or four pounds. Because, you know, like

  • if she were effectively to lost three or four pounds she wouldn’t be perfect. She would

  • just be plain. The illusion of perfection is created precisely by this excess. It’s

  • too much but then you imagine or without this it would have been perfect. If you sayif

  • you take away this excess you don’t get perfect, you know. This is what in psychoanalytic

  • theory we call object cause of desire. Not object of desire, object of desire I think

  • in this case is a woman or a man or whatever. But the cause of desire in the sense of what

  • makes you fall in love is always a sign of imperfection. So that’s for me a big problem

  • in I don’t, I’m not doing it so I don’t know enough of it how to include into online

  • dating this element of contingency.

  • I don’t find a problem with online dating in the idea that you are not spontaneous,

  • et cetera. Listen, we are never spontaneous. If there is a big lesson of all those Big

  • Brother and other reality shows it’s that even when we are just ourselves in private

  • life we always play being ourselves. And I think this is in a way a good thing. I mean

  • when people say no, you know, all these actor studio methodologyexpress yourself, be

  • who you really are. Well I think most people are monsters secretly. I think – I like

  • to live in a society where you do whatever you want. Just please don’t express yourself

  • too much, you know. I like people who know how to control themselves. I believe in proper

  • manners. So this aspect of health controlling that you stage a certain image of yourself,

  • this doesn’t bother me with online date, no. I even think now, I mean, if you allow

  • me to conclude with another paradox. It would be so interesting to demonstrate how precisely

  • when we act in an apparently wild way, you know, like let’s sayit’s not true

  • but let’s say we are talking in a nice polite way. Then for whatever reason you get mad

  • at me or I get mad at you. And I explode.

  • I start to swear using all dirty words blah, blah, blah. Now one would have thought the

  • this one. In normal conversation we control ourselves. Then when I cannot any longer control

  • myself I explode. No, I claim precisely this moment of explosion are the most precisely

  • trained structures artificial if you want. I notice this, you know how it’s a beautiful

  • anecdote, I like it. With my friends I notice that when we meet in a group to discuss just

  • to have fun we have to go through a certain ritual of humiliating each other with extremely

  • it’s not for our viewers to know if you know like the usual way we characterize

  • its other which what I – it’s the bulk of stuff what I will do to your mother, your

  • dead mother, I will dig her out of her grave and do things to her sexually. The most tasteless

  • thing. Then after ten minutes of talking dirty we tell to each other okay, we paid our tribute

  • to ugliness. We got rid of it. Now we can finally be what we are and talk in a nice

  • polite way, you know. Again, what I like is that it iswe have a certain perverse

  • superego duty to talk dirty. And after you get rid of that we can believe what we are.

  • This is why I have always. That’s why I’m not practicing for sadomasochist sexuality.

  • I notice especially 15, 20 years ago because they were close to my theory I met many sadomasicist

  • lesbians. And I can tell you I never met nicer, more kind girls or women. It is as if they

  • were able to enact all the dirty disgusting stuff out there so that then they could afford

  • when you paid your tribute to your superego to be nice, kind and so on and so on. So to

  • do the lust joke in this series maybe some viewers know it but I love it. I think this

  • is one of my otherwise in my series of boring repetitive jokes may be a better one. Where

  • are we today with sexuality. The Guardian, the British newspaper, asked me is romance

  • still alive today. And my idea, my answer to them was let’s imagine an ideal sexual

  • situation today. Let’s say I meet a lady, we are attracted to each other, we say okay,

  • you areall the usual stuffyour place, my place, whatever we meet there. Then what

  • happens then. I come with, she comes with her plastic penis electric dildo. I come with

  • some horrible thing. I saw it. It’s called something like stimulating training unit,

  • whatever. It’s basically a plastic vagina, a hole. But you canit’s wonderful technologically.

  • You can regulate everything. How much it squeezes you. How strongly it shakes and so on. So

  • my idea of a perfect date is the following one.

  • We met. Then I put, she puts her plastic penis dildo into my stimulating training unit is

  • the name of this product. Into my plastic vagina. We plug them in and the machines are

  • doing it for us. Theyre buzzing in the background and I’m free to do whatever I

  • want and she. We have a nice talk, we have tea, we talk about movies. What can bewe

  • paid our superego full tribute. Machines are doingnow where would have been here a

  • true romance. Let’s say I talk with a lady with the lady because we really like each

  • other. And, you know, when I’m pouring her tea or she to me quite by chance our hands

  • touch. We go on touching. Maybe we even end up in bed. But it’s not the usual oppressive

  • sex where you worry about performance. No, all that is taken care of by the stupid machines.

  • That would be ideal sex for me today.

The problem I see with online dating is that it always automatically involves this aspect

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

スラヴォイ・ジジェック、合成セックスと「自分自身であること」について (Slavoj Žižek on Synthetic Sex and "Being Yourself")

  • 56 5
    VoiceTube に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語