Name: キヤノン6Dレビュー1年以上のハンズオン (Canon 6D Review 1+ Year of Hands-on)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T05:57:00.000Z
Duration: 20 min 53 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

基礎受動態

Hi, welcome to the Canon 6D review. About a year ago the Canon 6D was announced by Canon

as the lightest, smallest full-frame SLR in the world. So, as a landscape

程度の副詞

and travel photographer this really intrigued me and I bought one of

the first copies to ship. So this review is not going to be based on marketing sheets

or data sheets or anything like that. This is going to be based on hands-on

experience with the camera. I'm really excited to be doing this review

now after having used the camera for the last year and I've put on about 50,000 shutter

actuations, so it's gotten some good use into it in the first year. So

in this review we're going to take a look at my experience with the

camera and we're going to take a look at all the good things, the bad things, and all the

Landscape photography is a very unforgiving avenue when it comes to the conditions that

equipment has to endure - saltwater, salt flats, high mountains, hail,

rain, sleet, sand, snow, saltwater - these are all conditions that the

Canon 6D has been subjected to, fortunately and unfortunately, in the past year of use.

So, when first holding the Canon 6D for the first time, the lightness and the smallness

is really noticeable. In fact, if you're used to using a Canon 5D or

a Nikon D3 or a Nikon D700 or a D800 or something like that, in that

range, this thing is really, really light. For durability, I'd say it's extremely impact

and extremely pressure resistant. So the internal frame of this camera

is, of course, metal and the back and the front plates are metal just

like the 5D family bodies. But, the top case is actually a polycarbonate reinforced fiberglass

material. Now, this is different than any material that Canon

has put out in its full frame bodies in the past, and the reason that Canon

selected to use this material is due to the WiFi and the GPS, to allow it to permit it

through the material. The durability and the design - really nice. Ergonomics

of this camera are really good, but it is slightly smaller in

physical size. So, if you can fit all four of your fingers on the camera grip of the

5D original, 5D Mark II, 5D Mark III, you can still do that on this one, but

for people who have big hands, you might not and your pinky might

I had some doubts about the top-case material which is made of polycarbonate reinforced

fiberglass, but after having gotten it, you know, in the field and actually

getting some really good use on it, it actually performs very well.

Actually, it performs, in my opinion, just as well the magnesium alloy found in the 5D

Canon implemented a new sensor in the 6D and the pixel level detail of this full frame

CMOS sensor is capable of producing incredibly detailed images. I've

printed large format prints from the 6D all the way up to 40x60 inches and

the level of detail is just incredible, and I'm finding that the print quality between

the original 5D, 5D Mark II, 5D Mark III and 6D - they're pretty much indistinguishable

from each other. I was thinking there might be better quality

in terms of, you know, image quality and print quality but I'm seeing the same results. But,

just as important as image quality is, however, is the quality

of optics in the light path - you can't overlook that and previsualization.

As Ansel Adams once said, image quality is only as good as visual quality.

The Canon 6D has Canon's most powerful image processor - the DIGIC 5+ - and the Canon 6D's

DIGIC 5+ processor is 17x faster than a DIGIC 4 and 30% faster than

a DIGIC 5. The image processor in a camera is responsible for reducing

noise as higher ISO's, among other things, and the DIGIC 5+ represents the best to date,

so the introduction of the DIGIC 5+ also introduced chromatic aberration

correction based on Canon lens profiles which are embedded or added to

the memory of the in-camera memory on the 6D and the 5D Mark III. So these in-camera

profiles are there for, you know, intended to reduce chromatic aberrations

for Canon's lenses, but in real world results I haven't really seen that

much of a difference on this. So, again, the DIGIC 5+ is great, but what all this marketing

really boils down to is better noise at higher ISO's and higher ISO's.

So, one of the biggest and most important questions when researching, reviewing, or

buying a camera is image quality. For me, it's the most important question - everything

else is secondary. So, what is the image quality like on the

6D? Well, let's take a look at a few examples at actual size to get a better idea.

So, let's take a look at this image in Grand Teton National Park. I was there shooting

a sunrise, and this is one of my favorite national parks. This sunrise photograph

was taken this passed fall during the national park closure.

Now, image quality is dependent on the quality of optics in the light path - filters, lenses,

etc. So, in talking about image quality we're also talking about

optic quality. But let's take a look at a few camera specific image

quality characteristics, separate from the lens. So, let's zoom in here. I consistently

see excellent color rendition from this camera. Images that come

out of the camera are either typically clean and well saturated. I

actually find the color rendition to be identical to the 5D bodies - all the way from the original

5D to the 5D Mark III. That is to say it's excellent. And the

dynamic range of the 6D is excellent for this range of cameras. So, in

this image we're getting pretty good dynamic range between the front of the barn with the

mountain peaks. And notice the landscape just below the clouds. So, all

in all, this image looks pretty good and it looks as I remembered it.

OK, let's take a look at this image. Now, harsh light, harsh environmental conditions,

and landscapes that will blow your mind is what Death Valley is all about.

Let's take a look at this sunset photograph which also doesn't have much

post except for sensor dust. Actually, let me show you really quick what it looks like

right out of the camera. So this is the raw file, out of the camera. Again,

my post-processing work flow, in it I don't use much post outside of

analog darkroom procedures such as dodging, burning, crop, straighten, those kinds of

things, and sometimes, on some of my images, I use zero post-processing.

Therefore I rely on the camera to accurately record the color saturation as

I remember it, and I'm finding that out-of-camera image quality on the 6D is excellent. OK,

back to the adjusted image here - use your video play-head to scrub

back and forth below this video to get a better idea of the before and

after comparison. But, let's dive into the actual size and take a look at what we have

here. So the dynamic range of this image is pretty typical of how the 6D

performs. There's pretty good highlight headroom in the sky here, probably

could have been better if I'd used ISO 100. The ridge-line sharpness is also excellent

and controlled well against the sky. Again, I'm just going to reiterate that

the image quality is only as good as the lens and most Canon L lenses

are pretty good in this respect. But, for dynamic range, highlight control, and definition

of the distant mountain details, this one is looking pretty good.

The foreground of this image has wonderful detail in the plants and it

looks like snow or ice but it's actually salt, and the salt has an incredibly high-level

of detail. When printed out to 40x60 this is really impressive - the detail

here is just amazing. So, again, a lot of this is depending the

字幕リスト動画再生

キヤノン6Dレビュー1年以上のハンズオン (Canon 6D Review 1+ Year of Hands-on)

pretty

quality

good

feature