Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • David Keirsey nicknamed them the supervisors, and their stereotype in the Jungian community,

  • as far as I have seen, has been the insufferably traditionalist, inflexible and hard-nosed

  • disciplinarian who taught your sixth grade algebra class. This is clearly an unfair depiction,

  • but those who try to give a more desirable description of the ESTJ often just describe

  • a short sighted and unambitious ENTJ. As with all of these videos, I aim to describe

  • the core of the ESTJ profile and the typical ESTJ as an individual just as capable or incapable

  • of becoming a hero of the history books as any other personality.

  • To begin, let’s break down what constitutes the ESTJ functionally.

  • They are a Judging type, meaning that they prefer extroverted judging and introverted

  • perceiving. This means that they base their judgment criteria on objective, outside information,

  • while simply observing and drinking in their subjective information and experiences. You

  • could say that they are more aggressive towards the outside world and more receptive towards

  • their inner experience. Their preferred way of doing this is through

  • extroverted thinking and introverted sensation. Extroverted thinking is inductive. It forms

  • conclusions based on objective data, which they then aggressively try to fulfil. Meanwhile,

  • Introverted Sensation perceives reality as it is, but invests its perceptions with subjectivity

  • and recalls these subjective memories in similar situations. It is recording, or if you like,

  • cataloguing or recalling. Third, they are very similar to the ISTJ;

  • both prefer Te and Si. The ESTJ however, prefers Te more than Si. Nevertheless, they are in

  • some sense the same type, or at least sister types. I personally like to call STJ types

  • the "Scientists", because they thoroughly examine reality and compare it with all the

  • past experiences they've collected in their database. They then form logical conclusions

  • from this breadth of objective data. Of course, "Scientist" is merely a nickname to help me

  • remember the STJ nature, and does not mean STJs are more likely to have an interest in

  • actual science. The ESTJ then, is a quote "scientist" for

  • whom the objective data and its resultant conclusions hold more sway than their subjective

  • perceptions. It is primarily concerned with fulfilling its obligations than in recording

  • and exploring information gleaned from reality.

  • As such, the word I like to use to encapsulate the ESTJ nature is "responsibility". As far

  • as I understand, the core element of this personality is the inductive formation of

  • conclusions about the world: essentially, they develop a world-law or formula for how

  • things logically must be, and then seek to live according to this law, as to not do so

  • would be illogical and nonsensical. In other words, they form conclusions from objective

  • data, and then feel obligated to live according to those logical conclusions; they have a

  • solemn responsibility to do so, so long as the conclusions remain sound. They do this

  • despite any inner, sentimental protests they may have. Their inner sentiment is repressed

  • and seen as a weakness. The world law must be obeyed no matter what, it only makes sense

  • to do so. As such they feel that they ought to be held

  • completely accountable for all their actions, good or ill, reasonable or flawed. Nothing

  • will get done in their favor unless they hunker down and produce, working according to their

  • understanding of the world. In other words, "stick to your guns" and "you reap what you

  • sow". Once they form a conclusion they ought to stick to it, accepting full responsibility

  • for their actions, reaping whatever they sow by their brilliance or incompetence. They

  • also expect the same responsibility of others, and get frustrated when people pose sentimentally

  • charged arguments, excuses or sob stories, which they perceive as the cowardly or petty

  • avoidance of responsibility for their actions. It's now easier to see where the stereotype

  • came from; they can appear hardnosed and disconcertingly strict or harsh. Although, most ESTJs, as

  • with any type, do not submit to their preferences pathologically. A typical ESTJ isn't going

  • to go about shoving their formula down everyone's throat. But they will naturally take the perspective

  • that people ought to stick to their guns, reap what they sow, suck it up and not fall

  • back on sob stories to excuse themselves, even if they don't go broadcasting this opinion

  • or consider it an essential part of themselves. On the other hand, the ESTJ may purposefully

  • express their opinions in as bigoted and offensive a way as possible. This is an expression of

  • the ESTJ's tertiary Ne, because in this situation the ESTJ knows full well that their statement

  • will be offensive to people. They state it so offensively to make fun of those who can't

  • handle the truth, while they just as easily could have stated it in a more politically

  • correct way. I make mention of this as an example of the often unnoticed clever, multifaceted

  • Ne side of the ESTJ. They are by no means narrow-minded, humorless, backwards disciplinarians.

  • On the contrary, they have a tertiary perception of future possibilities and multiple facets

  • of an issue, despite how their dominant Te may make them appear. Underlying their personality

  • is the cleverness, innovation, and cognizance of a typical Ne type.

  • Finally, it is important to mention the adverse effects of their dominant Te. This causes

  • a repression of the Fi function, responsible for forming judgment criteria based on personal,

  • subjective sentimental values. As mentioned before, the ESTJ strives to keep their logical

  • obligations despite any nagging sentimental protests. Its repression also extends to how

  • they view other people, as they find it difficult or aversive to give any weight to others'

  • personal values. This is why they abhor sob stories, because it's an expression of personal

  • feeling and sentiment, which feelings are repressed under the importance of keeping

  • one's obligations. They may find it difficult to empathize with others or understand what

  • they're going through, because they naturally believe that objective data ought to hold

  • the greater sway for things in the world to go right.

  • So, in summary, the ESTJ is responsible, submitting to their logical conclusions, expecting nothing

  • less of themselves and others than to get down in the dirt and produce without whining

  • about it. Underlying it all, they have a clever and innovative spirit and humor. Unfortunately,

  • they have trouble with recognizing their own or others personal values and feelings, making

  • it difficult for them to empathize with others and more likely to deeply offend them or mow

  • them over. The best list of example ESTJs can be found

  • at CelebrityTypes.com, and includes Bernard Montgomery, Henry Ford, Hilary Clinton, Dr.

  • Phil, Ann Coulter, Tom Clancy, Uma Thurman, Emma Watson, and Judge Judy.

  • Thanks for watching, and for all the ESTJs out there: thanks for trying to keep us on

  • the straight and narrow.

David Keirsey nicknamed them the supervisors, and their stereotype in the Jungian community,

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B2 中上級

16のタイプESTJ (The Sixteen Types: ESTJ)

  • 168 9
    林筠潔 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語