Name: 第14講申命記の歴史。カタストロフィへの対応（1王と2王 (Lecture 14. The Deuteronomistic History: Response to Catastrophe (1 and 2 Kings))
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T05:30:01.000Z
Duration: 51 min 35 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

Professor Christine Hayes: We were talking last

time about the establishment of the monarchy or kingship in

Israel and I want to say a little bit about some of the

features of Israelite kingship, and today I'll be coming back

frequently to the Israelite notions of kingship and royal

one of the most important things to realize is that the

king in Israel was not divine, as he was in Egypt,

Occasionally, he offered sacrifice but he

Israelite royal ideology was heavily indebted to Canaanite

royal ideology. You have similar language

The king is said to be appointed by the deity or

deities to end wickedness, to enlighten the land,

he is the channel of prosperity and divine blessing for the

as we've seen, is spoken of as God's son.

It's a metaphor, the metaphor of sonship.

It was used for the Canaanite gods as well,

and it expressed the special relationship between the king

and the deity. It was the same relationship as

was found between that of a suzerain and a vassal,

and in our suzerainty treaties, also, the vassal is the son of

and what it means is that the one who is metaphorically the

faithfully, but is also susceptible to chastisement from

Nathan's statement or pronouncement or prophecy to

David last time. Michael Coogan points out that

the notion of the sonship of the king was revolutionary.

It was a deliberate effort to replace an earlier understanding

according to which the entire nation of Israel was God's son.

You remember during the plagues in Egypt when God refers to

Pharaoh as having oppressed His son, Israel, His firstborn.

As Yahweh's son, the king now is standing

And we're going to return in a moment to this new royal

ideology and what's really going to be a very tense juxtaposition

But first I want to say a little bit more about the

characters of David and Solomon before going into the way royal

importance and in textual space to Moses;

the amount of space that's devoted to him,

There are three characteristics of David which stand out,

and the first is that he's described as being quite

proficient in music and poetry and so we'll see that later

tradition is going to attribute to him not only the invention of

various instruments but also the composition of the Book of

would be the composer of the Book of Psalms in that he has a

He is also credited with great military and tactical skill and

confidence. He deploys his army on behalf

deploys his army within Israel against his rivals.

Third, he is depicted as a very shrewd politician.

And it was David who created permanent symbols of God's

election of Israel, God's election of David

or line or dynasty to rule over Israel in perpetuity.

It is said that he conceived the idea of a royal capital.

He captured the city of Jebus, Yebus--it was a border town so

I guess it's sort of like Washington, D.C.;

it's not located really within any one tribe;

and he captured this and built it up as the city of David.

The city was going to be renamed Jerusalem and it would

the place where God caused His name to dwell:

as Deuteronomy said, there would be a place where

God would choose to cause His name to dwell.

And so Jerusalem becomes a symbol of God's presence,

it becomes a symbol of Israel's kingdom, the monarchy;

it becomes a symbol of the dynasty of David.

David transfers the Ark to this city and so he makes it the home

to the ancient witness of the covenant, the Sinaitic Covenant.

The added implication is that the Davidic dynasty has

It is somehow fulfilling the promise to the patriarchs,

which is also associated with the nation of Israel at Sinai.

He planned a temple that would become the permanent resting

place for the ark and a cultic center for all Israel but the

building of this temple was left to Solomon so we'll discuss it

and its symbolism when we get to Solomon.

But according to the biblical record it was still David who

made the chosen dynasty, the chosen city,

what would eventually be the temple, into permanent and

deeply interconnected symbols of the religion of Israel.

And it's really with David that the history of Jerusalem as the

Now the biblical assessment of David is initially relatively

字幕リスト動画再生

第14講申命記の歴史。カタストロフィへの対応（1王と2王 (Lecture 14. The Deuteronomistic History: Response to Catastrophe (1 and 2 Kings))

text

criticism

history

ideology