字幕表 動画を再生する
>> Today's lecture is basically going to show you that a lot
of the rules that you learned in sophomore organic chemistry
like the N plus 1 rule are simplifications
and we'll be seeing a lot of examples that look really weird
because I want to show you where these simplifications break down
and then next time we'll get to more sort
of the typical rules of splitting.
So as I said, I wanted to begin with this notion
of magnetic equivalents and let me begin with a definition.
We'll say magnetic equivalents and let's say that 2 protons
or nuclei, in other words, we're normally talking
about proton NMR but, of course, it could be fluorines
or phosphorescence or whatever are magnetically equivalent.
[ Writing on board ]
If they are chemically equivalent.
[ Writing on board ]
And remember 2 nuclei that were chemically equivalent were
nuclei that were interchangeable by a symmetry operation
or a rapid process like rotation about a bond.
So we saw lots of examples of chemically equivalent nuclei
by symmetry and then we saw how when you have, for example,
a chiral center, methylene group is no longer
chemically equivalent.
So chemically equivalent.
So there is a subset of chemically equivalent
and they have the same geometrical relationship
to all other nuclei in the spin system.
[ Writing on board ]
So this brings up one other concept and that's the question
of what is the spin system
and the spin system is just a complete set
and I'll underline complete meaning all of the nuclei.
So complete set of nuclei in which members are coupled.
[ Writing on board ]
All right this is, let's start with the easy idea,
the spin system, and let's just do this by example.
So, for example, if we have ethylproplether, CH3CH20, CH2,
CH2, CH3, we have in the molecule 2 spin systems.
We have 1 spin sustain comprising the ethyl group
and another spin system comprising the propyl group.
So in other words, the ethyl group is a set of nuclei.
Obviously we're talking about the protons
since for all intents
and purposes there are no C13s in this fragment.
So we have these hydrogens and these hydrogens
and at least one member is coupled to every other member.
They make up a set together.
In the propyl group, we have the methyl group,
the methylene group and the other methlyene group
and there's coupling among them.
In other words, the CH3 is coupled to this CH2,
the hydrogens of the CH2 are coupled to each other,
the hydrogens or the CH3 are coupled but that doesn't count.
The hydrogens of the CH2 are coupled
to the next CH2 and what's important.
So each of these is complete meaning it takes
in all the coupled nuclei.
What's important is we don't have coupling
between the ethyl spin system and the propyl spin system.
So they kind of have 2 separate sets
so we can consider the ethyl, we can consider the propyl
and there's no interaction between them.
Let's try another example.
Let's take a acetyl phenylalanine
and we'll take the methyl, the mid.
[ Writing on board ]
So what are the spin systems in this molecule?
[ Writing on board ]
So you have the 2 methyls on the end and the benzo group.
[ Pause ]
For all intents and purposes the benzylic protons are not coupled
to the phenyl so what would you do for the spin system here?
[ Inaudible question ]
Separately so I'm going to revise this, okay,
so we have the phenyl that's going to be 1 spin system.
What do we do here in the middle?
>> Couple those 2 together.
>> Alpha and beta.
What about the NH?
[ Inaudible question ]
We saw an example where I said you have an ND20
and you exchange so it's deuterium there,
which although it has a spin for all intents
and purposes you can discount but what about this NH?
Is that going to be J coupled?
Remember, amides are different than alcohols.
Alcohols exchange amides and, remember,
I said alcohols can exchange or cannot amides
on the laboratory timescale if I throw them in D20 will exchange
but on the NMR timescale that NH stays there
and we're not doing this in D20 so what should I do
with this middle part of the molecule?
So that all becomes a spin system and what
about the very end of the molecule?
[ Inaudible question ]
Okay, good.
So these guys interact.
Now, I'll tell you right now so we have 4 spin systems
in the molecule and we have the methyl group, we have the NH,
the alpha and the beta protons and we have the phenyl group
and then we have the methyl and mid group.
So forced in systems in a molecule and we can look
at each of these separately.
I'll tell you there's a miniscule
like undetectably small and I'll show you how to see it
if you squint right later on coupling between these hydrogens
and the benzogroup, but for all intents and purposes you can say
that the phenyl group is not coupled over here.
So for all intents and purposes we have this is an isolated spin
system, a phenyl group, the alpha, beta and NH,
the methyl and methyl NH.
Other thoughts?
[ Pause ]
[ Inaudible question ]
Yeah, yeah, and so in chloroform solution, in D20,
these would eventually wash out
but in chloroform solution what we'd see
for this NH is a doublet.
It would be a little bit broad.
This one is going to have 3 coupling partners
in chloroform solution where this has an exchange or in DMSO.
So we'd see either a doublet of doublets of doublets
or a triplet of doublets or doublet of triplets
and we'll talk more about that
if you're not familiar with those terms.
This NH is going to have 3 coupling partners
in chloroform solution
where this hasn't exchanged or in DSMO.
So we see either a doublet of doublet of doublets or triplet
of doublets or doublet of triplets and we'll talk more
about that if you're not familiar with those terms.
This NH would appear as a quartet
and chances are it would be broadened out a little bit.
Remember, I mentioned this nitrogen quadrapolar coupling?
So couple of ways this can appear so it can appear as a 1
to 3, 3 to 1 quartet slightly broadened.
It can appear just due to this nitrogen quadrapolar broadening
as an envelope that encompasses the whole thing.
Or it can appear as something where if you don't see the wings
of the quartet and you just see a little dip you might say, oh,
it looks like a doublet to me.
So depending on the quadrapolar broadening
from the nitrogen this methyl group in turn is not going
to have significant quadrapolar effects;
it's going to be split into a nice doublet.
So this will be a quartet or broad quartet or something
that looks like a single.
If it's very broad, the methyl group will be a doublet.
[ Pause ]
All right let's now tack all this notion
of the same geometrical relationship.
So, let's look at this molecule.
Let's take 2, 6 dichloro 1 tert butyl benzene.
So as far as chemical equivalents goes,
we have 2 types of protons.
We have the proton that's powered to the tert butyl group
and the proton that's meta to the tert butyl group.
So these 3 constitute a spin system.
Chlorines don't count; they're quadrapolar nuclei
and essentially not spin active.
The tert butyl group is magnetically isolated;
it's its own spin system.
So we look at this and we say, all right, we have 2 protons
that are the same as far as chemical equivalents;
they're interchangeable by a symmetry operation.
Now we ask this geometrical question.
Do they have the same relationship
to all other nuclei in the spin system?
This hydrogen says, oh, look, I'm ortho to this hydrogen
and this hydrogen says, oh, look, I'm ortho to it also.
So, these 2 are magnetically equivalent as well
as chemically equivalent.
[ Pause ]
Now there's a way of naming systems
where you have different types of protons
and we'll give a different letter to each type
of non-chemically equivalent proton.
So, for example, we'll use letters like A and B and C and M
and X and Y if you need to.
The general idea is if the protons are close
in chemical shift we'll use letters that are right next
to each other in alphabet, As and Bs and Cs.
If they're far apart in chemical shift, we'll use letters
that are far apart in the alphabet.
Letters like A and X or A and M and X. So depending
on whether these protons are close in chemical shift
to the center proton or whether they're fall in chemical shift,
we'll either call this an A to B spin system
or an A to X spin system.
Now, technically only ones
where they're far apart are truly first order,
but even if they're close there's some very regular
patterns that you can see.
If they're far apart in chemical shift
and by far apart what I mean is the separation
of the peak centers in hertz is many,
many times the coupling constant.
So like a typical ortho coupling constant is about 7 hertz,
so if the peaks are far apart like 10 times as far apart
like 70 hertz or 100 hertz or 200 hertz apart,
then they will end up being As and Xs.
Now, remember, at 500 PPM, 1 PPM is 500 hertz.
So, in other words, if these guys are about two-tenths
of a PPM apart, you know, three-tenths of a PPM apart,
we would call this an A to X spin system.
What we'd expect would be to see a doublet for the 2
on the outside because they're being split by the 1
in the middle and a triplet
and so I'll just draw a little squiggly
to indicate these are far apart in the spectrum and a triplet
like so for the center hydrogen.
I guess technically the triplet would be shorter
than the doublet so I'll make the doublet a little bigger.
If they're close together, and I'm going to actually start
in just a moment with the archetypical AB system,
if they're closer together, what you will see so if it is,
indeed, A to B, what you'll see is a slight tenting inward
depending on how far.
In other words, the lines of the doublet instead of being equal
in height will become unequal in height
with the bigger line toward its J coupling partner and the lines
of the triplet will be similarly distorted
so that the inner line is a little bigger
than the outer line.
I always like to think of these as sort of tenting
in toward each other and that would be what it would
like as an A to B system.
[ Pause ]
Let's try another example and I'll take difluoromethane.
[ Writing on board ]
Remember, fluorine is spin active, spin of a half,
it's magnetic gyro ratio [phonetic] is
about 90% of that of a proton.
So it shows up a million miles away whereas your protons are
resonating at 500 megahertz, your fluorine is resonating
at 470 or 460 megahertz.
So they are far, far, far away from each other,
but they're J coupled to each other
so collectively the hydrogens
and the fluorines constitute a spin set, a spin system.
If I want to remember my geometry because we're going
to ask what type of spin system it is,
it's a tetrahedral molecule.
So the geometrical relationship of this hydrogen
to the fluorine is the same as the geometrical relationship
of this hydrogen to the fluorine.
In other words, we would call this spin system an A2,
X2 spin system.
We have 2 hydrogens that are chemically equivalent,
they're interchangeable by a symmetry operation,
and 2 fluorines that are chemically equivalent,
they're interchangeable by a symmetry operation reflection,
and the hydrogens if you test everyone has the same
geometrical relationship to all other nuclei in the spin system.
So this is an A2, X2 spin system.
[ Inaudible question ]
No. Just that they're farer away.
As I said, if these guys are more than a few tenths
of a PPM away, we would call this X in this case
and if there were 2 of them
in some circumstances we'd call them X2.
So, if you look at the H1 NMR spectrum or the F1 NMR,
you would expect the H1 NMR spectrum
to show up as a triplet.
[ Pause ]
Now, I want to contrast this example
with another example difluoroethylene.
[ Pause ]
How would we characterize that spin system?
[ Pause ]
What?
[ Inaudible question ]
ABXY, okay, let's start with this issue
of chemical equivalence here.
So are the 2 hydrogens chemically equivalent
to each other?
Okay so these guys are chemically equivalent
and the 2 fluorines?
Yeah, okay, chemically equivalent.
So we're going to use the same letter
but we have a problem now they're not
magnetically equivalent.
So we need to introduce another term.
When we have hydrogens that are chemically equivalent
but not magnetically equivalent, we'll use --
or nuclei in general -- we use primes.
So what we'll do is we'll call this an A, A prime,
X, X prime spin system.
The big difference is that while a system that's an A2,
X2 system is first order and even these types
of systems I'll call pseudo first order.
This is a spin system that is distinctly not first order.
I want to show you the difference between them.
[ Pause ]
Okay, so on the top I have, and these are very old spectra.
These are spectra from a book that were taken at 60 megahertz
and they're probably from the 1960s.
They're taken on the CW instrument.
CW instruments are non-fourier transform instruments not used
anymore, but these little wiggles are just artifacts
of it being a CW instrument.
So don't worry about that.
But the main thing here is the difluoromethane,
these are proton spectra, is exactly what you would expect.
It's a triplet.
The difluoroethylene you'll look at and you say what's going on.
There was no simple description of this pattern.
[ Pause ]
This type of pattern can be calculated, indeed,
our NMR spectrometers have software that will calculate it
and it can be calculated by computer program,
by back of the envelope calculations for simple systems,
but basically defies a simple description.
[ Inaudible question ]
Why are the hydrogens, which one?
[ Inaudible question ]
Well, here but it's not the hydrogens here,
it's the fluorines are splitting the hydrogens.
So the difluoromethane is a triplet
because the 2 hydrogens are split by the 2 fluorines.
In the case of the difluoroethylene,
the problem is the adage that we use that hydrogens
that are the same don't split each other really replies most
rigorously to hydrogens that are magnetically equivalent,
but hydrogens that are chemically equivalent
but not magnetically equivalent kind of sort of do.
There are many circumstances where for all intents
and purposes you don't see any effect and these are cases
that I'll call pseudo first order cases, and what I want
to show you today is how all the stuff that we learned
in sophomore chemistry
for coupling really doesn't rigorously apply to lots
and lots of common systems.
Now the first thought when you look at this is, okay,
well this is, you know, this is difluoroethylene,
it's not a common system.
So let's take a common system and it's one that you're going
to see in the course of your graduate career most likely.
So this is dioctyl phthalate.
It's commonly used as a plasticizer
in all sorts of plastics.
If you go to the store and buy yourself a water bottle
and it says phthalate free, that's probably saying
or you see plastics listed as phthalate free,
that's saying it doesn't have this plasticizer,
this compound added, this oily compound,
to make plastics pliable.
Tygon tubing is great with water, however,
because it contains dioctyl phthalate if you use it
on your manifold methylene chloride
and THF vapor will dissolve into the Tygon,
dissolve into the dioctyl phthalate diluted
and it will dribble into your reaction flask
and when you work your spectrum up, you'll see the spectrum
and when you work your compound up you'll see a spectrum
for this and you'll say what the heck?
What's going on?
Let's take a look at the molecule and figure
out what sort of spin system it is.
So we have the octyl groups which are separate
and we have the benzene groups.
How do we characterize the benzene here?
[ Pause ]
AA prime, BB prime.
Indeed. Or if they're far apart in chemical shift?
AA prime, XX prime.
So in other words, if these guys are within two-tenths of a PPM
of each other with typical couplings,
you might call it AA prime, BB prime if they're more
than a couple of tenths of a PPM apart you'd probably call it AA
prime and XX prime.
What that says is your rules
of simple coupling may not apply here.
So many a graduate student has taken their reaction mixture
and gone and seen the following pattern in it and come
to their advisor or their group mates
and said what the heck is going on?
This is dioctyl phthalate and, again,
it defies a simple description.
This is an AA prime, XX prime system
and it doesn't matter how high a field you go to the spectrum
of dioctyl phthalate is going to look like hell.
The only difference as we change field strength is you see how
this line, these lines on the inside are a little bigger
than these lines on the outside?
If we went to a lower field spectrometer they'd be a little
more unequal if we went
to a higher field spectrometer they'd be a little bit more
equal, but no matter what the spectrum
of dioctyl phthalate is going to look like that
and that should freak you out just a little bit
because it says all that stuff you learned
in sophomore chemistry kind of sort of applies
but kind of sort of doesn't.
[ Inaudible question ]
Nothing. So the neoprene is great for your manifold.
The one that's even better, so that has more, is more permeable
to air and so it's okay.
The one that's really good is butyl rubber
or I think it's a nitryl;
I think it's a butyl nitryl co-polymer.
Anyway that's particularly good for manifold lines
but stay away from Tygon.
Tygon is meant for aqueous solutions.
All right well now that I've messed with you a little bit
for your own good, really, it's for your own good,
now that I've messed with you for a little bit,
let's take a look and see when the rules
of sophomore chemistry apply
and when they don't necessarily apply rigorously and let's play
with the implications of this.
All right so if I look at chloro ethane, now my first thought
and I'll do a Newman projection on it.
My first thought is wait a second the methyl group we talk
about geometrical relationships and this is confusing
because this hydrogen is parallel to this hydrogen
and this hydrogen is ortho to these hydrogens, but of course,
there's rapid rotation so let's see what happens.
So remember I said rapid processes can equal things out.
So we'll call these hydrogens 1, 2,
3 and we'll call these guys 4 and 5.
I'll just imagine a series of rotations.
[ Writing on board ]
So you have 3 equal rotamers and although H5 is anti to H2
in the first rotamer, we have the second equal rotamer,
they're all equivalent, they're all equally populated.
Where H2 is, goes to H5 and H1 is anti to H5
and this third were H3 is anti.
So in the end, it all evens out and if we want
to describe this spin system how would we describe it then?
[ Inaudible question ]
Which, take a guess.
We've talked about the chemical shifts of dichloroethane.
[ Inaudible question ]
AX and what specifically would we use for numbers?
How many hydrogens are there in the methyl group?
Three.
[ Inaudible question ]
So what sort of spin system?
It's an A3 X2 spin system.
All of these spin systems were there no primes are truly first
order and while the Bs when you get things
that are close it'll deviate from first order but if they're
on top of each other, it gets really messy
but if they're a little bit separated,
you basically can call it an AB type of system.
All of these spin systems are first order.
[ Inaudible question ]
First order means those simple rules of coupling count
up number of different types of neighbors work out perfectly.
So an A2 X2 spin system you can trust is going
to give you a triplet and another triplet in the case
of difluoromethane the other triplet is
at 460 megahertz whereas 1 triplet is 500 megahertz
but you get 2 pure triplets and in the case of here,
we expect a triplet and a quartet
and everything is hunky dory.
Now let's take a look at a different compound.
Take a look at bromochloromethane
and we're going to do the same thing.
I'll Newman project, I'll put the chlorine on the back
and the bromine on the front and we'll call it H1,
H2 and call these H3 and H4 and I'm just going
to imagine the rotamers.
[ Writing on board ]
So we have 2 ghost [phonetic] rotamers and 1 anti rotamer.
So we can consider the ghost rotamers as a pair
but they're separate from the anti rotamer.
All of them, of course, are interconverting
but let's just look at the anti rotamer
because the anti rotamer isn't equivalent
to the 2 ghost rotamers
and you'll see the conundrum that we end up with.
See the problem we end up with in the anti rotamer
and in this here you can say H1 and H2, one is ghost
and then the other gets to be ghost.
You can say let's consider them as a pair.
Here we say, okay, well, the bromine is anti,
these 2 have the same relationship
and they're interchangeable by symmetry so H1
and H2 are symmetrical.
H3 and H4 are symmetrical, but the problem particular
to the anti rotamer is that when you apply this test
and say what's their geometrical relationship, it's different.
So you look at the anti rotamer and you say this is going
to be an AA prime XX prime or AA prime, BB prime spin system
and the problem is this is
that situation that's truly not first order.
[ Writing on board ]
Now the good news on this is most of the time,
and I've just given you some of the ugliest examples,
most of the time non-first order systems can be approximated
as first order systems.
In other words, you ask your sophomores what this spectrum
should look like and they'll say, oh, well,
they told me the N plus 1 rule it should be a triplet
and a triplet.
That's largely true, but I'm going to show you cases
that break down from that.
Now I want to show you the sort of break
down from non-first order
to let's call it pseudo first order.
So, in other words, if we take a simple AB system
or a simple AX system, let's say I do bromine, bromine, chlorine,
chlorine, so this is a simple AX system
if they're far apart you'd see a doublet and a doublet and,
again, I'll draw a break to indicate that they're far apart
and if they're closer together,
we see what's called an AB pattern where the 2 tent
into each other and if they're very close you'll see an AB
pattern with the inner lines very big
and if they're really close you might even mistake it
for a quartet; it's not, it's an AB pattern.
Anyway so most of the time you can get away approximating
non-first order systems as sort of pseudo first order systems.
[ Writing on board ]
In other words, often non-first order systems will show behavior
that's very much like you would expect with just the notion
that inner lines may become a little bit bigger, but as we saw
in our example with dioctyl phthalate,
you can have some very, very big deviations and so what I want
to do now is show you really a catalog of typical deviations
because once you see them and once you see when they come up,
I think you'll be much less freaked
out by things that occur.
[ Pause ]
So the scary thing about the diagram that I made
on the right hand board is any time you have a methylene chain
technically it is not first order.
Every pair of methylenes, every methylene the pair
of hydrogens technically they are chemically equivalent
but not magnetically equivalent.
Of course, if there's a stereocenter in the molecule,
they're not chemically equivalent then it's like an A2,
an ABX system but in the case of just a plain methylene chain
without a stereocenter they are chemically equivalent
but not magnetically equivalent.
Normally you can get away and you say, okay, they taught me
as a sophomore the N plus 1 rule, I expect to see a triplet.
Normally it works pretty well.
I'm going to show you some cases where we see some very,
very big deviations and I want to show you
where these things come up.
So, this is, these are 2 different molecules
that I've worked with.
One of these has a propyl chain connecting an azulene a very
bulky group to a phenyl group and so you'll look
at the protons on this chain and you say, okay, they all look,
this methylene, that looks kind of reasonable.
Looks like a triplet.
You could call it an apparent triplet if you liked,
but the one that's right next to the azulene, this very,
very bulky group, really ends up looking very, very funny.
You see this pattern that has what kind of looks
like a triplet except in the center it's further split
and the one over here
in the middle also looks a little funny.
It doesn't look quite like a quartet.
See, the thing is with CH2 chains if you've got a mix
of anti and ghost confirmers [phonetic] and you've got some,
you know, anti but also some ghost, basically it averages
out enough that it behaves like a first order system.
It behaves like you were taught it should
in sophomore chemistry; however,
if it's heavily biased toward the anti confirmer,
then just as we saw in dioctyl phthalate this really funny
splitting you see the same thing
and this group is very bulky here.
So, in other words, when you're looking at this,
you have the azulene group and then you have the hydrogens
and then it is almost completely locked in the anti confirmer
and so you really, really end up seeing this.
So this ends up being an A, A prime, M, M prime X,
X prime spin system and that's what it technically is
so technically it's non-first order but we get
that effect full force over here.
You'll notice these types
of patterns come up again and again.
So here's a very different compound
where you still have a trimethylene chain
but now your bulky group is this TMS group
and the hydrogen that's next to your bulky TMS group, again,
gives this exact same pattern.
Completely different molecule but exact same pattern
of non-first order behavior.
I would just call this peak a multiplet.
I would call all of these multiplets
and I would simply list their range.
I guess I'd call this guy a triplet.
[ Inaudible question ]
Exactly. I mean we have
to understand this is a non-first order system
and that normally we can get,
often we can get away describing non-first order systems
as first order but you really can't always.
Let me show you some other non-first order behavior.
So, okay, so most of the time take bromopropane,
another molecule with a chain in it and remember most
of the time you can get away describing things
as first order.
So you look at your bromopropane and you'd say, oh,
that looks pretty good.
You have a triplet, you have a sextet,
you have a triplet, beautiful.
Just what you would expect from sophomore chemistry.
Now, another sort of breakdown that occurs is when protons end
up lumped on top of each other even
when they're not chemically equivalent.
So you go from bromopropane, which has a beautiful triplet
to bromobutane and you say, okay,
it still has a beautiful triplet,
we see all of our resonances dispersed.
You go to bromopentane.
[ Pause ]
And now these 2 protons, the protons at the beta
and gamma position are starting to get very close to each other
and your triplet just starts to look a little funny.
You can already see there's some tenting in there.
That's just your AB behavior; that's perfectly normal,
but now you see the methyl is starting to fatten out
and by the time you get up, so these guys are really,
really lumped on top of each other.
So by the time you get up say to bromohexance
where now these 2 protons or 3 protons are really,
really let's see we've got alpha, beta,
let's see that's beta, okay, so now we end
up with these guys really lumped on top of each other
and now you notice our triplet really is break down
and it doesn't look like a clean triplet.
You could still call it an apparent triplet
but it's much uglier than you would expect
and this is exactly what I'm talking
about for non-first order behavior.
You get up to bromo octane and now you see it even more so.
So this is what I'm talking
about for non-first order due to overlap.
So in other words, you have all of these guys
in the chain overlapping with each other
and often what we will call this is virtual coupling.
In other words, when hydrogens are overlapping,
the methyl group is coupling to the adjacent methylene
but you can say in effect it's also coupling to these others
down the chain because they're right on top
of each other in chemical shift.
You'll see this effect it's extremely pronounced
and you've already seen this before.
Any of you who have seen a spectrum
of THF has seen this behavior.
Let me show you.
Succinic acid, no problem.
You're a singlet.
You have 4 chemically equivalent protons in the chain,
all 4 show up at the same chemical shift,
they don't split each other, you go to glutaric acid
and you'd say, okay, even though remember none
of this is a truly first order system, none of these compounds
with chains are a first order system.
You'd say that doesn't look bad;
it looks like what they taught me in sophomore chemistry.
I see a triplet for the outer 2 CH2s and I see a quintet
for the inner one, everything should be hunky dory
and then you come to adipic acid
and you say what the heck is going on?
What the problem is this business of virtual coupling,
which is just 1 way to say it's a non-first order system,
when you have these 2 methylenes right on top
of each other this methyl, methylene group looks at it
and says, well, I'm coupled to 1 but I'm virtually coupled
to the other and now these break
down into non-simple patterns here and it's reciprocal.
So this one looks and says well I'm coupled
to this I have my neighbor and he's coupled to that
and we're all lumped together and it's nothing
about the length of the chain;
it's all about this issue overlap.
So you go up from adipic acid to palmitic acid, 1 more carbon,
and everything is back to being hunky dory.
In other words, you look at your outer methylenes
and they each look at their neighbors
and even though it's not a true first order system they say,
okay, we're fine, we're not overlapping it'll behave largely
like a first order system and this is what I'm talking
about where you go ahead and say normally you can get away
with this sophomore level analysis.
Normally you can get away with treating things as first order
or pseudo first order systems but watch out because
like this example and like our azulene example,
we're really playing on thin ice and as I said these types
of patterns come up again and again.
So tetrahydrofurane has exactly the same principle
as adipic acid.
You have a methylene chain, you have this issue
of virtual coupling and so you have this hydrogen is virtually
coupled, the one next to the oxygen is virtually coupled
to the other 2 and everything is reciprocal
and so you see this pattern here
and you see this pattern in other places.
So we're very good as human beings at pattern recognition
and I've shown you 3 types, 4 types of patterns today.
I've shown you the pattern of a ortho disubstituted,
symmetrically disubstitute aromatic and we saw it
for phthalic acid, for dioctyl phthalate and you'd also see it
for orthro dichlorobenzene or any other ortho compound.
I showed you the distortion pattern for methyls that occurs.
I've shown you the pattern that occurs
in an extended methylene chain when it's locked
in an anti confirmation, and I've shown you this pattern
that you get where you get virtual coupling
in the middle of a chain.
So keep those in mind because you will see them again
in the course of your graduate career. ------------------------------fcaefe9298fb--