Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Well many people ask me about the virtues of psychedelics because I’ve written about

  • this on my blog and in my book Waking Up. And they were at a point early in my inquiry

  • they were indispensable and this is an experience that’s shared by many Westerners. It’s

  • hard to really recommend psychedelics without serious caveats because some of them I think

  • are probably neurotoxic. Some are really well tolerated but still you can have very scary

  • destabilizing experiences on them. So you just can’t without a caveat recommend that

  • people drop acid or take MDMA. So it’s – everything I say on the subject should be understood

  • in that context. But for some people taking a drug is the only way theyre going to

  • notice that it’s possible to have a very different experience of the world. Theyre

  • sufficiently lumpen and uninquisitive about the nature of their own minds that if you

  • tell them to meditate, if you teach them mindfulness, if you tell them how to follow their breath

  • they will look inside for 30 seconds or 30 minutes and see nothing of interest and walk

  • away feeling that there’s no there there. Either it doesn’t work for them or that

  • everyone else must be just faking it or there’s – it requires a certain talent and a certain

  • degree of luck, therefore, to have enough concentration to connect with anyspiritual

  • practicethe first time or even the tenth time or even after a year of attempting it

  • because it’s justthese practices are difficult and the conditioning of our minds

  • to just ceaselessly talk is deep.

  • So, as Terence McKenna once said, “Psychedelics are the only method that truly guarantee an

  • effect.” And this effect can be, again, very painful. Youre not necessarily going

  • to have a good experience but there’s no question that if someone gives you 100 micrograms

  • of acid something is going to happen. Two hours later the significance of your existence

  • will have just been borne down on you like an avalanche. And again this can be terrifying

  • or it can be absolutely sublime depending on various causes and conditions. But the

  • one thing it cannot be is boring. And that is you can’t say that about yoga or meditation

  • or just going into solitude or anything else thatany other, you know, non-pharmacological

  • means of inquiry. So, where drugs have been indispensable for many people is in advertising

  • the possibility of a change in consciousness. And so I don’t think theyre durable methods

  • for people that – I don’t think you need or should just keep taking drugs month after

  • month, year after year, as a mode of spiritual inquiry. But there’s certainly a period

  • in many people’s lives at the beginning where you wouldn’t even see a glimmer of

  • reason to suspect that a radical change in the nature of your experience would be possible.

  • My first experience with psychedelics that was important, that actually shifted my view

  • of human possibility was with MDMA which I took before it became a club drug. I think

  • this was in 1987 I took it. And no one I knew, no one of my generation had taken it. And

  • although the drug obviously goes back many decades before that. And it had not been adopted

  • by popular culture as a party drug. So this was coming pretty much coming out of the therapeutic

  • community. People were doing in a closeted way psychotherapy with it. And I took it as

  • a means of discovering something about the nature of my mind. It was not a social situation.

  • I was just – a friend and I were alone and we took it together and just had a conversation

  • on this drug. And what was revelatory about it was that it was an experience of absolute

  • sobriety. It was notthere was no druggy component to it. We just became clearer and

  • clearer and clearer in our thinking and feeling. And the crucial component of this was a loss

  • of any feeling of self-concern.

  • I was no longer looking at myself through my friend’s eyes. I was no longer worried

  • about what he was thinking about me. I was no longer subtly correcting course based on

  • changes I saw in how he was perceiving what I was saying. It was a whole veneer of fear

  • frankly that I didn’t know was there that got stripped away. And there was just kind

  • of naked awareness of the present moment and what came into that void was a very clear

  • understanding that I loved him, that I – here I was, you know, 18 or 19 and I was not in

  • the habit of, you know, thinking about how much I loved the men in my life. And here’s

  • one of my best friends and I just realized with a, you know, it sounds absolutely pedestrian

  • to say it but I realized that I wanted him to be happy in a way that was justit

  • was like, you know, a lightning bolt. And thewhat was truly revolutionary about

  • this insight was that the feeling that came crashing down to that point was just, you

  • know, boundless love for one of my best friends and absolutely no egoic self-concern, no possibility

  • for feeling envy, for feeling any kind of petty emotion that separated myself from him.

  • But then I realized in the next moment that I would feel this way for anyone who walked

  • through the door.

  • There was nothing contingent on our relationship about this feeling. It was not a – it was

  • not justified by my friendship with him. This was the way I felt for every other conscious

  • being. So this is the way I would feel for the postman if he walked through the door.

  • And that suddenly opened my mind to the possibility of being like Jesus, whoever he was, you know.

  • That these icons of traditional religion were not all epileptics and schizophrenics and

  • frauds. These were people whoand again we can be skeptical about any specific individual,

  • you know, some of them could have been schizophrenic. Some of them could have had temporal lobe

  • epilepsy but some people historicallyand even in the present have borne witness to

  • this experience where you can just quite literally lose yourself concern in a way that makes

  • you love people unconditionally. And so, you know, that was the experience I had on MDMA.

  • It, you know, frankly blew my mind and it took me years for me to integrate this understanding

  • of this possibility into my intellectual life. And it prompted me to seek to have this experience

  • in other ways, you know, for many, many years.

  • I spent years studying meditation in various contexts, mostly in India, Nepal. And, you

  • know, I can say you can have this experience without MDMA. It’s not, MDMA isn’t the

  • only way to have it. And the truth is virtually any experience you can have with psychedelics

  • you can have without psychedelics because all psychedelics do is modulate the existing

  • neurochemistry of the brain. Theyre not doing something that the brain can’t do

  • on its own. Youre just playing with neurotransmitters or mimicking neurotransmitters. I have had

  • the same experience to more or less a similar degree just through meditation. But it’s

  • clear to me that I would never have suspected that such an experience was possible but for

  • my experimenting with MDMA in the beginning. So I have to just acknowledge that. Again,

  • issuing the caveat that this drug could well be bad for you. There’s some evidence of

  • its neurotoxicity. And there’s also a lot of evidence that that research has been heavily

  • politicized so you have to be cautious on both sides. But, I can’t advocate that we

  • drop MDMA in the water supply and cure us of our egocentricity. There’s reasons to

  • be circumspect there.

Well many people ask me about the virtues of psychedelics because I’ve written about

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

サム・ハリスサイケデリックはあなたの心を拡張するのに役立ちますか? (Sam Harris: Can Psychedelics Help You Expand Your Mind?)

  • 73 4
    稲葉白兎 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語