Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Now, on NOVA,

  • take a thrill ride into

  • a world stranger than science fiction,

  • where you play the game, by breaking some rules,

  • where a new view of the universe,

  • pushes you beyond the limits

  • of your wildest imagination.

  • This is the world of string theory,

  • a way of describing every force and all matter

  • from an atom to earth, to the end of the galaxies --

  • from the birth of time to its final tick --

  • in a single theory, a theory of everything.

  • Our guide to this brave new world

  • is Brian Greene, bestselling author and physicist.

  • BRIAN GREENE

  • And no matter how many times I come here,

  • I never seem to get used to it.

  • NARRATOR: Can he help us solve

  • the greatest puzzle of modern physics --

  • that our understanding of the universe

  • is based on two sets of laws, that don't agree?

  • Resolving that contradiction eluded even Einstein,

  • who made it his final quest.

  • After decades,

  • we may finally be on the verge of a breakthrough.

  • The solution is strings,

  • tiny bits of energy vibrating

  • like the strings on a cello,

  • a cosmic symphony

  • at the heart of all reality.

  • But it comes at a price:

  • parallel universes and 11 dimensions,

  • most of which

  • you've never seen.

  • BRIAN GREENE: We really may live in a universe

  • with more dimensions than meet the eye.

  • AMANDA PEET People who have said that there were extra dimensions

  • of space have been

  • labeled crackpots, or people who are bananas.

  • NARRATOR: A mirage of science and mathematics

  • or the ultimate theory of everything?

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.

  • If string theory fails to provide

  • a testable prediction,

  • then nobody should believe it.

  • SHELDON LEE GLASHOW

  • Is that a theory of physics,

  • or a philosophy?

  • BRIAN GREENE: One thing that is certain

  • is that string theory is already showing us that the universe

  • may be a lot stranger

  • than any of us ever imagined.

  • NARRATOR: Coming up tonight...

  • it all started with an apple.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.

  • The triumph of Newton's equations

  • come from the quest

  • to understand the planets and the stars.

  • NARRATOR: And we've come a long way since.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Einstein gave the world

  • a new picture for what

  • the force of gravity actually is.

  • NARRATOR: Where he left off, string theorists now dare to go.

  • But how close are they to fulfilling Einstein's dream?

  • Watch The Elegant Universe right now.

  • THE ELEGANT UNIVERSE

  • Hosted By Brian Green

  • Einstein's Dream

  • A Theory of Everything?

  • BRIAN GREENE: Fifty years ago, this house was the scene of one of

  • the greatest mysteries of modern science,

  • a mystery so profound that today

  • thousands of scientists on the cutting edge of physics

  • are still trying to solve it.

  • Albert Einstein spent his last two decades

  • in this modest home in Princeton, New Jersey.

  • And in his second floor study

  • Einstein relentlessly sought a single theory so powerful

  • it would describe all the workings of the universe.

  • Even as he neared the end of his life

  • Einstein kept a notepad close at hand,

  • furiously trying to come up with the equations

  • for what would come to be known as the "Theory of Everything."

  • Convinced he was on the verge of

  • the most important discovery in the history of science,

  • Einstein ran out of time, his dream unfulfilled.

  • Now, almost a half century later,

  • Einstein's goal of unification --

  • combining all the laws of the universe

  • in one, all-encompassing theory --

  • has become the Holy Grail of modern physics.

  • And we think we may at last achieve Einstein's dream

  • with a new and radical set of ideas

  • called "string theory."

  • But if this revolutionary theory is right,

  • we're in for quite a shock.

  • String theory says

  • we may be living in a universe

  • where reality meets science fiction --

  • a universe of eleven dimensions

  • with parallel universes

  • right next door --

  • an elegant universe composed entirely

  • of the music of strings.

  • But for all its ambition,

  • the basic idea of string theory

  • is surprisingly simple.

  • It says that everything in the universe,

  • from the tiniest particle to the most distant star

  • is made from one kind of ingredient --

  • unimaginably small vibrating strands of energy

  • called strings.

  • Just as the strings of a cello

  • can give rise to a rich

  • variety of musical notes,

  • the tiny strings in string theory vibrate in a multitude of different ways

  • making up all the constituents of nature.

  • In other words, the universe is like

  • a grand cosmic symphony

  • resonating with all the various notes

  • these tiny vibrating strands of energy

  • can play.

  • String theory is still

  • in its infancy,

  • but it's already revealing

  • a radically new picture of the universe,

  • one that is both strange and beautiful.

  • But what makes us think we can understand

  • all the complexity of the universe,

  • let alone reduce it to a single "Theory of Everything?"

  • We have R mu nu, minus a half g mu nu R --

  • you remember how this goes --

  • equals eight Pi G T mu nu...

  • comes from varying the Einstein-Hilbert action,

  • and we get the field equations

  • and this term. You remember what this is called?

  • DOG BARKS: Vau, vau!

  • No that's the scalar curvature.

  • This is the ricci tensor.

  • Have you been studying this at all?

  • No matter how hard you try,

  • you can't teach physics to a dog.

  • Their brains just aren't wired

  • to grasp it.

  • But what about us?

  • How do we know that we're wired

  • to comprehend the deepest laws

  • of the universe?

  • Well, physicists today are confident that we are,

  • and we're picking up

  • where Einstein left off in his quest for unification.

  • Unification would be the formulation of a law

  • that describes, perhaps,

  • everything in the known universe from

  • one single idea, one master equation.

  • And we think that there might be this master equation,

  • because throughout the course of the last

  • 200 years or so,

  • our understanding of the universe

  • has given us a variety of explanations

  • that are all pointing towards one spot.

  • They seem to all be converging

  • on one nugget of an idea

  • that we're still trying to find.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG

  • Unification is where it's at.

  • Unification is what

  • we're trying to accomplish.

  • The whole aim of fundamental physics

  • is to see more and more of the world's phenomena

  • in terms of fewer and fewer and simpler and simpler principles.

  • MICHAEL B. GREEN

  • We feel, as physicists, that if we can explain

  • a wide number of phenomena in a very simple manner,

  • that that's somehow progress.

  • There is almost an emotional aspect to the way

  • in which the great theories in physics

  • sort of encompass a wide variety

  • of apparently different physical phenomena.

  • So this idea that we should be aiming

  • to unify our understanding is inherent, essentially,

  • to the whole way in which this kind of science progresses.

  • Newton's Embarrassing Secret

  • BRIAN GREENE: And long before Einstein, the quest for unification

  • began with the most famous accident

  • in the history of science.

  • As the story goes, one day in 1665,

  • a young man was sitting under a tree when,

  • all of a sudden, he saw an apple fall from above.

  • And with the fall of that apple, Isaac Newton

  • revolutionized our picture of the universe.

  • In an audacious proposal for his time,

  • Newton proclaimed that the force

  • pulling apples to the ground

  • and the force keeping the moon in orbit

  • around the earth were actually one and the same.

  • In one fell swoop, Newton unified the heavens and the earth

  • in a single theory he called gravity.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG:

  • The unification of the celestial with the terrestrial --

  • that the same laws that govern the planets in their motions

  • govern the tides and the falling of fruit here on earth --

  • it was a fantastic

  • unification of our picture of nature.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Gravity was the first force to be understood scientifically,

  • though three more would eventually follow.

  • And, although Newton discovered his law of gravity more than 300 years ago,

  • his equations describing this force make such

  • accurate predictions that we still make use of them today.

  • In fact scientists needed nothing more

  • than Newton's equations to plot the course of a rocket

  • that landed men on the moon.

  • Yet there was a problem.

  • While his laws described

  • the strength of gravity with great accuracy,

  • Newton was harboring an embarrassing secret:

  • he had no idea how gravity actually works.

  • For nearly 250 years,

  • scientists were content to look the other way

  • when confronted with this mystery.

  • But in the early 1900s,

  • an unknown clerk working in the Swiss patent office

  • would change all that.

  • While reviewing patent applications, Albert Einstein

  • was also pondering the behavior of light.

  • And little did Einstein know

  • that his musings on light

  • would lead him to solve Newton's mystery

  • of what gravity is.

  • At the age of 26, Einstein made a startling discovery:

  • that the velocity of light is a kind of

  • cosmic speed limit, a speed that nothing in the universe can exceed.

  • But no sooner

  • had the young Einstein published this idea

  • than he found himself squaring off

  • with the father of gravity.

  • The trouble was, the idea

  • that nothing can go faster than the speed of light

  • flew in the face of Newton's

  • picture of gravity.

  • To understand this conflict,

  • we have to run a few experiments.

  • And to begin with, let's create a cosmic catastrophe.

  • Imagine that all of a sudden, and without any warning,

  • the sun vaporizes and completely disappears.

  • Now, let's replay that catastrophe

  • and see what effect it would have on the planets

  • according to Newton.

  • Newton's theory predicts

  • that with the destruction of the sun,

  • the planets would immediately fly out of their orbits

  • careening off into space.

  • In other words, Newton thought that gravity was

  • a force that acts instantaneously

  • across any distance.

  • And so we would immediately feel

  • the effect of the sun's destruction.

  • But Einstein saw a big problem with Newton's theory,

  • a problem that arose from his work with light.

  • Einstein knew light doesn't travel instantaneously.

  • In fact, it takes eight minutes

  • for the sun's rays to travel the 93 million miles

  • to the earth.

  • And since he had shown that nothing, not even gravity,

  • can travel faster than light,

  • how could the earth be released from orbit

  • before the darkness resulting from the sun's disappearance

  • reached our eyes?

  • To the young upstart from the Swiss patent office

  • anything outrunning light was impossible,

  • and that meant the 250-year old Newtonian

  • picture of gravity was wrong.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.:

  • If Newton is wrong,

  • then why do the planets stay up?

  • Because remember, the triumph of Newton's equations

  • come from the quest to understand

  • the planets and the stars,

  • and particularly the problem of why the planets have the orbits that they do.

  • And with Newton's equations you could calculate the way

  • that the planets would move.

  • Einstein's got to resolve this dilemma.

  • BRIAN GREENE: In his late twenties, Einstein had to come up with

  • a new picture of the universe

  • in which gravity does not exceed the cosmic speed limit.

  • Still working his day job in the patent office, Einstein

  • embarked on a solitary quest to solve this mystery.

  • After nearly ten years of wracking his brain

  • he found the answer in a new kind of unification.

  • A New Picture of Gravity

  • PETER GALISON

  • Einstein came to think of the three dimensions of space

  • and the single dimension of time

  • as bound together in a single fabric of "space-time."

  • It was his hope

  • that by understanding the geometry of this

  • four-dimensional fabric of space-time,

  • that he could simply talk about

  • things moving along surfaces

  • in this space-time fabric.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Like the surface of a trampoline,

  • this unified fabric is warped and stretched

  • by heavy objects like planets and stars.

  • And it's this warping or curving of space-time

  • that creates what we feel as gravity.

  • A planet like the earth is kept in orbit,

  • not because the sun reaches out and instantaneously

  • grabs hold of it, as in Newton's theory,

  • but simply because it follows curves

  • in the spatial fabric caused by the sun's presence.

  • So, with this new understanding of gravity,

  • let's rerun the cosmic catastrophe.

  • Let's see what happens now if the sun disappears.

  • The gravitational disturbance that results

  • will form a wave that travels across the spatial fabric

  • in much the same way that a pebble

  • dropped into a pond makes ripples

  • that travel across the surface of the water.

  • So we wouldn't feel a change

  • in our orbit around the sun

  • until this wave reached the earth.

  • What's more, Einstein calculated that these ripples of gravity

  • travel at exactly the speed of light.

  • And so, with this new approach,

  • Einstein resolved the conflict with Newton

  • over how fast gravity travels.

  • And more than that, Einstein gave the world a new picture

  • for what the force of gravity actually is:

  • it's warps and curves in the fabric of space and time.

  • Einstein called this new picture of gravity "General Relativity,"

  • and within a few short years Albert Einstein

  • became a household name.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.: Einstein was like

  • a rock star in his day.

  • He was one of the most widely known

  • and recognizable figures alive.

  • He and perhaps Charlie Chaplin were

  • the reigning kings of the popular media.

  • MARCIA BARTUSIAK People followed his work.

  • And they were anticipating...because of this wonderful thing

  • he had done with general relativity,

  • this recasting the laws of gravity out of his head...

  • there was a thought he could do it again,

  • and they, you know, people want to be in on that.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Despite all that he had achieved

  • Einstein wasn't satisfied.

  • He immediately set his sights on an even grander goal,

  • the unification of his new picture of gravity

  • with the only other force known at the time,

  • electromagnetism.

  • Now electromagnetism is a force

  • that had itself been unified

  • only a few decades earlier.

  • In the mid-1800s,

  • electricity and magnetism

  • were sparking scientists' interest.

  • These two forces seemed to share a curious relationship

  • that inventors like Samuel Morse were taking

  • advantage of in newfangled devices, such as the telegraph.

  • An electrical pulse sent through a telegraph wire

  • to a magnet thousands of miles away

  • produced the familiar dots and dashes of Morse code

  • that allowed messages to be transmitted across the continent

  • in a fraction of a second.

  • Although the telegraph was a sensation,

  • the fundamental science driving it

  • remained something of a mystery.

  • But to a Scottish scientist named James Clark Maxwell,

  • the relationship between electricity and magnetism

  • was so obvious in nature that it demanded unification.

  • If you've ever been on top of a mountain

  • during a thunderstorm you'll get

  • the idea of how electricity and magnetism are closely related.

  • When a stream of electrically charged particles flows,

  • like in a bolt of lightning, it creates a magnetic field.

  • And you can see evidence of this on a compass.

  • Obsessed with this relationship,

  • the Scot was determined to explain

  • the connection between electricity and magnetism

  • in the language of mathematics.

  • Casting new light on the subject,

  • Maxwell devised a set

  • of four elegant mathematical equations

  • that unified electricity and magnetism

  • in a single force called "electromagnetism."

  • And like Isaac Newton's before him,

  • Maxwell's unification took science a step closer

  • to cracking the code of the universe.

  • JOSEPH POLCHINSKI

  • That was really the remarkable thing,

  • that these different phenomena

  • were really connected in this way.

  • And it's another example of diverse phenomena

  • coming from a single underlying building block or a single underlying principle.

  • WALTER H.G. LEWIN

  • Imagine that everything that you can think of

  • which has to do with electricity and magnetism

  • can all be written in four very simple equations.

  • Isn't that incredible? Isn't that amazing?

  • I call that elegant.

  • PETER GALISON: Einstein thought that this was

  • one of the triumphant moments of all of physics

  • and admired Maxwell hugely for what he had done.

  • BRIAN GREENE: About 50 years after Maxwell unified

  • electricity and magnetism,

  • Einstein was confident

  • that if he could unify his new theory of gravity with Maxwell's electromagnetism,

  • he'd be able to formulate a master equation

  • that could describe everything, the entire universe.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.:

  • Einstein clearly believes that the universe

  • has an overall grand and beautiful pattern to the way that it works.

  • So to answer your question,

  • why was he looking for the unification?

  • I think the answer is simply

  • that Einstein is one of those physicists

  • who really wants to know the mind of God, which means the entire picture.

  • A Strange New World

  • BRIAN GREENE: Today, this is the goal of string theory:

  • to unify our understanding of everything

  • from the birth of the universe

  • to the majestic swirl of galaxies

  • in just one set of principles,

  • one master equation.

  • Newton had unified the heavens and the earth

  • in a theory of gravity.

  • Maxwell had unified electricity and magnetism.

  • Einstein reasoned all that

  • remained to build a "Theory of Everything"--

  • a single theory that could encompass all the laws of the universe --

  • was to merge his new picture of gravity

  • with electromagnetism.

  • AMANDA PEET: He certainly had motivation.

  • Probably one of them might have been aesthetics,

  • or this quest to simplify.

  • Another one might have been just the physical fact

  • that it seems like the speed of gravity

  • is equal to the speed of light.

  • So if they both go at the same speed,

  • then maybe that's an indication of some underlying symmetry.

  • BRIAN GREENE: But as Einstein began trying to unite

  • gravity and electromagnetism

  • he would find that the difference in strength between these two forces

  • would outweigh their similarities.

  • Let me show you what I mean.

  • We tend to think that gravity is a powerful force.

  • After all, it's the force that, right now,

  • is anchoring me to this ledge.

  • But compared to electromagnetism,

  • it's actually terribly feeble.

  • In fact, there's a simple little test to show this.

  • Imagine that I was to leap from this rather tall building.

  • Actually, let's not just imagine it.

  • Let's do it.

  • You'll see what I mean.

  • Now, of course, I really should have been flattened.

  • But the important question is:

  • what kept me from crashing through the sidewalk

  • and hurtling right down to the center of the earth?

  • Well, strange as it sounds,

  • the answer is electromagnetism.

  • Everything we can see, from you and me

  • to the sidewalk, is made of tiny bits of matter

  • called atoms.

  • And the outer shell of every atom

  • contains a negative electrical charge.

  • So when my atoms collide

  • with the atoms in the cement

  • these electrical charges repel each other

  • with such strength that just a little piece of sidewalk

  • can resist the entire Earth's gravity and stop me from falling.

  • In fact the electromagnetic force

  • is billions and billions of times stronger

  • than gravity.

  • NIMA ARKANI-HAMED

  • That seems a little strange, because gravity keeps our feet to the ground,

  • it keeps the earth going around the sun.

  • But, in actual fact,

  • it manages to do that only because

  • it acts on huge enormous conglomerates of matter,

  • you know -- you, me, the earth, the sun --

  • but really at the level of individual atoms,

  • gravity is a really incredibly feeble tiny force.

  • BRIAN GREENE: It would be an uphill battle for Einstein to unify

  • these two forces of wildly different strengths.

  • And to make matters worse, barely had he begun

  • before sweeping changes

  • in the world of physics would leave him behind.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG: Einstein had achieved so much

  • in the years up to about 1920,

  • that he naturally expected that he could go on

  • by playing the same theoretical games

  • and go on achieving great things.

  • And he couldn't.

  • Nature revealed itself in other ways

  • in the 1920s and 1930s,

  • and the particular tricks and tools that Einstein had at his disposal

  • had been so fabulously successful,

  • just weren't applicable anymore.

  • The Quantum Cafe

  • BRIAN GREENE: You see, in the 1920s a group of young scientists

  • stole the spotlight from Einstein

  • when they came up with an outlandish

  • new way of thinking about physics.

  • Their vision of the universe was so strange,

  • it makes science fiction look tame,

  • and it turned Einstein's quest

  • for unification on its head.

  • Unification! Unification!

  • Led by Danish physicist Niels Bohr,

  • these scientists were uncovering an entirely

  • new realm of the universe.

  • Atoms,

  • long thought to be the smallest constituents

  • of nature, were found to

  • consist of even smaller particles:

  • the now-familiar nucleus

  • of protons and neutrons orbited by electrons.

  • And the theories of Einstein and Maxwell

  • were useless at explaining

  • the bizarre way these tiny bits of matter

  • interact with each other inside the atom.

  • PETER GALISON: There was a tremendous mystery

  • about how to account for all this,

  • how to account for what was happening to the nucleus

  • as the atom began to be pried

  • apart in different ways.

  • And the old theories were totally inadequate to the task of explaining them.

  • Gravity was irrelevant. It was far too weak.

  • And electricity and magnetism was not sufficient.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Without a theory to explain this strange new world,

  • these scientists were lost

  • in an unfamiliar atomic territory

  • looking for any recognizable landmarks.

  • Then, in the late 1920s, all that changed.

  • During those years, physicists developed

  • a new theory called "quantum mechanics,"

  • and it was able to describe the microscopic

  • realm with great success.

  • But here's the thing:

  • quantum mechanics was so radical a theory

  • that it completely shattered all previous ways

  • of looking at the universe.

  • Einstein's theories demand

  • that the universe is orderly and predictable,

  • but Niels Bohr disagreed.

  • He and his colleagues proclaimed

  • that at the scale of atoms and particles,

  • the world is a game of chance.

  • At the atomic or quantum level, uncertainty rules.

  • The best you can do,

  • according to quantum mechanics,

  • is predict the chance or probability

  • of one outcome or another.

  • And this strange idea

  • opened the door to an unsettling new picture of reality.

  • It was so unsettling

  • that if the bizarre features of quantum mechanics

  • were noticeable in our everyday world,

  • like they are here in the Quantum Café,

  • you might think you'd lost your mind.

  • WALTER H.G. LEWIN: The laws in the quantum world

  • are very different from the laws

  • that we are used to.

  • Our daily experiences are totally different

  • from anything that you would see in the quantum world.

  • The quantum world is crazy.

  • It's probably the best way to put it:

  • it's a crazy world.

  • BRIAN GREENE: For nearly 80 years,

  • quantum mechanics has successfully claimed

  • that the strange and bizarre are typical

  • of how our universe actually behaves

  • on extremely small scales.

  • At the scale of everyday life,

  • we don't directly experiencethe

  • weirdness of quantum mechanics.

  • But here in the Quantum Café,

  • big, everyday things sometimes

  • behave as if they were microscopically tiny.

  • And no matter how many times I come here,

  • I never seem to get used to it.

  • I'll have an orange juice, please.

  • BARTENDER: I'll try.

  • BRIAN GREENE: "I'll try," she says.

  • You see, they're not used to people placing

  • definite orders here in the Quantum Café,

  • because here everything is ruled by chance.

  • While I'd like an orange juice,

  • there is only a particular probability

  • that I'll actually get one.

  • And there's no reason to be disappointed

  • with one particular outcome or another,

  • because quantum mechanics suggests

  • that each of the possibilities

  • like getting a yellow juice or a red juice

  • may actually happen.

  • They just happen to happen

  • in universes that are parallel to ours,

  • universes that seemas real to their inhabitants

  • as our universe seems to us.

  • WALTER H.G. LEWIN: If there are a thousand possibilities,

  • and quantum mechanics cannot, with certainty,

  • say which of the thousand it will be,

  • then all thousand will happen.

  • Yeah, you can laugh at it and say,

  • "Well, that has to be wrong."

  • But there are so many other things in physics

  • which -- at the time that people came up with --

  • had to be wrong, but it wasn't.

  • Have to be a little careful, I think,

  • before you say this is clearly wrong.

  • BRIAN GREENE: And even in our own universe,

  • quantum mechanics says there's a chance

  • that things we'd ordinarily think of as impossible

  • can actually happen.

  • For example there's a chance

  • that particles can pass right through walls or barriers

  • that seem impenetrable to you or me.

  • There's even a chance

  • that I could pass through something solid, like a wall.

  • Now, quantum calculations do show

  • that the probability for this to happen in the everyday world

  • is so small that I'd need

  • to continue walking into the wall

  • for nearly an eternity before having a reasonable chance of succeeding.

  • But here, these kinds of things happen all the time.

  • EDWARD FARHI

  • You have to learn to abandon those assumptions

  • that you have about the world

  • in order to understand quantum mechanics.

  • In my gut, in my belly,

  • do I feel like I have a deep intuitive

  • understanding of quantum mechanics?

  • No.

  • BRIAN GREENE: And neither did Einstein.

  • He never lost faith that the universe

  • behaves in a certain

  • and predictable way.

  • The idea that all we can do is calculate the odds

  • that things will turn out one way or another

  • was something Einstein deeply resisted.

  • MICHAEL DUFF

  • Quantum mechanics says that you

  • can't know for certain

  • the outcome of any experiment;

  • you can only assign a certain probability

  • to the outcome of any experiment.

  • And this, Einstein disliked intensely.

  • He used to say "God does not throw dice."

  • BRIAN GREENE: Yet, experiment after experiment

  • showed Einstein was wrong

  • and that quantum mechanics really does describe

  • how the world works at the subatomic level.

  • WALTER H.G. LEWIN:

  • So quantum mechanics is not a luxury, something

  • that you can do without.

  • I mean why is water the way it is?

  • Why does light go straight through water? Why is it transparent?

  • Why are other things not transparent?

  • How do molecules form?

  • Why are they reacting the way they react?

  • The moment that you want to understand

  • anything at an atomic level,

  • as non-intuitive as it is,

  • at that moment, you can only make progress with quantum mechanics.

  • EDWARD FARHI: Quantum mechanics

  • is fantastically accurate.

  • There has never been

  • a prediction of quantum mechanics

  • that has contradicted an observation,

  • never.

  • Gravity - The Odd Man Out

  • BRIAN GREENE: By the 1930s, Einstein's quest

  • for unification was floundering,

  • while quantum mechanics

  • was unlocking the secrets of the atom.

  • Scientists found that gravity

  • and electromagnetism

  • are not the only forces ruling the universe.

  • Probing the structure of the atom,

  • they discovered two more forces.

  • One, dubbed the "strong nuclear force,"

  • acts like a super-glue,

  • holding the nucleus of every atom together,

  • binding protons to neutrons.

  • And the other, called the "weak nuclear force,"

  • allows neutrons to turn into protons,

  • giving off radiation in the process.

  • At the quantum level,

  • the force we're most familiar with,

  • gravity, was completely overshadowed

  • by electromagnetism and these two new forces.

  • Now, the strong and weak forces

  • may seem obscure,

  • but in one sense at least,

  • we're all very much aware of their power.

  • At 5:29 on the morning of July 16th, 1945,

  • that power was revealed by an act

  • that would change the course of history.

  • In the middle of the desert, in New Mexico,

  • at the top of a steel tower about

  • a hundred feet above the top of this monument,

  • the first atomic bomb was detonated.

  • It was only about five feet across,

  • but that bomb packed a punch

  • equivalent to about twenty thousand tons of TNT.

  • With that powerful explosion, scientists

  • unleashed the strong nuclear force,

  • the force that keeps neutrons and protons

  • tightly glued together inside the nucleus of an atom.

  • By breaking the bonds of that glue

  • and splitting the atom apart,

  • vast, truly unbelievable amounts

  • of destructive energy were released.

  • We can still detect remnants of

  • that explosion through

  • the other nuclear force,

  • the weak nuclear force,

  • because it's responsible for radioactivity.

  • And today, more than 50 years later,

  • the radiation levels around here are still

  • about 10 times higher than normal.

  • So,

  • although in comparison to electromagnetism and gravity

  • the nuclear forces act over very small scales,

  • their impact on everyday life is every bit as profound.

  • But what about gravity?

  • Einstein's general relativity?

  • Where does that fit in at the quantum level?

  • Quantum mechanics tells us

  • how all of nature's forces work in the microscopic realm

  • except for the force of gravity.

  • Absolutely no one could

  • figure out how gravity operates

  • when you get down to the size of atoms

  • and subatomic particles.

  • That is, no one could figure out

  • how to put general relativity and quantum mechanics together into one package.

  • For decades,

  • every attempt to describe the force of gravity

  • in the same language as the other forces --

  • the language of quantum mechanics --

  • has met with disaster.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.: You try to put those two pieces

  • of mathematics together,

  • they do not coexist peacefully.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG: You get answers

  • that the probabilities of the event

  • you're looking at are infinite.

  • Nonsense, it's not profound,

  • it's just nonsense.

  • NIMA ARKANI-HAMED: It's very ironic because it was the first force

  • to actually be understood in some decent

  • quantitative way, but, but,

  • but it still remains split

  • off and very different from, from the other ones.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.: The laws of nature

  • are supposed to apply everywhere.

  • So if Einstein's laws

  • are supposed

  • to apply everywhere,

  • and the laws of quantum mechanics

  • are supposed to apply everywhere,

  • well you can't have two separate everywheres.

  • Strings to the Rescue

  • BRIAN GREENE: In 1933, after fleeing Nazi Germany,

  • Einstein settled in Princeton, New Jersey.

  • Working in solitude, he stubbornly continued

  • the quest he had begun more than a decade earlier,

  • to unite gravity and electromagnetism.

  • Every few years,

  • headlines appeared,

  • proclaiming Einstein was on the verge of success.

  • But most of his colleagues

  • believed his quest was misguided

  • and that his best days were already behind him.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG: Einstein, in his later years,

  • got rather detached from the work of physics

  • in general and, and stopped reading people's papers.

  • I didn't even think he knew

  • there was such a thing as the weak nuclear force.

  • He didn't pay attention to those things.

  • He kept working on the same problem

  • that he had started working on as a younger man.

  • S JAMES GATES, JR.: When the community of theoretical physicists

  • begins to probe the atom,

  • Einstein very definitely gets left out of the picture.

  • He, in some sense, chooses not

  • to look at the physics coming from these experiments.

  • That means that the laws of quantum mechanics

  • play no role in his sort of further investigations.

  • He's thought to be this doddering,

  • sympathetic old figure

  • who led an earlier revolution but somehow fell out of it.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG: It is as if a general

  • who was a master of horse cavalry,

  • who has achieved great things

  • as a commander at the beginning of the First World War,

  • would try to bring mounted cavalry

  • into play against the barbwire

  • trenches and machines guns of the other side.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955.

  • And for many years it seemed that Einstein's dream

  • of unifying the forces in a single theory

  • died with him.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.:

  • So the quest for unification

  • becomes a backwater of physics.

  • By the time of Einstein's death

  • in the '50s,

  • almost no serious physicists

  • are engaged in this quest for unification.

  • RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: In the years since,

  • physics split into two separate camps:

  • one that uses general relativity

  • to study big and heavy objects,

  • things like stars, galaxies and the universe as a whole...

  • LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: ...and another that uses quantum mechanics

  • to study the tiniest of objects,

  • like atoms and particles.

  • This has been kind of like having two families

  • that just cannot get along

  • and never talk to each other...

  • RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: ...living under the same roof.

  • LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: There just seemed to be no way to combine

  • quantum mechanics...

  • RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: ...and general relativity in a single theory

  • that could describe the universe on all scales.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Now, in spite of this,

  • we've made tremendous progress

  • in understanding the universe.

  • But there's a catch:

  • there are strange realms of the cosmos

  • that will never be fully understood

  • until we find a unified theory.

  • And nowhere is this more evident

  • than in the

  • depths of a black hole.

  • A German astronomer named

  • Karl Schwarzschild

  • first proposed

  • what we now call black holes

  • in 1916.

  • While stationed on the front lines

  • in WWI,

  • he solved the equations

  • of Einstein's general relativity

  • in a new and puzzling way.

  • Between calculations of artillery trajectories,

  • Schwarzschild figured out

  • that an enormous amount of mass,

  • like that of a very dense star,

  • concentrated in a small area,

  • would warp the fabric of space-time

  • so severely

  • that nothing, not even light,

  • could escape its gravitational pull.

  • For decades,

  • physicists were skeptical

  • that Schwarzschild's calculations

  • were anything more than theory.

  • But today

  • satellite telescopes probing deep

  • into space

  • are discovering regions

  • with enormous gravitational pull

  • that most scientists believe

  • are black holes.

  • Schwarzschild's theory

  • now seems to be reality.

  • So here's the question:

  • if you're trying to figure out

  • what happens in the depths of a black hole,

  • where an entire star is crushed

  • to a tiny speck,

  • do you use general relativity

  • because the star is incredibly heavy

  • or quantum mechanics

  • because it's incredibly tiny?

  • Well, that's the problem.

  • Since the center of a black hole

  • is both tiny and heavy,

  • you can't avoid using

  • both theories at the same time.

  • And when we try to put the two theories together

  • in the realm of black holes,

  • they conflict. It breaks down.

  • They give nonsensical predictions. And the universe is not nonsensical;

  • it's got to make sense.

  • EDWARD WITTEN

  • Quantum mechanics works really well

  • for small things, and general relativity

  • works really well for stars and galaxies,

  • but the atoms, the small things,

  • and the galaxies, they're part of the

  • same universe.

  • So there has to be some description

  • that applies to everything.

  • So we can't have one description for atoms

  • and one for stars.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Now, with string theory,

  • we think we may have found

  • a way to unite our theory of the large

  • and our theory of the small

  • and make sense of the universe

  • at all scales and all places.

  • Instead of a multitude of tiny particles,

  • string theory proclaims

  • that everything in the universe,

  • all forces and all matter

  • is made of one single ingredient,

  • tiny vibrating strands of energy

  • known as strings.

  • MICHAEL B. GREEN: A string

  • can wiggle in many different ways,

  • whereas, of course, a point can't.

  • And the different ways in which the string wiggles

  • represent the different kinds

  • of elementary particles.

  • MICHAEL DUFF: It's like a violin string,

  • and it can vibrate just like violin

  • strings can vibrate.

  • Each note if, you like,

  • describes a different particle.

  • MICHAEL B. GREEN: So it has incredible

  • unification power,

  • it unifies our understanding

  • of all these different kinds

  • of particles.

  • EDWARD WITTEN: So unity

  • of the different forces and particles

  • is achieved because they all

  • come from different kinds of vibrations

  • of the same basic string.

  • BRIAN GREENE: It's a simple idea

  • with far-reaching consequences.

  • JOSEPH LYKKEN

  • What string theory does is it

  • holds out the promise that,

  • "Look, we can really

  • understand questions that

  • you might not even have thought were scientific questions:

  • questions about how the universe began,

  • why the universe is the way it is

  • at the most fundamental level."

  • The idea that a scientific theory

  • that we already have in our hands

  • could answer the most basic questions

  • is extremely seductive.

  • Science of Philosophy?

  • BRIAN GREENE: But this seductive new theory

  • is also controversial.

  • Strings, if they exist,

  • are so small,

  • there's little hope of ever seeing one.

  • JOSEPH LYKKEN: String theory

  • and string theorists do have a real problem.

  • How do you actually test string theory?

  • If you can't test it in the way

  • that we test normal theories,

  • it's not science, it's philosophy,

  • and that's a real problem.

  • S. JAMES GATES, JR.: If string theory fails

  • to provide

  • a testable prediction,

  • then nobody should believe it.

  • On the other hand,

  • there is a kind of elegance to these things,

  • and given the history of how theoretical

  • physics has evolved thus far,

  • it is totally conceivable

  • that some if not all

  • of these ideas will turn out to be correct.

  • STEVEN WEINBERG:

  • I think, a hundred years from now,

  • this particular period,

  • when most of the brightest young theoretical physicists

  • worked on string theory,

  • will be remembered as a heroic age

  • when theorists tried and succeeded

  • to develop a unified

  • theory of all the phenomena of nature.

  • On the other hand, it may be remembered as a tragic failure.

  • My guess is

  • that it will be something like the former rather than the latter.

  • But ask me a hundred years from now,

  • then I can tell you.

  • BRIAN GREENE: Our understanding of the universe

  • has come an enormously long way

  • during the last three centuries.

  • Just consider this.

  • Isaac Newton,

  • who was perhaps the greatest scientist

  • of all time, once said,

  • "I have been like a boy playing on the

  • sea shore, diverting myself in now

  • and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than usual,

  • while the great ocean of truth

  • lay before me, all undiscovered."

  • And yet,

  • two hundred and fifty years later,

  • Albert Einstein,

  • who was Newton's true successor,

  • was able to seriously suggest

  • that this vast ocean,

  • all the laws of nature,

  • might be reduced to a few fundamental ideas

  • expressed by a handful

  • of mathematical symbols.

  • And today,

  • a half century after Einstein's death,

  • we may at last be on

  • the verge of fulfilling his dream of unification

  • with string theory.

  • But where did this daring and strange new theory come from?

  • How does string theory achieve

  • the ultimate unification of the laws of the large

  • and the laws of the small?

  • And how will we know if it's right or wrong?

  • SHELDON LEE GLASHOW: No experiment

  • can ever check up what's going on

  • at the distances that are being studied.

  • The theory is permanently safe.

  • Is that a theory of physics

  • or a philosophy?

  • STEVEN WEINBERG: It isn't written in the stars

  • that we're going to succeed,

  • but in the end

  • we hope we will have a single theory that governs everything.

  • Made by: Naurisenvalds Coool Coool Corp. ©

Now, on NOVA,

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B2 中上級

エレガント・ユニバース 第1話【RUSサブ (The Elegant Universe — Episode 1 [RUS sub])

  • 289 16
    Daniel Yang に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語