Name: Philosophical Zombies (P-Zombies): Are They the Key to Understanding Consciousness?
Uploaded: 2024-05-20T22:32:57.000Z
Duration: 15 min 20 s

関係詞節（制限と非制限）

Imagine you are on a distant planet, interacting  with an alien species that mirrors human behavior  

perfectly, yet the species lacks any  subjective experience or awareness. 

This alien species moves and talks like  humans do, displaying a rich variety of  

emotional and social responses. They shake hands, laugh at jokes,  

and show genuine excitement when discussing  their latest achievements. Their world is  

filled with art, music, and literature, and  they participate in social structures that  

parallel human families and communities. Their behavior is impeccably human-like.  

However, they lack any inner world of  subjective experience or consciousness. 

These aliens are what philosophers  might call "philosophical zombies" or  

"p-zombies," entities that outwardly appear  fully sentient but internally are devoid  

of awareness or subjective feeling. Despite their advanced behaviors and  

complex interactions, they are hollow vessels,  mere automata going through the motions. 

This concept highlights a haunting question about  the nature of consciousness: how can we ever truly  

know what lies within another being, and what is  it that gives rise to our own rich inner lives? 

So let's talk about it To delve into the implications  

of p-zombies, it will be helpful to talk  about the hard problem of consciousness. 

So What is the hard problem of consciousness? 

The "hard problem of consciousness" is a  term coined by philosopher David Chalmers.  

It addresses the challenge of explaining why and  how subjective experiences, or qualia, arise from  

neural processes. This contrasts with the "easy  problems" of consciousness, which deal with  

understanding the brain's functional aspects, like  information processing and behavioral responses. 

While the term "easy problems" is used  somewhat tongue-in-cheek, Chalmers emphasizes  

that these issues are still quite challenging.  As cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker notes,  

they are "easy" only in comparison to the  hard problem. At least For the “easy problem”  

scientists know what to look for, and with  sufficient resources and intellectual effort,  

solutions might be found within this century. The hard problem, on the other hand, seeks to  

uncover why these processes are associated with  personal, internal experiences, such as the  

redness of red or the pain of a headache. While science can map brain activity and  

understand its functions, this problem questions  why these processes give rise to a conscious state  

rather than operating in darkness. It's  a philosophical issue that continues to  

puzzle researchers in neuroscience,  cognitive science, and philosophy.

This leads us to two predominant theories  in the philosophy of mind,Physicalism and  

What are the differences between  Physicalism and Mind-Body Dualism? 

Physicalism posits that everything is physical or  at least supervenes on the physical. Under this  

view, mental states, including consciousness,  are the result of physical interactions within  

the brain. If true, the exact replication of  a human's physical brain state should yield  

identical conscious experiences, leaving  no room for p-zombies—they simply cannot  

exist because their physical equivalence  to humans necessitates consciousness. 

Mind-Body Dualism, on the other hand, argues  that mental phenomena are non-physical and thus,  

not bound by physical laws. This perspective  allows for the possibility of p-zombies as  

it suggests that physical replication  alone might not replicate consciousness.  

The mental and physical are distinct,  and one can exist without the other. 

These theories bring us to the  concept of the philosophical zombie. 

The Philosophical Zombie Argument is a  thought experiment in the philosophy of mind,  

particularly in discussions about  consciousness and physicalism.

Proposed by philosopher David Chalmers,  the argument presents the concept of a  

"philosophical zombie," which is an entity  that is indistinguishable from a normal  

human being in every way except that it lacks  conscious experience, qualia, or sentience.

The zombie behaves and appears  exactly like any other human;  

it can speak about its emotions, respond to pain,  

and behave as if it is conscious, but it does  not actually have any subjective experience.

The core of the zombie argument  is to challenge physicalism,  

the doctrine that everything is physical or that  the real world consists only of physical entities.

Chalmers uses this argument to suggest that  

conscious experience cannot be fully  explained by physical processes alone.

If it is conceivable that there could be  a physical duplicate of a person without  

consciousness, then consciousness  must involve something non-physical.

This leads to the conclusion that physicalism  is false, as the existence of such zombies  

would mean that physical facts do not  exhaustively account for mental facts. 

Chalmers argues that the mere logical possibility  of p-zombies suggests that physicalism is  

insufficient to explain consciousness. If we  can coherently conceive of a human devoid of  

consciousness, then consciousness and the  physical brain state cannot be identical. 

A related thought experiment, known as  Mary's Room, further supports this notion. 

Mary's room thought experiment? The Mary's Room thought experiment,  

a thought experiment proposed by philosopher  Frank Jackson, provides an intriguing insight  

into the nature of subjective experience. In this scenario, he imagines a scientist  

named Mary who lives her entire life in a  black-and-white room. Despite her confinement,  

Mary becomes an expert on the science  of color vision and understands all the  

physical and neurological facts  about how humans perceive color.

However, she herself has never actually seen  any colors firsthand. The experiment raises the  

question: what happens when Mary finally steps  out of her monochromatic environment and sees a  

vibrant color, such as red, for the first time? According to Jackson, when Mary finally sees  

the color red, she gains new knowledge, that  is- what red truly looks like. This suggests  

that the subjective experience of seeing red  provides a distinct kind of information that  

cannot be fully captured by objective, physical  descriptions alone. The thought experiment is  

designed to demonstrate that there is an aspect of  consciousness, often referred to as "qualia," that  

goes beyond physical explanations, challenging  purely physicalist accounts of the mind.

However, some argue that the philosophical zombie  actually cannot prove physicalism is wrong. 

against philosophical zombie argument : Inconceivability: Critics like Daniel Dennett  

argue that if a being acts indistinguishably  from a conscious being, it must, by necessity,  

be conscious. Thus, p-zombies are not genuinely  conceivable—they are a contradiction in terms. 

Dennett, a prominent philosopher and  cognitive scientist, suggests that  

if a being behaves indistinguishably from a  conscious being, it must be conscious itself  

because the behavior is a manifestation of  the processes we associate with consciousness. 

This reasoning challenges the concept  of p-zombies, which as we mentioned were  

introduced by philosopher David Chalmers  as hypothetical beings who act exactly  

like conscious beings but lack inner experiences.  They would hypothetically react to stimuli, hold  

conversations, and express emotions like conscious  humans, but without any subjective experience. 

Dennett argues that p-zombies are  not genuinely conceivable because  

if a being behaves exactly like a conscious  person, they must also possess consciousness. 

According to Dennett, the concept of a p-zombie  implies that consciousness is a distinct,  

non-physical property. He rejects this, arguing  that consciousness is not separate from the  

physical processes occurring in the brain. This  view is rooted in functionalism and the idea  

that mental states can be fully explained by the  physical and functional processes of the brain. 

For example, imagine a robot programmed to act  exactly like a human: it could hold conversations,  

detect and respond to emotions, and even write  poetry. Dennett would argue that if such a robot  

字幕リスト動画再生

Philosophical Zombies (P-Zombies): Are They the Key to Understanding Consciousness?

specific

cognitive

essentially

conscious