字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント AMNA NAWAZ: Good evening. I'm Amna Nawaz. GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett. On the "NewsHour" tonight: President Biden prepares to speak to Congress and the American people in his annual State of the Union address. AMNA NAWAZ: A cyberattack on the nation's biggest medical payment processing company cripples much of the United States' health care system. GEOFF BENNETT: And the U.K. government proposes new legislation to punish those responsible for the rising tensions triggered by the war in Gaza. JONATHAN HALL K.C., Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation: I haven't seen such open hostility towards categories of individuals as I have since the 7th of October, that willingness, almost a brazenness, to go out on the streets. (BREAK) AMNA NAWAZ: Welcome to the "NewsHour." Tonight, President Biden will address Congress and millions of Americans in his third State of the Union and the last of his current term. GEOFF BENNETT: It's a high-stakes moment for the president as he continues his 2024 reelection campaign. And the speech will give him the chance to reach voters and convince them to give him a second term in the White House. Joining us to explain what we can expect are the "NewsHour"'s Lisa Desjardins and Laura Barron-Lopez. So, Lisa -- or, rather, Laura, we will start with you. What new proposals and announcements can we expect from the president tonight? LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: Thanks, Geoff. President Biden is expected to announce that the U.S. military is going to establish an emergency port on the coast of Gaza. And we don't know exactly the location of where that port will be, but we do know that that port will enable the delivery of truckloads via ship, truckloads of crucial aid. That includes food, water, medicine, temporary shelters. And this announcement comes after the third airdrop in recent days of aid. And it means that also no U.S. military will be required to deploy to Gaza. In addition to that, Geoff, there are also a number of key domestic proposals that the president will be announcing, including raising the corporate tax rate to 28 percent, offering first-time homebuyers a $5,000 tax credit, capping out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs for all Americans, not just those on Medicare, and urging Congress to pass the bipartisan border deal. GEOFF BENNETT: And, Laura, how are people in the White House and in the Biden campaign really viewing this speech as a chance for the president to reconnect with the key parts of his coalition, the winning coalition that delivered him the White House back in 2020? LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: People inside the White House tell me, Geoff, that they really view this speech as what they call the starting gun of 2024. And it's a chance for the president to lay out his vision to the biggest audience that he is likely to have this entire year. This is a type of audience that he won't typically get if he's just giving a campaign speech. And then a source close to the president told me that, when the president prepares for speeches like this, he spends a lot of time by himself trying to think about what he wants to say. He takes input, but he is also -- he tends to shut everything out. And we saw him really take a lot of time this weekend at Camp David in preparation for this speech. And we have an excerpt of what he is preparing to say that the White House provided to U.S. based on his prepared remarks. He's expected to say: "My lifetime has taught me to embrace freedom and democracy. Now, some other people my age see a different story, an American story of resentment, revenge and retribution. That's not me." That defense of democracy, Geoff, at home and abroad is going to be one of the three main themes of the president's speech. He's going to remind people about January 6. He's going to remind people about the COVID pandemic that he inherited. And he's also -- the other two pillars are a defense of individual freedoms, like abortion, IVF access, and then finally building upon his economic vision. GEOFF BENNETT: All right, so, Lisa, over to you. If this speech is the starting gun of 2024, to use that phrase, how are Republicans planning to respond? LISA DESJARDINS: That is something we have rare bipartisan agreement on, that this is essentially the opening of the 2024 presidential season. Republicans' response will come from one of their most junior members of the U.S. Senate, 42-year-old Katie Britt of Alabama. Now, speaking to her office, they believe that one thing that Britt brings to the table tonight is the fact she's a working mom. They told me that her theme will be the idea that Republicans, that their party is the party of families and children. They will push that forward. And another thing that Katie Britt plans to do, she says she sees her speech as the closing prosecution of the case that Joe Biden failed as president. It seems to me she's not going to talk so much about Donald Trump, but instead her job, which is a classic job for the response, will be to take on Joe Biden's policy, specifically kitchen table issues they want to talk about, inflation, prices, those kinds of things. But immigration certainly will come up as well. This will be a big test for her, but her office says that she's a meticulous prepper and that they're not fazed, even though they know it's an awkward format. One other thing we're watching for from Republicans tonight, though, Geoff, is, will there be outbursts in the chamber? House Speaker Mike Johnson has asked his Republicans not to have outbursts. However, as we well know, he does not govern their individual decisions. GEOFF BENNETT: Well, the president is the primary focus tonight, but we should also say that members of Congress each get one ticket to give out to a guest who can join inside the chamber. I know you have reached out to nearly every House office. What do these guests tell us about the members of Congress and their priorities? LISA DESJARDINS: That's right. In this time where national politics just seems so stratified, we now see kind of decentralized politics, and local politics matter more than ever. These members have a lot at stake tonight in the messages that they convey to their constituents. So I saw some trends overall, a lot of guests having to do with health care, on the Republican side, some having to do with crime and veterans issues. But we found three guests that we thought were interesting, that we wanted to highlight their stories who are here tonight. One is an IVF doctor, another someone who has received some rare disease treatment. But, first, as I -- as you listen to these members who are here tonight from all of the United States, I want to bring the voice of a woman who was there on the -- at the Selma march, Bloody Sunday. She was 9 years old. That anniversary is tonight, Geoff, as you know. And she came here to talk about voting rights. SHEYANN WEBB-CHRISTBURG, Civil Rights Activist: It was when I was 9 years old, when I participated as the youngest little girl on that Bloody Sunday march, the most traumatic experience of my life. And one of the things that's very critical as we embark upon a new election is that we continue to really push and fight, not only to vote, but to get others engaged, to become registered voters. DR. PIETRO BORTOLETTO, Reproductive Endocrinologist and Director of Reproductive Surgery, Boston IVF: So earlier this week, I was actually performing IVF. I help retrieve eggs from women who are trying to use the technology to be able to build their family. I also retrieve eggs from women who are about to undergo cancer treatment. People use IVF for different reasons. And I'm here tonight to be able to advocate for them. JENNELLE STEPHENSON, Gene Therapy Patient: I'm visiting here today because I was fortunate to be a recipient of gene therapy for sickle cell anemia. And it's been post six years since my transplant. And I haven't experienced any pain or any crises related to it. And so I really just want to bring attention to the topic. LISA DESJARDINS: Now, another point of attention that you will see in the chamber tonight, Democratic women have decided to wear white. They say that's a representation of women's rights, especially reproductive rights. Of course, that was the color of the suffragettes as well. One other thing happening tonight, Geoff, I want to relay. TikTok has barraged these members with phone calls today. Many of them shut down their phones after this appeared on the TikTok app, making anyone who wants to use that app had to call Congress or restart their phone. And this is something that has gotten a lot of attention. But, tonight, as a result, there was a backlash from Congress in committee, passed a bill that would effectively ban TikTok. I just raised that because, as much as this speech -- President Biden has so many goals that Laura's been talking about, many of these members are thinking about something else that might not come up. GEOFF BENNETT: Yes, in fact, we have a report on that later in the broadcast. That is Lisa Desjardins and Laura Barron-Lopez. Our thanks to you both. And we will see you later this evening. LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ: Thank you. AMNA NAWAZ: Well, as Lisa and Laura reported, the stakes are high, not just for President Biden, but for Republicans, too, in this pivotal election year. When John Thune of South Dakota first won his Senate seat 20 years ago, he made history by defeating a party's Senate leader for the first time in over 50 years. Today, he is a candidate to replace Mitch McConnell as the Senate's top Republican. I spoke with Senator Thune moments ago. Senator Thune, welcome back to the "NewsHour." How are you? SEN. JOHN THUNE (R-SD): Thanks, Amna. Good. Nice to be with you. AMNA NAWAZ: Thank you so much for joining us. It's fair to say now your party essentially has a presumptive nominee in former President Trump after Super Tuesday. You have endorsed him, as have many others in leadership. I should point out you were among those criticizing him after his second impeachment, when you said what he did -- quote -- "to undermine faith in our election system and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power is inexcusable." So why support him today if what he did then was inexcusable? SEN. JOHN THUNE: Well, look, I said what I said then and I'm not going to relitigate it, but I think what we have in front of us now is a very clear choice. And the voters, Republican voters around the country, have made clear that they want President -- former President Trump to be the Republican nominee. And I have said I would support the Republican nominee, and I think now we have a clear choice. It's either going to be Trump or Biden. And my view is, we need to put an end to the Biden-Schumer agenda, which consists of higher prices, broken borders, less energy independence, and a weakened America on the global stage. Those are things that a lot of us believe that we can change, if we can unite behind our nominee and get a majority in the United States Senate. And those are the types of things we're going to be working on because we think the stakes are really high for the American people. AMNA NAWAZ: It seems there are a number of voters who still have questions, though. The primaries revealed specifically among Republican primary voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina anywhere between 61 and 76 percent of Nikki Haley supporters said that they'd be so dissatisfied with Mr. Trump that they would not vote for him in November. So how does he win them over? SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think it's really important for the former president, now that the -- a lot of those primaries are out of the way -- there are still some coming, but he clearly is winning very decisively. He's got to reach out and build a coalition of support that is broad enough, wide enough, strong enough, and deep enough to win a national election. He's got tremendous support, as you know, loyalty among base voters, but general elections are decided in the middle of the electorate. And so I think it's really important that you reach out to Nikki Haley supporters, to suburban voters, independent voters, people who a lot of times are -- can swing back and forth in elections. He's going to have to have them in order to win the election in November. And a lot of us believe that he's got to perform that way at the top of the ballot, and it will help our downballot races in the Senate and the House. And we're trying to get a majority of the United States Senate. AMNA NAWAZ: I want to ask you about the race to replace Senator Mitch McConnell as leader when he steps down later this year. You have thrown your hat in the ring. On the issue of Ukraine aid specifically, do you think, as leader, you would be able to convince House Republicans to back aid to Ukraine in a way that Mitch McConnell has not yet so far, especially if Mr. Trump continues to oppose it? SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think that the challenge, of course, right now, with the situation deteriorating there, is to try and feel a sense of urgency about this. I'm hoping the House can execute on getting something passed, ideally the Senate bill, but if not something that they could send to the Senate that we could then act on. I'm hoping that there is enough of a consensus and a majority of Republicans in the House who believe that we need to defend America's interests, we need to stand with our allies, that this does represent a national security threat for our country. America cannot retreat from the world stage. American leadership is desperately needed now more than I think any time in recent history, and we need to make sure that Ukraine has the weaponry and the resources that it needs to defeat the Russians, because, if we're not sending them American weapons, and they succeed in Ukraine, and they go into a -- roll into a NATO country, then we're going to be sending American sons and daughters. And I would much rather send weaponry, ammunition, that sort of thing, and let the Ukrainian people, who have been really good about carrying the fight to the Russians, win that battle. And I hope that we can get the political support to make that happen. AMNA NAWAZ: Senator, as you know, abortion access remains a top issue for millions of voters. We do expect President Biden to speak to that tonight. And I guess, when you ask Democrats, what is their stance on abortion, they say protect a woman's right to choose. What would you say is the Republican stance on abortion access? SEN. JOHN THUNE: Well, I think that the Republican position is to let the people decide. And what the court said is, this is not going to be decided by people in Black robes in Washington, D.C. This needs to go back to the states and their voters. And I think that's exactly what's happening. States around the country are making decisions, putting policies in place that reflect the will and the sentiment of the voters in those individual states. AMNA NAWAZ: On a related issue, we saw the Alabama ruling on IVF show just how far and wide-reaching the implications of the overturning of Roe v. Wade can go. Your Republican colleague blocked a bill that would actually protect IVF access nationwide. So I just wanted to ask on your stance. Do you support IVF treatment? SEN. JOHN THUNE: Absolutely. IVF has been an amazing, I guess you would say, solution for a lot of couples and families that haven't been able to have kids. And I think it's been made clear. Of course, the Alabama court took a position, but the Alabama legislature has since ruled or proposed legislation on that, which the governor has since signed in support of IVF. And I don't think that you will find very many people in this country who don't realize what an effective method it is of enabling people who otherwise couldn't be able to have a family. So we're pro-family, we're pro-life and IVF represents that. AMNA NAWAZ: I need to ask you more broadly about this moment in time where we are now eight months before the election. You have two elderly, unpopular candidates with very different visions for America. One, however, does face 91 criminal charges. He tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power and already lost to Mr. Biden in 2020. So, in an election that hinges on a few states and very narrow margins, are you worried that voters concerned about all of those things will either stay home or vote for a third-party candidate? SEN. JOHN THUNE: I think, in the end -- and I know there's always a lot of conversations about third-party candidates. And, clearly, in some cases, if people don't like the options, they could stay home. But I do really think that you will see a big turnout this year because I think people see it a very clear choice. And you pointed out these are contrasting visions and these are very different views about how to lead this country and the direction we ought to head in. I'm one who believes that we need to pivot, we need to go in a different direction, and that we need new leadership both in the White House and in Congress, or at least in the Senate. And so my view is that, as people think about this election, yes, I want them to vote. I want the electorate to be energized and engaged. And I ultimately believe they will be, because I think, as I said before, the stakes are really high. And I think people understand what's at risk here if we don't get it right. And I'm hopeful, again, that we will see people turn out in big numbers and that they will vote for Republicans for Senate and hopefully President Trump for the White House. AMNA NAWAZ: That is Senate Republican Whip John Thune of South Dakota joining us tonight. Senator, thank you. Always great to see you. SEN. JOHN THUNE: Thanks, Amna. Nice to see you. AMNA NAWAZ: And we will have more live coverage of the State of the Union online and later tonight beginning at 9:00 p.m. Eastern right here on PBS. GEOFF BENNETT: In the day's other headlines: President Biden moved closer to clinching the Democratic presidential nomination overnight. He won the Hawaii caucuses with 66 percent of the vote, but the choice of uncommitted received 29 percent. The president still needs a little over 400 delegates to wrap up the nomination. A move to bar access to TikTok headed to the House floor today after a strong show of support in committee. The vote was 50-0 to make the Chinese firm ByteDance sell off the video sharing app or see it banned. The bill also allows for denying access to a foreign-owned app that is deemed a danger to national security. TikTok denies that it poses any danger to U.S. users. In the Middle East, cease-fire talks in Cairo are now on hold with little chance of a deal before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan starts. Hamas blamed Israel today for refusing to accept a permanent cease-fire and withdrawal from Gaza. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a military graduation ceremony today that the offensive will not stop. BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, Israeli Prime Minister (through translator): Today, I want to tell you in clear words the IDF will continue to operate against all Hamas battalions all over the Gaza Strip. And this includes Rafah, the last stronghold of Hamas. Whoever tells us not to operate in Rafah tells us to lose the war, and that will not happen. GEOFF BENNETT: Meantime, Jordan, the U.S. and other countries airdropped more humanitarian supplies into Northern Gaza. But relief workers said it's still only a fraction of what's actually needed. Sweden officially became the 32nd member of NATO today. The Swedes and Finland moved to join the alliance after Russia invaded Ukraine. Today, the Swedish prime minister handed over final documents to Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Washington. The papers were officially deposited into a special vault. Here at home, a jury in Michigan heard opening statements in the involuntary manslaughter trial of James Crumbley. His teenage son killed four high school classmates in 2021. Today, the father listened as prosecutors noted he bought the handgun used in the shootings. The defense argued he had no way of knowing his son's intent. MARC KEAST, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Oakland County, Michigan: James Crumbley bought that gun that his son used to kill as a gift for his son four days before the attack. James Crumbley failed to secure that gun in a way to prevent his son from accessing it. MARIELL LEHMAN, Attorney For James Crumbley: The prosecution alleges that James Crumbley had knowledge that his son could and would hurt other people and that he failed to protect those people, that he failed to take steps to protect others. And, ladies and gentlemen, that simply is not true. GEOFF BENNETT: The shooter's mother, Jennifer Crumbley, was found guilty of the same charges last month. Xcel Energy acknowledged today that its equipment apparently ignited a giant wildfire in the Texas Panhandle. But the utility also disputed any claim of negligence. Authorities are still investigating the cause of the blaze that's become the largest in state history. It burned nearly 1,700 square miles in hundreds of buildings, but is now nearly half-contained. And, on Wall Street, stocks rallied as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the Central Bank is not far from cutting interest rates. The Dow Jones industrial average gained 130 points to close at 38791. The Nasdaq rose 241 points. The S&P 500 added 52. And 29-year-old sailor Cole Brauer has become the first American woman to complete a solo race around the world. She stood on her 40-foot-long sailboat gliding into a Spanish port early today after setting sail from the same spot 130 days ago. Once on land, the champagne flowed as she celebrated. Congratulations to her. Still to come on the "NewsHour": the Biden administration's efforts to restore America's global influence after Trump left office; and the challenges that tribal communities face accessing the Internet. AMNA NAWAZ: A cyberattack on a little-known health care company last month has caused major trouble and serious financial consequences for hospitals, doctors and patients around the country. Stephanie Sy looks at the impact and the efforts to solve these problems. STEPHANIE SY: Amna, the American Hospital Association has described the hack as -- quote -- "the most serious cyberattack in history on the health care system." It began about two weeks ago, when hackers shut down a payment processing system run by a company called Change owned by UnitedHealthcare. Change essentially functions as a middleman between insurers, providers, hospitals, and pharmacies. Hospitals and other medical practices have not been able to process bills and get payments they need to operate. Doctors and patients have been unable to get insurance approvals for some procedures. And until a few days ago, pharmacies were also impacted. Here's what one doctor in Texas posted on TikTok. WOMAN: This morning, I spent probably several hours calling several pharmacies because my patients hadn't received their prescriptions that I prescribed last week. So I -- it's not usual that I have to call the pharmacies. Like, usually, I only call the pharmacies if there are, like, shortages or controlled substances or something else is going on. STEPHANIE SY: She suspects the delays were because of the health care hack. This week, the Department of Health and Human Services announced steps to help, including providing some advanced payments for providers. But problems remain. Dan Diamond has been covering this for The Washington Post and joins me now. Dan, welcome to the "NewsHour." You heard me describe some of the problems. Give us a sense of the scope and the magnitude of the disruptions and who has borne the brunt of the impact. DAN DIAMOND, The Washington Post: Stephanie, Change Healthcare was the middleman for tens of millions of insurance claims every day. So that means virtually everyone in health care is being touched by this directly because they're waiting to get paid or they work with performers and players that are waiting. Right now, there are real pains for physicians. Physicians don't necessarily have the cash flow for now two weeks of not getting paid. So we have talked -- here at The Washington Post, we have talked to doctors who have had to take out emergency loans, that have gone on heroic measures to just keep their practices open. Hospitals also have been able to scramble and try to figure out how to keep their operations paid for, pharmacists that you mentioned earlier. I talked to a therapist who hasn't been paid. It really is touching every corner of health care right now. STEPHANIE SY: Is critical patient care being impacted? DAN DIAMOND: Right now, no. There are efforts to make sure that patients are being protected. There are procedures that are still taking place. It's a back end issue, but the back end issues are so severe that, inevitably, if this continues, there will be problems facing the front end. There will be doctors who can't keep their lights on. There will be staff who might have to be furloughed. So, eventually, there will be a crisis point. And that's what health officials are trying to stave off by talking about or starting to advance emergency loans to keep these providers open. STEPHANIE SY: So, we're now already at least two weeks in to since the hack was reported. And there have been reports that UnitedHealthcare may have paid a $22 million ransom to the cyber gang purportedly behind the attack. Why isn't the system back up and running if that is the case? DAN DIAMOND: First, I think ransomware groups, hackers, are not necessarily the most reliable partners here. And even though there may have been a payment from UnitedHealth -- they have not confirmed that -- it's not necessarily going to resolve the issue when you're dealing with one of these groups. There still are systems that need to be checked. There's data that was encrypted and was taken and may not be back in the hands of United, assuming they made this payment. So it's very risky when dealing with ransomware to begin with. And the scope of this hack was so extensive, it's hard to just flip the switch back on, even if the hackers have returned what was taken. STEPHANIE SY: What made Change Healthcare vulnerable to this? And more broadly, Dan, what is it exposed about the weaknesses in our health care system? DAN DIAMOND: Change was vulnerable in part because they're a big target. Even before United bought them, and United is a major health care company, one of the largest companies in the United States, Change was already this major processor of claims. And they take data from hospitals, from doctors, and then check that data, pass it on to the insurance company. They're in the middle of all of these transactions. They have sensitive medical data that is very alluring to hackers. So I'm not exactly sure. I don't think we know the ways that hackers found their way into Change, but health care companies are under attack in this way all the time. This just happens to be a particularly large hack. And it also has pointed to how much we rely on just a handful of health care companies as consolidation increases across the industry. Change is this major middleman. They're owned by UnitedHealth, which has its fingers all over health care right now. And that is something that government officials that I have talked to this week have been thinking about as well. There's an antitrust probe into United through the Justice Department preceded this. But there is a real question about, what are the risks if so much of health care is concentrated in just a few hands? STEPHANIE SY: We talked a little bit about the Department of Health and Human Services' response. How do physicians and hospitals feel about how the government has reacted? DAN DIAMOND: They're not feeling great, Stephanie. No one is happy with the response so far. Hospitals have gotten more help. They have deeper pockets, that they're able to weather the pain better than some other organizations. But even hospitals say they need more than the loans that are being offered potentially by the federal government. Physicians are not eligible for those loans right now from the federal government. UnitedHealth has made available emergency loans for doctors, but what they have told us, they're getting offered pennies on the dollar. They might be down hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions of dollars at this point in claims that haven't been paid, and they're being offered thousands of dollars, maybe $10,000 to patch that hole, which they can't do. So there is bipartisan outrage in Congress. I was at the White House earlier today talking with officials, who say this is really something that they're looking to the private sector right now to try and solve before the federal government steps in more. STEPHANIE SY: Dan Diamond with The Washington Post. Dan, thanks so much for your reporting. DAN DIAMOND: Thank you, Stephanie. GEOFF BENNETT: In Britain, the government there is planning new legislation to punish extremists responsible for rising tensions over the war in Gaza. As special correspondent Malcolm Brabant tells us, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is concerned that both Jewish and Muslim communities are being targeted and that social cohesion is under threat. MALCOLM BRABANT: Support for the Palestinian cause in the city of Brighton is particularly vocal, and protesters wore black to mourn for Gaza and show disdain for Rishi Sunak's urgent speech to the nation last Friday. RISHI SUNAK, British Prime Minister: In recent weeks and months, we have seen a shocking increase in extremist disruption and criminality. What started as protests on our streets has descended into intimidation, threats and planned acts of violence. MALCOLM BRABANT: The Brighton demonstration was peaceful, but organizer Russell Craddock didn't like the scrutiny of our camera. RUSSELL CRADDOCK, Palestinian Solidarity Campaign: Who are you filming for? MALCOLM BRABANT: American television. RUSSELL CRADDOCK: Oh. I'm not giving you permission to film. MALCOLM BRABANT: I have permission to film because this is an open space. RUSSELL CRADDOCK: Does someone want to stand in front of him? MALCOLM BRABANT: Freedom to film in public places is a longstanding British tradition, but national values, including tolerance, are under strain. RISHI SUNAK: Jewish children fearful to wear their school uniform, lest it reveal their identity, Muslim women abused in the street for the actions of a terrorist group they have no connection with. Now our democracy itself is a target. MALCOLM BRABANT: Across the square, Jewish residents stood guard around a memorial to victims of the Hamas terrorist attack on Southern Israel on October the 7th. ADAM MA'ANIT, Jewish Community Leader: The day after the October 7 massacres, on October 8, they had a demonstration in the center of the city, and they had a speaker who praised the October 7 massacre and said that it was a day of celebration. That's who these people are. MALCOLM BRABANT: Adam Ma'anit's 18-year-old cousin, Maayan, was murdered on October the 7. Her father was kidnapped and remains a hostage. ADAM MA'ANIT: You speak to any Jew in the country, many of them will be experiencing heightened sense of insecurity and fear from weekly protests, people shouting at them when they exit their synagogues, people harassing them on social media. I mean, social media is a sewer right now. MALCOLM BRABANT: On the other side of town, former dancer Lee Whitaker carried a bundle to represent children killed by Israel's bombardment of Gaza. LEE WHITAKER, Pro-Palestinian Protester: You can see what extremists we are. And that is just Rishi Sunak. He's making trouble. It's actually our protests are protests of love. The big thousands of us marching in London, I have never seen any trouble. There's such a wonderful feeling of camaraderie. MALCOLM BRABANT: In London, the mayor, Sadiq Khan, is concerned that anti-Muslim bigotry is also on the rise. SADIQ KHAN, Mayor of London: What we're witnessing is a concerted and growing attempt by some to degrade and humiliate minorities for political and electoral gain. MALCOLM BRABANT: But an angry and chaotic debate in Parliament about Gaza last month raised fears about intimidation. House Speaker Lindsay Hoyle: SIR LINDSAY HOYLE, Parliament Speaker, United Kingdom: I am very, very concerned about the security of all members. PROTESTER: From the river to the sea! PROTESTER: Palestine will be free! MALCOLM BRABANT: This chant is at the center of government concerns. While some right-wing Israeli factions use "From the river to the sea" to taunt Palestinians about expulsion, Jewish groups regard the pro-Palestinian version as a threat to wipe Israel off the map. It was projected onto Parliament's clock tower as members were arguing about the war. RISHI SUNAK: M.P.s do not feel safe in their homes. There is no context in which it can be acceptable to beam antisemitic tropes onto Big Ben in the middle of a vote on Israel-Gaza. JONATHAN HALL K.C., Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation: No, I don't think it was just politicking. He was effectively drawing attention to what he and I think also the official opposition regard as something of real significance, and if not urgency. MALCOLM BRABANT: Jonathan Hall monitors extremism as part of his role reviewing Britain's terrorism laws. JONATHAN HALL K.C.: I haven't seen such open hostility towards categories of individuals as I have since the 7th of October. That willingness, almost a brazenness to go out on the streets and to be really vile and horrible and invite hatred and in some circumstances violence against people by category is something that we haven't really seen. MALCOLM BRABANT: In Brighton, demonstration organizer Russell Craddock gave his verdict on Rishi Sunak's plans to crack down on extremism. RUSSELL CRADDOCK: We won't be intimidated by Sunak. We won't be intimidated by the Met. We won't be intimidated by so-called claims of violent antisemitism. MALCOLM BRABANT: But this was Russell Craddock the day after the Hamas terrorist attack. RUSSELL CRADDOCK: So, amazingly, incredibly, most of the Hamas fighters paraglided their way. (CHEERING) JONATHAN HALL K.C.: Someone who glorifies a terrorist organization and is reckless, so takes the risk that someone will be encouraged to support that organization, does commit an offense. MALCOLM BRABANT: The Kaddish, traditional Jewish prayer of mourning, next to a memorial that has frequently been vandalized. Across town, white flags for the Palestinian dead, and that chant, which local police say can warrant arrest in aggravating circumstances. PROTESTER: From the river to the sea! PROTESTERS: Palestine will be free! MALCOLM BRABANT: We approached the man with the megaphone. From American TV. Can I ask you a question please? PROTESTER: Go ahead. MALCOLM BRABANT: Can you just explain to me... (CROSSTALK) PROTESTER: Don't -- don't.. MALCOLM BRABANT: No, I'm allowed to do this because this is a public... PROTESTER: No, you're not allowed to take photo of me. MALCOLM BRABANT: Yes, I am. I'm -- it's a public space. PROTESTER: We're here to support people that have been massacred and murdered, children and babies, and you're here sticking (INAUDIBLE) in people's faces. MALCOLM BRABANT: No. PROTESTER: Don't you think that's disgraceful? MALCOLM BRABANT: No, I don't. I'm just merely asking a question. (CROSSTALK) PROTESTER: No, you're not. MALCOLM BRABANT: Yes, I am. PROTESTER: You came and picked on this man. MALCOLM BRABANT: Because he was actually chanting. PROTESTERS: Palestine! Free, free, Palestine! PROTESTER: From the river to the sea! MALCOLM BRABANT: The police ushered us away because, here, asking questions risks a breach of the peace. For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Malcolm Brabant. AMNA NAWAZ: The foreign policy focus of President Biden's State of the Union address tonight will be on Israel and Ukraine. And he will present himself as a steady steward of American interests around the world, drawing a contrast between his approach and former President Trump's. A new book examines how President Biden's foreign policies break, but sometimes embrace his predecessors. Here's Nick Schifrin with more. NICK SCHIFRIN: When Joe Biden became president, he proudly declared, "America is back." He and his administration believed that former President Donald Trump and his administration had mistreated allies, become an unreliable partner, and pursued misplaced priorities. But did the Biden administration really abandon Trump's foreign policy? How did the collapse of Kabul humble Biden's most senior aides? And how has the administration's strategy shifted, as it faces two unexpected wars in Europe and the Middle East? That is the story told in the new book, "The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy After Trump." The author is Alexander Ward, a national security reporter at Politico. Alex, thanks very much. Pleasure to have you here. Let's start in Afghanistan. You write: "For an administration that felt America had to be humble about the limits of their power, the preparation for Afghanistan was coated in hubris." How? ALEXANDER WARD, Author, "The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy After Trump": Well, part of it was that they expected, basically, that they could end the war with minimal chaos. They expected chaos, to be clear, but not for it to be as chaotic as it was. Part of it was that the intelligence they had at the time of the decision to leave was that it would take 18 to 24 months for the Taliban to take over. And they didn't actually really question that intelligence or that timeline, even though there was even open-source material showing that the Taliban was ready for a pretty quick sweep across the country. NICK SCHIFRIN: And, of course, there were internal people in the State Department saying, that intelligence was wrong. ALEXANDER WARD: Precisely. NICK SCHIFRIN: A senior official told you that: "Had we known we only had a few months after the president's decision in April to withdraw, we would have done things differently, probably so." Do we have any idea what they would have done differently had they known? ALEXANDER WARD: Really fast-track the rebuild of the SIV program, the Special Immigrant Visa program, which was to bring Afghan allies of Americans back to the U.S. One of the reasons they hadn't scaled that up so quickly, well, part of it was, it was decimated in the Trump years, but the other was they thought they had 18 to 24 months, so that was something that they could work on sort of in the longer term. Another might have been the Pentagon decided speed was safety. They went faster than even the White House and some of the State Department expected. So I think, in the rethink of how this could have happened, one would have been a greater coordination between all the agencies, and especially on how quickly the military would leave, because that will -- that shrunk some of the options available to the administration. NICK SCHIFRIN: You have this extraordinary anecdote about that lack of coordination, or at least part of the debate between state and DOD. You write about a meeting in which a State Department official told four-stars, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, sitting across the table that -- quote -- "The State Department had a higher risk threshold than the soldiers at the table, and Milley nearly jumped out of his chair." How did that tension between state and DOD play out? ALEXANDER WARD: The State Department was preparing to stay in Kabul. They were preparing for a longer mission there, but it was the Pentagon that was saying, it's time to go, right? The weakest part of a military is one that is retreating. NICK SCHIFRIN: While they're retreating. NICK SCHIFRIN: That's what they were worried about, yes. ALEXANDER WARD: Precisely, yes, while they're retreating. So, in that case, there was just a mismatch in what the goals were. NICK SCHIFRIN: Despite the chaos, you write that, afterward, there was never any serious reckoning inside the administration about Afghanistan. No one offered to resign, in large part because the president did not believe anyone had made a mistake. That is an extraordinary thing. Why not? ALEXANDER WARD: Because, at the end of the day, it was the right strategic decision to leave. That's how the administration sees it. Now, with all that's going on in the world today, they would argue, look, isn't it great that we're out of a war we couldn't win after 20 years, that the military had no real solution for, that we spent a lot of money, time and treasure to execute? And so it makes sense that we would leave. NICK SCHIFRIN: How much of the disaster in Afghanistan informed their decision-making ahead of the Ukraine full-scale invasion? ALEXANDER WARD: Quite a bit. They wanted a lot more coordination between the agencies. They wanted to let allies know what they were doing. So, when the Ukraine intelligence was coming to the fore, the U.S. said, look, tell our allies what we're up to, what we know, tell the Ukrainians what we know, get every agency coordinated, build a Tiger Team, right, work on every single possible scenario. NICK SCHIFRIN: The other focus, of course, for the administration today is Israel. And you write about the early days of the Biden administration dealing with the crisis in Israel and Gaza. And you chronicle Joe Biden's decades-long support for Israel and, as you put it, strategy of honey in public, vinegar on the phone. How's that played out, not only what you write about in 2021-'22, but today? ALEXANDER WARD: Well, if you talk to the Biden administration, in 2021, it worked quite well, because that conflict, while deadly and brutal, ended after 11 days. And for October 7, the attack of October 7, which, of course, was brutal, and 1,200 people died in one day, then you, of course, have a far right government in Israel, and you have a public reeling after what they saw. And so it's a much bigger, different context than it was in 2021. The administration still uses that playbook, the honey in public, vinegar in private. But with that context, with that different context, it's harder to have as much suasion over the Israelis as the U.S. had in 2021. NICK SCHIFRIN: You quote an administration official in 2021 saying that the team was not putting a -- quote -- "effing second of effort into a two-state solution." Did that have an impact in today's war? ALEXANDER WARD: It's -- potentially, right We don't really know. But one of the things critics were saying, from -- really from the Trump administration through the Biden administration, was that you can focus on the Abraham Accords and you can focus on normalization deals all you want, but the Israeli-Palestinian issue is still there, and it's still festering. And so if you leave that wound to fester, it'll eventually cause you problems. And so, and with the Biden administration, they really felt that a bank shot was better, that you could maybe get to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through the normalization deals. NICK SCHIFRIN: And that's one example, I think, of something that you rightly point out. How has the Biden administration not abandoned Trump foreign policy? ALEXANDER WARD: We cannot deny that there are many elements of Trumpism in Bidenism, one of which would be the competition with China, keeping export controls on them, keeping the tariff war going, one of which would also be the Abraham Accords, right? That's a continuation of Trump era policy, and this general railing against free trade and globalization, a sense that we have to protect a lot of our industries here at home in order to make life better for the middle class. You don't get the Biden administration foreign policy without Trump's win. It is born from the trauma of Trump's victory. Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, is right there next to Hillary Clinton when she's conceding to Trump. And what he's thinking is, hey, I was born in the traditional Democratic foreign policy thinking. NICK SCHIFRIN: Minnesota. ALEXANDER WARD: A Minnesota boy. How did I lose populist politics to a New York billionaire real estate magnate? And so he spends four years trying to figure out how to do this. And that thinking, this foreign policy for the middle class epithet, has become the underlying intellectual framework for what we have seen in this administration so far. NICK SCHIFRIN: Alex Ward. The book is "The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy After Trump." Thank you very much. ALEXANDER WARD: Thanks for having me. GEOFF BENNETT: And we will be back shortly for a look at the barriers to Internet access in some tribal communities. AMNA NAWAZ: But, first, take a moment to hear from your local PBS station. It's a chance to offer your support, which helps to keep programs like this on the air. GEOFF BENNETT: For those of you staying with us, growth in the global art market is spawning some new investors. Economics correspondent Paul Solman takes a look at the prudence of investing in art in this encore report for our arts and culture series, Canvas. PAUL SOLMAN: The grand opening of ARTEX, a European art stock market, which plans to start trading soon, selling shares in art like this Francis Bacon, one work at a time. YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI, ARTEX: We are the equivalent of Nasdaq. We love the New York Stock Exchange or the London Stock Exchange. PAUL SOLMAN: Co-Founder and CEO Yassir Benjelloun-Touimi. YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI: Instead of buying a corporate share in a company, you buy a share into a masterpiece. PAUL SOLMAN: One of 550,000 shares in a triptych by the late English painter Francis Bacon of his lover George Dyer. An IPO, a public offering, with shares priced at $100 each. And what do I get for that? YASSIR BENJELLOUN-TOUIMI: You get the appreciation in exact way. You get the appreciation if you're buying an ounce of gold. PAUL SOLMAN: Now ARTEX is the latest firm to sell shares in individual works of art, but not the first. KELLY CROW, The Wall Street Journal: In the past, collectors and dealers have often bought things in small consortiums. PAUL SOLMAN: Wall Street Journal art market correspondent Kelly Crow. KELLY CROW: The British Railway Pension did sort of pioneer this idea that you could pool your money and buy better things and hold it for a time and resell it. PAUL SOLMAN: So somebody can buy a share of, this is a Warhol or a reproduction of a Warhol, that you own. But nowadays, New York's masterworks already sells art shares to the public, as you would stocks. Chief Investment Officer Allen Sukholitsky. ALLEN SUKHOLITSKY, Masterworks: Masterworks is a firm that makes art and investable asset class. The first firm that's ever done it, we started in 2017, so we've been doing it now for several years. PAUL SOLMAN: During which the firm's value has climbed to more than $1 million it says. Employees beating the bushes for marketable high value artwork and customers to whom to hawk shares in a masterwork like an Andy Warhol or a Yayoi Kusama. ALLEN SUKHOLITSKY: She's actually about 100 years old, which is always interesting. It tells you that artists have definitely cracked the code on living forever. PAUL SOLMAN: The usual minimum investment, $15,000, for shares of an artwork whose price is derived from an auction database tracking 7000 artists post-World War II. Masterworks says it only buys blue chips. Artists like Warhol and Kusama, whose values have outperformed the stock and bond markets for the past 20 years, Ed Ruscha, KAWS, supposedly Masterwork backed securities. KELLY CROW: The art market is just super unregulated. It's kind of like a wild West. And if you want to buy $100 share just for kicks in the same way that you would go to a baseball game just to have fun and see how something does roll the dice, have some fun. I just I would be a little nervous. You know, taking out a second mortgage. PAUL SOLMAN: Even for a painting is highly valued in the current market as the Francis Bacon triptych? KELLY CROW: These George Dyer Triptychs that sold in 2017 for mid $50 million are important because that lover eventually committed suicide on the eve of a major show of Bacon's. We really love the soap opera of an artist's life and how that feeds into the work. PAUL SOLMAN: Contemporary art consultant Alex Glauber, who helped his client by this work by Alex de Court. Glauber has sold to Masterworks, so an art stock market is a good thing. ALEX GLAUBER: Certainly brings more money and attention to the art market, but I don't know if it's necessarily healthy for art and the appreciation of art long term. PAUL SOLMAN: Why not? ALEX GLAUBER: Why? Because if the conversation is more about the money than the art that really devalues and undermines the very purpose of art. PAUL SOLMAN: But the argument is, I will start out with it as an investment. Then I will get interested in it and I will learn more about it. I will become an art appreciator. ALEX GLAUBER: But if what you're trying to learn about is why this is a savvy investment, why this artist is poised for an uptick in their value, that's very much at odds with what perhaps put that artist in that position in the first place. PAUL SOLMAN: In other words, we're talking speculation, as in some 1000 Picasso's and innumerable other brand name works stored in warehouses around the world. Or more recently, speculation in digital NFTs, non-fungible tokens, that boomed and then swooned. Since I interviewed investor Lin Dai barely a year ago. OK, so what's happened to the NFT market since last we talked? LIN DAI, NFT Entrepreneur: Yeah. You know, there's a lot of have changed. We saw this speculative bubble pop. PAUL SOLMAN: Which had seen Lin Dai's Bored Ape NFT double in value to $400,000 before falling back down to around $100,000 today, by his estimate. You have second thoughts? Misgivings about having bought your Bored Ape? LIN DAI: No, absolutely not. I think certainly the Bored Ape probably will hold its value over time. PAUL SOLMAN: Unlike, say Jozef Israels' Pancake Day, which fetched more than a million pounds in 1895. A billion or more dollars today, depending on how you convert prices. Israels' largest painting at auction in recent years brought $35,000. Just one of countless examples that illustrate what philosopher Barbara Herrnstein Smith calls the contingencies of value. BARBARA HERRNSTEIN SMITH, Philosopher: Value is not fixed, inherent objective and part of objects, but the product of numerous interactions between people and things in their universe. It's contingent in the sense that what effects those interactions changes. The question is always going to be will it continue to be valued over time? Not will it continue to have value over time? PAUL SOLMAN: And thus for the investment value of art, we've learned to prize from Leonardo and Rembrandt to Israels, Van Gogh and Picasso, Bacon, Warhol, Kusama, a Bored Ape. Time will tell if we fickle mortals, will continue valuing them as we do today. For the "PBS NewsHour," Paul Solman, mostly in New York. AMNA NAWAZ: For many tribal communities in America, Internet access isn't always as easy as logging on to a computer. The FCC reports, almost 28 percent of tribal land residents lack high-speed broadband, compared to 1.5 percent of urban residents. The Biden administration is offering funds to change that. But as student reporter Maria Staubs from Arizona State University's Cronkite School of Journalism tells us, better connectivity may not be enough. MARIA STAUBS: This construction project on the Tohono O'odham Nation is bringing the 21st century to a rural part of Arizona. TONYA JOAQUIN, Vaya Chin Resident: Here on the reservation, our connection with the Internet is kind of sparse, so it's here or there. MARIA STAUBS: The Tohono O'odham Utility Authority is laying down a fiber optic network to provide high-speed Internet to members of the nation. It's thanks to a $10 million grant from the Department of Agriculture. TONYA JOAQUIN: We are moving more towards the technology era, and we don't want to get left behind. MARIA STAUBS: Vaya Chin resident Tonya Joaquin says the high-speed Internet will improve her family's education and health care. TONYA JOAQUIN: We live about, what, two hours, 2.5 hours away from town. My son will have telemed. So, he sees a doctor out at the Phoenix Children's Hospital. We don't have to drive there. We have a home visit on the Internet. KRISTAN JOHNSON, Tohono O'odham Utility Authority: We're able to educate and teach our tribal membership of all ages. MARIA STAUBS: Kristan Johnson manages operations for the tribe's main Internet service provider. She says broadband will provide opportunities for economic development. KRISTAN JOHNSON: Whether they're basket weavers, they are dressmakers, they harvest, or whatever they do, they're able to put that on the Internet and be able to sell it and be -- help themselves out. MARIA STAUBS: While members of the nation have welcomed the investment in broadband infrastructure, there are fundamental barriers that prevent its full implementation in Native American communities, high on the list, access to a computer or a smartphone at home and an understanding of how to use them. BRIAN FICKETT, General Manager, Tohono O'odham Utility Authority: We have elders that they don't even know what Internet is. MARIA STAUBS: Brian Fickett is the general manager of the agency that provides Internet and cell service to the tribe. BRIAN FICKETT: These folks will be able to connect at home, just like they would off the reservation. MARIA STAUBS: Here at the Tohono O'odham Community College, a computer literacy training program provides 10 members from each district with education on how to use the Internet. MAN: Your subject line right here. MARIA STAUBS: Lessons can be as simple as sending an e-mail. Anselmo Ramon is one of the leaders of the program. ANSELMO RAMON, Tohono O'odham Community College: We train them from the very basics of the components, move them up to the features on the keyboard, move them up to turning it, like, on and off. MARIA STAUBS: There are students of all ages here. Some are familiar with the technology. JUANITA HOMER, Student: It's been over five years since I used a computer. So, this is really helping me to learn more. MARIA STAUBS: Others are starting fresh. FRANCINE JOSE, Student: It's really new to me. Everything's new to me. I have never been on the computers. MARIA STAUBS: Funding for the computer training course lasts only two years, so Anselmo Ramon has devised a plan to grow computer literacy throughout his tribal nation. It relies on students passing on their newfound knowledge. ANSELMO RAMON: So, in train the trainer, we want to train 10 people. In turn, we want those people to train another family member or a friend or a co-worker. MARIA STAUBS: It's a practical solution because tribal members understand, before they can run with high-speed Internet, they have to first learn how to walk. For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Maria Staubs with Cronkite News on the Tohono O'odham tribal lands. AMNA NAWAZ: And don't forget to join us later tonight for our live coverage of President Biden's State of the Union address. We will have full coverage of the president's speech, as well as analysis from our correspondents and our expert panel. That starts at 9:00 p.m. Eastern right here on PBS. And that is the "NewsHour" for tonight. I'm Amna Nawaz. GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett. We hope we will see you later this evening.
B1 中級 米 PBS NewsHour full episode, March 7, 2024(PBS NewsHour full episode, March 7, 2024) 17 2 林宜悉 に公開 2024 年 03 月 08 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語