engaging numerous thinkers over the centuries.

The longstanding philosophical debate between  

determinism and free will exemplifies  the fallacy of affirming the disjunct.

This discourse questions whether human actions are  

predetermined or if individuals have  the freedom to choose independently.

A common misinterpretation is the oversimplified  argument: "Either actions are determined,  

or they result from free will. Since  causality exists, free will does not."

This binary perspective fails to  consider the potential coexistence  

or complex interaction of these concepts. Enlightenment thinkers like David Hume and  

Immanuel Kant played pivotal roles in this  debate. Hume's compatibilism suggested that  

causality's existence doesn't negate free  will, while Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason"  

proposed that free will could exist within moral  actions, even in a deterministic physical world.