Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • The newly born universe buzzed and frothed with boundless energy.

  • Even after the raging furnace of the first few minutes had died away,

  • Temperatures universe-wide were more than a hundred million degrees.

  • For thousands of years, this primal heat burned - a cosmos of plasma, a super-hot mix of particles

  • and radiation.

  • Until one day it changed forever.

  • That day arrived when the universe was almost four hundred thousand years old, and had cooled

  • to about three thousand kelvin.

  • In this now comparatively tepid soup lone electrons met lone protons, and finally could

  • stick together - forming the first atoms.

  • But this was not all.

  • For as each electron and proton bound together, a small amount of energy was released.

  • A packet of energy that raced away at the cosmic speed limit, the speed of light.

  • A particle of energy born in the formation of a hydrogen atom.

  • A particle we call a photon, a particle of light itself.

  • This photon was far from the first.

  • But as the universe began transitioning from plasma into neutral gas, light could then,

  • for the first time, stream freely through its reaches.

  • And so, our photon's long, long journey began.

  • It headed out first into the universe’s dark ages

  • A time before the first stars burned, a time before the first galaxies formed.

  • In the eerie darkness, gravity pulled on mass to mold the first seeds of cosmic structure.

  • But the photon sped on, and noticed nothing.

  • Eventually, the first stars burst into life around it,

  • Massive and bloated, these ancient suns burned themselves out in a cosmic blink of an eye

  • as the first supergiant black holes grew rapidly between them as they eagerly devoured mass.

  • But the photon sped on, and noticed nothing.

  • The first galaxies began to assemble The sky lit up with the fires of uncountable

  • young stars across the cosmos as they began to fuse the initial hydrogen and helium atoms

  • into heavier elements.

  • But the photon sped on, and noticed nothing.

  • Millions steadily turned into billions of years,

  • And as galaxies grew and matured, eventually, the intense light of young stars began to

  • settle.

  • The photon’s journey could have potentially lasted forever into eternity

  • But after almost 14 billion light years of travel, a large spiral galaxy steadily came

  • into view Its destiny was set.

  • Near a small blue dot orbiting a small white star.

  • After crossing the last few thousand years, the photon collided with a piece of metal

  • Part of a telescope built by humans and orbiting near the planet Earth

  • The photon’s energy was completely absorbed, energising electrons, and registering on detectors.

  • But as the photon vanished from existence, its billions-year long journey complete - it

  • simply did not notice.

  • Because to the photon itself, the journey never took place.

  • 13.8 billion years of cosmic time disappeared in an instant.

  • Yet how can this be?

  • Light has existed in the universe from its earliest moments,

  • And will continue to exist long after humanity and the stars are shred to dust.

  • But just how does it work?

  • And how can it seemingly last forever?

  • And perhaps most importantly - what even is it?

  • Light is fast - it only takes 0.13 seconds for it to circulate the entire globe.

  • Through fibre optic cables that slows down by a third - but that still means that with

  • Surfshark, changing your virtual location is almost instantaneous.

  • Surfshark have been kind enough to sponsor this video - and they are the best, simplest

  • VPN service out there.

  • You can change your country quickly and easily to stream whatever you want from wherever

  • you want in the world, with more than 100 countries to choose from.

  • Light seems to escape definition as it exhibits properties of both a particle and a wave - and

  • now you too can be similarly inscrutable to big tech companies and cyber criminals by

  • using Surfshark to mask your IP address and encrypting your data on public wifi.

  • Its the best way to secure your personal information when using the internet, and even warns you

  • of potential data breaches.

  • So, check out Surfshark by clicking on the link in the description and get 83% off and

  • 3 months for free - as well as a 30 day money-back guarantee.

  • Thanks to Surfshark for supporting education on youtube.

  • Light had played a pivotal role since the cosmos´ very beginning.

  • In these earlier times, it had only existed for the very briefest moments,

  • Slamming into speeding particles before it had a chance to travel anywhere, one piece

  • of light dying as another was born However our parcel of light was born into

  • a very different, very transparent, universe.

  • Forged with the first true atoms from featureless plasma.

  • With the cosmic maelstrom of the Big Bang finally abated,

  • Our photon could begin its immense journey unhindered.

  • As it travelled, many generations of stars lead to our Sun, forming in the collapse of

  • an immense gas cloud, and billions of years after, humans began to walk on the surface

  • of our small rocky planet.

  • And so eventually, as our photon was a couple of thousand light years distant from Earth

  • - these humans began to wonder.

  • All men by nature desire to know.

  • An indication of this is the delight we take in our senses…(and) above all others the

  • sense of sightThe reason is that this, most of all the senses, makes us know and

  • brings to light many differences between things.”

  • The ancient Greeks wondered if light emanated from the eyes, touching and feeling the world

  • around us.

  • But clearly, there are times when it is dark when we can’t see anything.

  • So, they concluded light must be something external, something captured by our eyes.

  • Islamic scientists began to unravel the properties of light,

  • Finding rules of reflection and the magnification properties of glass lenses.

  • Light was clearly a natural part of the universe around us.

  • But it took the coming of the scientific revolution, and a fight between two giants of science,

  • for light’s deep secrets to be finally uncovered.

  • The year was 1652, and Dutch physicist, astronomer, mathematician and all round genius Christiaan

  • Huygens was exploring optical phenomena.

  • He had noted how light travelled through lenses and bounced off mirrored surfaces, and was

  • particularly interested in the phenomenon of refraction - where the path of light is

  • bent when it passes from one medium to another.

  • Huygens noticed that light was often split into the colours of the rainbow by his instruments,

  • And sometimes strange patterns of dark and light would be produced.

  • Clear evidence, to him, that light was some sort of wave.

  • Some sort of travelling, oscillating phenomenon.

  • Oscillations can be found throughout nature, from planetary orbits to vibrating electrons,

  • But let’s start with a simple picture - think of a child on a swing.

  • As they swing, their position oscillates from one position to the next, then back again,

  • Just like a pendulum that drives the regular ticking and tocking of a grandfather clock.

  • When oscillations act in unison, but slightly out of step, waves are formed.

  • A stone thrown into a flat pond pulls the water down with it, but the water bounces

  • back.

  • This splash of water pulls on its neighbours, inducing them to oscillate, which, in turn,

  • pulls on their own neighbours.

  • These oscillations fan out across the pond as a steadily rippling pattern of waves.

  • Waves are everywhere, from sound waves coursing in the air, to ocean water waves driven by

  • the wind and moon.

  • Seismic shifts can generate violent and destructive earthquakes in our planetary crust,

  • Whilst similar waves ripple in the atmosphere of the Sun and other stars.

  • And so - light seemed to be a wave.

  • But this left a question.

  • If light is a wave, just what was doing the waving?

  • In Britain, Robert Hooke also reached a similar conclusion about the nature of light.

  • Hooke had observed light travelling through glass, and he realised that this picture of

  • wavey light could explain a lot of the phenomenon he had seen.

  • This was cutting edge science at the time.

  • But Hooke had a problem.

  • And that problem was a man.

  • There are no surviving portraits of Robert Hooke, and over the years a rumour passed

  • down the generations that this powerful man was to blame - having conveniently lost the

  • painting when taking over as head of the Royal Society in London.

  • For Robert Hooke had a powerful enemy, and that enemy’s name was Isaac Newton.

  • Since cleared of any wrongdoing in the absence of contemporary images of Hooke, there is

  • still little question that the two men were not friends.

  • For as well as his far reaching discoveries in mathematics and gravity,

  • Newton also had an interest in optics and the nature of light itself,

  • And he did not like what Hooke or Huygens had to say.

  • It was Newton who discovered that white light could be split into a rainbow by passing it

  • through a prism, And like Hooke he had kept musing on this.

  • But unlike Hooke, Newton did not conclude that light was some sort of wave.

  • To Newton, light consisted ofcorpuscles”.

  • To Newton, light was made of tiny individual particles.

  • Newton’s focus was the phenomenon of diffraction, the fact that waves bend around a sharp edge.

  • He knew that sound, a wave in the air, bent as it travelled past sharp edges.

  • It was clear that you could eavesdrop on a conversation from around a corner without

  • being able to see the gossipers.

  • You could hear from behind an object but you could not see.

  • So, he reasoned, light simply could not be a wave.

  • And he didn't stop there.

  • Newton went furthermuch, much further.

  • He reasoned that light, as a stream of particles, would even feel the pull of gravity

  • In his book Opticks, published in 1704, he wrote

  • Do not Bodies act upon Light at a distance, and by their action bend its Rays?”

  • And though on this he was right - he was not proved right for centuries.

  • So it was Newton's corpuscular theory of light that reigned supreme,

  • Due more to his weight of personality and scientific standing, as opposed to its ability

  • to explain the complex observations of light.

  • Over the years however, steadily, the tide began to turn away from Newton.

  • In 1800, polymath Thomas Young shone light through a pair of narrow slits,

  • And observed a pattern of interference on a background screen.

  • This wasn’t the first demonstration of interference, but it was the clearest.

  • How could Newton’s picture of light as particles explain Young’s observation of interference?

  • How could light, as tiny bullets passing through either one slit or the other, produce the

  • observed pattern?

  • Simply throwing a couple of pebbles into a still pond reveals that interference is naturally

  • produced by waves, either in water or in light.

  • Other observations of light supported its wave-like nature, including light´s polarisation

  • through a material called calcite.

  • But for centuries a big secondary question remained unanswered.

  • If light was a wave, what was doing the waving?

  • Our cosmic parcel of light was born when a proton captured an electron.

  • It sped out into the universe, powerful and energetic.

  • But as it travelled, and the universe expanded, it started to lose some of that energy.

  • The light, originally blue to our eyes, steadily morphed through the colours of the rainbow,

  • and into the red.

  • Soon it was joined by other energetic light, shining from countless billions of newly formed

  • stars.

  • There were different types of light too, light of exceptionally high energy - and light with

  • barely any energy at all.

  • The universe was awash.

  • Our light did not know that these would be invisible to human eyes,

  • For it would be many billions of years until eyes existed,

  • And indeed - these X-rays and radio waves, as we call them,

  • were unknown to us until the very end of the nineteenth century.

  • In this new era, thought itself will be transmitted by radio.”

  • Guglielmo Marconi was at his father’s estate near Bologna in Italy.

  • He was still a young man, aged only 20, but his education had opened his eyes to an invisible

  • world.

  • In the decades before, the nature of light had steadily been unravelled

  • And Marconi was ready to use this new-found knowledge to change everything.

  • Staring at his equipment, Marconi was waiting to see a faint spark in the darkness.

  • With its bundle of wires and coils of his workshop, such a spark would not be surprising,

  • But the impetus for this spark was not in the equipment before him,

  • It was in similar equipment located several miles away.

  • Of course, the nineteenth century had seen the arrival of the telegraph,

  • Where electronic pulses are sent along wires that cross entire countries and continents.

  • But this needed wires to be strung through the air and under the oceans.

  • Marconi had no need for such wires connecting his equipment.

  • He would be sending messages not along bits of copper.

  • His messages would simply fly, completely unseen, through the air.

  • But how?

  • The answer lies with one of science's greatest geniuses.

  • The answer lies with James Clerk Maxwell.

  • When a young James Clerk Maxwell arrived at the University of Cambridge in 1850,

  • He was told that attendance at the 6 am church service was compulsory for all students.

  • The Scottish-born prodigy had long been a night owl and simply responded

  • Aye, I suppose I could stay up that late”.

  • His name is writ large across the modern world.

  • But his crowning achievement was uniting two seemingly disparate phenomena and creating

  • something remarkable.

  • Electricity and magnetism had been known about since ancient times,

  • Seen in the strange attraction of rubbed materials, and mysterious stones that knew how to find

  • north.

  • But by the nineteenth century, it was becoming clear that these two are not truly distinct,

  • As experiments had revealed they were in fact implicitly entwined - a flow of an electric

  • current could generate a magnetic field, and a changing magnetic field could generate a

  • current in a wire.

  • But as Maxwell stared at these equations, he began to see a deeper picture.

  • Instead of separate relationships, he saw that electricity and magnetism could be united

  • into a single whole.

  • A united set of mathematics that encompassed all electric and all magnetic phenomena.

  • Maxwell’s vision would eventually be stripped back to four unique equations,

  • And the modern topic of electromagnetism was born.

  • But Maxwell’s great insight was not only concerned with electromagnetic complexity

  • - For he wondered about the simplest situation

  • of all - electromagnetism in the nothingness of a vacuum.

  • How does light travel through the emptiness of space?

  • He knew that electromagnetic fields filled all space, even in vacuums, but it was imagined

  • that in empty space these fields would be null - effectively not there.

  • But what if you plucked one of these fields, either electric or magnetic,

  • So that these fields were not zero at some location?

  • Maxwell pondered this question, using his equations to explore how the situation would

  • evolve And the answer was astounding.

  • Thinking about pinching the skin on the back of your hand.

  • What happens when you let go of your pinch?

  • Your skin sinks back to its unpinched self, Quickly if you are young, and somewhat slower

  • if you are older.

  • Maxwell’s equations told him that the electromagnetic pinch would evolve away back to zero,

  • But that was not the end of the story.

  • Pinching the electric field would generate a similar pinch in the magnetic field.

  • And the pinch in the magnetic field would generate a pinch in the electric field.

  • But that was not the end of it.

  • For the pinches in electricity and magnetism did not simply fade back to zero,

  • Instead, they oscillated, regenerating each other from one moment to the next.

  • And just like ripples on a pond, these oscillations travelled away as waves.

  • Maxwell realised these oscillations had the property of light.

  • Light, he realised, is a self-propagating electromagnetic wave.

  • But what caused the ripples?

  • What was the electromagnetic equivalent of the stone thrown in the pond?

  • He realised it was electric charges, something we now know as electrons.

  • As these charges jiggled and oscillate, they disturbed nearby electric and magnetic fields,

  • And these disturbances ripple away as electromagnetic radiations, what we call light.

  • He also realised the inverse must be true, as light entered the eye and fell on the retina.

  • The oscillations of the light must cause electrons in atoms in the eye to jiggle,

  • And it is this jiggling of electrons in the eye, sent as signals to be brain,

  • That we perceive as vision.

  • Finally Maxwell understood what it was that was waving, and what caused the waves - and

  • one more thing.

  • He knew that light had waves with a length of about a millionth of a metre - but his

  • equations showed no limitation on the wavelength of his electromagnetic waves.

  • And so he concluded that there must be light, with both long and short wavelengths, that

  • is invisible to the eye.

  • It would take two more decades for the answer to this puzzle to present itself, decades

  • in which Maxwell died of cancer at the age of only 48.

  • In 1886, Henrich Hertz, working at the University of Karlsruhe, was the first to find these

  • invisible waves.

  • Named Hertzian waves after their discovery, a new revolution had been born.

  • We now refer to these Hertzian waves as radio.

  • Hertz was very pleased with his discovery, but when asked about what practical use these

  • radio waves have, Hertz apparently responded, “Nothing, I

  • guess”.

  • It was these radio waves that only a few years later Marconi was using to send messages across

  • miles.

  • And then across counties, oceans, and all across the immensity of the globe.

  • In 1909, Marconi received the Nobel prize for his work on wireless telegraphy.

  • Hertz, however, died in 1894 at the youthful age of 36, never seeing the true promise of

  • his discovery.

  • The world was set to become full of invisible light as the twentieth century began, and

  • the mystery of light seemed settled.

  • That was, until 1905, and a remarkable year for one German patent clerk.

  • The universe continued to change and evolve as our parcel of light travelled.

  • The mixture of light joining it on its journey reflected that change, bursts of radio waves

  • and high-energy gamma rays becoming more and more frequent.

  • This energy surged through space, much of it flowing between the stars and into the

  • darkness, But some encountered lone atoms in the emptiness

  • of the void.

  • The low energy radio waves very gently shook and energised these atoms,

  • Like a calm ocean wave lapping at a sandy shore.

  • Just as we would expect from Maxwell’s picture of electromagnetic waves.

  • But the behaviour of the high-energy gamma rays was different.

  • They delivered their energy to the atoms with a violent punch that ripped electrons clean

  • away - not a lapping ripple, but an isolated smash.

  • The gamma rays hit the atoms not like waves, but like hard, little, energetic particles.

  • But how?

  • Could Maxwell be wrong?

  • Could, on some occasions, light be more like Newton’s vision and act like a particle?

  • And if so - just what would those occasions be?

  • “...for the present we have to work on both theories.

  • On Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays we use the wave theory; on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and

  • Saturdays we think in streams of flying energy quanta or corpuscles."

  • Alfred Nobel had made his fortune through his inventions and his businesses, especially

  • in the field of explosives and weapons.

  • And so, perhaps not unfairly, in an 1888 obituary in a French newspaper, he was called theMerchant

  • of Death”.

  • This surprised Nobel, firstly as he was still very much alive,

  • But secondly, and more distressingly, because he realised what his historical legacy was

  • to be.

  • So, in his will, he decided to leave most of his fortune to a series of prizes,

  • Prizes that would honour those that have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.

  • Across science, the Nobel Prizes are perhaps the most prestigious, the list of winners

  • replete with the giants of science over more than a century.

  • And in 1901, the inaugural Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to German Wilhelm Rontgen,

  • for his discoveries about the nature of light.

  • For it was he who discovered the X ray.

  • Rontgen’s experiments with various materials found that only the densest could halt X-rays.

  • He even managed to convince his wife, Bertha, to place her hand into the beam,

  • after realizing his X-rays should stream through her flesh, but be partly blocked by her denser

  • bones - thus producing the first X-ray photograph.

  • Whilst it was suspected that X-rays were electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength much smaller than

  • visible light, it took several decades to conclusively show that this is the case - though

  • in the meantime, the medical application of X-rays to fix bones and save lives grew without

  • bounds.

  • And so this meant that by the early 1900s, Maxwell’s vision of electromagnetic waves

  • beyond the visible had been undoubtedly confirmed, all of light´s secrets uncovered - even the

  • electron having been discovered.

  • All that remained was to find the rest of the light we could not see, gamma rays, microwaves

  • and more - to fill out the last gaps on the electromagnetic spectrum and wrap up the story.

  • But, of course, if physics feels that its job is done, a rude shock is assuredly just

  • around the corner.

  • In Maxwell’s picture of light, it could be thought of as a continuous wave.

  • Scientists had found that when light crashed into most materials, it continuously dumped

  • energy that energized electrons, causing them to be emitted.

  • This was called the photoelectric effect.

  • By lowering the intensity of light, it took longer for energy to be deposited,

  • And it usually took longer for the electrons to begin to be spat out.

  • Usually.

  • For that was not what was observed when light was shone on certain metalselectrons

  • would seemingly be ejected instantaneously from the metal surface.

  • And the really confusing observation came from adjusting the colour of the light being

  • shone.

  • Blue light would result in very energetic electrons being emitted,

  • Green light resulted in less energetic electrons And red light produced no electrons at all.

  • This made no sense.

  • If all colours of light carry energy, why did red light fail to energize the electrons?

  • This mystery was solved, and new mysteries were born, in a very special year.

  • This was no ordinary year - it was a miraculous year.

  • For it was the year that Albert Einstein changed physics forever.

  • Most people are familiar with Einstein’s annus mirabilis.

  • 1905.

  • The year he wrote down the special theory of relativity.

  • But that was just the beginning.

  • Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921.

  • The citation noted the award was for hisservices to theoretical physics

  • But one topic, in particular, was singled out for recognition,

  • And it was not his work on relativity.

  • It was: “especially for his discovery of the law

  • of the photoelectric effect" When Einstein explored the photoelectric effect,

  • he had to radically revise Maxwell’s vision of light.

  • He realised that when light interacted with electrons, it could not do so as a continuous

  • wave of energy.

  • Instead, the energy must be concentrated and dumped into an electron as an instantaneous

  • packet.

  • Light, Einstein declared, must be quantized.

  • It must be chunks of energy.

  • It must interact like a particle.

  • Einstein went on to explain that each packet of energy was proportional to the frequency

  • of the light.

  • A packet of red light carries less energy than a packet of green light,

  • A packet of green light carries less energy than a packet of blue,

  • And so in experiments, the red light simply didn’t deliver enough energy for an electron

  • to escape.

  • This enigmatic packet of energy didn’t get its current name until 1926, when in an article

  • in the journal Nature, Gilbert Lewis coined the name photon.

  • Evidence for the particle nature of light swiftly grew,

  • And it was in 1923 Arthur Compton put together an important experiment - but one that relied

  • on a bizarre fact.

  • Light can push.

  • This might seem like a strange thing to say.

  • How can light, which has no mass, push?

  • But Maxwell’s equations showed that, in carrying energy, light also carries momentum.

  • You can easily buy a Crookes radiometer today as an executive toy for your desk,

  • Consisting of four vanes in an evacuated glass tube, one side black and the other side white.

  • When placed in bright sunlight, the vanes begin to spin,

  • Pushed, supposedly, by the momentum of nothing more than sunlight.

  • As ever, the physics of the Crookes radiometer is more complex than this simple explanation,

  • But the force of sunlight pushing on the vanes is real,

  • With visionaries imagining future humanity coursing amongst the planets solar sailing

  • on sunlight.

  • Compton´s experiment however was a little different - and groundbreaking.

  • In his experiment, Compton aimed a beam of high-energy X-rays at an atomic target, ripping

  • electrons from the outer parts of the atoms.

  • But when examining the rebounding X-rays and recoiling electrons,

  • Compton found that Maxwell’s picture of a wave of energy and momentum simply did not

  • work.

  • Instead, Compton had to treat the X-rays and electrons like colliding billiard balls.

  • For when an X-ray hits an electron, it delivers its energy and its momentum as a discrete

  • packet.

  • When an X-ray hits an electron, they definitely interact like hard particles.

  • Newton’s vision of particles of light was reborn!

  • Was this definitive proof that light was a particle?

  • Not quite.

  • There was still a mountain of evidence for its wave-like nature.

  • If anything, scientists were more confused than ever before.

  • Despite Maxwell’s picture of electromagnetic waves proving extremely powerful and successful,

  • These experiments in the early nineteen hundreds demanded that light must be a particle, not

  • a wave.

  • Was there even an answer to be found?

  • We began this story following a photon of light as it travelled across the universe.

  • Maxwell tells us that this photon was formed by the changing energy of an electron,

  • And that it vanishes when finally absorbed by electrons at its journey’s end.

  • But what happens in between?

  • Is this epic journey simply governed by fate?

  • Does the photon fly off in a random direction, careening randomly into an electron at some

  • point in its future?

  • This question is the next part of our story.

  • For in the early twentieth century, it was realised that this simply could not be the

  • case.

  • In the language of quantum mechanics, the photon’s journey has nothing to do with

  • chance.

  • Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think.”

  • We begin on a chilly morning in France in January 1793.

  • With the swish of a guillotine blade, the king, Louis the sixteenth, was no more.

  • Throughout this revolution, chaos reigned across France.

  • In the thick of the chaos, Victor-François, the 2nd duc de Broglie, battled for his king,

  • but eventually, like many others of the aristocracy, fled France for safety abroad.

  • The de Broglie’s eventually returned to their native France to shape the country after

  • the upheaval of the revolution, And after a series of statesmen, diplomats,

  • and writers, In 1892, Into the de Broglie family was born

  • the man who would change our understanding of everything.

  • His name was Louis Victor Pierre Raymond, 7th Duc de Broglie.

  • But in the annals of physics history, he is simply known as de Broglie.

  • In the early twentieth century, he bore witness to the birth of quantum mechanics,

  • And the growing confusion about whether light was a particle or a wave.

  • To de Broglie however, there was an obvious solution, though a counterintuitive one.

  • Light was neither and both at the same time.

  • It was clear that light, when it travelled, travelled as a wave, producing the effects

  • of interference and diffraction.

  • But when it interacted, it interacted like a particle.

  • It seemed to exhibit properties of being both a particle and a wave but was never really

  • either.

  • de Broglie’s remarkable insight was to realise that this was true, not only for light,

  • But for the entire quantum world.

  • Here, he claimed, there are no true particles and no true waves,

  • Everything, de Broglie told us, was some sort of quantum thing.

  • And so In his PhD in 1924, he claimed that electrons, which were clearly particles, should

  • ALSO exhibit wave-like properties, And in 1929, he received the Nobel Prize when

  • experiments bore out his predictions.

  • There has been significant philosophical discussion about this wave-particle duality in quantum

  • mechanics, But its observational consequences are incontrovertible.

  • A series of single photons or electrons sent through multiple slits still result in interference

  • patterns, And even large complex molecules have also

  • been shown to be both waves and particles - the largest yet tested being 2000 atoms

  • in size.

  • And so with quantum mechanics in hand, the quest was on to understand just how light

  • and electrons interacted.

  • With classical physics, the physics of Maxwell, electrons jiggled as electromagnetic waves

  • passed by.

  • Just like seagulls bobbing on a choppy ocean.

  • And by their jiggling, the electrons emitted their own electromagnetic waves, adding to

  • the mix.

  • But the quantum picture had to be different For the quantum world was one of quanta, and

  • particle reactions.

  • It didn´t take long for a solution to be found - and it was another scientific titan

  • - Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac - that began to crack the code.

  • In the late nineteen twenties, he was working to unite two of the greatest breakthroughs

  • in modern physics, The strange worlds of quantum mechanics and

  • Einstein’s special theory of relativity.

  • Dirac’s story has been told many times, his famous absentmindedness and lack of communication

  • skills, Quantum pioneer Niels Bohr went as far as

  • to call himthe strangest man”, But there is absolutely no doubt that Dirac

  • was a revolutionary genius.

  • And it was through his work on quantum mechanics that Dirac made his mark on scientific history.

  • To understand the modern view he helped to bring about,

  • We have to accept that everything is actually fields.

  • These fields are different to things like classical electric and magnetic fields.

  • In quantum field theory, there are electron fields, photon fields, fields for the various

  • quarks and more - A ripple in the electron field is an electron,

  • and a ripple in the photon field is a photon.

  • Think of an atom.

  • What do you see?

  • In our minds, we often have the picture given to us by Niels Bohr,

  • Of electrons orbiting a nucleus like a planet orbiting a star.

  • And when an electron jumps from a higher orbit to a lower orbit, a photon of light is emitted.

  • But when considering the quantum world, this is not quite correct.

  • In quantum field theory, we think of an orbiting electron as a vibrational pattern in the electron

  • field.

  • The higher energy orbit is one particular pattern, and the lower energy orbit is another.

  • In the language of physics, the electron field and the photon field are coupled together,

  • And jumping between the higher and lower orbits, the electron field generates a vibration in

  • the photon field.

  • Quantum field theory has grown to become arguably the most successful theory of our world to

  • date, describing almost everything in our universe across 24 quantum fields, corresponding

  • to the various possible interactions of the Standard Model.

  • And so, simple - everything is fields, and the fields interact.

  • But, of course, as they often do in the quantum world - things are about to get a lot stranger.

  • Many of the great minds of quantum mechanics were involved in this move towards strangeness,

  • But perhaps the most well-known is a man from Far Rockaway with a broad Brooklyn accent,

  • A man named Richard Feynman.

  • Born in 1918, he started his career as part of the Manhattan Project, and was recommended

  • by Oppenheimer himself for Berkeley, in a now famous letter sent in 1942:

  • He is by all odds the most brilliant young physicist here, and everyone knows this…I

  • may give you two quotations from men with whom he has worked.

  • Bethe has said that he would rather lose any two other men than Feyman from this present

  • job, and Wigner said, "He is a second Dirac, only this time human."

  • Though his 1985 autobiographySurely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!”

  • was an eye-opener for many.

  • Not only regarding his numerous contributions to science,

  • But also, his extroverted personality and complex private life, including a penchant

  • for strip clubs.

  • These aspects did not fit the stereotypical vision of a professor.

  • Indeed, Murray Gel-mann, another giant of quantum mechanics once even quipped of Feynman:

  • “[Feynman] was a great scientist, but he spent a great deal of his effort generating

  • anecdotes about himself.”

  • And yet, when it came to thinking about the quantum world, for many physicists Feynman

  • changed everything.

  • Whilst Feynman´s quip that that no one truly understood quantum mechanics may have been

  • true, Feynman himself certainly understood the depth

  • of the mathematics that underlies it.

  • This gave him the insights to think about the true nature of light and how it interacts.

  • And it all starts with a solitary electron.

  • In the electromagnetics of Maxwell, the charge of the electron results in an electric field

  • surrounding it.

  • And a charge in an electric field feels the presence of the electric field,

  • In this situation, there must be energy in the interactionbut how much?

  • The problem was, every time Feynman tried to calculate the amount of energy,

  • The answer came out to be the sameinfinity.

  • So, Feynman did something quite radical, He threw away the classical notion of the

  • electric field as defined by Maxwell.

  • In the acceptance speech for the award of his Nobel Prize in 1965, Feynman said:

  • “I suggested to myself, that electrons cannot act on themselves,

  • they can only act on other electronsAnd a new picture of the interaction of light

  • and electrons emerged.

  • The best visual representation of this interaction is the diagram named after Feynman himself.

  • The Feynman Diagram.

  • They are often a complicated mixture of lines, wiggles, and loops,

  • But at their heart, Feynman diagrams describe all of the possible interactions in quantum

  • mechanics.

  • To pick apart a Feynman diagram it is best to start with the simplest of interactions.

  • The interaction between electrons and light.

  • Feynman diagrams represent an interaction over space and time.

  • Lone electrons trace out straight-line paths through space-time, a path known as its world-line.

  • The electron is really just a vibration in the quantum electron field,

  • And with no interactions it happily traces a simple straight-line path.

  • We also know, however, that the electron field can couple with the photon field,

  • And when this happens, the vibrations in the electron field change.

  • In an atom, the electron jumps from a high-energy orbit to a low-energy orbit,

  • But for a free electron, conservation of momentum means that the electron changes direction.

  • If we imagine this over space-time, the world-line of the electron possesses a distinct kink,

  • And this occurs where and when the photon, usually depicted as a wavey line, is emitted.

  • This structure, this junction - is known as a vertex,

  • And it is the basic lego piece for building all Feynman diagrams.

  • Full Feynman diagrams are more than a single vertex, they usually combine several distinct

  • pieces.

  • The emitted photon from one electron is eventually received by another electron.

  • Two vertices are joined together to give the complete interaction,

  • Two kinked electron paths joined with the wiggly line representing the photon.

  • But what governs the coupling between the electron field and the photon field?

  • This is related to the charge on the electron, and one of nature’s constants, the fine-structure

  • constant.

  • This is electromagnetism, and the exchange of the photon between two electrons is the

  • electromagnetic force in action.

  • And so, in Feynman´s view, we wave goodbye to the electromagnetic field.

  • In its place we have two electrons interacting through the exchange of a photon - and when

  • huge numbers of these photons are exchanged, it approximates the classical force,

  • Even though at its heart, this electromagnetic force is a quantum phenomenon.

  • And it’s not just electromagnetism, but it is also true for the fundamental weak and

  • strong nuclear forces.

  • For the strong force, it is gluons instead of photons that are exchanged between quarks,

  • And for the weak force, it is via the exchange of massive particles known as the W and the

  • Z, But at their heart, all these forces can be

  • presented by a combination of Feynman vertices.

  • Feynman, however, had one even stranger card yet to play when it came to light.

  • He had said that one electron acts upon another, And this happens through the exchange of a

  • photon, Producing the complete Feynman diagram of

  • the interaction.

  • But does this mean that an electron fires out a photon at random?

  • Does this photon stream out into the universe with only a remote chance of being absorbed

  • by another electron?

  • The answer, counterintuitively - was no.

  • Feynman told us that the photon is only passed between two electrons that have agreed on

  • the exchange.

  • But there is something odd happening here.

  • If we are in the middle of the photon’s journey,

  • Its emission from one electron occurred in the past, whilst the absorption of the photon

  • by the other electron is going to occur in the future.

  • So, when did the electrons communicate and agree to exchange the photon?

  • How did they even know of each other’s presence?

  • It clearly cannot be via the electromagnetic force,

  • As this is precisely what the exchange of the photon actually is.

  • So, what is the solution?

  • As with a lot of quantum mechanics, whilst the mathematics just works,

  • The interpretation, the question of what is really happening, is the biggest challenge.

  • And so Feynman, with his supervisor John Wheeler, put a mind-bending possibility on the table.

  • The suggestion is something we now call the transactional interpretation.

  • They said that the two electrons handshake their acceptance of exchanging the photon,

  • But that this handshake is taken through time, With one electron messaging from the past,

  • and the other from the future.

  • This might sound ridiculous - but it completely fits with the mathematics of quantum mechanics.

  • So, on a dark night when you gaze at a distant star,

  • An electron in your eye and an electron in the atmosphere of that star

  • Spoke to each other through time and agreed to exchange the photon you see.

  • And going even further - for the lonely photon we met at the beginning of our story,

  • Two electrons separated by an immensity of space

  • Shook hands over billions of years of time, billions of light years of space,

  • And agreed that the photon should undertake its cosmic journey.

  • The world of quantum mechanics never disappoints.

  • And yet - there is one final, even stranger mystery to unfold about light,

  • and our lonely photon in the blackness of space.

  • As it travels over its many billions of lightyears, Just what does it experience?

  • We have followed our photon over many billions of years.

  • Eventually, at journey’s end, the universe it inhabits is very different to the one of

  • its birth.

  • Yet there is a disconnect.

  • For whilst this photon was almost as old as the universe itself, it remained eternally

  • youthful.

  • Galaxies formed in the void, stars were born, lived and died, whole superclusters splintered

  • and collapsed.

  • And the photon missed it all.

  • Because to the photon, time itself meant nothing.

  • This might seem a strange thing to say - the photon clearly had an existence in time.

  • But with the coming of Einstein, and his special theory of relativity, it was realised time

  • was actually flexible.

  • Time was relative, dependent upon who or what was actually measuring it.

  • And light - light takes this idea to the extreme.

  • What would the universe look like if I were riding on the end of a light beam at

  • the speed of light?”

  • In the middle of the seventeenth century, Ole Romer was baffled.

  • Working at the Paris Observatory, Romer was peering at Io, one of the bright moons of

  • Jupiter.

  • Like clockwork, the moon orbited the giant planet in just over forty-two hours.

  • Vanishing from view as it ducked in and out of Jupiter’s shadow.

  • Except there seemed to be something odd about this cosmic clock!

  • Romer noticed that the timing of Io’s eclipses drifted.

  • Romer realised that the timing of the eclipse of Io was somehow tied to the Earth’s orbit,

  • Changing from earlier to later and back again when the Earth was either closest to or furthest

  • from Jupiter.

  • And it was then Romer realised the culprit was light,

  • And in particular its speed.

  • He reasoned that the drift in Io’s eclipses must be due to a finite speed of light.

  • As the Earth moved in its orbit, the distance to Jupiter changed,

  • And the change in time was because light had to traverse these differing distances.

  • His initial estimate was fast, very fast - two hundred and twenty thousand kilometres every

  • second.

  • And eventually, more accurate measurements tied the speed of light to almost three hundred

  • thousand kilometres per second.

  • But just what was this speed relative to?

  • It had been the belief for centuries that there existed a medium, the aether, that carried

  • light waves.

  • Surely, therefore, light’s speed was relative to this medium?

  • From Plato to Newton, this aether had long been suggested as a solution to various questions

  • in physics, but never firmly detected - experiments in search of evidence had failed time and

  • time again.

  • And so it was that in 1905, during his annus mirabilis, Einstein rang the final death knell

  • for this invisible medium.

  • Special Relativity.

  • The truth was that it was the speed of light was the universal absolute and invariant,

  • Measured to be the same value for all observers across the cosmos.

  • A lot has been written about special relativity, and although much of it seems confused and

  • paradoxical, there is a simple central message at its heart.

  • Particles with mass, such as electrons, chart out their own time as they travel through

  • space-time.

  • Imagine two clocks sitting at the same location, synced to show exactly the same time.

  • Now take these clocks on two separate journeys, speeding up and slowing down.

  • In Newton’s view of the universe, of absolute time, if you were to bring the clocks together

  • agajn and compare their times they would have remained synchronised.

  • But not in Einsteins.

  • The relative motion of the two clocks will have influenced their relative passage of

  • time.

  • And as they traced out different paths through space-time,

  • When they reunite, their times will now be out of sync.

  • This mind-bending aspect of relativity seems too strange to be true,

  • But numerous experiments have shown this to be the way the universe works,

  • From globe-trotting atomic clocks to high-speed particles in accelerators, time is definitively

  • relative.

  • But what does this mean for light?

  • Light had taken a central place in Einstein’s new vision of the cosmos - everyone in space-time

  • should measure the speed of light to be precisely the same value.

  • But in demanding this, something else had to give,

  • And so space and time themselves had to bend - become flexible and rubbery to accommodate

  • the consistency of the speed of light.

  • Indeed one immediate consequence of this Einstein’s insights was that light would feel the existence

  • of gravity, And as it travels through the universe, light's

  • path would be deflected by the presence of mass.

  • Newton’s claim from two centuries prior reborn.

  • Indeed, experiments have borne this out again and again - with the results becoming more

  • and more accurate.

  • Massive objects, such as stars and galaxies, can even behave as gravitational lenses, magnifying

  • distant baby galaxies in the very early universe and revealing the presence of dark matter.

  • The beauty of these natural telescopes is clear in deep space images - such as the first

  • revealed by the James Webb Space Telescope.

  • And so the flexible nature of space and time had truly seen the end of Newton’s view

  • of a rigid universe.

  • But what about light?

  • What did this mean for its experience of space and time?

  • Travelling at the fastest speed possible in the universe, the effects of relativity become

  • extreme.

  • Very extreme.

  • All distances shrink to zero.

  • As does the time taken to cover these zero distances.

  • And so, for photons, no matter how far they travel across the universe, not an instant

  • of time will tick by.

  • Even though this light may have existed in time and space for many many years or light

  • years, Even though it would have been clearly formed

  • by one electron in one location and vanished when absorbed by an electron in another,

  • The space-time distance between these two events would be exactly zero.

  • To the photon, it is born and dies at precisely the same moment.

  • To the photon, it is as if it never existed at all.

  • We began this story by following a photon from its creation just after the beginning

  • of time, To its ultimate destruction in the detector

  • of a telescope orbiting our planet today, And yet the photon itself saw nothing of this.

  • Not the intense light of stellar birth, Or the catastrophic explosions that came with

  • stellar death, Or the formation of planets and eventual rise

  • of life on our own pale blue dot.

  • The photon noticed nothing.

The newly born universe buzzed and frothed with boundless energy.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B2 中上級

How Does Light Actually Work?

  • 23 1
    VM3 に公開 2023 年 04 月 18 日
動画の中の単語