Name: Can The Navy Fix Its Most Controversial Warship?
Uploaded: 2021-10-13T06:21:22.000Z
Duration: 15 min 19 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

Brad Howard: The US Navy is falling behind on what they say

is an important goal building up the force of 355 ships. But at

程度の副詞

the same time the Navy wants to get rid of some relatively new

Unknown: the Navy goes to Congress and and says we want to

retire ships, all Congress wants to think about is we already are

short on ships. Why are you getting rid of more ships?

Brad Howard: One key to growing the fleet is the Littoral Combat

ship or LCS. The LCS is designed for littoral areas, which is

what are closer to shore. larger ships have trouble operating in

these areas because of how shallow the water is, are im

Brad Howard with CNBC and today I'll be going aboard the US

Navy's Littoral Combat ship, it's one of the Navy's newest

Unknown: So the LCS program, much like every other major

defense program has had its own series of setbacks,

Brad Howard: engine issues and mission module problems in the

evolving state of the world and put the ship in choppy waters.

Unknown: The question of the of the LCS, his ability to defend

It's a zero sum game. Okay, every dollar you spend to keep

those LCS is going as $1 you can spend on these other I think

Brad Howard: The next ship the Navy hopes to procure that will

take on some of the missions of the LCS is the constellation

class frigate. This frigate is based on a design already used

by several navies, which means it should have fewer teething

Unknown: But ultimately, at the end of the day, the Navy has

more than 30 of the ships, they have to do something with them.

They've spent tons and tons of money on this, and they are at

the moment now where they have to figure it out because this is

going to be a significant part of the fleet going forward.

Brad Howard: But with a significant investment already

in the LCS can the Navy find a way to make them viable in the

The LCS program began in 2002. After the 911 terror attacks,

the Navy's priorities shifted to fighting terrorism and policing

waters closer to shore. The Navy ended up producing two variants

of the LCS, the freedom class and independence class, the

freedom classes and more traditional steel and aluminum

ship and the independence classes and all aluminum

trimaran style design. Both ships are built for speed and

can hit around 40 knots which is about 46 miles per hour. The USS

Milwaukee a freedom class LCS is training off the coast of

Florida, which means getting there requires a one hour

helicopter ride. The LCS is capable of handling a variety of

helicopters on its flight deck including uncrewed helicopters

'away starboard side'. Behind me is a fire scout the MQ-8C fire

scout is an uncrewed helicopter that is as big as a normal

helicopter, it can help the crew by providing surveillance over

the horizon among other uses. The LCS isn't a giant warship it

seems like every inch is dedicated to a purpose. The

galley where the crew eats is utilitarian, but it provides an

area for the crew to unwind during the weeks or even months

at sea. And the rear of the ship has a hold capable of being

loaded with conex boxes among other types of equipment which

can be particularly useful during humanitarian operations.

The last LCS was ordered in fiscal year 2019. And the

average cost of the last five LCS is ordered was about

$983,000,000, 23 ships have bee  commissioned in nine ships ar

currently under construction o  in pre construction

Unknown: The freedom class is built by Marionette marine and

Wisconsin and the independence class is built by Austal USA in

Brad Howard: But the LCS hasn't panned out exactly as planned,

which could be the reason the Navy has started to decommission

Unknown: My sense on the LCS is that it probably makes sense.

Both because the ships are expensive to maintain. So you

got high sustainment costs that you want to try to get down,

that they're not meeting the breadth of capabilities that

we're looking for. And that's not to say that there aren't

some missions that the LCS can capably perform. I'm sure there

are. But when you look at the cost of maintaining a ship, that

the sustainment costs aren't working, working out as well as

you would like. You don't have the same mission set that you

need versus beginning to invest in future systems that are going

You have to look at those ships they were test designs there was

a lot of changes that went from those ships into the into the

block by so you know, the program office took a hard look

and I stand by the decision the Navy made,

Brad Howard: both ships have had their share of problems and

criticisms. Some observers are concerned that the independence

class is not up for surface to surface warfare due to its

aluminum hull and light armament. The freedom class has

also had engine problems since its inception,

Unknown: late last year, when it was discovered that the freedom

class the one designed by Lockheed Martin has an issue

with it the combining gear which is basically a part of its its

propulsion, and this has created a conflict between the Navy and

Lockheed Martin everyone In agreement that this is an issue,

and it's potentially an issue for all of Lockheed Martin's

Brad Howard: In a statement to CNBC Lockheed Martin noted our

solution will soon be rigorously tested at sea to validate the

improved design modification. Following successful sea trials

and navy approval, we will deliver the first modified ship

and implement the design modifications for other freedom

字幕リスト動画再生

Can The Navy Fix Its Most Controversial Warship?

sort

significant

dedicated

effective