Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • [MUSIC PLAYING]

  • IAN: All right, folks.

  • Welcome back to week six, where we're going

  • to talk a little bit about exposure.

  • So to this date we've talked a lot about composition, lensing, storytelling,

  • without focusing too much on the technical details of how

  • to actually make an image, and match it to our intentions.

  • So we'll dive a little bit more in that today.

  • And I think it's important to define exposure.

  • So the idea of exposure is that we want to render

  • a scene in a specific way using our camera controls to interpret

  • the amount of light in a given scene.

  • So what does that really mean?

  • Well we're going to dive deep into this, and we're

  • going to look at each of the different camera controls.

  • How they affect the image, and how we can utilize

  • them to make different exposures.

  • So what's our goal with exposing an image?

  • It's really to capture that intentional image.

  • It's to make a decision about how we want an image to look

  • before we press the shutter button.

  • When you have a camera that's on auto mode and you press the shutter button

  • you're basically giving up all the decision making to a small machine.

  • And they're sophisticated, sure, but they're not intelligent.

  • And our goal is for us as intelligent operators

  • to make the decisions for the camera, or at least

  • override decisions that may be poor.

  • So I think what we really need to understand

  • is what exactly is it that we're trying to do?

  • And so in any given scene there's some amount of light.

  • And we can use absolute measurements to tell how much that is.

  • It could be 150 foot candles of light, but I don't know what that means.

  • I sort of conceptually understand that, but it doesn't help me take a camera

  • and make an image.

  • I have to do a bunch of math.

  • It gets very confusing.

  • There's easier ways.

  • So what we really need is a relative amount of light,

  • or at least the scale--

  • a relative scale that we can use to adjust our camera settings.

  • So for us in this class when we're talking about photography,

  • and then later cinematography, we're going to use the concept of f-stops.

  • And all an f-stop is is a doubling or halving unit.

  • So if you have a camera that has some sensitivity,

  • and you double the sensitivity of it, that's one stop.

  • If you have a camera that has some light coming into it,

  • and you cut the amount of light coming into it by one half, that's one stop.

  • They're going in opposite directions, but it's

  • an equivalent unit of one stop.

  • So just briefly to get a sense of how this

  • might look when we look at an image we have here an image from Mount Auburn

  • Cemetery that's at exposure, roughly.

  • And I made this exposure using a DSLR, and the light meter

  • that was in the camera told me that if I set the camera settings to this

  • it'll be at exposure.

  • And I think it did a pretty good job.

  • There's no real complaints there.

  • So in an effort to sort of investigate how much difference a stop might be

  • I opened up one stop.

  • So I allowed double the amount of light to strike the sensor.

  • And you can see that it gets much brighter.

  • If we go backwards we have some dark shadow detail in here, neutral gray,

  • some bright white, and everything feels naturalistic.

  • We start to brighten up that neutral gray begins

  • to push towards the lighter gray, this definitely begins to clip,

  • these trees feel a little bit brighter.

  • Not completely unnatural, but getting there.

  • So now if we allow four times as much light in, or two stops--

  • remember that you're doubling each time you open up a stop.

  • So you double, and then you double again.

  • Now this image really starts to fall apart.

  • And this is the classic overexposure that maybe you've accidentally done,

  • or you've been struggling with your camera controls.

  • And you end up here where you have clipping elements, there's no detail,

  • there's no actual shadow detail.

  • No dark tones in this at all.

  • It's all light grays.

  • And if we go even further it completely falls apart.

  • And we could keep opening this--

  • allowing more light to hit the camera and eventually we'd

  • end up with a solid white image.

  • So, OK, that's overexposure.

  • But when we look at this image again--

  • add exposure.

  • This is the same image from the beginning.

  • And we go the other way, I've now reduced

  • the amount of light entering into the camera by a half, or one stop.

  • And you can see that all the tonalities get depressed.

  • They're getting pushed down into the shadow areas.

  • There's more detail in that white snow, which was much brighter before,

  • but now it's sort of a shade of gray.

  • And if we keep going two stops so four times less light

  • is reaching in the sensor you now see like beautiful detail in here,

  • but everything else is turning into a muddy, crushed, shadowy darkness.

  • And if we keep going it becomes almost unreadable.

  • So all that is is to say that we have these tools that

  • allow us to increase and decrease the amount of light,

  • and we do so by measuring it in doubling or having units.

  • So how do we measure light?

  • Well, we have a brief video online that we posted earlier this week, on Friday,

  • on light meters, which if you've all watched, great.

  • And if not we'll talk a little bit about as a refresher.

  • But there's a few different ways.

  • You can use a handheld light meter like this to measure light,

  • but I think more often than not what we'll use

  • is the internal light meter of the camera.

  • And so this will measure the amount of light that's striking the subject,

  • and reflecting back through the lens onto some sort

  • of light sensitive material.

  • And it will say if you set your camera to these values you'll

  • get a decent exposure.

  • So they can be hand-held or internal to a camera,

  • but all light meters are calibrated to expose

  • for an idea called 18% reflective gray.

  • And they do so in different ways.

  • So briefly, before we look at a couple different ways

  • they do that, 18% reflective gray is often sort

  • of colloquially termed middle gray.

  • When exposed properly it forms the middle value between absolute light

  • and absolute black in your image.

  • It's right in the middle.

  • So it's a very handy reference tone for us.

  • And it's usually found on a gray card--

  • something like this, that reflects back 18% of the light that strikes it.

  • Cool.

  • So before we get here let us quickly fire this guy up.

  • So this is the output of our camera right now.

  • If we take a middle gray card and we place it

  • in front of the camera well illuminated--

  • we'll fill the frame with it.

  • We can see that in the middle of this there's this histogram,

  • and sort of all of the image data is centered right in the middle.

  • If we set it for this white background you

  • can see that it's sort of drifted back to the middle as well.

  • And that's sort of interesting because we would

  • expect this tone to reflect more light.

  • So there is a bit of a trick going on with reflective light meters

  • that we need to pay attention to.

  • Reflected light meters always assume that every single element

  • that they're metering is middle gray.

  • So there's a problem when you meter something that is not

  • middle gray like this white background.

  • And so if we actually are to open up this camera

  • and allow a little bit more light in--

  • what am I doing here?

  • There we go.

  • I has auto ISO on.

  • So there's the shadow.

  • Let's get this shadow out of here so we can--

  • so now all of a sudden we brighten the image up by allowing more light in,

  • and this tone is rendering normally or as we would wish it to.

  • So we can also do the same thing if we have a black object.

  • You can see that the camera using the reflective meter

  • set this value to add exposure, which is lining up

  • that small cursor with the caret in that scale.

  • You can see that this is not black.

  • It's middle gray.

  • It's actually rendering this incorrectly because what it's expecting to see

  • is this middle gray card.

  • So what we need to do in order to offset that

  • is actually underexpose what the camera is reading.

  • So now when we check this the camera is like you're over three stops

  • underexposed, but this starts to look correct.

  • So we talked a lot about this-- thanks, Ben.

  • [INAUDIBLE]-- in the light meter video.

  • And we'll come back to this, but that is to say that in any given scene

  • the exposure suggested by a camera is made to be 90% accurate.

  • Most scenes have a mix of light values, dark values, and values in between.

  • So if you sort of assume that that all melds down to about middle gray

  • you can suggest an exposure.

  • And the meter will suggest an exposure, and then

  • when you expose for that you'll be pretty accurate.

  • But so this scene here is pretty much all highlights.

  • And my camera said if you set it to these settings

  • you'll get a properly exposed image, but it's not.

  • It's too dark.

  • So if we open up one stop.

  • Well, we're getting closer.

  • Snow starting to look like snow.

  • And if we open up one more stop maybe we're a little bit too far.

  • It's getting a little bit bright over in this area over here,

  • but it's rendering as a very bright white.

  • And sort of side by side you can see it here.

  • The metered exposure versus compensating by increasing our exposure one stop.

  • So this is what I mean to say when I say that we need to be a little bit more

  • intelligent than the machines.

  • They're very sophisticated.

  • They can measure all kinds of things, but they're still sort of locked in

  • and reference at specific values.

  • So we need to understand what those are so

  • that we can compensate, and sort of use our intention

  • to override the camera when it's making, essentially, a dumb decision.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: If middle gray is meant to be halfway

  • between pure black and pure white how come it's 18% and not 50?

  • IAN: So it has to do with the sensitivity of--

  • or the way that human eyes render light, and because it's logarithmic.

  • So it's a power function.

  • So 50% is not quite halfway on a linear scale

  • when it gets transformed, I think, but essentially it

  • is because if you have say--

  • this is a good example.

  • If you have one light bulb, and you turn it on,

  • and you add another light bulb it's almost

  • like you've doubled the amount of brightness,

  • and it's a very obvious difference, but if you have 100 light bulbs

  • and you turn one more light bulb on it's such a tiny incremental difference.

  • So we're dealing with light on this power function scale

  • where we're doubling and we're halving, and so the value that gets us

  • to that middle gray is actually 18% and not 50%

  • because it's not a linear scale.

  • Which there's plenty of math, and I certainly won't do it justice,

  • but we can dive down that rabbit hole another time.

  • So we looked a little bit about what exposure is doing

  • and how we might fool ourselves with the light meter,

  • but what are the actual settings that I was just changing on the camera?

  • I was pushing and pulling at some buttons and dials,

  • and I was clicking some things, and the image was changing, but what was it?

  • So the three main camera controls.

  • The first one is ISO, which is the sensitivity of a sensor to light,

  • or a film stock, or any kind of medium that we're using to capture light.

  • The second is shutter speed.

  • How long do we let light strike that sensitive medium for?

  • In the case of DSLRs it's how long the shutter is open,

  • but maybe there are other mechanisms in play on other cameras.

  • And the final one is aperture.

  • So in every lens there's a diaphragm that opens and closes.

  • And depending on how open that is or how small that is it

  • lets in more or less light.

  • That's a control that we have at our disposal.

  • And so by using all three of these elements

  • we can control how much light reaches the photographic sensor,

  • and how sensitive that sensor is to light more generally.

  • So let's dive in a little to each of these categories because there

  • are different artifacts that happen when we change and control each one of them.

  • So first one, ISO.

  • So it, again, measures the sensitivity of a medium to light.

  • In digital cameras it's the sensor.

  • In old film cameras it's actually a type of stock, like film stock,

  • and they each have different ISO values.

  • And the sensitivity doubles and halves, which

  • is that unit of a stop, when the ISO value is doubled or halved.

  • And in this little scale down below there's some common ISO values.

  • A few of them you'll notice are bigger than the other ones.

  • Those are-- maybe you can call them major stops of ISO.

  • When you bought film stock back in the day

  • it generally did not come in these third stop increments.

  • It came as 100, or you'd get 200, or 400, or 800.

  • So through that they've become our major stops,

  • and there's ISO values in between that digital cameras can

  • replicate at third stop intervals or maybe half stop intervals.

  • But every time you double the number--

  • so if you go from 100 to 200 it's now twice as sensitive.

  • And if you half the number going from 800 to 400 it's half as sensitive.

  • And it works even with the third stops.

  • So say we had our camera at 320 and we double it

  • to 640 that's doubling the ISO value, that's one stop.

  • We've increased the exposure value of the camera by one stop.

  • DAN: And by default most DSLRs that you buy, and mirrorless as well,

  • will increment by thirds of a stop.

  • So you can set it to half stop or only to do full stops,

  • but by default your camera as you kind of click up--

  • and this is all the exposure values--

  • is a third of the stop.

  • IAN: Exactly.

  • So when we were shooting on film predominantly

  • you would load a camera with a roll of film,

  • and you would have one ISO at your disposal

  • until you finished that roll of film.

  • So the flexibility of digital cameras is sort of

  • amazing because in any given moment--

  • I had it on auto ISO by accident, and it was just

  • sort of changing ISO to every stop in between for any different shot

  • that we want to make.

  • So let's do a little exercise 'cause I really

  • want to drive home this idea of the relationality of stops.

  • So if we go from 200 ISO to 800 ISO how many stops difference is that?

  • And is it more or less sensitive?

  • This is a good time for the internet to chime in if you're on there

  • and want to join us.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: I would say more sensitive.

  • IAN: It's more sensitive, but how much more?

  • AUDIENCE: Two stops more sensitive.

  • IAN: Two stops because we to start at 200, and we go to 400, and then to 800.

  • So we've doubled, then doubled.

  • That's two stops difference.

  • Absolutely.

  • More sensitive.

  • Great.

  • How about this one?

  • Ooh, so much math.

  • All the arithmetic.

  • 1,600 50.

  • How about someone from Zoom?

  • Anyone feeling brave?

  • DAN: Carla says five stops.

  • IAN: Five stops.

  • Yep.

  • Less sensitive.

  • Exactly.

  • Very good.

  • How about 320 to 400?

  • This is a little bit weird.

  • I was talking about it halving in doubling, being a whole stop.

  • What do we think this might be?

  • One third up.

  • There we go.

  • Nice.

  • And then finally one where we have a weird incremental stop that's maybe not

  • one of those major stops, 500 to 1,000.

  • Is it doubling or having?

  • Right, it's doubling.

  • It's going 500 to 1,000 It's one more stop more sensitive.

  • This feels very basic in the moment, but at the end of the day

  • having a firm grasp that when you double and half you're

  • moving things in a stop increment it's helpful because every other camera

  • control also moves in stop increments.

  • Can be controlled in stop increments.

  • So if you add a stop here you can take a stop away somewhere else.

  • So because there is no free lunch in anything

  • that we do and there are nothing but trade-offs

  • there are artifacts that are associated with different ISO values.

  • So increasing the sensitivity of a medium introduces noise.

  • Does anyone have a sense of what ISO noise looks like

  • or what noise is more generally?

  • Yeah.

  • So in the old days of film it was actually grain.

  • You'd see particles that were actually-- the molecular structure of the film was

  • bigger so that it was more sensitive to light because there was more surface

  • area.

  • In electronical-- or electronical--

  • [CHUCKLES]

  • In electronic systems it's actually just random data

  • that gets introduced into our image.

  • And so the more sensitive ISO values tend

  • to have much higher levels of noise.

  • And lower ISO values have less noise.

  • It's much more apparent in the shadows of an image.

  • Why do you think that might be true?

  • Yes?

  • AUDIENCE: There's probably less data in the shadows.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So there's less data in the shadows.

  • There's no information to overwrite a noise value.

  • So you can see even low value noise in shadows

  • because there's very little data there to begin

  • with whereas if you have a lot of-- like a bright highlight

  • it may overwrite sort of a medium level value of noise.

  • The first place you're going to see noise is always in the shadows.

  • So this is actually from a cinema camera.

  • This is still of our friend Dan Armendariz.

  • And here we can see him sitting in this magnificent room at 400 ISO.

  • I don't see too much wrong with this image.

  • I don't see a lot of noise anywhere.

  • It sort of seems fairly clear and crisp to me.

  • At 3,200, well, I can sort of start to see a little bit of degradation.

  • If we go back and then forward there's some something there.

  • Still not crazy-- it doesn't seem from this distance.

  • But then if we go to 12,800 that looks wild.

  • There's just so much textural element to it.

  • So much noise.

  • And so it's a little hard to see at that scale

  • so if we zoom in we have Dan looking handsome.

  • Dan looking, ooh, a little horse.

  • And whoa.

  • And you definitely can see it down in the shadow areas.

  • And I didn't mean to make fun of Dan there.

  • He's a handsome man.

  • DAN: Ian, you we're talking about the ISO levels like at 400--

  • IAN: Mm-hm.

  • DAN: I forget-- something in the middle, and then

  • 1,200, but is every camera the same?

  • IAN: No.

  • So every camera is not the same.

  • The range of ISO values that you have available to you is hardware dependent.

  • So you'll find that certain cameras can go from 50 to maybe 32,000.

  • Some of them have ludicrous numbers.

  • Like the A7S, I think, is like 120,000 or something.

  • It can see in the dark.

  • Whereas a film camera might be locked into one

  • ISO because you put 100 speed film in it.

  • Or maybe your camera only has ISOs from 50 to 3,200.

  • And maybe it only has half stop increments in between.

  • It doesn't have third stops.

  • So the range of ISOs that you have available to you is hardware specific,

  • but the relationship is the same regardless of hardware.

  • Doubling or having increases or decreases

  • the sensitivity of the medium by half or double.

  • DAN: And my question also--

  • like 400 on one camera, is it the same as 400 on another camera?

  • IAN: I would say no because at the end of the day

  • the way the hardware is interpreting the electronic signals is

  • different for every single camera.

  • And so you may have one camera and say, oh, there's no noise at 400 ISO,

  • and then use a different camera, and you may find that in a specific image

  • there is a lot of noise at 400 ISO.

  • And so there is definite variability in the quality of the electronic circuits

  • that are in digital cameras.

  • And so obviously higher tier cameras are going

  • to do better at more ISO values than lower tier cameras.

  • So, yeah.

  • DAN: So sensitivity-wise they are the same,

  • but there are definitely trade offs between different models

  • and different sensors as far as quality?

  • IAN: Right.

  • Exactly.

  • So has the same sensitivity, but you may actually

  • end up with more noise, more artifacts, and it's

  • because of the quality of the camera.

  • That's a good way to say it.

  • So why would you ever accept more noise?

  • Why would you why would you increase the noise?

  • If it looks so bad why would you do it?

  • Well, it's a really pragmatic decision.

  • There sometimes is just not enough light.

  • It's nighttime, it's dark, it's dusk.

  • There's just not a lot of light and so you

  • need to boost up the sensitivity of the sensor

  • to even render any kind of image.

  • So there's a very practical side of it.

  • Or maybe you're going for aesthetic effect.

  • To mimic grainy footage.

  • Maybe you're trying to mimic some surveillance footage or something

  • like that, or you want to go back to--

  • a lot of street photographers used to shoot 3,200 speed film

  • and it always had really heavy grain in it.

  • And maybe you like that kind of look and style

  • and you want to add a little bit of more noise

  • into your image to mimic that for a textural effect, perhaps.

  • Here's a picture of a ghost I took.

  • I was ghost hunting last night.

  • Do you see it?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: All right.

  • Well, you guys will have to investigate it later.

  • So shutter speed.

  • So that's ISO.

  • It's the sensitivity of the sensor.

  • Increasing the sensitivity introduces noise.

  • Lowering the sensitivity sort of minimizes noise,

  • but it also requires more light so there's a trade off there.

  • So shutter speed.

  • So shutter speed is the amount of time the sensor is exposed to light.

  • There is a shutter in here.

  • It opens for some period of time.

  • The sensor is struck by light and then it closes.

  • We measure it in fractions of a second, though you

  • may see them written on cameras as integer values.

  • This is to save space.

  • On those tiny knobs you may see like 1,000.

  • That's actually one over 1,000, 1/1000 of a second.

  • And listed there are the major stops or shutter speeds.

  • This is what you would find on most old school 35 millimeter film cameras.

  • Starting at a second and going up to about 1/1000.

  • So, again, hardware specific.

  • Your camera may have more shutter speeds available

  • to you, and in different increments.

  • Or it may have less.

  • But the important thing to take away is that doubling the length of time

  • doubles the amount of light that can strike the sensor.

  • Halving the length of time halves the amount of light

  • that can strike the sensor.

  • So, again, we have this stop interval.

  • So you could imagine that if I have to decrease the sensitivity of my sensor

  • maybe I can open the shutter for twice as long.

  • So go down one stop here, and up one stop here.

  • And it's the same amount of light just manifesting a little bit differently.

  • So we're gonna count stops again.

  • So a 1/60 to a 1/15.

  • DAN: 1/60 of second.

  • IAN: 1/60 of a second.

  • I apologize.

  • I shorthand a lot of this, but I should be more specific.

  • So 1/60 of a second to 1/15 of a second.

  • So it can be a little counter intuitive.

  • 1/60 of a pizza is more or less than 1/15 of a pizza?

  • That's how I have to do it my head to be frank with you.

  • [CHUCKLES]

  • How many stops?

  • Yes?

  • AUDIENCE: Two stops.

  • IAN: Two stops.

  • So it goes from 1/60 to 1/30, 1/30 to 1/15.

  • Two stops more sensitive, or more light striking the sensor.

  • 1/1000 to 1/30?

  • So much counting.

  • DAN: Alex says five stop.

  • IAN: Bam.

  • Five stops.

  • And that's wrong.

  • That should say more sensitive.

  • That's a typo.

  • I apologize.

  • Because we're going from 1/1000 of a second to 1/30 of a second

  • that's much more light.

  • That should read five stops more sensitive.

  • I'll fix that before the end of the lecture.

  • So 1/500 to 1/400.

  • This is odd.

  • That doesn't feel like a doubling or halving.

  • What might that be?

  • AUDIENCE: A third, maybe?

  • IAN: A third.

  • Yep, a third more sensitive.

  • And from 1/180 to 1/90?

  • Those are odd numbers that weren't on our list, but it's still half.

  • Yep.

  • Exactly.

  • So it's one stop more.

  • So like all things that we've talked about there

  • is a trade-off with shutter speed.

  • You can't just open up your camera for as long

  • as you want and still expect to render a crisp image.

  • So this is an image of a dam that Dan took, and you

  • can see that the water is frozen.

  • It was falling down, and it's literally frozen in midair.

  • So this must be a very short shutter speed

  • in order to freeze motion like this.

  • The blink of an eye.

  • Here's the same image with the same amount of light.

  • So technically these exposures are equivalent,

  • but they look very different.

  • In this one there's time for the water to fall all the way down and create

  • this sort of streaking effect in the image.

  • So this is a slower shutter speed.

  • What is it?

  • Half a second.

  • So the shutter is open for half a second,

  • whereas in the previous one what was it?

  • 1/4000 of a second.

  • That's beyond fathoming to me.

  • It's a little too fast.

  • And so this image takes a second to load,

  • but you can see here a composite image that Dan's made

  • that starts at very slow shutter speeds, and moves towards very fast shutter

  • speeds.

  • And if we actually put the shutter speeds there

  • you can see incrementally where motion begins

  • to look how we might perceive it normally

  • into being frozen instantaneously or drifting

  • into this fairy-like wishy-ness.

  • DAN: This kind of raises the question of how fast is fast enough too?

  • So it really depends on your subject.

  • For sports maybe one 1/250 of a second is fast enough to freeze motion,

  • but obviously to freeze waterfall you need to crank it up even further, so.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • DAN: So it depends.

  • IAN: And also perception too because when

  • I think about when I turn my tap on, and what I see I see something over here.

  • I can't make out individual drops unless I'm tracking them.

  • It's gushing, but it doesn't look like this.

  • This is sort of very ethereal.

  • And it definitely doesn't look frozen in time like the one

  • before so the speed of the object matters.

  • And sort of our perception of that speed as humans

  • defines how what it looks naturalistically.

  • AUDIENCE: That's to say human eyes are sort of equivalent to some f-stop,

  • would you say?

  • IAN: I don't know.

  • Maybe--

  • DAN: There are arguments online that yes, but--

  • IAN: Oh, I'm going back.

  • DAN: I think It varies very much by person to person as well.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • And I think the argument is you have to be looking at a fixed point.

  • And everything-- when humans track objects--

  • fast moving objects to achieve more clarity than maybe

  • if something passes right in front of your vision

  • while you look at a fixed point.

  • So it's a really hard experiment to perform

  • because people eyes are always moving.

  • And if you move something in front of them they just will track it.

  • And you sort of get--

  • it's all skewed data I would say.

  • But there probably is some sort of upper bound

  • of what we can resolve with our eyes.

  • Just as fast as they refresh.

  • So this is last night's snowy night.

  • Snow is just streaking down through these wires.

  • Here's another one with a tree.

  • DAN: Just to go back one second to the previous conversation.

  • I think it also largely comes down to something

  • known as frame rate, which is how many images you see in sequence,

  • and what human perception is to believe something is actually in motion.

  • And so I think that is a bigger part than shutter speed,

  • for example, as far as what feels natural and feels normal.

  • And we're going to punt to the next lecture in here

  • on that when we talk about video.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • It's sort of the idea of persistence of vision.

  • Video is not moving images.

  • It's a sequence of still images, and we perceive them

  • as moving because they happen fast enough that we don't notice.

  • So there is some sort of threshold where that happens.

  • I'm just not convinced I know what it is.

  • So to sort of jump back to that idea of we

  • can actually track objects to increase the perceptive focus of this,

  • this is a car that's driving by, but by panning with the car

  • I was able to capture this in focus while the rest of it is out of focus

  • at a much slower shutter speed.

  • If I hadn't moved the camera at all everything would be blurred.

  • It would just be a large streak.

  • DAN: And I think we should be careful with what you say

  • is in focus versus what's not in focus.

  • This is actually motion blur, which is different from something

  • being in soft focus.

  • IAN: That is true.

  • A very important distinction.

  • So this is actually--

  • as it moves across the sensor it ends up looking blurry,

  • which is the idea of that motion blur for sure.

  • So it does lead us to this question that if shutter speeds get low enough

  • you can actually introduce shake or movement just from your own human body.

  • This camera's on a tripod.

  • It's very stable, but if I hold something I'm always moving.

  • Always.

  • Try as hard as I might.

  • So the rule of thumb is to minimize hand-held camera shake set your shutter

  • speed to faster than one over your focal length.

  • So it seems confusing, but I have a 50 millimeter lens on here.

  • In order for there not to be any camera shake when I hand hold it

  • I should be shooting it faster than 1/50 of a second.

  • If I put a 70 millimeter lens on here or a 100 millimeter lens then maybe

  • I want to shoot at 1/70 or 1/100.

  • So, especially-- this comes into play a little bit more too with zoom lenses

  • where you might be zooming in and out and changing your focal length,

  • and not sort of paying attention to what shutter speed you're at.

  • And you're say at 1/70 of second and you're shooting at 70 millimeters,

  • but then you sort of snap into 200 all of a sudden

  • you're going to introduce camera shake into the image.

  • A little bit of motion blur that reduces the crispness of your images.

  • So aperture.

  • The final of our three is the size of the opening in a lens.

  • And we have a little short video to tease you with this

  • if we can just watch like this.

  • So as the lens gets more and more open what do you notice happening?

  • AUDIENCE: The numbers get smaller.

  • IAN: Yeah, the numbers get smaller.

  • This is odd.

  • Interesting.

  • So aperture actually refers to the size of the diaphragm opening in a lens.

  • And it's a fractional relationship between the size of the opening

  • and the length of the lens.

  • So it, again, is written in the integer--

  • as integers or decimals on camera bodies and lenses and things like that,

  • but it's actually like a fractional amount.

  • So it's 1/2 or 1/2.8.

  • So 1/22 is smaller than one half.

  • And that's why the diameter of the opening

  • gets smaller the larger the number gets.

  • It's a little frustrating, and counter intuitive,

  • and can be confusing, if you're not used to this,

  • but with practice I promise you'll grab it.

  • So the major f-stops are listed below up to 22.

  • You can have smaller apertures like f/32, or 45, or 64.

  • And there are increments in between.

  • There are third stop increments in between.

  • You may find someone that shoots something at f/9 or something like that

  • and you're like, well, that's not listed here,

  • but so there's increments in between.

  • And just to drive home the point that the smaller the f number

  • is the larger the opening.

  • So over here we're in like 2.8, and over there we're at f/22.

  • And so when you refer to the size of an aperture

  • you might just say F whatever the number value.

  • So I'm at f/2, or I'm at f/16, or f/8 to denote

  • that you're talking about the size of the aperture,

  • and not some other numerical value associated with camera exposure.

  • So artifacts of aperture.

  • Again, there are trade-offs with everything.

  • So changing the aperture directly affects the depth of field of an image.

  • We have not talked about depth of field except sort

  • of in glancing blows in critique.

  • And depth of field is defined as the amount of an image in apparent focus.

  • So in reality with the way optics are there's

  • only one single plane of critical focus in an image

  • that runs perpendicular to the lens axis.

  • And it's set at some distance from the lens.

  • And if you look at your lens you'll probably

  • see that there's feet and meter indicators on there.

  • And when you adjust those to a witness mark

  • that's how far away that critical plane of focus is.

  • But, before we get there, that's sort of obviously not

  • how we experience photographs.

  • We often look at photographs where there's

  • more things in focus on the z-axis than a single plane.

  • So there's some artifact that's happening

  • when cameras make images that allow us to have more in focus

  • than just a single plane, and that is what depth of field is.

  • How much distance on the z-axis is in apparent focus.

  • And we'll come all the way back around to depth

  • of field in just a few minutes, but that's

  • the concept that we're talking about, and aperture directly affects it.

  • Oops.

  • Forward.

  • So here we have an image of a young man in--

  • DAN: Handsome young man.

  • IAN: What?

  • DAN: A handsome young man.

  • IAN: Handsome young man in a swing.

  • And I used Dan's son as my stand in.

  • But you'll notice that the back of the image is out of focus.

  • And so we're at what?

  • At f/1.4.

  • So in this image-- which is a really large opening--

  • really large aperture opening.

  • If we go one more image we're now at 11 so the aperture has gotten smaller.

  • And we've compensated for that with other exposure controls,

  • but now you can see that all of this background is in focus.

  • I love that he sort of looks over his shoulder at that point.

  • What's that?

  • And so side by side you can see that these images while the exposure is

  • the same, the brightness of the light values

  • and the darkness of the dark values is the same, they look very different.

  • And so you can use depth of field as a creative tool.

  • And it's often used to separate people from environments

  • to make things more intimate, or to show how expansive an environment might

  • be if you go the other way.

  • DAN: Can I--

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • DAN: [? Can ?] I give an easy way to remember the f-stops?

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • DAN: Can you set a drawing for me?

  • IAN: Yeah, I can.

  • DAN: So I to this day I have trouble remembering these numbers,

  • just like-- you know, you get to know the majors,

  • but the easiest way for me to visualize this as you're going along

  • is start with one and 1.4.

  • And so the nice thing now is you can just keep doubling along the way.

  • So one you double to two.

  • 1.4 doubles to 2.8.

  • Two doubles to four.

  • 2.8 doubles to 5.6.

  • Four doubles to eight.

  • 5.6 doubles to approximately 11.

  • We round here.

  • Eight doubles to 16.

  • 11 doubles to 22.

  • And that covers most lenses that you'll pick up and operate with.

  • So if you're trying to remember this scale just remember one and 1.4,

  • and then keep doubling.

  • IAN: Quick and dirty.

  • So we talked-- oops.

  • So I was alluding to--

  • these have the same--

  • they're allowing the same amount of light to strike the sensor.

  • They're just using different settings in order to do this.

  • So that means that there's some sort of idea

  • that you can have different exposure settings that

  • yield equivalently exposed images with different artifacts.

  • And so as a photographer, or an image maker,

  • you have to make decisions about which artifacts you want and which ones you

  • don't.

  • And it comes back to that idea that we were talking about so much of intention

  • and supporting your narrative story.

  • 'Cause this image over here is very much about this young boy.

  • And this image is actually about this boy in a larger environment.

  • And by making the decision to have narrow depth of field we're

  • focused in with the child, but to have expensive depth of field

  • we're sort of looking at the child in relationship to the space.

  • So exposure equivalencies.

  • So we can expose the same scene with different settings,

  • and yield an image that is at exposure.

  • But how does the image change?

  • So to come back to this image again, this is exposed at ISO 100.

  • So a lot of noise?

  • Not a lot of noise in that do you think?

  • AUDIENCE: Low.

  • IAN: So low noise probably.

  • It's at f/5.6.

  • So is that a lot of depth of field or a little depth of field?

  • Shallow or narrow?

  • AUDIENCE: In the middle.

  • IAN: It's in the middle-ish we could say.

  • And it's exposed at 1/100 of a second.

  • So when we think back to the image of the dam with all the sequential shutter

  • speeds on that it's not super fast right to freeze anything

  • like falling water or anything moving really fast, but fast enough

  • to freeze most things.

  • And it's also not slow enough to allow significant motion blur.

  • So here's the same image, and we've changed a couple of things.

  • We're now shooting at ISO 400.

  • So what have we done compared to the last image?

  • AUDIENCE: Doubled the ISO?

  • IAN: We were at 100 before so we went 100 to 200.

  • 200 to 400.

  • So we increased the sensitivity by two stops,

  • but we also opened up the aperture by several stops,

  • and then shrank the shutter speed by a fair amount.

  • But what you'll see is that f/1.4 is a really big opening and has a very

  • shallow depth of field.

  • And you can begin to see that.

  • If we go backwards you can see detail here.

  • Crispness.

  • We go forward and it's totally blurry.

  • And we know that that's probably not motion blur

  • because we're shooting at 1/6400 of a second, which is incredibly fast.

  • It's fast enough to freeze water and most anything

  • that we would deal with in our daily life.

  • So here's another version of this image.

  • We're still shooting at a very high shutter speed.

  • We're shooting at a deeper--

  • or a smaller aperture, which gives us deeper depth of field,

  • but we're shooting at this really wildly high ISO, which

  • introduces a lot of noise.

  • And it's difficult to see, but we'll zoom in on this in just a second.

  • So again, just to go the other way.

  • So we have f/1.4.

  • And this is 1/8000 of a second, which-- there's not a lot moving in here,

  • but there's relatively no motion blur.

  • DAN: There would be nothing moving even if there were.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • Exactly, but it wouldn't be moving if it was.

  • And a sort of relatively benign ISO 640.

  • And again f/22.

  • And we notice that the difference between f/1.4 if you look at that

  • gravestone in the very far background there.

  • This guy here.

  • All of a sudden--

  • oops, I went the wrong way--

  • at f/22 it's sort of crisp, whereas before it was out of focus.

  • DAN: And, Ian, you said a moment ago a benign ISO here,

  • but I don't know that you defined what is an acceptable ISO range?

  • Like we talked about the trade of a high ISO introducing noise,

  • and a low ISO having less noise, but like in your-- maybe

  • this is an experiential question.

  • In your experience--

  • IAN: Yeah

  • DAN: --like what would your target range be

  • if you're going to go out and shoot something

  • and wanted to keep as little noise as possible while giving yourself a range,

  • what would you operate in?

  • IAN: So I tend to shoot between 100 and 400.

  • And I think that may be just habit from shooting 35 millimeter film

  • where I would buy it at 100 speed, or 200 speed, or 400 speed,

  • but mostly 100 and 400.

  • But I think on any given shot I'm willing to push up

  • to like 800, maybe 1,000, and once I get past that it just starts to--

  • I need to really want to have the grain there

  • because it gets hard to get rid of.

  • So I would say experientially, yeah, I shoot around 400.

  • 400 to 800 is sort of what I shoot because it's sensitive enough

  • that I can be in a reasonably dark situation and capture what I want,

  • but it's also just not introducing that much noise

  • that there's a real problem when I go in and look at the images later.

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: Are you shooting full frame or crop?

  • IAN: Full frame.

  • Well, it depends.

  • It depends which camera I'm using.

  • So I'll shoot full frame, which means a 35 millimeter size sensor,

  • but I own cameras that have smaller sensors than that.

  • And so the-- yeah, and so and so it really depends

  • on what piece of hardware I'm using.

  • Again, all of these values and things are dependent on the hardware

  • that you have.

  • DAN: Yeah, but I think Ralph's question is actually interesting

  • asking which size sensor.

  • Is there a performance difference with a bigger sensor versus a smaller sensor?

  • IAN: Yeah, there is because you can have larger photo sites.

  • So because you have a larger sensor the photosites that are sensitive to light

  • can be larger which means that they are effectively

  • better at higher sensitivities than sensors that have smaller photosites.

  • So a full frame or a larger sensor is going

  • to have better quality in lower light than something

  • that has a smaller photo sensor.

  • DAN: With a higher ISO.

  • IAN: Yeah, with a higher ISO.

  • I think, all things being equal, if you say

  • have like a small micro 4/3 mirrorless camera at ISO 400

  • they're probably indistinguishable.

  • Maybe if you really, really, really dig into the image you can find it.

  • But if you're shooting it say 3,200, or 6,400, or something like that,

  • having a larger photosite, which means a bigger sensor,

  • is going to be more beneficial to you.

  • That's where you're going to find that little bit of edge that it gives you.

  • For sure.

  • It's a good question.

  • DAN: And then I just want to highlight--

  • Alec said that there's vignetting on the lens.

  • It's very noticeable between 1.4 f/11.

  • IAN: Yeah, there definitely is.

  • AUDIENCE: There is.

  • IAN: Yeah, like you can see it here.

  • At 22 all the corners are bright, and at 1.4

  • for there's this serious vignetting.

  • And it almost feels like it's softening too a little bit.

  • And what that is is that the coverage of the lens

  • is sort of just getting a little bit too small for the sensor size

  • and it's just-- not quite enough light is reaching the sensor at that time.

  • So I'm going the wrong way.

  • That's why they keep going.

  • So if we jump in and look at both.

  • This is the first image, which was sort of medium values of everything.

  • It's very vanilla.

  • This is 1.4 and you can see my focus was just off.

  • AUDIENCE: It's hard to focus at 1.4.

  • IAN: It's really hard.

  • And I sort of left this in here as an illustration

  • that you might think you have something in focus when you're

  • looking at it with a smaller aperture, but then

  • if you open up it may not quite be--

  • you're plane of focus might not be exactly where you expected it to be.

  • And this is very--

  • like this happens a lot.

  • Like it's not far off really.

  • It's on this bush here somewhere, but it's just too far forward.

  • Like I made a mistake.

  • DAN: And it's really unfortunate when you're shooting with a person and--

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • DAN: The thing you want when you're shooting a person is for their eyes

  • to be in focus because that's like the first thing your eyes typically go to.

  • And when you perceive an image in focus the eyes are typically in focus.

  • So if you notice that the focus is like just on the end of someone's nose,

  • but their eyes are not in focus it's definitely a moment to kind of-- it's

  • good to double check if you're taking a picture of people,

  • I guess, to punch in digitally on your screen

  • and make sure that the image is actually sharp.

  • So

  • IAN: This is that image with a really high ISO.

  • And I think it was a little bit difficult to see,

  • but in when we zoom in now you really can

  • see the noise just sort of introduced and all of the texture.

  • And you'll almost see-- like it's almost a little bit brighter

  • too because there's so much added bright data in the shadows.

  • Lift them up a little bit because there's so much of it.

  • So, again, 1.4 again was my bad focus.

  • So frustrating.

  • AUDIENCE: It happens to all of us.

  • IAN: Right.

  • But then if we go to f/22--

  • and this is what tricked me because I think I actually shot this one first

  • and I was like, ah, it's in focus.

  • Looks great.

  • You can see that this background is in focus.

  • And this foreground object is in focus.

  • So it has a large depth of field.

  • So this should visually illustrate that we

  • have the ability to have different exposure settings for the same exposure

  • value.

  • So if we think about a scene in this way there

  • is some sort of amount of available light that we want to sort of render.

  • And we have three controls at our disposal to do that.

  • And by increasing or decreasing one we can increase or decrease

  • the overall sensitivity of the camera to some amount of light.

  • Or we can increase one and decrease another to not change

  • the sensitivity of the camera, but the change the way that image looks.

  • So if we think about this-- if we assume that are base exposure that we metered

  • returned some values like f/5.6, 400 ISO at 1/60 a second, which is, again,

  • not that grainy.

  • It's not that fast.

  • Not that slow.

  • There's not a lot of room for motion blur.

  • Someone walking would be fine.

  • A car might be out of--

  • a moving car might have a little blur to it.

  • Someone standing still would be fine.

  • And the depth of field is in the middle range.

  • We haven't figured out quite what that means, how much that means,

  • but we know it's in the middle compared to 1.4 or 22.

  • So let's make some decisions.

  • Let's change the way this image looks.

  • And what I've done is I've filled in two of the three blanks

  • with different numbers.

  • So we should at this point be able to calculate what the empty is.

  • So we'll just walk through the very first one.

  • So before we were at 5.6 and then we closed down one stop to f/8

  • so we allow less light in by one stop.

  • Here we're at 400.

  • We're still at 400.

  • So we've allowed one stop less light in.

  • So now we need to compensate for that.

  • And we're going to compensate for that in this empty square.

  • So we need to allow one stop more light in to make them equivalent.

  • Does it make sense?

  • So what would the value be in that square?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • DAN: I've got the internet.

  • You're right here.

  • Go ahead.

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah, but [INAUDIBLE].

  • I haven't heard them all day.

  • DAN: Miles says should we go up to 1/30 of a second?

  • IAN: We should.

  • Well done.

  • That's awesome.

  • So we reduce the amount of light by one stop by closing the aperture down.

  • So we had to increase the amount of time that the shutter speed

  • was open by one stop.

  • This isn't the only decision we could have made, but it is the decision here.

  • AUDIENCE: For the proper exposure, right?

  • IAN: Yeah, to maintain our exposure.

  • The same exposure that we had given by these yellow numbers up here.

  • So now we have a different set of numbers.

  • And again, we're still going to reference the yellow numbers.

  • Don't worry about the bottom one.

  • So we open up the camera from 5.6 to 1.4.

  • DAN: Can you go back to my drawing?

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • DAN: To go this far I still have to visualize it.

  • So we're going from 1.4--

  • IAN: Well, we started at 5.6.

  • DAN: Right, sorry.

  • IAN: Was the original exposure value, and we're

  • going to open up the aperture to 1.4.

  • DAN: 1, 2, 3.

  • IAN: 4.

  • DAN: I won't say the final number.

  • Somebody else can say it.

  • IAN: So we've added four stops more light by adjusting the aperture value.

  • We still haven't adjusted the ISO value so that's the same.

  • So we now just have to compensate for four stops more light.

  • Got a few answers from online.

  • AUDIENCE: Do you need more light or less light?

  • IAN: Well, so you tell me.

  • We started at 5.6 and we're going to 1.4.

  • AUDIENCE: OK.

  • We need to add more.

  • OK, yeah, I'm good.

  • I'm good.

  • IAN: Right.

  • So the smaller numbers are larger openings,

  • which is sort of counter intuitive, but we've gone five stops more open.

  • So where would the shutter speed go to?

  • You said you have an answer?

  • DAN: I have a few answers from online.

  • IAN: OK.

  • DAN: So I have 1/240.

  • I've got 1/1000.

  • 1/960.

  • IAN: OK.

  • So we'll start with the lowest and we'll go all the way up.

  • So 1/240.

  • So we were at 1/60 and we want to reduce the amount by four stops, right?

  • Is that what we decided?

  • So we go 160 to 120.

  • 1/120 to 1/250, which doesn't match perfectly,

  • but that's sort of the way it is.

  • 1/250 to 1/500, and 1/500 500 to 1/1000.

  • That's our four stops.

  • So we end up at 1/1000 of a second.

  • DAN: And this is a good moment to highlight the rounding that we do.

  • The kind of fudging of the math.

  • It's the same thing from 5.6 to f/11 when we make that jump.

  • It's not quite, but it's easier to talk in whole numbers

  • than it is to remember 1/960 of a second.

  • IAN: Right, exactly.

  • And so you will find as you investigate some of these concepts

  • that some of the numbers are scales on the cameras.

  • Maybe you do have that fudge factor when you go from 5.6 to 11,

  • which doesn't quite make sense.

  • Which should be 11.2 I think.

  • All right, so let's do this one here.

  • So we're at 5.6, and we open up to 2.8.

  • How many stops?

  • AUDIENCE: Two stops?

  • IAN: 5.6, four, 2.8.

  • Yeah, two stops.

  • 1/60 to 1/30.

  • Opening or closing?

  • More sensitive or less sensitive?

  • AUDIENCE: More.

  • IAN: More sensitive.

  • By how many stops?

  • AUDIENCE: One.

  • IAN: One.

  • So we add one more.

  • So that's three stops difference.

  • So now if we were at ISO 400 and we've added three stops of light

  • how much less sensitive do we need to make that?

  • There's so much arithmetic.

  • It's annoying, I know.

  • But I'll make you really good at it.

  • AUDIENCE: Three stops.

  • IAN: Yeah, so we need to go down three stops.

  • So what is the numerical value for that?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: OK, perfect.

  • That's exactly right.

  • Great.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Great.

  • All right, so our last one we've doubled the ISO.

  • We've done something with the shutter speed.

  • How many stops differences is the shutter speed from 1/60?

  • Oh, I still have to do it my head.

  • 1/30.

  • 1/15.

  • So you go from 1/60 to 1/30, 1/30 to 1/15, 1/15 to 1/8.

  • That doesn't make any sense, but that's what the number is.

  • So it's three stops more light.

  • And we've also doubled the ISO.

  • So that's one stop more sensitivity.

  • So that's a total of four stops.

  • So if we take the aperture we need to close down four stops from 5.6

  • so we just go the other way.

  • We go 5.6 to eight, eight to 11, 11 to 16, 16 to 22--

  • f/22.

  • And finally this last one.

  • I don't even understand this one.

  • We'll go 400 to 320.

  • That is not halving nor doubling.

  • What do we do?

  • AUDIENCE: It's a third isn't it?

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • Let's do the rough math.

  • It's about a third.

  • So I've got a third of a stop.

  • I don't know how to do that with my fingers

  • so I'll just keep it in my head.

  • Now we go from 1/60 to 1/100.

  • Is that a full stop?

  • Full stop would be 1/120.

  • So it's 2/3.

  • So now we have 2/3 and 1/3.

  • Ah, one stop.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] can handle that.

  • IAN: Perfect.

  • So we just have to open up to f/4.

  • So it can get a little funky.

  • And it can get-- like you can start to sort of move and shake things around,

  • but you literally can make different images.

  • So what does this image look?

  • This middle one?

  • 1.4, 400, 1/1000 of a second?

  • AUDIENCE: There would be a vignette.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So we noticed that when it was at 1.4 with this lens on this camera

  • there was seriously vignetting so if we use this same system again

  • we'll get serious vignetting, but what's the artifact

  • that we'll really care about?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] a shallow depth of field.

  • IAN: It'll have very shallow depth of field.

  • What about things that are moving in that?

  • Say there's some cars in it.

  • AUDIENCE: They'll be frozen.

  • IAN: Yeah, they're going to be frozen.

  • 1/1000 of a second.

  • That's pretty fast.

  • That's 1,000 pictures in one second.

  • That's actually pretty ludicrously fast if I think about it.

  • So very shallow depth of field, but no motion blur.

  • So blur because of depth of field--

  • or lack of focus because of the depth a field, but what about this one?

  • F/22 at 800 at 1/8 of a second?

  • Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: You'll have wide depth-- very wide depth of field.

  • IAN: Mm-hm.

  • AUDIENCE: And potentially, depending on the lens,

  • it's gonna have like a bit of shake or blur.

  • IAN: Mm-hm.

  • AUDIENCE: At 800 I'm assuming not too bad.

  • Not too much grain.

  • IAN: Yeah, but more than 400 for sure.

  • So large depth of field and then some motion blur.

  • 1/8 of a second.

  • I can do a lot in 1/8 of a second.

  • Like I moved.

  • A lot of dancing in 1/8 of a second.

  • So that is to say that we can actually speculate

  • at what these images look like abstractly just

  • by looking at the camera settings.

  • We have an understanding of how to previsualize what a scene will

  • look like at given settings.

  • So when you're out photographing you can look at a scene and you can be like,

  • oh, so there's cars moving, there's some water flowing,

  • I know if I set a low shutter speed I'm going to get interesting blur.

  • Cool, I want to try that.

  • And you know that you can then decrease the shutter

  • speed so that you end up with more light,

  • and then you maybe have to stop down.

  • It's going to increase your depth of field,

  • which may be an interesting image.

  • Now I'm going backwards again.

  • So briefly, what do you think the camera settings were for this image?

  • And we're going to talk abstractly without sort of like digging

  • into the image file.

  • We don't know for sure, but we can take some guesses.

  • AUDIENCE: F/11.

  • IAN: OK, so you're saying f/11, but why are you saying that?

  • AUDIENCE: Well, a lot's in focus.

  • IAN: So there's a large depth field.

  • That's our first indicator, so we're going

  • to say that it's probably a small aperture.

  • F/11, maybe higher.

  • Who knows?

  • But like a small aperture for sure.

  • What about the shutter speed?

  • AUDIENCE: Relatively slow.

  • IAN: Relatively slow.

  • Why do you say that?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] shutter speed, there would be a shadow on that,

  • I guess.

  • IAN: Well, we don't we don't know how much light was at the scene.

  • We don't know, but what we can do is look at the artifacts.

  • And the artifact of shutter speed is is there motion blur?

  • Is there not?

  • Is there motion blur on certain things and not other things?

  • Because that gives us an indication of how fast it is.

  • AUDIENCE: It doesn't look like there's much motion [INAUDIBLE] at all.

  • IAN: Yeah, so I think-- you know, where there's--

  • the water is rippling in some wind and that seems relatively crisp.

  • Like maybe there's a little bit of motion blur there, but it's not a lot.

  • It's not sort of distracting, and it doesn't

  • look like the water in the dam picture, which was super smooth and flowing.

  • AUDIENCE: Carla says 600 ISO.

  • IAN: 600 ISO.

  • AUDIENCE: What?

  • IAN: Yeah, why?

  • So why?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] be more.

  • IAN: What is the reasoning for that?

  • The logic behind that assessment?

  • AUDIENCE: Aperture's closed down.

  • IAN: I don't see a lot of grain so if that is the idea-- like, yeah, there's

  • not a lot of noise.

  • And so I think we could say that this scene probably

  • has a fair amount of light in it.

  • It's a sunlit vista.

  • And there's a reasonably high shutter speed, a large depth of field,

  • and some relatively low ISO.

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah.

  • IAN: Right?

  • And maybe-- yes?

  • AUDIENCE: Isn't another artifact of a low ISO good color reproduction?

  • 'Cause like when I saw the picture at the beginning with-- what's his name?

  • I don't know if his name was Dan as well.

  • Was his name Dan [INAUDIBLE]?

  • IAN: Mm-hm.

  • AUDIENCE: So like at 400 the colors looked OK,

  • but when you went to 1,200, 800, it was blotchy and colors

  • that weren't there started to exist.

  • IAN: Yeah, so in that sense because noise is random

  • and it's not just brightness values, it's

  • also color values, that you can get random red introduced

  • at a pixel or a bunch of other pixels and so the color

  • loses fidelity with the introduction of noise in the same way

  • that your exposure loses fidelity.

  • And you notice in the graveyard image where it seemed almost brighter

  • because there was so much noise in the shadow it easily

  • could have been like seemed more colorful or the colors seemed

  • off and messed up because of like random color data forming as noise.

  • So, yes, in that sense absolutely.

  • DAN: Yeah, and with the stretching of the information basically

  • you're sensor's just like stretching the information that it is able to collect.

  • As we saw there was a lot--

  • when the noise comes up in the shadows that can also

  • lead to the perception of lack of contrast

  • as well because there's just like more noise across the darks that

  • seem to raise them more than they actually

  • are so there's better reproduction at a lower ISO because of that as well.

  • IAN: So what's going on in this image?

  • Hm?

  • AUDIENCE: Looks like a California.

  • IAN: Maybe.

  • Are they cormorants or pelicans?

  • I don't know.

  • High ISO or low ISO?

  • We'll start there.

  • DAN: Getting a lot of slow shutters.

  • Long shutter--

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • I think the most the most sort of dramatic thing about this image

  • is the slow shutter speed that allows the water to blur.

  • And the depth of field is--

  • I don't know.

  • I mean there's some definition in the water out

  • in the far horizon and the rock so maybe it's pretty large, but it's, you know--

  • and I don't notice a lot of noise so.

  • But the most dramatic feature of this is someone

  • is utilizing a slow shutter speed for an interesting compositional effect.

  • AUDIENCE: And I would say it's low noise because when you

  • have the sun that's a powerful source.

  • IAN: Yeah, right.

  • So they may not need a lot of sensitivity,

  • but we don't know what time of year?

  • What time of day?

  • This could be evening or early morning so there's a lot of room for variation.

  • Our error bars are large with that's that sort of idea,

  • but yep the sun is an incredibly strong source of illumination

  • so probably not something really, really high.

  • And we also don't see any artifacts of that.

  • I don't see a lot of noise in the image.

  • How about this one?

  • AUDIENCE: Very small f-stop.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So a very small f-stop.

  • Well, actually I think we should say a small aperture opening, which

  • is a large f-stop number.

  • Just to be specific because it gets so confusing otherwise if you're like,

  • oh, it's a large f-stop and you're like, but is

  • that the big number or the big opening?

  • So.

  • AUDIENCE: Small number, big opening.

  • IAN: Yeah, yeah.

  • No, but just-- it takes muscle memory and practice.

  • So this is really about sort of diving into a very small section of an image

  • and letting the out of focus play is sort of a graphic element around that.

  • There doesn't appear to be a lot of noise,

  • and there's not a lot to suggest anything either way

  • about the shutter speed.

  • It's some sort of neutral value, but they made a very conscious choice

  • to shoot at a very large aperture to get a shallow depth of field.

  • Whoa.

  • What's this one?

  • DAN: Fast shutter speed, [INAUDIBLE] says.

  • IAN: Yep, exactly.

  • And not much to suggest--

  • I mean, the depth the field feels pretty reasonable.

  • I can see things in the background that are in focus.

  • The water is completely stopped midair for sure.

  • AUDIENCE: It's a big aperture.

  • IAN: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

  • Absolutely.

  • Whoa.

  • God.

  • What about this one?

  • AUDIENCE: High ISO.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • I would agree.

  • Absolutely.

  • That's a good read.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]. fast ISO.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • What about the shutter speed though too?

  • This is sort of interesting.

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah.

  • I would say fast 'cause look, they're frozen in the air.

  • IAN: Yeah, they're frozen in midair so it's fast enough

  • to stop someone in mid leap.

  • But also they see in order to do that they

  • needed to boost up the ISO to make it more sensitive because it was allowing

  • such little light in for the time.

  • AUDIENCE: Yeah, and there's a lot in focus in the picture.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • AUDIENCE: How did they get this picture?

  • IAN: By boosting the ISO.

  • And I think you could-- like the level of grain in the image,

  • or noise in the image, is really apparent.

  • AUDIENCE: Yes.

  • IAN: Yeah?

  • AUDIENCE: One thing on this image as well,

  • like you mentioned about color reproduction and higher ISO.

  • IAN: Mm-hm.

  • AUDIENCE: I think this image might be made black and white

  • and that's one kind of thing people sometimes

  • do when they bump up their ISOs.

  • When you have bad color you just make it black and white [INAUDIBLE]..

  • IAN: Yeah, because the color gets really mushy and noisy,

  • and then the black and white begins to feel

  • like a textural compositional element rather

  • than a degradation of some other image.

  • That's a very good point.

  • Nope.

  • Backwards again.

  • So let's take a five minute break at 7:04, and then we'll come back

  • and we'll talk a little bit about depth of field

  • because I've sort of been saying oh there's large depth of field

  • and shallow depth of field, but we don't know what it is.

  • So let's demystify this when we return in just a couple of minutes.

  • All right, folks.

  • Welcome back.

  • So We're gonna dive right in and start talking a little bit about depth

  • of field as a creative tool, and also how it works from a functional

  • standpoint with your camera.

  • So depth of field is the amount of any image that's in apparent focus.

  • We've seen some images where there's only-- a tiny part of the frame

  • is in focus and everything else is sort of blurring out

  • in the foreground and the background.

  • And we've seen images where everything from the foreground

  • object to the vast horizon in the distance is in focus.

  • So we need to be careful because apparent focus is the linchpin of this.

  • There is only one plane of focus in an image,

  • and it's set when you adjust the focal ring on your lens

  • and choose some distance at that witness mark.

  • The rest of everything that you perceive as in focus is apparently sharp.

  • It's sharp enough that our human eyes don't notice that it's out of focus.

  • So there is a threshold where at a certain point

  • our eyes do notice that it's out of focus.

  • And this threshold is much lower on smaller images.

  • And as you blow things up, and I think you

  • may have experienced this, where you take a picture

  • and it feels like it's sharp, like my gravestone image.

  • And then I blow it up to a big size and I'm like,

  • oh, it's actually out of focus.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah, on an 85 inch TV.

  • So there is this relationship to how that apparent level of focus breaking

  • down the larger you enlarge an image.

  • So the bigger print that you're going to make,

  • the larger you're going to project something, the more important

  • it is to make sure that you nail that critical plane of focus.

  • And to Dan's point we often, when we're doing portraiture,

  • put that right through the eyes.

  • So that we know that this person's perfectly in focus,

  • and that as the depth of field grows we'll get

  • a wonderful image of their whole face.

  • So what does this look like more generally?

  • So this is a funky diagram that I made where

  • you have this sensor plane that's inside of the camera, you have a lens,

  • and then you have your plane of focus out here set to some distance.

  • So one of the interesting things about depth of field

  • is that it's not perfectly 50/50 surrounding that plane of focus.

  • So the amount that's apparently in focus is 1/3 third in front of it

  • and 2/3 behind it.

  • So there's actually a little more behind that plane of focus that

  • appears in focus than in front of it.

  • And this is a handy trick if you're really

  • shallow, you have a really shallow depth of field,

  • you can actually cheat that plane of focus a little bit forward

  • to make use of that extra space that's behind it.

  • Nope.

  • I keep-- do I keep going backwards?

  • So we described depth of field as being deep when

  • there's much of an image in apparent focus,

  • and conversely when only a small area is in apparent focus

  • we describe that as being shallow.

  • The three factors that control this are our aperture, focal length,

  • and the focusing distance of the lens.

  • So the only exposure control that effects depth of field is aperture,

  • but other elements effect depth of field as well.

  • And that means the length of the lens, whether you're at a wide,

  • normal, or tele.

  • And how closely the lens is focused.

  • Whether you're focused at a subject really,

  • really close in front of the lens or much, much further away.

  • So to sort of talk a little bit more concretely about this.

  • So the smaller the opening the deeper the depth of field for aperture.

  • So f/22 will make a deeper depth the field in the same image than f/1.4.

  • And we saw some examples of that with the cemetery shot where there's--

  • the background gravestone was out of focus, but then it was in focus.

  • The larger the opening the shallower the depth the field.

  • And there's this little basic--

  • major stops down there.

  • Shallow are going this way towards more open and the smaller F number.

  • And deeper going towards the larger F number but smaller opening.

  • So your rule of thumb to help you make sense of this

  • is that doubling the aperture doubles the depth field.

  • Yes?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: So it's a little bit helpful that if you don't have enough depth of field

  • you can double the amount of it just by opening up one stop--

  • or closing down one stop.

  • I'm sorry.

  • Closing down one stop and adjusting one of the other exposure

  • controls to give you a little bit more depth of field.

  • So a big thank you to Andrew Markham for sitting in for us on this.

  • But what we have here is a wide angle lens

  • set to f/16 with some amount of lighting in a space.

  • And what I want to look at is not just our subject, but the area behind them.

  • And watch what happens as we play this video.

  • So what we're actually doing in this moment

  • is opening up the aperture at the same time as we decrease

  • the amount of light in the space.

  • So we're actually dimming the lights as we open up the aperture.

  • And what you see is in the starting frame when we're at f/16

  • all this appears crisp.

  • Maybe a little blurry, but much crisper than this, for certain.

  • So this is a wide angle lens.

  • Do you remember what focal length we were at, Dan?

  • 25, let's say.

  • Maybe.

  • DAN: There was crop factor there too.

  • IAN: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

  • But it definitely is a wide angle lens.

  • And then if we look at this same situation with a normal lens

  • we'll see something interesting happen.

  • Remember that I said that focal length increases depth of field.

  • So here we are with a normal lens.

  • The angle of view has shrank a bit.

  • The camera hasn't moved.

  • We've just tightened up the lens a little.

  • Remember from Dan's lecture.

  • And we'll do the same thing again where we start at f/16

  • and we'll open up the aperture.

  • And we'll actually just sort of dim the lights in concert.

  • And if we look at this one, again, you see that the background is in focus.

  • And then it's out of focus, but is it more out of focus

  • than the previous one?

  • AUDIENCE: Yes.

  • IAN: OK.

  • Yeah.

  • That's sort of interesting.

  • So now we'll move to a telephoto lens.

  • Again, the angle of view cropping in-- or not cropping in,

  • but we'll run this again.

  • And now it's really soft.

  • Incredibly soft.

  • And this is the difference between them.

  • And I would say that this starting softness out here is not quite as crisp

  • as it was in the earlier two iterations of this, but that is much much softer.

  • So that's adjusting the aperture in three different situations.

  • One on a wide angle lens, one on a normal lens, and one

  • on a telephoto lens.

  • And by opening up the aperture, making the opening larger,

  • we shrink the depth the field in all three of those cases.

  • It's interesting to see how it's different for wide, normal, and tele.

  • And we'll come back to that in just a second.

  • So one of the other factors that effects depth of field

  • is the distance to the subject.

  • And what I mean by that is where your lens is focused.

  • Generally I'm just going to assume that we're focused on our subject,

  • but perhaps not.

  • But the distance that your lens is focused at, whether it's near or far

  • changes how deep or shallow the depth of field is.

  • The closer that critical plane of focus to the film plane

  • the shallower that depth of field is.

  • So the closer our subject is to us the shallower the depth of field

  • will be versus when it's further away.

  • It's the inverse.

  • And a rule of thumb for this is doubling the distance quadruples

  • the depth of field so there's some power law here.

  • Yeah.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

  • IAN: Right?

  • Or halving the distance cuts it by four, so--

  • DAN: It's dramatic though.

  • IAN: It is.

  • It is.

  • DAN: And I was shooting some macro photography this weekend,

  • and I was at an aperture that was 5.6 six and f/8 and it was so thin.

  • You think of that depth field as being fairly deep,

  • but it really matters how close you are.

  • With the macro lens you're right up against your subject,

  • and so this really is exaggerated there.

  • IAN: Right, and I think maybe even that image

  • that we looked at that was the green plant with that really

  • narrow depth of field might have been on a macro lens.

  • Let me just go--

  • what did I do?

  • I went backwards again.

  • So this is a wide angle lens where we're focused at four feet.

  • Look at the background.

  • There's a lot out of focus.

  • We have our little rubber ducky there.

  • And as we play this video--

  • perhaps.

  • No.

  • And we moved the camera further away from our subject

  • racking with our subject, so keeping the focus on our subject.

  • Increasing that distance you can see that the focus in the background

  • begins to change.

  • That by increasing the distance the objects behind our subject

  • come into crisper focus.

  • DAN: It's so slow.

  • It's wonderful.

  • It's like--

  • AUDIENCE: Can you play it again for me?

  • IAN: Sure.

  • So if you think back to that duck originally it

  • was much softer than it is now.

  • AUDIENCE: So you're changing focal length.

  • Are you doing it literally moving the camera,

  • but keeping the focus on the subject?

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So what that is doing is essentially changing where the lens is focused,

  • and just moving it like this.

  • As the camera moves backwards it changes that distance.

  • So when you look at the starting position and the end position

  • you really can see how soft it originally

  • was when we were very close to the subject

  • compared to when we moved further back.

  • So this is all, again, a wide angle lens.

  • So now we have a normal lens.

  • We start a little bit more out of focus in the background.

  • The depth of field is a little bit shallower.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: So if we do our little comparison again

  • we can see that distance to subject is really driving how much depth the field

  • we have between these two images.

  • And to do our due diligence here is a telephoto lens.

  • Notice how out of focus our friend the duck is.

  • And as we move through the scale we'll see if we can get him to be in focus.

  • So not quite.

  • Not quite in focus.

  • The depth of field is still shallow enough to keep the duck out of focus.

  • And this is again a telephoto lens.

  • And if we do the comparison between the two

  • we can see that it's incredibly out of focus.

  • Almost unrecognizable to getting into some sort of shape

  • that we can understand a little bit.

  • What is happening?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • DAN: Don't steal my thunder.

  • IAN: OK.

  • We'll leave it for a second.

  • So this is what's called a dolly zoom.

  • This is where the camera is moving back as the camera zooms in

  • at the same time.

  • So we maintain the exact same frame over a camera movement.

  • And what you notice is we actually go from a wide angle lens with this frame

  • to a telephoto lens with this frame and you

  • can see the actual spatial distortions that happen in real time

  • as you change--

  • OK, one more time.

  • OK.

  • DAN: We'll look at this next week when we talk about video as well.

  • Yeah.

  • IAN: So this is--

  • I really wanted to show it because it's awesome.

  • And one of the things that--

  • our final element of effecting depth of field or controlling depth of field

  • is this idea that focal length matters.

  • That a longer full focal length yields a shallower depth of field.

  • So a 150, a 250 millimeter lens on a full frame camera, a telephoto lens,

  • has a shallower depth of field than a wide angle lens, which

  • yields a deeper depth of field.

  • And I think we saw that when we looked at how different each of the elements

  • were when they were in wide, normal, and tele.

  • The wide angle lenses had more in focus in the background

  • than the telephoto ones.

  • AUDIENCE: Regardless of the aperture?

  • IAN: Yeah, regardless of the aperture.

  • Well, yes.

  • So when we were changing aperture--

  • If we go-- let's-- whoops.

  • Let's go back here.

  • So we were changing aperture here.

  • And you can see the effect that it has on depth of field.

  • We didn't change focal length and we didn't change focus distance.

  • When we go to here and we change--

  • let's do this one.

  • We don't change aperture.

  • We don't change focal length.

  • This is a wider angle of view.

  • This is the camera backing up.

  • This is just the distance to the subject.

  • And you can see the difference between the elements.

  • But that is to say that this image compared to this image

  • are two different-- this is us changing focal length,

  • while all the other elements stay the same.

  • We still shifted over distance, but this is its own unit.

  • So your rule of thumb for this is halving the focal length

  • quadruples the depth the field.

  • Doubling the focal length cuts it by a quarter.

  • That might be helpful for you in the field

  • if you want to-- like I need much more depth of field.

  • A little rule of thumb to help you get there.

  • The interesting thing though is that in this comparison

  • when we start at the beginning and the end is the depth of field different?

  • And I think maybe we'll do this side by side here.

  • So this is the dolly zoom that we did.

  • We started with a wide angle lens very close to the subject.

  • And we didn't change the aperture.

  • We did change the focal distance, but then we

  • moved the camera to a telephoto lens further from the subject.

  • So we increased the focal length, but at the same time

  • we also increased the distance to the subject.

  • And if you look at this it's sort of apparent,

  • but it's difficult because we maybe don't see this,

  • but the parts that are out of focus are sort of

  • similarly out of focus in both of these positions.

  • So what that means is that as the focal length pushed the depth of field

  • smaller and smaller the distance to the subject pushed it larger and larger

  • and they sort of offset each other.

  • Remember that our rule of thumb was if you change it by half it doubles it.

  • If you change it by half--

  • or if you change it by half it quadruples it.

  • If you change it by half it quadruples it.

  • And so those two values actually offset each other.

  • So for the same frame focal length doesn't

  • do a lot to adjust your depth of field because you

  • have to change the focus distance.

  • Does that make sense?

  • And they actually offset each other.

  • So if you-- let's draw it.

  • Maybe that's the easiest way.

  • So if we have a frame here and we have a frame here.

  • And they're the same frame, but for this one the camera is very close,

  • and for this one the camera is very far.

  • And for this one we're at a wide, and for this one we're at a tele.

  • We've zoomed the lens out--

  • this is exactly what a dolly zoom is.

  • It starts close.

  • It moves this way and as it moves we zoom the camera in.

  • So what we've done is this focal length is

  • getting larger, which we know produces a shallower depth of field.

  • We're going from a wide to a tele.

  • And this focus distance, the distance from here to here,

  • is getting larger, which we know increases the depth of field

  • so it makes it deeper.

  • And in doing so they essentially cancel each other out roughly.

  • AUDIENCE: And that's what gives that whole effect [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah, so really what we're only seeing

  • is the spatial relationships of the foreground and background doing

  • that sort of expansion, compression trick,

  • rather than large portions of the image coming in and out of focus

  • as the depth of field shifts throughout that entire element.

  • So that's just a little aside.

  • That's like a hiccup where if you--

  • focal length really matters for depth of field if you don't with the camera.

  • Because obviously, you start to move the camera,

  • it begins to do less because you change your focal distance along with it.

  • Are there questions on depth of field before we move on a little further?

  • So one of the other tools in your arsenal besides a light meter

  • is this histogram, which is basically a plotting.

  • It shows the distribution of brightness values of any given image.

  • It can also display the distribution of color values.

  • But for our purposes right now we're going

  • to look at it as a luminosity scale.

  • And all this says is that they're--

  • it reads left to right.

  • So this is black, and this is white, and everywhere in between

  • is some midtone of brightness.

  • And it just shows you how much of your image is falling in certain areas.

  • And so is if this is full black that means

  • this area is probably our shadows.

  • If this is full white this area is probably our highlights,

  • and somewhere in here is our midtones.

  • So in looking at this histogram we can see

  • that there's a lot of data in the dark side of this

  • with a big spike of white light at the top.

  • And there's sort of nothing at the high delicate highlights or mid tones.

  • So this is a histogram What do you think this is a histogram of?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So this is a histogram of this.

  • Just plain white.

  • Everything is just jammed up on that end.

  • So this should warn you when you start to see your images sort of jam

  • up towards one end--

  • towards the right hand side you're going to end up

  • with something that's very bright.

  • What about this one?

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah, it's this.

  • It's just this.

  • Just black.

  • Inky blackness.

  • How about that one?

  • AUDIENCE: Is it 18%?

  • IAN: Yeah, this is middle gray.

  • It's this image right here.

  • Here's one for you.

  • What's this?

  • It's a lot of everything.

  • AUDIENCE: It's going to be, probably, [INAUDIBLE] highlight [INAUDIBLE]..

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • Maybe.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • It's actually just this gradient.

  • It's equal parts of every sort of element

  • and it renders a very flat histogram.

  • So what's interesting about that is this flat histogram

  • tells you that there's a completely even distribution

  • of tones, which sort of suggests that that's exactly what this is.

  • It's about as even a distribution of tones

  • as you can get in any kind of image.

  • DAN: Well, [INAUDIBLE],, just to hammer around the point of how to read this,

  • this gradient is on the left black, on the right white,

  • which is how a histogram represents its luminosity as well.

  • But if you were to reverse this image the histogram

  • does not read left to right like an image does.

  • It would be the same histogram.

  • IAN: Yes.

  • Yeah.

  • Actually that-- yeah, exactly.

  • 'Cause it's just basically saying that there

  • is a certain number of dark pixels in this image

  • and a certain number of light pixels in this image.

  • It doesn't care where they are.

  • Just there's this much value.

  • So let's go back to the histogram that we saw before.

  • What do you think this is a histogram for?

  • Keeps coming back around.

  • It's like a boomerang.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • DAN: Alec says an outside shot.

  • IAN: An outside shot.

  • That's sort of interesting.

  • Why might we say that?

  • DAN: Alec also feel free to unmute and just shout it out.

  • IAN: Yeah, we can hear you.

  • AUDIENCE: My guess looking at that would be like your outside shot that you had

  • 'cause there was so much shadow detail from--

  • like in the trees and everything.

  • IAN: Yeah, totally.

  • It's the same shot.

  • It just keeps coming back.

  • AUDIENCE: You've gotta make points.

  • IAN: Yeah, that's nice.

  • So there's not a lot of highlight value in this image.

  • There's a little bit of that snow, but most of it

  • is this dark tree value, which is pushing the majority of our tones

  • into this shadow area, but we see a pretty decent distribution of tones,

  • and we have some highlight values, and we have some shadow values.

  • DAN: And the very rightmost pixel here, on the right side,

  • we also have this indicator up here.

  • And it looks different in different software,

  • but this is the clipping indicator meaning

  • that something is fully overexposed, meaning that it's true white.

  • IAN: Yeah, and it honestly is the--

  • it's the middle section in here.

  • Like there's some small amount of that that's clipped out pretty hard.

  • AUDIENCE: So when you say clipping that means like there's like [INAUDIBLE]??

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • So as you try to render tones in an image

  • you can essentially push up against the maximum value, which

  • is like it's so bright that it hits the maximum recordable value for the camera

  • and then there's just no more data to record so it just is at max.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: It's at full, which is usually--

  • like clipping over exposure.

  • It will show up as white because it's maximum red,

  • maximum blue, maximum green.

  • It's just pinned at the top.

  • AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]

  • IAN: Yeah, exactly.

  • And the opposite is where it is just crushed down to that black.

  • And that's what those two extreme examples of the white histogram

  • and the black scram were.

  • Where there was-- like all the values were just

  • pinned at either the left or the right.

  • Either the maximum highlight value or the minimum darkness value.

  • And so once you clip though you can't get that information back.

  • It's lost.

  • There's no way to bring that back.

  • If you try to do any correction on that and bring the tone down

  • it's just going to shift in grayness 'cause there's no detail.

  • It's just bright white.

  • It's a flat white field, and if you bring it down

  • it just will be a flat gray field or you go all the way down to a flat black.

  • So if we look at this here histogram, which

  • is the idea of a low key histogram it's pushed to which side?

  • AUDIENCE: The left.

  • IAN: Which is?

  • AUDIENCE: Shadows.

  • IAN: Shadows.

  • And we've got some midtones.

  • Not really a lot.

  • AUDIENCE: Very little.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • And we have some highlights--

  • AUDIENCE: And there is a peak of light seek of white.

  • IAN: What's that?

  • AUDIENCE: There is a peak of white somewhere in there as well.

  • IAN: Yeah, there is a little bit of brightness.

  • You can see it ticks up just at the end.

  • Just a little bit there.

  • So what do we imagine this image looks like?

  • DAN: [INAUDIBLE] says, underexposed.

  • AUDIENCE: A white dot on a dark wall?

  • IAN: A white tall and a dark wall?

  • Yeah, something like that.

  • Yeah.

  • So there's some small amount of brightness in a large dark field.

  • That was a pretty good read.

  • This is probably our white values.

  • There's the tiny bit of mid tones that we were getting and the rest of it

  • is falling off into these very distinctive shadow details.

  • So you might have looked at-- if you look at this histogram, like all tools,

  • it can be fooled.

  • This was an intentionally exposed image to have all of the values--

  • to have this be dark.

  • To have everything pushed to the left because that's

  • the sort of the composition that this photographer was going for,

  • but if you were sort of just looking a histogram

  • you'd be like no that's not right.

  • I'm looking for an even distribution of midtones.

  • And I think you'll find a lot of people suggest that that's the correct way,

  • but it's not always.

  • It does matter about your intention.

  • So the flip side of this is a high key histogram.

  • It's pushed to which side?

  • AUDIENCE: The highlights.

  • IAN: The highlights.

  • DAN: And just to say plainly we're looking

  • at an overlay of several histograms here.

  • Different color channels.

  • And then the gray one represents the luminosity.

  • IAN: Right.

  • DAN: But that just depends on which software you're using

  • and what options you have turned on.

  • IAN: Yeah, and so you can get a variety of different scopes.

  • And actually that's a good point.

  • So the earlier version that we were looking at it

  • was the histogram from Photoshop and this is luminosity and color

  • like a compound histogram from Lightroom.

  • And so you have different options that you can turn on and turn off.

  • And sometimes for certain images having the color

  • on shows you a cast or a skew that might be in there especially if you did not

  • set your color temperature.

  • So what does this image look like?

  • AUDIENCE: Bright.

  • IAN: Bright.

  • Right.

  • I think we can safely assume that.

  • There's not a lot in here that is actually a deep dark color--

  • dark tone.

  • It's mostly whites.

  • Bright sky highlights.

  • There's some grays in there.

  • There's not even really a solid black.

  • Maybe a little bit of a shadow detail in there.

  • And so when we look at the histogram you really can see this.

  • And so again we're not using an even distribution

  • but we understand that this is correct for our subject.

  • Sweet.

  • So putting it all together.

  • Here is an image that is overexposed.

  • This image is mostly white.

  • The values up here are completely clipping.

  • It's solid white, but it's OK because it's the point of the image.

  • So this is an intentionally overexposed image.

  • We could meter this and the camera might try

  • to tell us to make this a middle gray because it thinks that's what we want,

  • but we know we're smarter than it.

  • So we're going to increase the exposure so that pushes up to white and in fact

  • clips.

  • And we get an interesting shot of these sunglasses.

  • Solid marketing.

  • So then the flip side is this is intentional under exposure

  • where we've decided to not expose for this value,

  • but actually for this white value and give ourselves a silhouette.

  • DAN: Do you have a histogram for this one?

  • Like what does this histogram look like?

  • IAN: I don't.

  • I could get it in a second, but I don't.

  • I don't have it.

  • DAN: It's split though right? 'Cause we have--

  • IAN: Yeah, it is split.

  • DAN: --very little in the middle 'cause it's almost all largely the bottom

  • because the histogram represents like 100% of the pixels in the image.

  • Most of them are in the dark so that's going

  • to be where our biggest mountain and the highest peaks are.

  • And then we'll have also a big spike up on the right

  • because the white screen in that image was almost fully overexposed.

  • So histograms I think--

  • most cameras have histograms on them when you're shooting.

  • If you pull up your digital screen and push the button to pull up the display

  • you can cycle through different overlays on your screen.

  • And so histogram is an option, but I find that they're

  • much more useful in post-production.

  • When you're actually shooting I think the thing

  • you typically want to look at is your light meter

  • and to know if you're getting a good exposure or not.

  • And obviously you'll either intentionally

  • add exposure over or under, but at the end of the day histogram

  • is helpful when you want to look at overall trends

  • once you get to post-production.

  • And really to check if you are clipping any information at the highlights

  • or in the shadows.

  • I think that's really where the histogram is best served.

  • IAN: Yeah, and I think actually, I also tend

  • to check the histogram early when I'm shooting,

  • but when I'm pushing exposure in an image like this or an image

  • where it's really bright and I'm going to maybe push up against overexposure

  • or clipping I will look at the histogram at that moment.

  • When I know that I'm compensating and I want to make an image brighter,

  • and I want to push it up towards that bright white value

  • I want to make sure that I don't clip because I

  • can't get that information back so I want to get as close to it

  • while still maintaining some detail in the image.

  • So it's a really good tool for when you begin

  • to experiment with pushing and pulling your exposure

  • away from what the light meter is telling you.

  • At the end of the day 90% of the scenes that you photograph the light meter

  • is going to do an amazing job at calculating some calibration for you.

  • AUDIENCE: It'll get you really close.

  • IAN: Yeah, it'll get you really close, but you then have to make a decision.

  • Do I accept this, or do I push one way or the other?

  • DAN: And the other thing I'll just say, since we're talking about histograms,

  • is the useful thing-- the indicator that popped up.

  • In post, and we haven't covered Lightroom in this class,

  • but if you're using something like Lightroom or Photoshop

  • typically if you hover over the indicator that you're overexposed

  • it'll show you an overlay on the screen where which portion of your image

  • is clipping.

  • And it's just helpful to get a read on exactly which part of the image

  • is over or underexposed.

  • So I think that's the tail end of our conversation about exposure.

  • I want to stop for a minute and see if there are

  • questions from anyone in the audience.

  • What questions do you have?

  • AUDIENCE: I have a question.

  • IAN: Yeah, go for it.

  • AUDIENCE: When you introduced histograms programs Dan just briefly mentioned

  • this, that we can see a histogram in our viewfinder

  • or on the screen in our cameras?

  • IAN: You can in a large number of cameras.

  • I think this is now turned off.

  • So let me just fire up this camera.

  • We can take a look.

  • So this is the output of the 5D and it's currently

  • shooting this bright white wall.

  • And you can see that the histogram is pinned,

  • except when I walk in front of it, right to the right hand side.

  • But if we do something like maybe introduce another tone--

  • again, this is over exposed-- we can see that the histogram starts to move--

  • this is a darker tone--

  • in real time for what it is that it's seeing.

  • So in this image I would look at this exposure

  • and I would know that if what I want is a bright white field

  • I have successfully exposed this image.

  • But if I don't want that-- if I want some kind of detail

  • I'm going to adjust some values.

  • Like maybe I'll close the aperture down, which

  • you can see I'm doing on the bottom.

  • And I'll change the exposure so that now I don't have a bright white field,

  • but I have a middle gray field.

  • And I know that it's rendering as middle gray

  • because right in the middle of the histogram there's this giant peak.

  • I think-- can you push the talk?

  • AUDIENCE: Sorry.

  • IAN: That's all right.

  • AUDIENCE: So I assume you have to be on a manual mode in order for this--

  • to see a histogram and alter all of these different--

  • IAN: It's actually just one of the info features.

  • I can actually turn off all of that clutter.

  • If I press it again I get it without the histogram.

  • I get some extra data.

  • And then I can turn the histogram on.

  • So your camera may or may not have this feature.

  • Most do at this point.

  • So there should be either a way to turn it on in the menu or a button

  • that functions to allow you to turn this on so you can get

  • a sense of what you're exposing for.

  • DAN: And Lorna, your camera may not have it in automatic mode.

  • You might need to be in a different camera mode.

  • And we did record a short video on camera modes

  • so check that out after this lecture if you have more questions.

  • And if I can just speak experientially for a second with histograms.

  • Like I said I think when you're going out to shoot--

  • I don't find them all that useful when I'm shooting,

  • but the times that they are useful-- if you're shooting a bright sun

  • and can't quite get a read on your screen

  • and you want to know if you're overexposed on your highlights it's

  • really helpful in that moment, but for the most part when I go out and shoot I

  • am using exclusively the camera meter.

  • IAN: Yeah.

  • And I think that's a good point.

  • Just like it's sometimes very hard to assess your focus on a very

  • tiny monitor or through a viewfinder.

  • It can be difficult. It can also be very difficult to see a LCD

  • screen in bright sunlight, which is I think what you're talking about.

  • And that the histogram sort of proves to you what is happening in the image

  • because it's not based on some visual cue.

  • It's based on the actual data in the field.

  • So again there's a video on light metering more

  • generally and how to trick and fool your light meter,

  • and also one on camera modes, which I would encourage you to watch

  • for the next assignment because there's a couple-- we're

  • going to ask you to experiment with the different elements of exposure.

  • And you can use either aperture priority mode or shutter priority mode

  • to help you play with that as well as full manual

  • if you're feeling brave and adventurous, which

  • I encourage you to feel at this point.

  • Any final questions or parting thoughts?

  • Well, we'll stick around for a few minutes

  • and let us know, but thank you all very much and we'll see you next week.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

Exploring Digital Media 2019 - Lecture 3 - Exposure and Visual Camera Artifacts

  • 19 1
    Angus に公開 2021 年 07 月 25 日
動画の中の単語