Name: How ExxonMobil Pollutes the World
Uploaded: 2021-07-11T03:28:05.000Z
Duration: 15 min 50 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

基礎受動態

This video is sponsored by Brilliant, if you stick around until the end, I'll give you

a link to get 20% off a premium membership!

In July 1977, Exxon held a meeting in its headquarters and a climate scientist told

the truth: without strong action to curb fossil fuel emissions within the next 5 to 10 years,

the world would face a warming trend that could spell disaster for countries around

the globe. These were harsh facts, especially for the executives of one of the largest oil

and gas companies in the world. But Exxon leaders didn't face these daunting climate

change facts with opposition, instead, they embraced the scientist's conclusions and

poured money into funding state-of-the-art climate models and research vessels to gain

a better understanding of the climate change their industry was causing. As InsideClimate

New's senior correspondent Neela Banerjee asserts, “Exxon was on the cutting edge

of science, they wanted to be on the cutting edge of science on climate change.” But

then everything changed: “And they ended up instead leading the denial and clouding

the public perception of science. I mean the change is amazing.” Exxon knew about climate

change since 1977 and has since worked hard to make sure no one does anything about it.

This company is one of the largest in the world, worth almost $400 billion, and since

its inception in 1911 with the breakup of Rockefeller's Standard Oil monopoly, has

been involved in countless nefarious operations harming the environmental and social ecosystems

of not only communities but whole countries. So today, we're going to dive deep into

the environmental and social consequences of this fossil fuel giant. Today, we take

First and foremost, ExxonMobil is a fossil fuel behemoth. It ranks fifth on the top 100

companies responsible for 71% of cumulative global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988.

Its operations span the globe with refineries dominating the Niger Delta and offshore exploration

reaching into Egyptian deepwater wells. It's not too far of a stretch to say that ExxonMobil

is one of the leading causes of climate change. The list of environmental wrongs created by

ExxonMobil's business is extensive. You can point to the 4167 spills ExxonMobil's

operations have caused since 2005. Or the over $20 billion spent on exploring and expanding

their fossil fuel infrastructure in 2018, locking in deepwater drilling operations in

Guyana and Mozambique for years to come. You can even look towards the 20-day methane leak

from an ExxonMobil natural gas subsidiary in 2018, that, according to the New York Times,

“released more methane than the reported emissions of the oil and gas industries of

countries like Norway and France.” The list of environmental grievances is long, but let's

zoom in on one of the more ecological racked regions globally to understand ExxonMobil's

relationship with the environment: the Niger Delta. According to one 2018 study on Nigerian

ecosystems, Europe as a whole experienced 10 incidences of oil spills in 40 years, while

Nigeria experienced 9,343 incidences in just 10 years. The same study goes on to claim

that the Nigerian environment has experienced the equivalent of one Exxon Valdez oil spill

every year for the last 50 years. This vast amount of pollution has led to a loss of 5-10%

of the delta's mangrove population and a decline in fish stock decimating the livelihoods

of local fishers. And the largest oil company operating in the Delta is none other than

ExxonMobil, which, with its private army of over 2,500 security guards protects its polluting

interests with supreme aggression. Essentially, the world, and particularly marginalized and

indigenous communities, has become ExxonMobil's dumping ground. Environmental destruction,

climate change, and waterway pollution are just seen as unfortunate side effects of the

The full extent of ExxonMobil's impact can't be understood, however, until we address the

connection between their fossil fuel activities and the communities they operate within. So,

let's travel back to the United States for a minute. To the Charlton-Pollard section

of Beaumont, Texas where a majority black community lives with consequences of ExxonMobil

every day. A 2017 investigative report from The Intercept followed residents like Joseph

Gaines, as they struggled with the constant flaring of chemicals from the ExxonMobil refinery

down the block. The Intercept report revealed that the plant releases at least 135 toxic

chemicals, many of which are carcinogens, and the plant is regularly in noncompliance

with the Clean Air Act. People in Charlton-Pollard live with the constant smell of sulfur wafting

through the air, and residents have been diagnosed with cancer and heart problems. The air pollution

there is over 54 times higher than the national average. The population of Charlton-Pollard

has sought answers in form of a complaint to the EPA, but only after 17 years was it

answered, and it took the investigative reporting of The Intercept to push the EPA into action.

The EPA eventually fined ExxonMobil $2.5 million for polluting the communities around eight

of its Gulf Coast refineries, with the added requirement of spending $300 million to fit

their refineries with pollution control systems. While this is a victory, it's too little,

too late. This slow action is a symptom of ExxonMobil's and other fossil fuel interests'

defanging of Texas enforcement agencies. In 2016, for example, the state punished fewer

than 1 percent of illegal pollution releases.

But ExxonMobil's strategy of casting its negative externalities onto low-income communities

and communities of color is not just limited to the local scale, it happens globally as

well. If we go back to the Niger Delta, the consequences of big oil companies like ExxonMobil

have manifested in nearly double the infant mortality rate near oil spills as well as

a complex web of illegal refineries and armed conflicts surrounding pipeline and fossil

fuel operations. One community leader interviewed by The Guardian laments, "Oil companies do

not value our life; they want us to all die. In the past two years, we have experienced

10 oil spills and fishermen can no longer sustain their families. It is not tolerable."

Nearby, ExxonMobil, with the help of the World Bank, tore a sharp line through the land of

Cameroon's Bakola indigenous peoples in order to construct the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline.

They did this despite the knowledge of an impact report detailing the damage the pipeline

would cause to the Bakola people. According to a World Bank environmental specialist,

“ The pipeline didn't need to go through their area. It could have followed the road

on the outside… But, ExxonMobil didn't relocate the pipeline. They put it directly through

Bakola lands, doing much environmental damage in the process.”

Farther down the coast, one 2013 study connects the prevalence of malaria in Equatorial Guinea

with its rapid transition into a petro-state spearheaded by ExxonMobil. When the study

was published most of the population had yet to see the substantial royalties from ExxonMobil's

oil operations. 60% of the 650,000 citizens at the time lived on less than $1 per day.

And despite the wealth pouring out of Exxon's oil fields, the government was slow to act

on malaria aid as well. There were an estimated 193,000 cases of malaria in 2006. The study

points towards ExxonMobil's illicit backing of the country's dictator and other leaders

as a part of the reason why malaria continued to be a major problem within the country.

The author asserts that the “rapid influx of wealth in one sector can lead to... depression

of other economic sectors, general inflation, potential for conflict, and the encouragement

of weak or corrupt management.” Essentially, the paper argues that ExxonMobil was propping

up a failing government with little desire to address the malaria epidemic all in order

to maintain control of its lucrative oil assets. This exploitation of the resources of oil-rich

countries at the hands of corporations like Exxon has become such a pervasive global issue

it's been deemed the “resource curse” in academic circles, as in, to have more resources,

which should create economic power for a poor country, actually leads to worse economic

outcomes for that country. According to one study, between 1970-1993, “resource-poor

countries without petroleum, grew four times more rapidly than resource-rich countries

with petroleum, despite the fact that they had half the savings.” The study goes on

to say that “The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) have both confirmed that

字幕リスト動画再生

How ExxonMobil Pollutes the World

essentially

constant

vast

description