Name: The Future of Airliners? - Aurora D8
Uploaded: 2021-06-01T09:05:20.000Z
Duration: 10 min 50 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

When we look back over the last century of innovation in flight it's sometimes hard

様態の副詞

The Wright's first flight in 1903 was at best a proof of concept; only managing to

fly 37 metres before falling ungracefully from the sky.

We often look back at this historic event and see it as the spark that ignited a century

of human flight, the truth is, the event barely registered in national media and most questioned

It took another 3 years of incremental improvements and public test flights before the international

community began to accept their achievements and by that stage others had begun to catch

By 1910, Louis Blériot had flown across the English Channel, Georges Chavez soared over

2 kms to clear the Alps and Glenn Curtis began to testing planes as a platform for weapons

and his biplane became the first to take off from the deck of a ship.

This marked a trend for the next 35 years of aviation history, which was dominated by

war and by the time World War 2 came to a close giant companies had been formed who

were mass producing planes capable of transporting humans across the world.

These companies were not going to simply vanish as the war ended and instead set their sights

on building a new commercial civilian transport industry.

In the final year of World War 2 over 4 thousand Douglas DC-3s had been built and many of these

would go on to be converted for civilian use.

The DC-3 is still the most produced airliner in history with over 16,000 built and some

are even still in service across the world, but it's slowly being caught up by the Boeing

737, which has sold so many units that at any single point there is an average of 2000

The 737 made it's debut in 1968 and it's design has essentially become the template

for which most jet airliners have been built on since.

The initial design of the 737 had the engines mounted on the tail, similar to the DC-9,

which the 737 was competing with, but placing the engines here reduced the amount of space

available towards the rear of the cabin and mounting the engine pods tight against the

underside of the wing freed up space at the back of the cabin for more passengers, which

was important for this narrow and short body, short haul plane.

It also reduced the bending load on the wings, counter-acting the upward bending load caused

The success of this design has allowed the 737 to stay in service for over half a century

with incremental improvements and today it's so popular that most budget airlines like

Ryanair and Southwest airline use no other plane.

It's engines have got gradually larger and more powerful.

It's cabin got larger as traffic increased, wingets were introduced to the wing to reduce

induced drag and later this year the latest iteration of the 737, which has already sold

over 3400 units, will make it's debut with new split winglets, more efficient engines,

an improved flight deck and the modern cabin interior developed for the 787 dreamliner.

This theme of incremental improvements in the airline industry happens for a reason.

Introducing a totally new plane design is an incredibly risky business.

We need to look no further than the failed Concorde for proof of that, but even introducing

a new plane series like Boeing's 787 can cause massive losses in revenue.

The plane was plagued with delays, originally slated to arrive in 2008, but actually made

its first commercial flight in 2011 and only recently has hit it's stride in manufacturing

New designs are simply a risky business decision and in general companies will play it safe

On top of this a plane's service life is a huge part of its selling point.

Airlines want to buy planes that maintain their value over the years and can last them

a significant amount of time with minimal maintenance, so manufacturers have made effort

to increase the service life of these planes, which in turn has increased the cycle times

With the current status quo of the airline industry.

We aren't likely to see much change any time soon, BUT what if a new industry disrupter

One that could shake up the duopoly of Boeing and Airbus to force competition and new designs?

We have seen this happen in other industries recently.

The energy sector is being revolutionised by cheap solar panels, Tesla was the first

successful car start up in America in over a century and composite materials are set

to continue replacing metals in many every-day applications.

These disruptive technologies combined with rising air traffic could raise the pressure

In this new series of videos I am going to break down a number of future aircraft and

the design challenges they need to overcome to become a reality.

Let's first take a look at the D8, nicknamed the Double Bubble, developed by Aurura, MIT

The current template of plane design at the moment consists of a tubular fuselage.

This shape is primarily there to resist the internal pressurisation, allowing the fuselage

to expand without creating dangerous stress concentrations.

As long as we pressurise the inside of our planes this design aspect won't change,

but we can create fuselages with multiple interconnecting tubular sections.

This is exactly what the D8 does, with it's double bubble fuselage.

So let's look at how they came up with this design and the theory behind their design

To design this concept they actually started off with a 737 and performed a morphing study

by gradually introducing their design goals to the current design.

They started by first optimising the airframe of the current 737-800 airframe with current

They then changed the fuselage to feature the double bubble.

This shortened and widened the fuselage considerably.

The wider body and shaped nose allows the body of the aircraft to generate more lift,

This allowed the wings to get thinner and thus reduce the drag they generate, but it

also meant that the tail wing could decrease in size too.

The primary purpose of the tail wing is to generate downforce at the rear of the plane,

which keeps the nose of the plane up, an important stability characteristic, but when the nose

generates it's own lift, the importance of the tail wing is diminished and it can

decrease in size, which again reduces the drag.

They then reduced the cruise speed of the plane from 0.80 mach to 0.76 mach, which may

seem like a step backwards, but remember the primary goal of this future design are to

This allowed the wing sweep of the plane to decrease, if you don't understand this go

ahead and watch my “why are plane wings angled backwards video”.

In the next iteration they reduced the cruise speed again to 0.72, essentially removing

Reducing the speed of the plane reduces the thrust requirements of the plane, which reduces