字幕表 動画を再生する
-
need to be thinking about what is convention, ambition convention, What the scientists are telling us for a change and this is something we haven't done and covered teaches that look at the mess we've made in the UK by not listening to the scientists the mess we made in the U.
to be thinking about what is convention, ambition convention, what the scientists are telling us for a change and this is something we haven't done and covered the something is that look at the mess we've made in the UK by not listening to scientists the
-
S.
S.
-
But not listening to the scientists on doing what they told us up front.
しかし、科学者の言うことを聞かないのは、前もって言われたことをやっているからだ。
-
It is a nutter unmitigated disaster, and that is exactly what climate change is shaping up to be.
これは、気が狂うほどの大災害であり、まさに気候変動がそうなるように形成されているのです。
-
So I think setting a 2050 target for a company is a really easy thing for a chief executive to dio when that CEO knows that he is going to be long gone before the company for its clear, whether or not he's burning, not they're not his successor's successor's successor's problem.
だから私は、会社の2050年の目標を設定することは、そのCEOは、その明確なのために会社の前に彼が長くなることを知っているときに、最高経営責任者がディオするのは本当に簡単なことだと思います、彼は燃えているかどうか、彼らは彼の後継者の後継者の問題ではありませんでした。
-
Eyes being created by companies if they're not clearly, really well costed out and planned on the evidence for that provided to investors so that we can treat it seriously because we're able Thio credibility assess those targets on that for us, really is key is around having a nearer term targets with a demonstrably aligned Thio say a net 0 2050 outcome for a company with clear, well, costed, well explained, Well, evidence plans as to how you get there, why you get there and why you've set that target is supposed to any other.
もし企業が明確に、本当によくコストをかけて、投資家に提供された証拠に基づいて計画されていなければ、企業によって目が作られてしまいます。
-
The big change over the last few years has Bean the inclusion off the broader footprint of companies but what it called scope three emissions or the broader impact of shell.
ここ数年の大きな変化は、Beanは、企業の広範なフットプリントをオフに含めるが、それはスコープ3排出量やシェルの広範な影響と呼ばれるものを持っています。
-
So when you do, use your car and you fill it with shell petrol that the emissions from the car are out scope three emissions and included within our footprint.
だから、あなたの車を使用して、あなたはそれをシェルガソリンで満たしているときに、車からの排出量は3つの範囲外の排出量であり、私たちの足跡の中に含まれていることを確認します。
-
So I think the biggest challenge has been finding a way off off articulating scope three emissions in a way that sensible for people like Nick in the investment community, and we've done that with what we call our net carbon footprint.
最大の課題は、スコープ3の排出量を明確にしないで、ニックのような投資家の方々が納得できる方法を見つけることだったと思います。
