Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • I want to talk to you about two

  • of the most exciting possible things.

  • You probably guess what they are -- data and history.

  • Right? So, I'm not a historian.

  • I'm not gonna give you a definition of history,

  • but let's think instead of history within a framework.

  • So when we are making history

  • or when we are creating historical documents

  • we are taking things that have happened in the past

  • and we are stitching them together into a story.

  • So let me start with a little bit of my own story.

  • Like anybody my age who works creatively with computers

  • I was a popular socially well-adjusted young man --

  • (Laughter)

  • And sporty! Sporty young man.

  • And like a lot of people my age

  • in the kind of business that I'm in

  • I was influenced tremendously by Apple.

  • But notice my choice of logo here, right?

  • The Apple on the left, not the Apple on the right.

  • I am influenced as much by the Apple on the right

  • as the next person. But the apple on the left

  • I mean look at that logo, it's a rainbow --

  • It's not even in the right order!

  • That's how crazy Apple was. (Laughter)

  • But I don't want to talk too much about the company.

  • I'll start talking about a machine though.

  • How amazing it is to think about this,

  • and I go back and I think about this --

  • Wednesday, one Wednesday when I was

  • about 12 years old, I didn't have a computer.

  • On Thursday, I had a computer.

  • Can you imagine that change?

  • It's so drastic, I can't even think about anything

  • that could change our lives that way.

  • But I'm actually not even going to talk about the computer.

  • I'm going to talk about a program

  • that came loaded on that computer.

  • And it was build by, not the guy on the left,

  • but the guy on the right.

  • Does anybody know who the guy on the right is?

  • Nobody ever knows the answer to this question!

  • This is Bill Atkinson.

  • And Bill Atkinson was responsible for tons of things

  • that you see on your computer everyday.

  • But I want to talk about one program

  • that Bill Atkinson wrote called Hypercard.

  • Yeah -- someone is cheering over there.

  • (Laughter)

  • So, Hypercard was a program that shipped with the Mac

  • and it was designed for users of the computer

  • to make programs on their computers.

  • Crazy idea today. And these programs were not

  • the apps that we think about today

  • with their large budgets and their big distribution.

  • These were small things. People making applications

  • to keep track of their local basketball team scores

  • or to organize their research

  • or to teach people about classical music

  • or to calculate weird astronomical dates.

  • And then, of course, there were some art projects.

  • This is my favourite one, it's called 'If monks had Macs'

  • and it's a non-linear kind of exploratory environment.

  • I thank the stars for Hypercard all of the time.

  • And I thank the stars for putting me in this era

  • where I got to use Hypercard.

  • Hypercard was the last program to ship

  • on a public computer, that was designed

  • for the users of the computer to make programs with it.

  • If you talked to the people who invented the computer

  • and you told them there would be a day,

  • a magical day, when everybody had a computer

  • but none of them knew how to program,

  • they would think you were crazy!

  • So let's get forward a few years.

  • I'm starting my career as an artist

  • and I'm building things with my computer --

  • small scale things. Investigating things

  • like the growth systems of plants.

  • Or, in this example, I'm building a simulated economy

  • in which pixels are trading colour with one another.

  • Trying to investigate how these types of systems work

  • and just kind of having fun.

  • And then this project led me to start working with data.

  • So I'm building graphics like this,

  • which compare "communism" -

  • the frequency of usage of the word "communism"

  • in the New York Times to "terrorism" at the top.

  • So you see "terrorism" kind of appears

  • just as "communism" is going away.

  • And with these graphics I was really interested

  • in the aesthetic of the graphs.

  • So, this is Iran and Iraq, it reads

  • like a clock, it's called the "timepiece graph"

  • And this is another timepiece graph

  • overlaying despair, I think, over hope

  • and there's only three times -- that's it, crisis

  • over hope -- There's only three times when crisis

  • eclipses hope. We are in the middle of one of them

  • right now -- but don't think about that too much.

  • (Laughter)

  • And finally the culmination of this work

  • with the New York Times' data a few years ago

  • was the attempt to combine an entire year's

  • news cycle into a single graphic.

  • So these graphics actually show us a full year

  • of news, all the people, and how they are connected

  • into a single graphic. And, from there

  • I started to be interested again

  • in more active systems. So, here's a project

  • called "Just landed" where I'm looking at people

  • tweeting on Twitter "Hey! I just landed in Hawaii!"

  • You know how people just casually try to sneak that

  • into their twitter conversation. "I'm not showing off!

  • Really! But I did just land in Hawaii."

  • And then I'm plotting those people's trips

  • in the hopes that maybe we can use social network

  • and the data that it leaves behind

  • to provide a model of how people move

  • which would be valuable to epidemiologists

  • among other people. And, more fun --

  • this is a similar project looking at people

  • saying "Good morning!" to each other

  • all around the world. Which taught me

  • by the way, that it is true that people

  • in Vancouver on the West Coast wake up

  • much later and say "good morning" much later

  • than the people on the East Coast

  • who are more adventurous.

  • Here's a more useful -- maybe -- project

  • where I took all the information

  • from the Kepler project and try to put it

  • into some visual form that made sense to me.

  • And I should say that everything I've shown you

  • up to now -- these are all things

  • that I just did for fun. It may seem weird

  • but this comes back from Hypercard.

  • I'm building tools for myself.

  • I may share them with a few other people

  • but they are for fun, they are for me.

  • So all these tools I showed you

  • that kind of occupy this weird space --

  • somewhere between science, art and design

  • and that's where my practice lies.

  • And still today from my experience with Hypercard

  • what I'm doing is I'm building visual tools

  • to help me understand systems.

  • So today I work at the New York Times --

  • I'm the data artist in residence at the NY Times --

  • and I've had the opportunity at the Times

  • to work on a variety of really interesting projects,

  • two of which I'm going to share with you today.

  • The first one I've been working on, in conjunction

  • with Mark Hansen. Mark Hansen is a professor

  • of statistics at the UCLA. He's also a media artist.

  • And Mark came to the Times with a very interesting question

  • to what may seem like an obvious problem --

  • When people share content on the Internet, how does

  • that content get from person A to person B?

  • Or, maybe person A to person B to person C

  • to person D. We know that people share content

  • in the Internet, but what we don't know

  • is what happens in that gap

  • between one person to the other.

  • So we decided to build the tool to explore that

  • and this tool is called 'cascade'.

  • So if we look at these systems that start

  • with one event that leads to other events.

  • We call that structural cascade.

  • And these cascades actually happen over time

  • so we can model these things over time.

  • Now, the New York Times has a lot of people

  • who share our contents, so the cascades

  • do not look like that one, they look more like this --

  • So here is the typical cascade.

  • At the bottom left, the very first event.

  • And then as people are sharing the content

  • from one person to another we go up

  • in the Y axis - degrees of separation -

  • and over on the X axis for time.

  • So we are able to look at that conversation

  • in a couple different views. This one

  • which shows us the threads of conversation.

  • And this one which combines that stacked view

  • with a view that lets us see the threads.

  • Now the Times publishes about seven thousand pieces

  • of content every month. So it was important for us,

  • when we were building this tool

  • to make it an exploratory one.

  • So the people could dig through this vast terrain

  • of data -- I think of it as a vehicle

  • that we are giving people to traverse

  • this really big terrain of data.

  • So here is what it really looks like

  • and here is a cascade playing in real time.

  • I have to say, this was a tremendous moment.

  • We had been working with canned data, fake data

  • for so long, that when we saw this

  • for the first moment, it was like an archaeologist

  • who had just dusted off these dinosaur bones.

  • And we discovered this thing

  • and we were seeing it for the first time.

  • These sharing structures that underlie the Internet.

  • And maybe the dinosaur analogy is a good one

  • because we are actually making some probabilistic

  • guesses about how these things link.

  • So we are looking at some of these pieces

  • and making some guesses but we try to make sure

  • that those are as statistically rigorous as possible.

  • Now, tweets in this case, they become

  • parts of stories, they become parts of narratives.

  • So we are building histories here, but they are

  • very short term histories. And sometimes

  • these very large cascades are the most

  • interesting ones, but sometimes the small ones

  • are also interesting. This is one of my favourites

  • - we call this "The Rabbi Cascade."

  • It's a conversation amongst rabbis about this article

  • in the New York Times about the fact that religious

  • workers don't get a lot of time off.

  • I guess Saturdays and Sundays are bad days

  • for them to take off.

  • So in this cascade there is a group of rabbis

  • having a conversation about a New York Times' story.

  • One of them has the best Twitter name ever --

  • he's called the 'VelveteenRabbi'.

  • (Laughter)

  • But we wouldn't ever found this if it weren't

  • for this exploratory tool.

  • This would just be sitting somewhere

  • and we would have never been able to see that.

  • But this exercise of taking single pieces

  • of information and building narrative structures,

  • building histories out of them,

  • I find it tremendously interesting.

  • Now, I moved to New York about two years ago.

  • And in New York everybody has a story

  • that surrounds this tremendously impactful event

  • that happened on September 11th of 2001.

  • And my own story with September 11th

  • has really become a more intricate one

  • because I spent a great deal of time working

  • on a piece of the 9/11 memorial in Manhattan.

  • So the central idea about the 9/11 memorial

  • is that the names in the memorial are not laid out

  • in alphabetical order, or chronological order,

  • but instead they are laid out in a way

  • in which the relationships between the people

  • who were killed are embodied in the memorial.

  • Brothers are placed next to brothers,

  • coworkers are placed together. So, this memorial

  • actually considers all of these myriad connections

  • that were part of these people's lives.

  • So I work with a company called Local Projects

  • to work on an algorithm and a software tool

  • to help the architects build the layout for the memorial.

  • Almost three thousand names,

  • and almost fifteen hundred of these adjacency requests,

  • these requests for connections. So a very dense story,

  • a very dense narrative that becomes

  • an embodied part of this memorial.

  • So I'm working with Jake Barton, we produce

  • the software tool, which allows the architects

  • to, first of all, generate the layout that satisfied

  • all of those adjacency requests, but then second

  • make little adjustments where they needed to

  • to tell the stories that they wanted to tell.

  • So this memorial, I think,

  • has an incredibly timely concept in our era

  • of social networks, because these networks --

  • these real-life networks that make people's lives

  • are actually embodied inside of the memorial.

  • And one of the most tremendously moving experiences

  • it's to go to the memorial and see how these people

  • are placed next to each other,

  • so that this memorial is representing their own lives.

  • How does this effect our lives?

  • Well, I don't know if you remember, but,

  • in the spring, there was a controversy,

  • because it was discovered that, on the iPhone,

  • and actually on your computer,

  • you were storing a tremendous amount

  • of location data. So, Apple responded saying,

  • this was not location data about you,

  • it was location data about wireless networks

  • that were in the area where you are.

  • So it's not about you, it's about where you are.

  • (Laughter) This is very valuable data!

  • It's like gold to researchers! This mobility data --

  • human mobility data. So what we thought --

  • we thought, "Man! How many people have iPhones?"

  • How many of you have iPhones?

  • So in this room we have this tremendous database

  • of location data that researchers would really really like.

  • So we built this system called Open Paths,

  • which lets people upload their iPhone data

  • and broker relationships with researchers

  • to share that data, to donate that data

  • to people that can actually put it to use.

  • So Open Paths was a great success as a prototype.

  • We received thousands of datasets, and we built

  • this interface which allows people to actually

  • see their lives unfolding from this traces

  • that are left behind on your devices.

  • Now, what we didn't expect was how moving

  • this experience would be. When I uploaded my data

  • I thought, "Big deal. I know where I live.

  • I know where I work. What am I going to see here?"

  • Well it turns out what I saw was

  • that moment I got off the plane

  • to start my new life in New York.

  • The restaurant where I had Thai food

  • that first night, thinking about

  • this new experience of being in New York.

  • The day that I met my girlfriend.

  • This is LaGuardia airport.

  • This is this Thai restaurant on Amsterdam Avenue.

  • This is the moment I met my girlfriend.

  • See how that changes the first time

  • I told you about those stories,

  • and the second time I told you about those stories.

  • Because what we do in the tool inadvertently is --

  • we put these pieces of data into a human context.

  • And by placing data into a human context

  • it gains meaning. And I think this is tremendously

  • tremendously important. Because these are

  • our histories that are being stored on these devices.

  • And by thinking about them that way,

  • putting them in a human context --

  • first of all what we do with our own data

  • is get a better understanding of the type

  • of information that we are sharing.

  • But if we can do this with other data, we can put

  • data into a human context, I think we can change

  • a lot of things. Because, it builds automatically

  • empathy for the people involved in these systems.

  • And that in turn results in a fundamental respect which

  • I believe is missing in a large part of technology.

  • And we start to deal with issues like privacy.

  • By understanding that these numbers

  • are not just numbers, but instead they are attached

  • - they are tethered to pieces of the real world.

  • They carry weight. By understanding that

  • the dialog becomes a lot different.

  • How many of you have ever clicked a button

  • that enables a third party to access

  • your location data on your phone?

  • Many people. Lots of you.

  • So the third party is the developer,

  • the second party is Apple --

  • the only party that never gets access

  • to this information is the first party!

  • And I think that's because we think about these pieces

  • of data in a strandred abstract way.

  • We don't put them into a context which I think

  • makes them a lot more important.

  • So what I'm asking you to do is really simple.

  • Start to think about data in a human context.

  • Doesn't really take anything. When you read

  • stock prices, think about them in a human context.

  • When you think about mortgage reports,

  • think about them in a human context.

  • There's no doubt that big data is big business.

  • There's an industry being developed here.

  • Think about how well we have done

  • in previous industries that we have developed

  • involving resources -- not very well at all.

  • And I think part of that problem is that we have had

  • a lack of participation in these dialogues

  • from multiple pieces of human society.

  • So the other thing that I'm asking for

  • is an inclusion in this dialogue from artists,

  • from poets, from writers -- from people

  • who can bring a human element into this discussion.

  • Because I believe that this world of data

  • is going to be transformative for us.

  • And unlike our attempts with the resource industry

  • and our attempts with the financial industry,

  • by bringing the human element into this story

  • I think that we can take it to tremendous places.

  • Thank you.

  • (Applause)

I want to talk to you about two

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

TEDx】TEDxVancouver - Jer Thorp - データの重み (【TEDx】TEDxVancouver - Jer Thorp - The Weight of Data)

  • 321 35
    阿多賓 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語