字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント This is such a vast spider web of contacts. This data that will be transferring between phones will now be encrypted. What more do we know about how this is actually going to work? The clamor to improve contact tracing has seen nations like Israel, Singapore, South Korea, and of course, China using a combination of location data, video camera footage, and credit card information to track and contain COVID-19 in their countries. We're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. It will go away, just stay calm, it will go away. The U.S. has lagged behind, but Google and Apple are feverishly building a contact tracing platform, scheduled for release in mid-May. It will enable the use of Bluetooth technology to help governments and health agencies reduce the spread of the virus by tracing people who have come into close contact with COVID-19. But how exactly this information will be used in the future and with whom is an open question. Well, we're kind of at this fascinating moment, right, where we don't know exactly what the response is gonna look like. We know that robust contact tracing is gonna be a huge part of re-opening the economy, and we know that we have to balance that with privacy concerns, somehow, but we don't know exactly what the balance is gonna look like. And I leave it up to the epidemiologists to say whether you need to be as repressive as China or if there are ways to protect privacy. We might not have a ton of time to debate it. And that's kind of the problem. There are currently few legal protections from data misuse or abuse, and while some states do have some laws in place, progress on this front has been halted. There was some privacy momentum in Congress before the pandemic hit, and that's been destroyed for obvious reasons. California passed a privacy law a couple of years ago, and there's been a lot of work to try to improve it as it goes into effect this year. A bunch of other states have been considering privacy legislation as well, like Washington State and New York, and then covid comes and a lot of the states legislatures have just pretty much shut down. Now before you envision a Black Mirror episode for your personal future, you should know that as of now, involvement will be voluntary. The data it collects is to be anonymized, and there will be no central server where the data is stored, so governments or corporations can't directly grab all this private data for its own purposes, but that could easily change. There's nothing really to stop them from having a centralized database. It's only the restraint of our expectations. If our expectations were to become overturned and again shift tremendously over to safety, it could become a lot more Orwellian a lot quicker. There's many scenarios that could be quite troubling. For example... Your information could be given to insurance companies, and it could be used as a pre-existing condition that prevents you from getting insurance or as a reason to charge you much higher prices. The information could be sold to data brokers, who could then package it to anyone that they want. The information could end up with your employer, who could use it to make decisions about whether to promote you because of your health. Now, that may sound a little paranoid, but we have good reason to be suspicious. These are entities that already collect enormous amounts of our data in a commercial context, and whose mishandling of data has come under fire in the past. Exhibit A. Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica. We just traded away everything there is to know about ourselves for Farmville, and I think that people are starting to realize that wasn't a good trade. In 2016, the big data company Cambridge Analytica took the personal data of millions of Americans from Facebook. They packaged it and sold it so that political groups could then target parts of the population with narrow casted messages. People were sharing information with friends, and they weren't necessarily expecting that data to be shared by a company like Cambridge Analytica that was making use of it to build political profiles, and then serve specific advertisements or propaganda. Cambridge Analytica really captures the dilemma of privacy, which is how data collected for one reason, with certain expectations, is used for another reason. We have been giving away all of our most private information to companies that have then sold it on and created what is now a multi-trillion dollar a year industry. This was business as usual as far as Facebook developers went. This scandal resulted in the Federal Trade Commission's fining of Facebook for five billion dollars, as well as a general push for broader privacy laws. We didn't take a broad enough view of our responsibility, and that was a big mistake, and it was my mistake, and I'm sorry. What you're seeing is a greater bipartisan concern about the power of these data-opolies and how do we rein them in. So how do we know this isn't gonna happen this time? The answer comes back to those privacy protection laws that have been put on hold because of the pandemic. If there had been a national privacy law enacted before the pandemic hit us, we probably would've been in a better position to respond to it with data. But even if there was a national privacy law in place, contact tracing is actually pointless if we don't have widespread testing to go along with it, which we don't. So what is this about? Is this a smokescreen for collecting a lot of data? Is the data truly gonna stay anonymized or aggregated? The pandemic is showing why a general privacy law is so important, because there's so much confusion around data collection, concern that there will be overreach, and lack of rules about how the information could be reused for other purposes. Laws are going to be needed to stem a lot of this corporate data collection, and I think you're only going to see those efforts continue. Short-term, I think they may be delayed because of covid, but I think the fundamental concerns around overly broad corporate collection aren't going away. I don't see some centralized bureaucracy that will then be shared with the police and the IRS and your future employer and your future insurer, at least not right now. I think it is worth noting that some of those things aren't forbidden.
B1 中級 コンタクトトレースには未知のプライバシーリスクがある (Contact Tracing Has an Unknown Privacy Risk) 6 0 林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語