- Hello everyone and welcome back to English with Lucy.

Today I am going to talk to you about

five strict English grammar rules

that natives don't always follow.

Yes, that's right.

Your teacher may have been lying to you.

Quickly before we get started, I would just like to thank

the sponsor of today's video it is italki.

And if you haven't heard of italki before,

it's a huge online database of both

native and nonnative teachers

who give one-to-one video lessons 24 hours a day,

seven days a week.

You can learn English and over 130 other languages

from anywhere in the world, anytime as long as you have

a stable internet connection.

It's an incredibly affordable way of learning a language,

much cheaper than an offline tutor or a language academy.

So many of my students message me

and ask me how they can meet and talk to native speakers.

Well, italki is a really good option

because not only do they have qualified teachers,

they also have community teachers who will practise

conversation with you.

They've given me a special offer to pass onto you.

You can get $10 worth of italki credits

in your student wallet, 48 hours after making

your first purchase of any amount,

or you've got to do is click on the link

in the description box and sign up.

Right, let's get started with the lesson.

All right, let's start with the first rule of English.

There are no rules.

(laughs)

That's just a joke.

There are many rules,

but we don't follow all of them

and that is what this video is about.

I just thought that was a lovely example

of how confusing language is.

Let's be serious.

Now, the first rule that we like to break

and the rule that doesn't always apply,

many teachers will tell you that you should never

ever end a sentence with a preposition.

Well, I'm about to prove your teacher's wrong.

There are quite a few situations in which you can end

a sentence with a preposition.

Now, if you can remove the preposition

from the end of a sentence without it changing the meaning

of the sentence, then you should do that.

But what about situations in which the meaning has changed?

Oh, let's talk about phrasal verbs.

These other verbs made of a verb

and at least one preposition.

Keep up, run down, get up,

put on, often sentences that use phrasal verbs,

end with a preposition.

For example, I think you should get up.

Or I hope you can come over.

Both of these sentences end with a preposition

and it can't be avoided.

If we remove the preposition,

the meaning will change and we can't really

rearrange it to avoid the preposition being put at the end.

Sometimes it's even okay to end a sentence

with a preposition

even if you aren't using a phrasal verb,

you might be able to rewrite these sentences

to avoid them ending with a preposition,

but it's not always necessary.

You might be over complicating things.

An example, does anyone know where he came from?

I could rewrite the sentence to say,

does anyone know from where he came?

But it would sound so unbelievably old fashioned.

Does anyone know where he came from?

Is perfectly fine.

Right, rule number two, the rule I want to debunk,

(chackles)

you should always say someone and I,

not someone and me.

This one is close to my heart

because I had it drummed into me when I was at school

both by my teachers and my mother,

and my teachers and my mother were misinformed at school.

Let's take a look at four sentences all regarding the zoo.

Lucy and I went to the zoo with Tom.

Lucy and me went to the zoo with Tom.

Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and I.

And Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and me.

Two of these sentences are incorrect

and two of them are correct.

The question of whether to use I or me,

it comes down to whether you're using the word as a subject

or an object in the sentence.

Both words are pronouns,

but I as a subject pronoun

and me is an object pronoun.

Native speakers, you can be forgiven

for getting confused with this.

I never learned this at school,

so after the first two,

Lucy and I went to the zoo with Tom,

it would be correct

because I is the subject of the sentence.

You can work this out by removing the extra bit,

the Lucy and bit does it work on its own?

I went to the zoo with Tom,

or me went to the zoo with Tom.

Well, me went, sounds very, very wrong.

So it's, I went.

However, in the second two sentences

it is the opposite.

Remove Lucy and again, in the second two sentences,

Tom went to the zoo with I, sounds weird.

So it's Tom went to the zoo with me.

Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and me.

In this case me is the object of the sentence.

So many native speakers

will always be taught to say someone and I,

when actually in many cases, someone

and me is the correct version.

Number three, a big rule that came up recently after

I used one of these in a title of my videos,

it is that you should never split an infinitive.

Many teachers will tell you this

because they are simplifying things a little bit,

but in reality we do split infinitives.

So infinitives are the two word forms of verbs like to run,

to laugh, to play.

When you split an infinitive,

you put something normally an adverb

between those two words,

for example, to quickly run, to carefully read,

to playfully dance.

So often it's a case of it just sounding better

when we split an infinitive,

it sounds more natural.

For example, I'm going to quickly run to the shop.

This sounds better than

I'm going to run to the shop quickly.

But in some more complex cases,

moving the adverb can actually change the meaning

of the sentence.

Take a look at this sentence.

I'm going to really kiss him when I see him.

If I say I'm going to really kiss someone,

it means that it's going to be quite a kiss, a big kiss,

a very strong one.

If I say, I am really going to kiss him when I see him,

rather than talking about the strength of the kiss,

I'm almost conveying a sense of determination.

It's only a slight difference,

but it does change the meaning.

Now, some sentences actually require a split infinitive,

which makes it all the more bananas

that teachers tell you to never split an infinitive.

Let's go straight in with an example.

He expects the staff numbers to more than triple

over the next five years.

You can't move more than in this sentence.

You can't put it in another place

whilst retaining the meaning.

This sentence requires a split infinitive.

Number four is,

we should always use there are instead of there is

before a plural.

So many teachers will tell you always use

there is then a singular and there are then a plural,

this doesn't always apply.

People get very upset about it.

In the comment section, if I use there is

before what they consider to be a plural,

I'm going to explain that use

but I would admit many native speakers, myself included,

do make mistakes and get confused

with there is and there are,

because we speak so quickly that we don't give ourselves

time to plan whether there is is needed

or there are is needed.

So just to cover the basics we use there is, and there are,

when we first refer to the presence or existence

of someone or something.

There is and also there's are both singular forms.

There's is the reduction of there is.

There is, there's.

There's is most commonly used in informal speaking.

So instead of saying it is a fly on my head, (laughs)

we would say there's or there is a fly on my head.

There are is the plural form of there is and there's.

An example, there are two spots on my face.

Now in speaking and in some informal writing,

we sometimes use there's when it refers

to more than one thing.

Bear in mind that this use can be considered

incorrect in examinations.

It's not uncommon to hear native speakers make this mistake.

I might say there's many cakes instead of,

there are many cakes because I'm just so used to saying

there's all the time.

There's one apple, there's two apples.

It feels almost natural to me.

Now this is considered to be incorrect.

However, there are actually some situations in which

it is considered to be it correct to use there's

then a plural.

Let's have a look at collecting phrases.

One in particular is a number of, a number of,

would I say there is a number of cakes for sale.

There's a number of cakes for sale,

or there are a number of cakes for sale.

Well it's actually really difficult to work out.

In a construction like this

the verb is being pulled to there, number, and cakes

all at once.

You can work out whether you should use

there is or there are in this situation

by focusing on emphasis.

Use is if you want to emphasise the group as a whole,

there is a number of, the group cakes

or use are if you want to emphasise the individual

members of that group,

each individual cake,

there are a number of individual cakes.

This works with a number of, (laughs)

collecting phrases like a variety of,

there is a variety of drinks at the bar.

Or there are a variety of drinks at the bar.

Both work depending on what you want to emphasise.

Now we do use there are when talking about a lot of,

and this is a mistake that a lot of native speakers make,

myself included.

Again, we shouldn't say there's a lot of people

in the room.

We should say there are a lot of people in the room.

But you will hear this mistake made.

Now with the phrase, there is two dogs, ever be correct.

Well, sort of if two dogs were included as part of a list,

sometimes there are just sounds wrong.

I wouldn't say there are a cat,

two dogs and a cow on the farm.

I would say there is a cat,

two dogs and a cow on the farm.

So that is a clear example of there is

used before a singular

but a singular formed as part of a list.

Some grammar lovers (laughs)

will still insist that this is incorrect

but I'm not with them on this one.

It just sounds wrong.