Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Jordan Peterson has become hugely successful.

  • What do you make of the phenomena?

  • Why do you think he's become so successful now?

  • There is a drought of authenticity and courage, and Peterson has found that hunger and he's tapped into tonight.

  • I admire his ability to detect it and to speak to it plainly in a way that it resonates with.

  • I did.

  • We were on a panel together in Vancouver, and I watched his talk, and he described his own surprise at how effective his message had been.

  • And he basically said that if he had outlined his message as the core of a business model, that it would have looked laughable to him and that he was a shocked as anybody that people were resonating with it.

  • But when when you live in a world that is as full of crap of the world we live in, where people are advertising bullshit to you from the moment you get up to the moment you go to sleep and then somebody finally tells you some truth that you need to hear.

  • It's a relief.

  • It's a relief just to know that there's some channel, it isn't compromised by nonsense.

  • and he I don't think he's the only one speaking truthfully, but I think he is speaking from the heart and people know it.

  • I think that he grasps directly the fact that human beings can only actually make sense of the world by virtue of communication with other human beings.

  • And this is all about the notion of admixture that one must have a mixture of of what women He uses the myth of poetic to make sense that the order, order and chaos, uh, the way at the Taoist way is the alchemical admixture of order and chaos on That's it, like that's how you do it.

  • And so if you buy us towards orderliness, you find yourself in a rigid, non adaptive, non creative, non exploratory framework, um, which will die because the world changes.

  • If you buy us towards chaos, Um, you you eat your young and evaporate um, which also dies for obvious reasons on the key is actually enabled these things to be in relationship with each other and vital, healthy relationship with each other.

  • And I think that's it, in some sense, the essence of what he's focusing on, and it's sort of the core of what he's actually about very easy to work with.

  • His voice is an instrument because he speaks very deliberately and Sana grisly on rhythmically anyway, he actually speaks in a kind of formal rhythmic charity.

  • Sometimes he is actually Rapid Peterson's words, plus lo fi hip hop he calls J B.

  • P Way.

  • First, It's like, Oh, it's a novelty thing and then I kind of listen to him.

  • I know it's not an old anything.

  • This is actually really good.

  • Yeah, that's been that's been the reaction all over.

  • I think that was Peterson's reaction.

  • He was instantly like thought this was gonna be silly and was amused and was like, Oh, this is actually artful on And now it's actually proving useful.

  • That's generally direction from people.

  • And if you don't have a no blame, that's not good.

  • That's not good.

  • That that's no good.

  • You have nothing but shallow interesting that you say as well that Peterson has a very musical or a very performative aspect to his speech because he talks about performance that performance or aligning yourself with the truth.

  • And if you are aligning yourself with the logos of the creative principle, you would expect to be for that to have an effect on your actual performance.

  • He feels like a very embodied speaker when he's on stage, like he's fully inhabiting the stories that he's that he's telling on that.

  • That performative aspect of it is, it seems to me, at least also related to what he's talking about, the logos and incarnated ATM or in your life and incarnated ATM or in your in your being.

  • Yes, and watching him become that over the years because he was not always is as confident Onda able to just not, you know, you're free cells right here is his whole theory.

  • Yeah, his whole career is really reminded me of.

  • It's Very 50 Cent, for example, got big off the back of drama.

  • There was created drama beefs with other rappers and being shot 13 times and all this stuff which draws people into this story.

  • But then he had this huge body of work on that kept people there.

  • Peterson did this.

  • Peterson had these public dramas, and that brought people to him with them.

  • When they got to him there, there was this huge body of work for them to get sort of lost in immersed in it.

  • Peterson has some kind of drama, like every week At this point, he's like the ultimate sort of contemporary battle rap Aries war with all sorts of people at all times, and it is brilliant, very interesting.

  • And if you're into, you know, if your rap fan or if you're what would you call if your intellectual duck or whatever the hell it is fat?

  • It's like this guy's getting incredible beefs every week, right?

  • There's a new sort of super villain to root against every week, three guards to him or if you're on his side or not, you know it's the whole thing's very entertaining, but then it pulls you in.

  • And then there's all this meaning of this huge body of work.

  • Meaning is what you have to trust yourself against drugs, but he's quite nude on this.

  • Like if you watch him like 15 years ago, who's be awkward, sort of.

  • He was very charming, and he knew what he was talking about, but the absolutely fucking beast that he has become a za performance creature who could now just rock up in an amphitheater and just like Freestyle, the new two hour lecture off the top of his head.

  • And he's very Inter not repeating himself too much.

  • And it's like you go see a stand up comedian.

  • You'll see pretty much the same set every week for, like, a year or something, right?

  • He won't do that.

  • Uh, he's more like a very good D.

  • J.

  • You know, he has all these years like a fistful of things that, you know, is works together and they're linked and taking on these different journeys.

  • But depending on who's in the room on where he is, he will create a new and transformative always experience.

  • I remember discovering Jordan Peterson last June and just immediately thinking this is the thing that is needed Right now.

  • This is about the re enchantment of the world, the assimilation of spirituality, the assimilation religion.

  • This is This is the thing that I was obsessed like digesting listening to all of this stuff and then pitched on an interview to him and was lucky enough to get an interview with him in October.

  • That we then put out is the truth in the Time of Chaos Documentary in January at exactly the time that, ironically, he then kind of shot to fame with an interview with my ex colleague Cathy Newman on Channel four News.

  • When a lot of what I had gone to talk to Jordan Peterson about was synchronicity on DDE, it was just uncanny.

  • That's when the synchronicity stop.

  • That's right.

  • That's right.

  • That's when things start to line up.

  • Yeah, and the more you're in that space, the more they line up.

  • And so the question is, if you're like, really in that space, how much do things line up?

  • All of this is happening, and I I wonder what I was gonna make, What to make of this?

  • And while I was thinking, Well, I have this kind of linked to tea Cathy and I have some kind of link to Jordan, so what I need to do is liaise between them and get them to go and do the second interview that I thought was necessary.

  • And so for a while I was doing that kind of trying to do stuff behind the scenes.

  • And then it was clear that Kathy wasn't interested.

  • Channel four weren't interested.

  • So gentle new story weren't interested.

  • So in the end.

  • I thought, why came?

  • And then it came to me, Okay, I should make a documentary glitch in the Matrix, which then was a way of, like, just downloading all the stuff that I've been thinking about for quite a while.

  • Include, especially since the election of Trump back under the shadow side of liberalism and all of the blind spots of liberalism.

  • A glitch in The Matrix was kind of the title of it, and it all it was.

  • It came from a very from a real flow state off, like being really a line of feeling like This is what I meant to be doing, which is the essence of kind of synchronicity and the essence of Jordan.

  • Peterson's deeper meaning is, you know, when you're aligned the right place and then your sense of meaning tells you what to do.

  • And I think he's often misconstrued by people who can't get past the politics or have a reactivity to him.

  • But to me, he is doing nothing less than channeling and fully articulating the deep story of Western culture for the first time.

  • And well, certainly, for the first time in the Internet age, you could argue that Young was doing the same thing back in the fifties and that there are people who come along and do this at times in the past, but effectively saying We already know a lot of the answers We already know the way to live.

  • It embodied interaction.

  • It's embodied in mythologies embodied in our religions.

  • It's embodied in all of these things.

  • Look at this piece of art.

  • What is it saying?

  • We represented it in art.

  • We represented it in all these ways, and now we can fully articulated tight into neuro science.

  • Tie it into on that it's a It's an epic epic project on DDE.

  • So I get accused and it's very easy to say, Well, you're obsessed with Jordan Peterson, your fan boy and all that stuff.

  • But for me, the message that he's bringing forward is that deep.

  • It's that deep.

  • And therefore I want to continue to use his thought as a lens to link into other great thinkers like we just put out on interview with Rupert Sheldrake, who I think is an amazing rebellious thinking.

  • He's been doing this stuff for a long time on DDE.

  • I want to also continue to kind of expand that into other into other thinkers.

  • Make the conscious linked to this sort of deeper worldview on help.

  • You just bring out great, bring out great content.

  • Really?

  • Where?

  • Where is his insight coming from?

  • And so we talked to you when you were describing how you almost sound a little bit like Jordan piece.

  • I mean, in the sense off.

  • Yeah.

  • I mean, if I had to describe my world view in a nutshell, it would be sort of a neo platonic.

  • So there was a near platonic Stoick Mystic Chris Diagnostic.

  • So the idea near platonic, I believe I have always just sort of felt like there is a realm of ideal forms.

  • Stoic, do the suck it up, fat kid, and do the hard thing 100%.

  • Um nah, stick.

  • There is a sudden, ineffable experience of being.

  • And then the mystic kristic is some some reflection on the Judeo Christian Western tradition, but nothing to do with 2000 years of bureaucratic administration and everything to do with what is nominally the metaphor of Kairos and Kronos, the intersection of kind of sacred and profane time in human form.

  • So in that respect, Yeah, I would track with Peterson my senses for me.

  • Um, my, you know, no sis or understanding has come from ex Tarsus has come from peak experiences on and my sense for him, at least as he shares what he does of his life has come from catharsis has come from the suffering that's come from battling depressions come from staring at the abyss in the face versus the view from the summit, and theirs are ideally come full circle and reinforce each other.

  • But if I had to sort of delineate, maybe wears his transmission anchoring from it's maybe a little bit more the staring the abyss and surviving it, then then calling out coordinates from the mountaintop.

  • The most important thing for me, quite apart from his work with these stories of modern myths, was, as you say, his investigation to the Bible.

  • I've always been fascinated.

  • Although I'm an atheist, I'm always been fascinated by the power of the biblical stories, often found myself looking at these huge cathedrals and churches that sprouted up all over Europe.

  • You know, Andi asked myself.

  • Well, what's that about?

  • You know, why was this story so powerful.

  • I mean, yeah, it's a defense against death if you want to be cynical.

  • But, hey, you know, it could be lots of other stories.

  • You know what?

  • Why is this one so unbelievably powerful?

  • And what does it mean for it to be so powerful and peace?

  • And I think brilliantly answers that question in the biblical lectures he's done.

  • And he really changed me those lectures.

  • You generally did, I think, change the way I lived my life because he came to this very, very important conclusion, which I'm pretty commits by.

  • I don't think I'm ever 100% commits by anything.

  • But I'm very convinced by his idea, as I've someone who's suffered depression and depression is like a crisis of meaning.

  • And you're it's the worst thing about depression is not about being miserable.

  • It's being having a life that seems utterly meaningless on.

  • That's why it's such torment.

  • Andi Pizza, in a way, tries to answer the question.

  • How do we as an individual?

  • That's a bit of a paradox.

  • How do I, as an individual acquire meaning because meaning is the most important thing any of us could have?

  • You know, there's meaning is it?

  • You know, if you don't know that yet, no one can quite say what meaning is which I think is interesting in itself.

  • You know what?

  • This is?

  • What I want to sense a meaning.

  • What is the sense of what is meaning on DDE?

  • Peterson, I think, acknowledges that mystery but also says, Well, you know, if you want a sense of meaning, it's not about just doing what you want.

  • It's not about just following your bliss is Joseph Camp would be or or having a much fun as possible, or or even necessarily being happy?

  • No, absolutely no, not necessarily Big happy.

  • It's There were more important things than being happy on Dive also found that to be true in my life, I hadn't heard someone making a compelling case like this that was actually getting traction with people and was clear Peterson was getting traction.

  • And so then I said, I've gotta listen to this guy.

  • I've got to figure out what he's saying and why it's working and what?

  • How I should respond to what's happening around him.

  • How is it being a cz?

  • Well, because Peterson has obviously began it been getting more and more controversial, and I've kind of felt this is, well, sort of like end up getting into conversations.

  • No, he didn't mean that.

  • It wasn't about that.

  • How is how is that being like people started arguing with you or judging what you're saying or house up being?

  • I deeply suspect there are a number of friends of mine that are deeply concerned for me because of this Jordan Peterson thing.

  • Because they hear again, the sound bite world grabs a few things.

  • Jordan Peterson is a bigot.

  • He's transphobic.

  • He's homophobic.

  • He's, you know, the Godfather, the patriarchy, whatever he is.

  • And so Paul.

  • But the thing is, they know me.

  • They know I'm not a bigot.

  • They know they know where I was raised.

  • They know who's in my church.

  • They know they know me by my actions.

  • So what to do with this?

  • I've given Jordan Peterson in a sense, a year of my life.

  • What do you do with that?

  • Well, they don't know what to do with that.

  • So they're quiet and they watch and they wait.

  • When Adam and Matt invited me to do that podcast, we were all someone who similar to the tour.

  • You, I believe, was starting to track Peterson and not just Jordan Peterson what he was saying, but also the ripples.

  • He was having a culture, the absolute phenomenon and explosion, um, of attention that was happening around him in the media and started kind of watching him, reading him with an open mind.

  • My experience was an open mind resonate with that love, always bringing and call Young and Joseph Campbell and archetypal dimensions to his thinking.

  • Like how he's kind of kicking the left a little bit and calling them on some of their problematic thinking and then watching this kind of phenomenon from the left of the far left with people just with extraordinary levels of, um, anger and fear and distrust and kind of the the difference in that experience of my own and some of our experiences of Peterson and then watching a lot of friends who are on the far left, having radically different experience and perception of who he is and what he's bringing.

  • And it was really just curious about that.

  • And it seems like similar to some of the stuff you've been doing with rebel wisdom as Ah, I mean your training.

  • As a psychologist, we do a lot of work with psychology as well.

  • When there's a huge reactivity to something, there's always something interesting going on behind it.

  • And that sort of makes you inquire like Okay, what is what are people reacting to?

  • Yes, whether you love him or hate him, it's like equal proportion of intensity.

  • And whenever that's there, it's What kind of called a complex complex is a is a psychological, And I think Young would say it like it can be a autonomous and autonomous complexes.

  • That's not part of the ego.

  • It's so deep rooted.

  • And it's my opinion.

  • It's a collective complex, collective unconscious.

  • It's like everyone on the right Thanks.

  • Everyone on the left is a Stalinist and everyone everyone on the right.

  • Thanks, everyone.

  • Everyone left things.

  • Everyone right is a Nazi, and there's this polarization happening where people like like Peterson, who are trying to carve out, I would say not non political, but a kind of a position that's lateral to politics that's more in the psychological domain toe.

  • Ask people look at themselves as individuals to question the extent to which they're projecting their shadow onto the other, which until we can resolve issues on that level, it's gonna be very difficult to resolve these political disagreements.

  • And so that's one of the main reasons that I've found myself so interested in what Peterson saying, shifting the level of the conversation or trying to at least I was so excited to see Jordan Peterson erupt onto the stage.

  • And I know you had a particular part in that There is a culture war that is in bright precedence.

  • I mean, we are in the middle of a culture war.

  • There's a polarization, and Jordan Peterson is standing in the middle is a lightning rod, taking all the projections from both sides.

  • He clearly sees the postmodern ideology, and it is an ideology.

  • It's a system of beliefs and values that will not lead us to the promised land.

  • It is.

  • It is problematic.

  • It leads us into a swamp with no exit.

  • It is not sustainable.

  • He sees it very clearly, and in my opinion he sees it from a modern perspective, very brilliant modern perspective.

  • He's, he's and he has a depth because of his understanding of Carl Young and his own work in psychology, the field of psychology that is deeper than most people.

  • So people are drawn to that depth.

  • He sees something much deeper than other people are seeing right now.

  • We had had we'd never met one another.

  • I knew actually very little about Jordan.

  • Pizzazz has written work.

  • He knew pretty little about mine on Dhe.

  • We were just told sit down and shoot and we had no idea where we were going.

  • So he just started talking.

  • So why the master in his emissary?

  • And it just went from that.

  • But what I felt Waas here was a super intelligent man who had wide ranging interests in psychology philosophy and didn't rule out a spiritual angle to things.

  • I don't think that I would be in the film in that clip.

  • I think it probably comes out that there are aspects of what Jordan was saying, that I was going well, yes, but so I don't entirely kind of not Peter's Peterson, but I do have a huge respectful and we had a great conversation and we're proposing to do more.

  • What do you make of the sort of the criticism?

  • Because often he's described as a fraud or a Charlotte in some of the media coverage.

  • But when you watch the interview with yourself, I mean, that's That's a very high level conversation.

  • The idea of him as a fraud or Charlotte in just seems kind of.

  • It's It's outrageous, It's it's disrespectful, It's dismissive, and it's entirely typical of blinkered liberalism.

  • He you couldn't disagree with him about many things on dhe.

  • I would disagree with him about a number of things, But to say that it's just thio show how thinking you are.

  • He's clearly an extraordinary man on DDE.

  • I didn't have a record of a Charlotte.

  • What does that mean?

  • I think what strikes people is that he was relatively unknown, and then he became No.

  • But that's what life is it disapprove your shoulders.

  • I mean, a lot of this sounds quite Jordan Peters and ask, What's your attitude?

  • Jordan Peterson?

  • Yeah.

  • I mean, I'm glad he's out there, Um, and I think that, uh, you know, I mean, I think the minimum that sort of three different Jordan Peterson's, You know, there's Jordan Peterson, the analyst and academic, which virtually nobody ever heard of theirs.

  • Jordan Peterson, the kind of contrary in public intellectual, which sort of, you know, kicked off in 2016.

  • And then there's sort of Jordan Peterson sort of rush on block for the culture wars, of which both left and right wildly distorted who he is, what he's saying and what on what it means for them.

  • And so we get, we get the second in the third one's completely mixed, although the 1st 1 you know, University of Toronto and Hopping, a former Harvard professor, is the one that gives the credibility and the weight to the other two dialogues.

  • So in that respect, I think what I imagine him to be as an actual man is a pretty high integrity principal person who likes to think for himself and likes to speak not just truth to power, but but also likes to, um, remind his audience, whether it's students or or broader than that.

  • What is you know, what is that?

  • What is the life?

  • Well, a good life, well lived, Um, and now that I think there are, there are problems in how in the age of sound bites and hundreds of hours of footage and tons of speaking and those kind of things that become problematic.

  • And I'm not in any way convinced that if I sat down with him and said, Hey, mate, what about this bit?

  • That he would actually stand a defendant.

  • But impressions I get would be that his I think he sometimes over catastrophe eyes, is the slippery slope to Marxism in the sense of that that all that you know this way life, Stalinist death camps.

  • Therefore, we cannot give one inch on concessions to progressive ideals or agendas.

  • Although having said that, I have also personally experienced the almost Chinese communist like Tom Zing struggle sessions of political correctness in the academy and it's kind of left wing left coast idea.

  • So it's not that I don't see the peril I do.

  • I just think sometimes he uses the slippery slope argument.

  • Maybe I think he pulls it out just sometimes.

  • A little early is the bottom line without necessarily enough conditions to justify it.

  • He sometimes in my experience, I think I remember him on Joe Rogan.

  • Doing the life is nasty, brutish and short.

  • That kind of Homs Ian.

  • It's always been this way.

  • Therefore, any efforts to try and recalibrate or re balance.

  • Those scales are fundamentally flawed, delusional and, by the way, lead to the Stalinist death camps without any more nuanced socio political critique of practices and policies.

  • So, for instance, concentration of wealth in the 1% and even the percent of the 1% has been directly traceable ATT least in the US over.

  • You know, tax and tax and corporate law various various deliberate policies that have fundamentally different in the seventies and eighties and have now resulted in an incredible skewing, an aggregation of wealth in the hands of the few.

  • For him to skip over that and go two lobsters and serotonin feels like skipping some critical steps and also skipping some critical places of potential responsibility.

  • And what became really clear is it left in liberal.

  • We're no longer the same.

  • The old original leftist were liberals, but the new leftists were ill liberals.

  • They're anti liberal, and that's a disaster.

  • You can't go forward with that kind of pathology.

  • And so if you're somebody like Jordan Peterson, who is thinking, interviewing and you're looking around and seeing what the hell's going on and you're starting to notice this and then the government comes along and says, Oh, and by the way, I'm going to compel your speech That would send anybody with integrity and integral thinking over the wall.

  • And so he was up all night.

  • He did those three videos on, um, you know, forcing, uh, unconscious bias, retraining and political correctness at what he saw happening with that and the nightmare of Bill See 16 threw him up on the Net went viral.

  • And the main cause of that, in my opinion, is that is thes orange liberal values of equal opportunity that we're getting crushed between the extreme far left of green and the strong far right of ethno centric amber and these liberal values in between.

  • We're just getting left out of out of the picture, and that was a disaster.

  • And that was the thing that at least put Jordan Peterson on the map.

  • And he was arguing against Bill See 16.

  • Because not only that yet put into law a constructivist few of human identity, that was his complaint.

  • It had nothing to a transgender people, and the people that attacked him for being anti transgender had absolutely nothing to do with that.

  • He's fair clear about that.

  • What it waas waas putting into actual law a constructivist view of human nature, which, by the way, is pure green.

  • It's pure, postmodern green viewpoint, and that also is on attack on free speech in the worst possible way.

  • For me, his success signifies how much we're thirsting for this father energy in our culture.

  • What do you make of Jordan Peterson?

  • What do you make of the Jordan Peterson phenomena?

  • You know, I think a personal I would not have predicted it.

  • So I don't want I think maybe I'm often called among my among my people who agree with me.

  • I'm called a visionary, and but I was not a visionary and enforcing Jordan Peterson.

  • I think it's amazing that intellectual that is a young gin who is, you know, who speaks in terms often of metaphor and an allegory that he has risen to such extraordinary success.

  • And I think it is.

  • It is in part a result of our enormous hunger we know we have.

  • We've attached to two extremely unlikely figures because our hunger that Donald Trump on the one hand and Jordan Peter said on the other two ends of the extreme in terms of somebody who's been willing to say, You know, fathers are important, families are important.

  • And so Jordan and I found ourselves in a hour and 1/2 dialogue in which I would give Ah, you know, I would talk about fathers and rough housing and he would talk about some intellectual PJ or someone else who was, you know, who was in the literature or in Disney movies or is something else that related to that.

  • And it was just a fascinating hour and 1/2 I think, because, you know, I'm usually when I'm being interviewed.

  • I don't learn a great deal.

  • But I certainly learned I was wonderful the way we learned from each other and you're you're from Canada.

  • One of the the biggest phenomenon of the last a couple of years has been Jordan Peterson would have you made of him his rise and what it says about the culture that people are so thirsting for what he's talking about.

  • Peterson first was very bright, extraordinary, articulate on been somebody's a compelling speaker, so he's an He's an attractive figure in some ways.

  • When I read him, I sent a lot of suppressed rage in it.

  • In fact, I think his voice is choking with rage A lot of time.

  • It's interesting that he talks about rage, that you have to deal with it.

  • I don't think you understand just angry yet.

  • And if you look at his Web sites, the comments are full of rage by his young acolytes.

  • Well, that's an energetic thing, but it's his energy that draws people as much as what he actually teaches.

  • Secondly, he teaches repression.

  • I mean, he you very rightly takes an issue where somebody mandates that shouldn't go on language.

  • Very rightly and righteously sense about will not be dictated to about worst language news.

  • Good for him.

  • I'm all in favor of not mandating language on one out.

  • On the other hand, he basically advocates repression in his book.

  • He talks about her and angry to your child, needs to be sit by themselves until they get over it.

  • Rather than understanding why a child would be angry at age two, what frustrations air having and what human contact they need to help them move through?

  • That anger, he says, repressed the anger.

  • So he's all about repressed.

  • Anger's for example, and it's very interesting.

  • Like talks about Children, he talks a little environments and little monsters and so on.

  • I know that's meant of humors, but it's also certainly of thinking of the young human child.

  • So fundamentally, I steam is an agent of repression, he posing as an agent of libertarianism, Not to mention he's got this big in his bonnet about what he considers to be seems to consider to be conspiracies by left wing intellectuals.

  • They seem to be his bet.

  • You are being a left wing intellectual myself.

  • I'd like to talk to him somehow.

  • What were you so upset about, Jordan?

  • Are you so afraid of?

  • You know he talks about these bloody Marxists and any point so very accurately all the poor that occurred under so called Marxist regimes, particularly in a sort of union.

  • He's absolutely accurate about that.

  • But then he promotes Christianity.

  • Shall I tell him about the mass murders that occurred in the name of Christianity?

  • Should I tell him about all the millions They were slaughtered in the names of the gentle Jesus?

  • In other words, let's be fair about it.

  • Hey, seems to pick ideologies to attack and the poor and embrace other ideologies that is just his murderers in practice.

  • Sometimes it's a much more interesting question for me.

  • What happened in Eastern Europe, how come under an ideology it was meant to be liberate people.

  • So many people were oppressed.

  • I come from Eastern Europe.

  • I was born in Hungary.

  • He doesn't have to tell me about what was like.

  • But how about asking?

  • How come a religious philosophy that was meant to promote love and acceptance and compassion has become such an agent of two million of repression, oppression and killing?

  • So can we be objective or we're gonna be simply tribal about it?

Jordan Peterson has become hugely successful.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

JBピーターソンの解説。反逆者の知恵 (Commentaries on JB Peterson: Rebel Wisdom)

  • 1 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語