Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Hello lovely people!

  • Today’s video has been highly requested thanks to a photo that was recently doing

  • the rounds on Twitter. That’s right, were going to be talking about thePublic Universal

  • Friend’: a Quaker who is said to have died as a young person and been reborn without

  • gender but imbued with the spirit of God and went on to fight for gender equality and lead

  • their own congregation in upstate New York.

  • Some people consider the Public Universal Friend-

  • - who I am going to be referring to as theThe Friendfrom here on out because

  • that’s what some of their followers did asThe Public Universal Friendis surprisingly

  • hard to say!

  • Some people consider the Public Universal Friend to have been asexual, a gender nonconformist

  • or a queer saint whilst others consider that reporting having seen angels means that they

  • may have been suffering from a mental illness. I’m going to be breaking down the story

  • for you in this video but I’m also going to preface it with: Whatever you may think

  • about this person and how they referred to themselves or the religion they followed,

  • this channel is not the place for you to invalidate someone else’s identity, if

  • this isn’t the video for you then just move on to the next one.

  • Remember that another person’s identity does not invalidate your own and that you

  • do not have the right to invalidate theirs. It’s perfectly fine to have a discussion

  • about history or religion in the comments but I draw the line at name calling and the

  • insinuation that mental illness and sexual or gender identity or religion are explicitly

  • linked. Please remain respectful.

  • - Always examine your motives before posting a mean comment. Do you really want to do that?

  • Really? [blink]

  • This person may or may not have been non-binary or transgender. We can’t say for sure because

  • no one asked them outright and theyre not here to tell us whether they identify with

  • what we now consider to be the meaning of those terms.

  • Okay, now that the longest disclaimer ever is out of the way: Hello again! If youre

  • new here, hi, I’m Jessica, please consider subscribing to this channel where I sometimes

  • make content that touches on both religious AND LGBTQ+ things and crosses over again here

  • in this video. If you enjoy profiles of amazing disabled or LGBTQ+ figures from history then

  • I suggest you check out myhistorical profilesplaylist which you can find in a card above.

  • And below the video you should be able to see the merch shelf featuring this lovely

  • Christmas jumper which now I'm calling a winter jumper

  • Because I'm going to sell it in January and February because I realise both months are also cold

  • So you can get your hands on one just like mine and then we can twin!

  • I’ve always wanted someone to twin with.

  • On the 29th November, 1752 the Wilkinson family welcomed their eighth child, Jemima, to their

  • home in Cumberland, Rhode Island. Parents Jeremiah and Amy Wilkinson were the third

  • generation to live in America and attended traditional worship with the Society of Friends

  • (Commonly known as Quakers).

  • - If you would like to know more about Quakerism, I’ve linked my playlist with explainers

  • in a card above and in the description below.

  • Upon reaching late teenagedom, Jemima decided to break away and instead attend meetings

  • with New Light Baptists in Cumberland who emphasized individual enlightenment and less

  • of the group. Jemima was disciplined by her family and in her early-20s disowned by the

  • Smithfield Meeting as these new ideas were deemed unQuakerly. Jemima was, however, unsatisfied

  • with the New Light Baptists and faced much upheaval having broken from family amid the

  • American Revolutionary War.

  • During the same year Jemima contracted a disease that is now believed to have been typhus and

  • was left bedridden, near death with a high fever.

  • Once the fever had broken Jemima then reported having died and received revelations from

  • God through two archangels. They insisted that they were Jemima no longer for she had

  • died and the angels had taken her soul to heaven, leaving in her place a new, genderless

  • spirit, charged by God with preaching his word. They insisted that their new name was

  • thePublic Universal Friendand described that name as having come directly from God’s

  • mouth.

  • - The name referencedPublic Friend’- the designation the Society of Friends used

  • for members who traveled to different communities to preach.

  • As you can imagine, it being the 18th century no one could attest whether they had actually

  • died for a split second or even for longer. Detractors have since asserted that the entire

  • illness was made up but accounts by the attending doctor and other witnesses say that although

  • the illness was most certainly real no one noticed the deathalthoughit was the

  • 18th century sowas anyone paying that much attention?

  • From this point onwards The Friend refused to answer to Jemima Wilkinson, even to close

  • friends and family; ignoring or chastising those who used that name. When people asked

  • if that was the name of the person standing in front of them, The Friend merely quoted

  • Luke 23:3 “thou sayest it”.

  • - ie. “If you say so!”

  • Any attempts at using gendered pronouns were also rebuffed with the Friend insisting on

  • gender-neutral language and presenting as something new to early American society: a

  • genderless spirit from God who eschewed gendered pronouns and dressed and spoke in ways that

  • purposefully blurred the lines between male and female.

  • - not that it was a particularly revolutionary concept for Native Americansbut I imagine

  • it was for the small Baptist town of Cumberland.

  • Rising from illness The Friend began preaching a message of repentance

  • Granted, the content of their sermons was nor strictly innovative but The Friend did

  • something unique by embodying genderlessness as an aspect of resurrected life.

  • On Oct. 13, 1776, the Sunday after being reborn, the Friend gave a public sermon for the first

  • time. Despite being rejected as a heretic by Quaker officials, the Friend went ahead

  • and preached throughout Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania.

  • The Public Universal Friend’s theology was broadly similar to orthodox Quakers,

  • - I talk about Orthodox versus Conservative Quakers in my Quakers and Weddings video,

  • which I’ll leave in a card above.

  • They believed in free will, pacifism and plain dress, opposed slavery andbedtime activities

  • that aren’t sleeping or brushing your teeth. They blended traditional Christian warnings

  • about sin and redemption with a modern take on gender equality. Woman had at this point

  • no legal rights in the United States and many were drawn to this progressive message, building

  • the Society of Universal Friends in which unmarried women took leading roles in their

  • households and community. As you can imagine, The Friend had a very charming and forceful

  • personality to match this progressive message

  • - okay, so it’s a bit cult-y. But aren’t all religions really?

  • The Friend rejected standard women’s attire and hairdos for a genderbending appearance:

  • commonly wearing a loose black male clergy gown with female petticoats peeking out at

  • the hem. The Friend’s long hair hung to the shoulder. The rest of the Friend’s outfit

  • often included a man’s broad-brimmed hat and women’s colorful scarves.

  • - Because when youre the leader of a cult you can wear whatever you like.

  • Granted the first recruits to the Society of Universal Friends were family members,

  • but the Friend soon attracted a diverse group of followers, including intellectual and economic

  • elites as well as the poor and oppressed.

  • Many writers have portrayed The Friend as either a fraud rather than a pioneer, upset

  • that followers proclaiming that the Friend wasthe Messiah ReturnedorChrist

  • in Female Form.” But The Friend did not make such claims themself.

  • They did however come to sense that the Millennium was imminent and would occur about the first

  • of April 1780.

  • - Millennialism is a belief held by some religious denominations that a Golden Age or Paradise

  • will occur on Earth prior to the final judgement. Which is nice.

  • Christianity and Judaism have

  • both created some messianic movements which feature millennialist teachings and they have

  • often led to social unrest.

  • Like the Reformation. In which definitely no one died(!)

  • However, on the 18th May 1780 the sun was entirely blotted out from 11am to 2pm, which

  • many took to be a confirmation of The Friend’s teachings and a sign of the imminent coming

  • of Christ. The Friend received additional followers as a result of this event.

  • Members pooled their money and started a utopian communal settlement in the wilderness near

  • Seneca Lake in upstate New York in 1788. As the first settlers in the region, they cleared

  • the land and became the first white people to meet and trade with the Native Americans

  • there. First settlers, but it’s not like there wasn't already somebody living there.

  • - I imagine quite fairly.

  • The Society was completely dependent upon gifts from supporters and unlike similar

  • cultsThe Friend held no property themself but all was held in the name of the Society

  • by a Board of Trustees.

  • So that’s nice

  • By 1790 the community had grown to a population of 260, most of whom were celebate.

  • And you wonder why theyre not around today (!)

  • Followers respected the wishes of The Friend and avoided gender-specific pronouns, even

  • when writing in private diaries, referring only toThe Public Universal Friend

  • or short formsThe Friendor ‘P.U.F.’

  • Which I’m really hoping they said asPUFsince that would lead to some excellent magic

  • dragon jokes.

  • The Friend had various idiosyncrasies which were remarked upon:

  • was remarked to beexcessively clean’: bathing daily and insisting upon fresh, clean

  • clothes.

  • - strange for the time but definitely not in general!

  • they only ate by themselves in their own room and with the door closed.

  • - okay a little strange.

  • Hostile observers put the Friend on trial for blasphemy in 1800, but the court ruled

  • that American courts could not try blasphemy cases due to the separation of church and

  • state in the U.S. constitution. In fact, The Friend befriended the judge during the trial

  • and was invited to speak a sermon on the topic of their choosing. Which is pretty darn impressive.

  • Through this the Friend was a pioneer in establishing freedom of speech and freedom of religion

  • in American law.

  • It’s also very impressive because traditional Quakers have a bad history of annoying judges

  • and ending up with longer sentences because they call everyonefriendand refuse

  • to swear on the bible in court- since that implies that they might lie normally.

  • Like other isolated utopian communities based on celibacy, the Society of Universal Friends

  • dwindled.

  • The Friendleft time,” as the Universal Friends put it, on July 1, 1819

  • at age 61. The organization disintegrated within a few years of the founder’s death.

  • Historians are torn on The Friend, calling them either a scheming fraud and manipulator

  • or a pioneering leader who founded several towns in which women were empowered to take

  • on roles reserved for men.

  • Historian Michael Bronski says in the award-winning A Queer History of the United States that

  • the Friend would not have been called transgender or transvestite "by the standards and the

  • vocabulary" of the time, but he calls the Friend a "transgender evangelist". Susan Juster

  • says that followers considered the Friend's clothing congruent with the genderless spirit

  • which they believed animated the preacher. They both note that to followers, the Friend

  • may have embodied Paul's statement in Galatians 3:28 that "there is neither male nor female"

  • in Christ. Scott Larson, writes that the Friend can be understood as a chapter in trans history

  • "before 'transgender'".

  • So there we go, The Public Universal Friend! Had you heard of this person before this video

  • or before you saw them trending on Twitter last week...?

  • I hope youve enjoyed today’s video, remember to subscribe if you haven’t already, don’t

  • forget we have a livestream on Saturday and I’ll see you tomorrow for a new video!

  • [music]

  • Clara: Oh sorry, I've just pressed REC.

  • Don't mind me, it's fine. It's fine.

  • [laughs]

  • The moment passed, not taking photos anymore.

  • Clara: I took 3 photos!

  • - It's fine. - [clara laughs] byeee

  • [door closes]

Hello lovely people!

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

非バイナリーで宗教的な人:パブリックユニバーサルフレンド // 歴史的プロフィール // Vlogmas 2019 19日目 (Non-Binary and Religious: The Public Universal Friend // Historical Profile // Vlogmas 2019 Day 19)

  • 5 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語