Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • James Grime: A new proof has been announced which they claim is the largest proof ever.

  • It comes in two parts. The first part is this. This is part one.

  • And part two is 200 terabytes large. That is huge!

  • I'm gonna start with something simpler, something perhaps you can try yourselves.

  • This is the idea. Let's take the numbers 1 to 9. I'm just gonna draw them out in a grid, here.

  • Imagine these are the number 1 to 9. I'm not gonna write the numbers in quite yet.

  • Now I'm interested in a+b=c.

  • These are gonna be whole numbers, and I"m gonna have a+b=c. That's not a difficult equation.

  • I want them to be different, so let's have a

  • Can I color these numbers, 1 to 9, using red and blue, so I don't have a+b=c all the same color?

  • I don't want them to be all red or all blue. That's something I want to avoid.

  • So let's try to see if we can. Let's start with 1 as a red. There's no reason why not. And let's have 2 be a blue.

  • This means 3, it's 1+2... Well, that's okay. We can pick a color. It could be red or blue.

  • Brady, you can pick if you want. Do you want to be red?

  • Brady: Let's make it red.

  • Yeah, ok, fine. So we'll have 3 in red. Well, that's interesting because now we can make some deductions.

  • 3 is red, 1 is red, so 4 can't be red. That's what we're trying to avoid.

  • We don't want them all to be the same color, because then we would have a+b=c all the same color.

  • 1+3=4 would all be red. That would be something we're trying to avoid.

  • That means 4 is gonna be blue. Let's write 4 as blue. Great.

  • Well, that's something we can use as well. 2 is blue, 4 is blue, 6 will have to be red. Let's put 6 as red.

  • Well, that's interesting now, because we've got...

  • 1+6=7. We're trying to avoid it being red. It'll have to be blue. Let's make it blue.

  • 6+3, those are both red, so I'm gonna have 9 as blue. We're doing okay so far, don't have a problem.

  • Oh, but wait. There is a problem.

  • Because 2+7=9, and they're all the same color.

  • Oh, no, I messed up. I didn't do it. I failed here. This has failed.

  • Well, there's lots of other ways of coloring in the numbers 1 to 9.

  • In fact, each number has two options, red or blue, so it's gonna be 2 to the power 9. That's 512.

  • So there's 512 ways you could color this in.

  • It's not very hard for you to convince yourself that you're always going to fail, it's always going to end up with something like that.

  • Or you could just check all the options, if you want. You could check the 512 options

  • and you'll see that it's not possible to avoid a+b=c in the same color.

  • That's what this problem was about, but they took it one step further. They were interested in a²+b²=c².

  • And they wanted to color in the numbers using red and blue just like we did before,

  • but they wanted to avoid a²+b²=c² being the same color, so all being red or all being blue.

  • Now, you might recognize a²+b²=c². That's Pythagoras's theorem.

  • But we're interested in whole-number solutions for this. A solution might be 3²+4². That is actually equal to 5².

  • Shall we just check and see if that's a solution? 3²=9, 4²=16. Add them together, 25. Great because 25=5².

  • Another solution to this might be 5²+12²=13². That is another solution that just uses whole numbers.

  • These are called Pythagorean triples. They're not particularly rare. In fact, the ancient Greeks knew how to make them.

  • I'll show you how to make a Pythagorean triple, if you want.

  • You just take two numbers, m and n, and what you do is... a=m²-n². So we're assuming m is the bigger one.

  • b=2mn, and c=m²+n².

  • And that is a Pythagorean triple. All you have to do is pick two numbers and you can generate a Pythagorean triple.

  • There's an infinite number of them, absolutely. So, this is a well known thing. This is not a mystery.

  • But the mystery now is, can we color in the integers using red and blue so that we don't get a Pythagorean triple in the same color?

  • So, imagine we have a blue set of numbers and a red set of numbers,

  • and the red set do not contain a Pythagorean triple, and the blue set do not contain a Pythagorean triple.

  • Now, there's lots of ways you can color your numbers. Is there a way to avoid this problem?

  • This is called the Pythagorean Triple Problem.

  • Now, this is an application of something called Ramsey theory.

  • Ramsey theory is about finding structure in large numbers of objects.

  • So, if you have a large number of objects, is a structure unavoidable, is it inevitable?

  • Can you avoid this problem?

  • Now, the answer is no, you can't avoid it.

  • So, what these guys have shown is that this is a solution, coloring the integers from 1 to 7824.

  • They've split them up into red numbers, blue numbers, and you see the white squares, perhaps?

  • The white squares represent numbers that could be red or blue and it doesn't matter, it would be a solution either way.

  • But when they took it one step further and they looked at coloring in the integers from 1 to 7825,

  • that's when it failed. That's when they showed that it can't be done.

  • In fact, you're always gonna end up with a Pythagorean triple in the red set or in the blue set.

  • This number, 7825, is the straw that broke the camel's back. It's the last item on Buckaroo. It's the thing that broke it all down.

  • The reason 7825 broke the solution is because it's in two Pythagorean triples. Here they are.

  • 625² + 7800² = 7825² and 5180² + 5865² is also equal to 7825²

  • So what they found is that when they looked at the solutions for 7824, you look at all the possible solutions,

  • 625 and 7800 were always the same color. They were either... Let's say they're blue.

  • And these numbers, 5180 and 5865, were always the same color and the other color. They were always red, perhaps, in this case.

  • Which means 7825 now has to be red and blue at the same time, which is not possible, and the whole thing fails.

  • In the 1980s, our friend Ron Graham actually offered a prize for the person who solved this problem, the Pythagorean Triple Problem.

  • He offered a $100 prize, which he has now delivered to one of the computer scientists at the University of Texas.

  • He's delivered the check. He's paid up.

  • So, to show that this is a solution for 1 to 7824,

  • to show that is a solution, and to confirm it's a solution, takes seconds on a computer. It's not very difficult to do.

  • But to show that there are no solutions for 1 to 7825, and he checked every possibility, would take a massive amount of computing time.

  • The number of ways you could fill those in, when each integer has two options, would be 2 to the power 7825.

  • And that number is so massive, well, you could take a supercomputer... it would take too long for a supercomputer to check.

  • Imagine all the supercomputers in the world, and imagine them checking all the possibilities since the dawn of time, since the Big Bang,

  • you still won't be able to check all the possibilities. So that's not what they did.

  • What they did is they used some clever mathematical tricks to reduce the number of things they had to check.

  • They boiled this down to about a trillion things that they had to check, and that took them about two days using a supercomputer in the University of Texas.

  • The only problem really with this type of proof is it doesn't increase our understanding of why this is true.

  • What is special about the number 7825? Why that number?

  • These kind of proofs that require this huge amount of computation does not tell us anything about why something is true.

  • And there is a conjecture that this will always be true no matter how many colors we use.

  • We might use three colors or four colors.

  • Now, that number's gonna get larger and larger, and the amount of computation it takes to find where it fails is gonna be bigger and bigger.

  • But to find a proof that shows it's always true, that's probably gonna take traditional mathematics.

  • Brady Haran: The Great Courses Plus is an on-demand video learning service with expert lecturers from all around the world

  • covering all sorts of topics, from nuclear physics to Roman history.

  • Now, of course I've got you covered for mathematics, and this section here on trending and newsworthy topics

  • is handy if you want a deeper understanding of current events.

  • And look at this. Dog Training 101. That's right, Audrey, it looks like our weekend is sorted.

  • Yeah? Are you up for some Dog Training 101?

  • Now, you can join a free trial with access to all the videos, including the dog training, by going to

  • TheGreatCoursesPlus.com/numberphile

  • This is a great chance to dive deeper into the topics you love.

  • And using the URL or the link in the video description will show them you came from Numberphile.

  • Our thanks to The Great Courses Plus for supporting this video. Thank you! Thank you!

  • [chuckle]

James Grime: A new proof has been announced which they claim is the largest proof ever.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

A2 初級

7825の問題点 - Numberphile (The Problem with 7825 - Numberphile)

  • 42 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語