Soiftheinitialtestswillbethrowingintheresultsfromthataswelltogiveyousomeideaofhowthe 2600 K keepsuptoday, startingwithsomeCPUintensivetestsandrunningCinnabenchAR 15 showsusthatintermsofsinglecoreperformance, the I 74 wasbehindtheriseandthreemarginallywith 1312135 respectively.
Inthemulticoretest, though, theeightthreadsoffthe 2600 k ensure a niceleadwith 6 10 comparedto 536 I alsorantheCPUZedbuiltinbenchmark, whichonceagainprovedadvantageoustowardstheriseand 3 22 100 reanysinglecourttestyetfavoredtheiceseveninthemulticalledperformance.
Althoughclockedat 3.4 gigahertzstock, the 2600 K hasfantasticovercookingpotential, andevenmycheaphyper 103 callerkeptthe 2600 k stableat 4.5 gigahertz.
Thisimprovedthesinnerbenchscores 2758 and 156 inthemultiandsingletests, respectively.
Butwithhairworksoffthe I 7 26 100 k 10 70 systemaveraged 72 F.
P s, whichgoestoshowthatonceagaintherewerenoproblemshere.
Asidefrom a fewmomentsofleginside, noregrettosomeofyou.
Thepowerofthe 2600 k mayhavebeenobviousconsideringsomepeoplehavedonecomparisonteststonewerIntel.
I seriousCPuseandfoundsmallperformanceincreasesacrossmultiplegenerations.
Thefactthatthisisnow a sub £100 ordollarsprocessofwithhugeoverclockingpotentialmeansitmaybeidealforthoseofyouwhowantdecent 10 80 p gamingperformanceatmodernentrylevelCebuprices, especiallyconsideringthelowercostofolder 11 55 motherboardsandDDRthreeram.