字幕表 動画を再生する
The US is stepping up its pressure against Huawei, again.
Just as other countries decide whether or not
to use the Chinese technology companies'
equipment in their 5G networks, US prosecutors
have unveiled a fresh set of allegations against it.
They accuse the company not only of stealing technology
from their US rivals, but they say
that this pattern of wrongdoing was so endemic to its business
model that it actually constitutes
a criminal enterprise.
They have charged Huawei with racketeering
- essentially being an organised crime outfit
- and these charges carry very severe penalties if proven.
Huawei's assets could be seized, and its senior executives
could be thrown in jail.
The details of some of the new indictments are eye-opening.
They read like the pages of a spy thriller.
Let me read to you the details of one such incident.
In or about July 2004, says the DoJ,
at a trade show in Chicago, Illinois,
a Huawei employee was discovered in the middle of the night
after the show had closed for the day
in the booth of a rival technology company,
removing the cover from a networking device
and taking photographs of the circuitry inside.
This individual wore a badge listing his employer as Weihua,
Huawei spelt with its syllables reversed.
One of our readers, Thomaham, has asked a pertinent question
here.
That person has asked why it has taken
so long to bring these charges and why these companies aren't
being named.
Well, the victim companies aren't being officially
named, Thomaham, but the details of the cases
that vary closely with previous civil lawsuits brought
by companies, including AT&T and Motorola.
And as for why it's taken so long for the DoJ
to bring these charges, well, the DoJ
might say it takes a while to prosecute
cases of such magnitude and such complexity.
Huawei, however, has its own answer.
The company says that this is all part of a wider
push by the Trump administration against it,
which it says is being done for commercial reasons.
It denies any wrongdoing.
Well, Huawei may or may not be right about that,
but one thing is for sure.
Charges with the magnitude of racketeering
carry very severe penalties, and it
needs to take them seriously.