Name: 25.デュルケームと社会的事実 (25. Durkheim and Social Facts)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T04:47:21.000Z
Duration: 51 min 9 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

様態の副詞

上級比較級を表す句型

like to spend as much time as I can on Durkheim's methodology.

But let me rush through of the test questions and just to tell

I think the first one is very obvious, probably a bit too

The question is how can you make it interesting?

I hope that the distinction between power and domination is

Power means that somebody can impose its will on somebody

else, even if that other person opposes it.

There is a strong element of coercion involved.

You can coerce people to obey your command.

Domination implies that you do not have to use coercion

internalize the reasons those who have power use in order to

And then this brings us to the notion of legitimacy.

Legitimacy are the claims which are made by those who have

reasonable that they should issue commands and others should

What is kind of controversial about this?

It's controversial the way how Weber uses the notion of

Normally we, in modern democratic theory,

we believe--right?--a system is legitimate when it has popular

People go to free and fair elections, and then they elect

leaders, and then they follow those elected to office this

But I think Weber wants to have a broader notion of legitimacy.

Because free and fair elections, operating with

universal suffrage, go back one-hundred years in

human history, and in some countries it still

And Weber does not want to describe the last ten minutes of

human history for human history's twenty-four hours.

He wants to offer some conceptual tools to understand

So that's why he has this interesting notion of

legitimacy; which it does imply that people

have to have a certain degree of belief in the validity of the

But it is a rather passive notion of belief.

They don't have to love the person in position of authority;

They simply--it's enough if they think, "Well I cannot

Another dictator could be worse than this one.

This is a dictator, but a reasonable one.

And Weber will say, as long as this is happening,

the person in authority will not have to use coercion

Let me also just say--of course, the coercive element is

If people disobey the law, then they will be coerced.

There is certainly a promise of coercion, even in modern free

People are put in jail; in this country people are even

Just the real question is how systematic that coercion should

And for Weber, pure exercise of authority is

the sort of last year or two or three of Hitler was fairly

Certain epochs of rule of Stalin in the Soviet Union were

illegitimate, not all the rule of Stalin.

During the Second World War he established some legitimacy.

But when he had to imprison ten million people--

right?--and to kill tens of thousands or hundreds of

thousands, that is an indication that this

So that's the way how I would handle it--right?--to work

around this interesting conception of legitimacy,

Well this is again a very simple question,

traditional and legal-rational authority.

字幕リスト動画再生

25.デュルケームと社会的事実 (25. Durkheim and Social Facts)

people

question

social

society