Name: 23.クィア理論とジェンダー・パフォーマティヴィティ (23. Queer Theory and Gender Performativity)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T04:47:14.000Z
Duration: 49 min 55 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

転換語

happened to me before-- although it might have but I

that I found myself lecturing on a person who had lectured

yesterday here at Yale, but that's what happened in

You read--let's just call it--the facetious article on the

Some of you may actually have been in attendance.

I unfortunately could not be, but as it happened I ran into

her later in the evening and talked to some of her colleagues

about what she'd said, so I do have a certain sense of

I'm going to be talking today about the slipperiest

intellectual phenomenon in her essay having to do with what she

the charge or excess from the unconscious which in some

measure unsettles even that which can be performed.

We perform identity, we perform our subjectivity,

we perform gender in all the ways that we'll be discussing in

which I'm going to be turning to in a minute.

This has something to do with the authentic realm of the

What Butler did in her lecture yesterday was to return to the

psychoanalytic aspect of the essay that you read for today,

emphasizing particularly the work of Lacan's disciple,

Jean Laplanche, and developing the ways in

which sexuality is something that belongs in a dimension that

exceeds and is less accessible than those more coded concepts

that we think of as gender or as identity in general.

So conveniently enough, for those of you who did attend

her lecture yesterday, in many ways she really did

return to the issues that concerned her at the period of

her career when she wrote Gender Trouble and when

she wrote the essay that you've read for today.

Now I do want to begin with what ought to be an innocent

Surely we're entitled to an answer to this question,

especially if you've got an ear fine-tuned to jargon--

"sexuality," which is obviously relatively

People didn't used to talk about sexuality.

They talked about sex, which seems somehow more

is a term which is not only pervasive in cultural thought

but also has a certain privilege among other ways of describing

In other words, there is something authentic,

as I've already begun to suggest, about our sexuality,

something more authentic about that than the sorts of aspects

That's Butler's argument, and it's an interesting

or perhaps not at all, an answer to the question,

Now for Foucault sexuality is arguably something like desired

and experienced bodily pleasure, but the problem in Foucault is

that this pleasure is always orchestrated by a set of factors

that surround it, a very complicated set of

factors which is articulated perhaps best on page 1634 in his

He's talking about the difference between and the

interaction between what he calls the "deployment of

I want to read this passage and then comment on it briefly:

"In a word [and it's of course not in a word;

it's in several words], the deployment of alliance is

attuned to a homeostasis of the social body..."

The deployment of alliance is the way in which,

in a given culture, the nuclear reproductive unit

the sorts of activities that are supposed to take place and

not take place in the family-- because Foucault lays a certain

amount of stress on incest and the atmospheric threat of

in the family and are surrounded by certain kinds of discourse

conveying knowledge-- and we'll come back to the

latter part of that sentence-- all have to do with the

On the other hand, the deployment of sexuality we

understand as the way in which whatever this thing is that

and therefore not by any state apparatus or actual legal system

necessarily-- but nevertheless simply by the

prevalence and force of various sorts of knowledge police.

To continue the passage: In a word, the deployment of

alliance is attuned to a homeostasis [or a

字幕リスト動画再生

23.クィア理論とジェンダー・パフォーマティヴィティ (23. Queer Theory and Gender Performativity)

sentence

cook

talk

question