special presentation.

The Exchange Candidate Forums from NHPR in partnership

with New Hampshire PBS.

From New Hampshire Public Radio, I'm Laura Knoy,

and this is "The Exchange."

Today, we continue our series of presidential primary 2020

candidate forums and for this show on Thursday, November 7,

we're talking with democratic presidential candidate, Andrew

Yang.

He's with us before a live audience in NHPR's Studio D.

[applause]

Our questions today will include some of the many

that we receive from listeners.

So thank you for your contributions.

Also, I'm joined by NHPR's senior political reporter,

Josh Rogers.

He and I will both ask questions of Mr. Yang.

And Andrew Yang, it's nice to meet you.

Thank you for being here.

It's great to be here.

Thank you so much for having me.

I love being in New Hampshire.

Josh, let's start with you.

All right, Mr. Yang, let's start big.

What's your view of the role government

should play in our lives besides giving everyone

over the age of 18 $1,000 a month?

[yang chuckles]

I love this question.

To me, the government's responsibility

is to solve the biggest problems and address the biggest

needs that don't have any market incentive attached to them.

And I'm a parent.

I talk a lot about how my wife is at home with our two

boys, one of whom is autistic.

And there's obviously no market value attached to her work,

despite the fact that we know it's the most important work

that anyone's going to do.

The same is true with educating our children.

I believe the same is true with keeping us healthy, keeping

our water and air clean.

There aren't market incentives attached

to some of these things and that's

where the government has to fill in to address that need for all

of us.

So you've written that quote, "without dramatic change,

the best case scenario is a hyper stratified society

like something out of "The Hunger Games"

or Guatemala with an occasional mass shooting.

The worst case is widespread despair, violence,

and the utter collapse of our society and economy."

I'll let that sink in for a moment.

A survey that NHPR took of listeners

indicate that a lot of voters this year

are seeking a positive healing vision from our next president.

I mean, you see a pretty grim future without dramatic change.

Do you think that this is speaking to what voters want?

Well, I believe that that is the vision that we have to prevent.

It's one reason why I love being here in New Hampshire,

because you all control the future of the country.

If you direct the country towards a more positive vision

of our future, then we can make that vision of reality very,

very quickly.

This is the most extreme winner take

all economy in our history.

And we're now going through the greatest

economic transformation in our country's history, what

experts are calling the fourth Industrial Revolution.

In my view, it is the main reason

Donald Trump won that we automated away

4 million manufacturing jobs that were largely centered

in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa,

all the swing states he needed to win.

You all lost about 40,000 manufacturing jobs,

but you did it a bit earlier.

And that devastated many communities

in the northern part of New Hampshire.

That wave then ripped a hole in many, many Midwestern

communities.

And I spent seven years working in many of these communities,

so I saw it firsthand.

And what happened to those manufacturing jobs

is now shifting to retail jobs, call center jobs, truck driving

jobs, fast food jobs, and on and on through the economy.

If we do not evolve in the way we see ourselves,

and our work, and our value, then our very bleak future

does await.

But it does not need to be that way.

And that is the message of my campaign--

that New Hampshire can create a new way forward

for the rest of the country.

I mean, what's a timetable on that vision?

Well, the manufacturing job loss has already been happening.

And again, we automated away 4 million manufacturing jobs

over the last 15 years or so.

And now 30% of your stores and malls

are closing in the next four years.

And that's not just in New Hampshire-- that is nationwide.

Now why is that?

It's because Amazon is soaking up $20 billion

in business every single year and paying zero in taxes

while doing it.

So the biggest misconception is that what I'm talking about,

this fourth Industrial Revolution,

is somehow in the distant future.

It is not.

It has been going on for 15, 20 years now,

and it's about to accelerate.

And when you look and you see your Main Street

store is closing forever, it doesn't seem like an automation

story because it's not like a robot went and took

that retail clerk's job.

But if you go to the Amazon fulfillment center that

is putting that store out of business,

it's wall to wall robots and machines.

But I mean, what is your view of basic human nature if we're

in such a precarious state that we

have let, in your estimation, the logic of markets

so dominate our culture that we're

facing this kind of apocalyptic vision?

What do you believe about the nature of Americans

and where we've let our politics go?

Most people who've heard about me and my campaign

know that I'm championing a freedom dividend of $1,000

a month for every American adult starting at age 18.

And when you hear that, it sounds

literally too good to be true.

But this is not my idea and it's not a new idea.

Martin Luther King championed it in the 1960s.

It is what he was fighting for when he who was

assassinated in 1968.

And it was so mainstream it passed

the US House of Representatives twice in 1971 under Nixon.

So when you're asking how have we gone to this point--

my wife and I have had the same conversation-- how

is it that what was a mainstream policy endorsed by 1,000

economists and passed the US House now

seems really radical, and dramatic, and extreme when

we're talking about it in 2019?

What happened between 1971 and now

is that we were all pushed to a point where

we started to confuse economic value and human value.

Where we said, hey, if the market thinks you're worthless,

then you are worthless.

It's why we have discussions around trying

to retrain coal miners and truck drivers to be coders.

Which makes no sense on the face of it,

but we're so brainwashed into thinking

that if you don't have economic value, you don't have value.

That we didn't contort ourselves in ridiculous ways

to try and push someone to a point where they still

have economic value, even when that doesn't make sense

on a human level or an economic level.

Let's get a little more clarity on the universal basic income,

Mr. Yang.

Again, $1,000 a month to every American adult

over the age of 18 up to 64--

could we just clarify that?

Up until your expiration, so it goes forever.

And it would be the greatest expansion of social security

benefits in our country's history, in large part

because we're facing a retiree crisis in this country, where

tens of millions of Americans will be

working until the day they die.

With the freedom dividend on top of social security

we can actually build an economy that works for Americans

to be able retire with dignity.

OK, so from age 18 up until death.

What about people who receive other government benefits,

besides social security, Mr. Yang-- food stamps, welfare

and so forth.

Would they also get those benefits plus the $1,000?

So the freedom dividend is universal and opt in.