Alright, look.

That's messed up. You guys know I'm a Kings fan.

And you know that the Lakers have consistently broken our hearts.

It makes me so mad that they're gelling,

that LeBron is back, that they're all getting along.

There's no drama. Dwight Howard is, like, now all of a sudden mentally there.

Alright. Does anyone else have any questions for me or anything?

I've got a question!

Why'd you cut our interview so short?

Ladies and gentlemen, Andrew Yang!

Andrew Yang!

You too! Yes!

Dude, you did fuckin'... Did you see the way he did that?

Aye man, you got the like, the swagger's– I've seen it, it's up now.

Oh, thank you, man. Thank you.

You hopped up like you had wheelies, man.

Let's see Bernie Sanders do that.

Oooh, wow!

Shots fired.

Andrew, that's ageist, bro. Don't do that.

Bernie's an inspiration and role model to me, uh...

Don't qualify. Don't qualify. Go full Nas, Jay-Z. Go full Take—

Just go Takeover.

Oh...

You know what you should do? Like, the Takeover track, be like,

“You little fuck, I got money stacks bigger than you.”

You should do that.

Alright, anyways.

- You're not the first person to tell me that. - Um, are you— are you ready for this?

I'm ready.

You realize the last presidential candidate that came on Deep Cuts dropped out, so...

We had Beto on the show. The ne— Like, the following day he dropped out.

You have to answer the question while holding an egg on a spoon.

So describe, in Spanish, what's happening right now on stage.

Ah, pues, es muy complicado...

- You ready for the danger zone? This is like— - You have absolutely nothing to worry about.

- Okay. - I'm gonna undo the Patriot Act jinx right now,

Ahh, it's not a jinx. Come on, man.

He was polling pretty low, but alright.

Now there's only one dude on TV doing this all the time.

Alright. So obviously, certain media outlets have blacked you out.

Yes.

- I'ma just say it. MSNBC... - Yeah. And I've got to say...

They call you John Yang...

All I'm asking for is that they say, “We're going to treat—

- Now you wanna—

...you exactly like every other candidate. We're going to allow surrogates on our air

just like we allow surrogates from other campaigns.” And they're going to acknowledge that they've

omitted me from over a dozen graphics and have made mistakes in our coverage.

Very, very reasonable. Just treat us like everyone else and then I will be back on the air the next day.

Okay, but you're asking for an apology, though. They have to admit fault?

- I mean they actually— - You want the news media to admit fault?

You want Rachel Maddow to tack on another 30 minutes to her three-hour show

- and be like, “I'm sorry, Andrew.” - I'm not looking for 30 minutes.

- I would take one minute. - One minute? Okay.

Uh, but the fact is they've already apologized for some of the mistakes they've made in isolation,

so I'm just asking for an apology to acknowledge that they've made additional mistakes, as well.

Okay. Why don't you do this: Go right to Camera One and say, “Hey, MSNBC...

the only time I agree with Trump is when he's talking about MSNBC.”

Wow.

- I, I would not put it that way. - Aw, come on!

Come on, dude! I'm trying to—

Look, you're what, at 6%?

- Yeah, I'm in, I'm in fifth place. - If you get the beef poppin'...

I guarantee you'll go up to 8%. If you really...

If you really swing dick at MSNBC...

Dude, you already have the internet. They'll go crazy.

- Look, I got to— - Reddit loves you!

I got to give them a road back...

- Just go raw. - ...because after I'm president,

you know, I'm going to be doing interviews with them.

- I'm serious. - We got to give them the path back.

But MSNBC, just come clean and say, “Look, mistakes were made.

Let's put this behind us so we can get to the business of beating Donald Trump in 2020.”

Mike Bloomberg just declared his candidacy. You're the numbers guy.

Should billionaires exist and be able to run for office? Two questions.

Well, our economic system has been geared towards this winner-take-all dynamic for years.

So, it's going to produce some billionaires as a byproduct of the way the economy is set up.

Uh, and so, you can't go back in time and rewire the way the economy

- ...should have been starting in the '90s. - What do you— what do you mean by that?

It's already designed for people to get a billion dollars?

It is designed so that it's going to end up producing some number of billionaires,

which we have to remedy and as president—

Because of what? Monopolies or what? Like what—

Yeah. You've seen market power consolidated in the hands of fewer and fewer companies

and then you've seen technology and capital converge. The—

But should he, should a billionaire like Bloomberg be able to run? That's the real question.

Because he can just buy his way through a situation that you're not in.

Yeah.

History has shown that

self-funding candidates have a very, very poor track record in elections.

And the fact is, you can't buy passion, you can't buy belief.

Uh, if you have people and money, I'll take people every single day.

And that's what I believe the billionaires in this race are going to find out, as well, in the days to come.

- But should— Should billionaires be able to run? - The way we're set up—

You're Euro-stepping the answer here

and then going to the hole.

I'm— I'm going man.

Now you gotta answer that.

Come on, Andrew.

Yeah.

Billionaires should be allowed to spend money on behalf of their own campaigns. Yes, I believe so.

Okay. But, and you're— You're okay going up against the David versus Goliath situation?

Well, I think what they're going to find is that spending money on advertising dollars is going to be like

pushing on a string where after a certain amount of ads, it actually becomes more irritating than anything else.

Uh, you're nodding because you see this

and you don't even live in Iowa.

So, if— if you live in this age—

So, like, people in Iowa are like, “Dude, I cannot... It's just Fashion Nova, Fit Tummy Tea,

and Michael Bloomberg.”

Is that what their Instagram is?

There was an article where some teenagers were doing a comedy routine where they were like,

imitating these political ads because they've seen them over and over again.

So much so that it's become a joke.

You know what, man?

You guys know what time it is. It's time for the surprise math quiz. Let's see it.

- Andrew, here we go. - Alright.

Two trains travels in opposite directions from the same station.

The first train travels 20 miles an hour faster than the second train,

but it starts one hour and 30 minutes after the second train.

Five hours after the second train starts, the trains are 512 miles apart.

What is the speed of the first train in miles per hour? Go.

As the math guy, I know the answer is always C!

Dude, it's E, are you kidding me?

It's E. Go, show the work. Super simple. We did this before.

Let X be the speed of train two.

X plus 20 is the speed of train one.

Obviously, 3.5X plus 20, plus 5X, five two, 8.5X plus seven equals five over two.

X is 52. Speed of train: 52 plus 20, 72. Easy.

You sold a test prep company, bro?

I did, I did. I did.

Alright, man.

- Now you've said the Freedom Dividend... - Number one in the country.

tested well as an alternative to UBI.

Yeah, yeah. We've tested all the names for giving people money.

- Dude. Come on, dude. - No, true.

I'm going to be the only one. It's just like, “You really tested it?”

You were like, “Okay. Let's try, uh, 'Allowance for Adults.'

Eh, it's not going to work.”

Yes. We didn't have that on the list.

- Patriot Bucks. Liberty Dollars. - We had something very close to that.

- Patriot Bucks? - We had a lot of variants.

- We had, uh, we had Freedom Dividend, which won. - Liberty Bribe. How about Liberty Bribe?

How about, how about, how about 'Not Even Half Your Rent...

- Bucks”? - That's true here in New York. That is true.

- Okay. No, but it tested really well. Yeah. - Anything with the word “Freedom” in it.

Anything with the word “Freedom” in it tested way, way better.

- Yeah. You know the show is called Patriot Act... - But we tested a whole bunch of that stuff.

because the Patriot Act was super fucked up.

- Yeah. And it got passed. - Okay.

Uh, the Republicans are really good at naming terrible stuff...

- Okay. - ...really appealing names.

Okay. But Silicon Valley people love it. Shouldn't we have a little bit of skepticism

if Silicon Valley bros love the idea of the Freedom Dividend?

Just based on...

everything.

- Well, the reason why I love the Freedom Dividend... - Yeah.

is that it makes people stronger, healthier, mentally healthier, less stressed out. We'll start to put value

on things that, right now, the market ignores. Like the work my wife does at home

- with our two boys, one of whom is autistic... - Yeah.

Caregivers, nurturers, uh, coaches and mentors, and increasingly artists, creatives, and even journalists.

There are people in Silicon Valley that do support this

and some of them support it for the exact right reason— because they know

that we're in the midst of the greatest economic and technological transformation in our country's history

and we need to do something about it as quickly as possible.

Are we using the Freedom Dividend as a short-term solve on massive

capitalistic inequality that already exists?

So, say me and my wife, we get the Freedom Dividend of a thousand. So, we get 24 Gs a year.

How is that going to take down the structure of the Michael Bloombergs, the Jeff Bezoses?

What does that do? That's not even a dent to them.

Well, to me, what it is—

- To massive economic inequality that's only growing. - Yeah.

Um, what it is, is a foundation for all of us.

Like you have— Do you ever stop building a house at the floor? You ever be like,

“Oh, this is a nice floor.” Of course not.

You have the floor and then you have to build a structure on top.

And you're going to go after the technology companies as well?

- Oh yeah. - Monopolies, all that stuff.

Well, the biggest thing that I'm stressed out about where the tech companies are concerned,

- uh, is that— - You know we're on Net— We're on Netflix.

- We're on Netflix. Everybody but Netflix. - It's cool.

Everybody but Netflix. Go ahead.

I don't think this does apply to Netflix, happily.

You'll be— that wasn't intentional.

Okay, good, good, good. Okay.

Oh, good.

Go ahead, go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.

- Yeah, fuck Google. Go, go, go, go. - ...is that—

Yo, you'll be like, “Disney's a huge fuckin' problem. Fuck them. I'm gonna break them up...”

That's funny.

Go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.

So, I'm a parent, uh, and what stresses me out most about technology is that we're going through

a mental health crisis in this country— record high levels of anxiety and depression,

and it's related to technology use and smartphone adoption and social media apps.

Uh, and a friend of mine in Silicon Valley said that we have some of the smartest engineers in our country

turning super computers into dopamine delivery devices and slot machines for teenagers.

And it's having a disastrous effect on our mental health.

So what we have to do is we have to get into the guts of these social media apps and

recalibrate their design choices so they don't just have the profits of the companies in mind,

but they also have our mental health and the mental health of our children.

Now...

You believe data should be owned by the person who generates it.

Yeah!

Our data needs to be ours. These companies are selling and reselling it and profiting

to the tune of billions and billions of dollars...

Which companies specifically? What are we talking about? The Majors.

Facebook, Amazon, Google— the Majors, are selling our data and profiting to the tune

of billions, even tens of billions, of dollars.

So I'm proposing that our data is ours.

Even if we decide to lend it to these tech companies,