ヤニス・ヴァルーファキスベーシックインカムは必要不可欠 (スペイン語字幕版) (Yanis Varoufakis Basic Income is a Necessity (subtitulos espanol))

字幕表動画を再生する

0:00
our final keynote speaker needs no introduction to this audience professor
0:04
dr. Jana summer a focus was the Greek Minister of Finance in 2015 he's a
0:08
leading participants and current debates on the global and European financial
0:13
crisis he is an author and professor he's authored the global minutes are
0:17
several academic articles on game theory and economics he's a professor of
0:21
economic theory at the University of Athens and holds visiting professorships
0:25
at the Universities of Texas and Stockholm please please give 'em very
0:30
warm welcome to our final keynote speaker of the day mister minister
0:34
Yiannis faraha
0:45
well thank you so much for one welcome it's one of the beer because basically
1:00
is a necessity I'm going to actually argue that this is not a question of
1:05
whether we like it or not it will be a major part of any attempt to civilize
1:11
capitalism as capitalism is going through a spasm caused by its own
1:18
generation of technologies that undermine itself to put it simply in the
1:26
20 century we had the stabilisation and simulation of capitalism through the
1:33
rise of social democracy new deeply new deal in the United States democratic
1:38
social market developments in Europe unfortunately this social democratic New
1:47
Deal paradigm is finished and you can not be devised actual make some comments
1:54
on this but first let me let us remind ourselves of what the social-democratic
1:59
New Deal tradition tradition is all about
2:02
about two things firstly redistribution of income with the wage labor a kind of
2:10
insurance for the working class working class ensuring the wedding plus take for
2:17
instance the National Insurance Contributions scheme in Britain after
2:22
the second world war unemployment insurance in the United States working
2:28
wage laborers have faced effectively providing insurance payments to those
2:35
out of a job
2:36
seeing with health provision pensions those wedding today providing for the
2:44
pensions of those who have stopped working so insurance and redistribution
2:50
within the working class to put it bluntly the second dimension of course
2:55
is redistribution between capital and labor between the rents and labor this
3:01
takes the form of minimum wages that are negotiated by the state it's also
3:07
process of collective bargaining user usually triangular involving trade
3:14
unions employers and the state and of course taxation transfers through the
3:20
taxation now this social democratic tradition I made a very big statement a
3:27
moment ago today is dead in the water and it is dead in the water or dying in
3:33
the water for two reasons for reasons that have to do with two earthquakes
3:39
that if he'd our societies on both sides of the Atlantic one is the process of
3:44
Finance financialization which created a huge wedge between capital and labor it
3:50
created a new form of capital financial ice capital that essentially depleted
3:57
the energy of both labor and in depth and he's inexorable financialization Dr
4:04
headed comeuppance in 2008 @ ever since you remember after 1991 socialism died
4:11
with the collapse of the Soviet Union and then after 2008 capitals date we
4:17
have a new regime now I gotta go bankrupt accuracy its rule by the bank
4:21
the banks the more bankrupt the bank the greatest capacity to mobilize and you
4:26
see economic grants comic value from the rest of society and that's the problem
4:34
with Bank of democracy the fact that for six years now we have a cynical massive
4:40
transfer of wealth of income of value from production towards the financial
4:49
eyes financial sector that the remains insolvent in reality despite this
4:54
synagogue the problem with it is that it is created two things firstly
5:01
deflationary forces ask anyone working in a sentimental switzerland today or in
5:06
the Buddhist monk
5:07
on the European Central Bank the Bank of Japan the Bank of England or the Fed
5:12
becomes sleep at night because of the the fact that about half of the global
5:20
economy now is languishing in negative interest rate that this is a reflection
5:25
of the collapse of the Social Democratic New Deal bargain contract if you want
5:37
of the twentieth century and that collapse happened in 2008 the world
5:41
after 2008 cannot be understood anymore in terms of made sense before 2008 just
5:46
like the world after 1929 would not be made sense off in terms that make sense
5:51
in the Gold Exchange standard era but I had a 1929 the second reason with the
6:00
deflationary process we have now the first blank of the social democratic
6:06
tradition is that in the water because the working class can no longer insuring
6:11
it
6:13
stagnant wages the fact that youngsters are caught up in a dual labor market and
6:19
they find it very difficult about Switzerland of course now but I'm
6:22
talking about the rest of the developed world so easily successful only because
6:28
it's only one of them and nobody else can be like but that's another
6:33
discussion the fact remains that the first black the usual as amongst wage
6:42
laborers is simply not possible because wage wages have stagnated such an extent
6:46
that it is impossible for the wedding last in shorts and a second plant blank
6:53
the redistribution between capital and labor is becoming increasingly
6:56
impossible for two reasons first the politics that has become quite toxic
7:02
just look at what's happening the negotiations between Greece and the
7:05
troika within the European Union at the moment in the United States where you've
7:09
got a congress be doing at the white house in a white house redoing the
7:13
congress this distribution between capital and labor that was part and
7:17
parcel of the new deal in social democracy
7:20
required political governance Europe and the United States around governor as we
7:25
speak at the leak completely on government and so that's the first that
7:30
the second half way has to do this is nothing new I'm sure has been discussed
7:37
their everyday a glimpse of this discussion
7:40
let me put it very bluntly in science fiction terms their eyes of the machines
7:44
artificial intelligence will consume very very soon is already doing it all
7:51
the repetitive routine work or algorithmic work is going to be replaced
7:56
especially the moment machines pass the Turing test and it is impossible for you
8:01
and I do understand when we speak to some of the other phone where they were
8:05
speaking to him sooner or to human person once we have that women have a
8:10
massive displacement effect which for the first time in human history is going
8:16
to overwhelm the creation of more job destruction than job creation remember
8:22
that the bankrupt agree that they have referred to came at the tail end of a
8:29
thirty-year period of replacement or manufacturing jobs in the developing
8:34
world with low-wage in a bit of work employment rate swings in Britain
8:41
speaker comes from employment rates are quite high in Britain and the white
8:46
house in the United States but the bulk of those jobs that were created to leads
8:52
to replace the jobs that were lost after 2008 after 1975 and 1983 low-wage jobs
8:59
that ones that would be called immediately the moment artificial
9:04
intelligence overcomes the test and we are facing a major issue there
9:11
to link it with what I was saying before this displacement is going to reinforce
9:17
the deflation reprocess the keep our central bankers awake at night because
9:22
it will eliminate a significant measure of aggregate demand it will create an
9:27
even greater level of income inequality and primarily disparity between savings
9:33
in the end is this battle between savings and investment will force the
9:39
price of money the rate of interest even below the current low low levels so this
9:46
is why I'm saying the basic income is going to be an essential part of a
9:50
necessary part of any attempt to stabilize I D and to civilized I don't
9:57
need to decide to do I define basic income let me just say that this travel
10:05
we are going to have to carry hearts and minds will be an ethical and unethical
10:11
under dozen simply putting out of opposition from the heads but also from
10:19
opposition from the have nots from such a democrat from leftists from those who
10:26
whose own sense of dignity response against naturally the idea of something
10:34 for nothing
10:36
this is why it's important to couch facing come as what it is it is the idea
10:42
that and allow me to not aided in broadens we are going to overturn the
10:50
current narrative on life under capital the current narrative the dominant
10:56
paradigm is what that we have private production of wealth which is then
11:06
appropriated by the state for social purposes in reality our production
11:15
is correct it is often and it is only then privately appropriate unless we
11:21
make the shift in an hour we're not going to be able to succeed to convince
11:26
even those who will benefit from basic income that it is worthwhile struggling
11:31
for it
11:32
dagen iPhone and pick it up and it will do you find it
11:37
you find a variety of technologies each one of them was created by some
11:42
government grant none of them was produced by Apple nothing was refused by
11:48
Google none of them were produced with was produced by Facebook they were all
11:53
produced bike down some government grant this is what I'm saying about his way
11:58
I'm adding to the collective production of wealth which is then privately
12:04
appropriated if you start thinking of it that way then it's very easy to start
12:09
thinking of basic income as it didn't a dividend of those to the collective that
12:15
was responsible for collectively producing the wealth and the gadgets and
12:20
a product and the markets because this forced separation using a separation
12:25
between the market and the state needs to be dissolved there would have been no
12:30
markets if there were no states that we have no capitalism if it was not a state
12:35
that would be doable no Google if it was not state and similarly there will be no
12:41
state if they were no private entrepreneurs it would be no state is
12:44
there were no private firms we need to resolve this false division and we have
12:52
to attack the narrative head on basic income is about giving money to the
12:59
undeserving it is about giving money to the rich it is about giving money to the
13:06
surface the beach bums the ones that we did like the ones that we would not like
13:11
to be our children and who if they were true then we will we will be scolding
13:16
them so we must not side the track be sidetracked by simply talking about good
13:24
people getting money that they deserve
13:26
talk about undeserving people
13:28
that get money courtesy of the fact that they are members of a society that is
13:33
collectively producing wealth and then on top of this we need to add the
13:40
narrative of stabilization think about in Europe today in the United States had
13:46
a basis income would really help central bankers go to sleep at night it will be
13:52
counted inflationary it will be a unique defense against the slow-burning
13:58
recessionary impact of 2008
14:01
now there are a decent argument against basic
14:08
that we must not avoid some of you may say to you yes but they do not need a
14:18
basic a basic income well sure but they don't they don't need to have the first
14:25
10,000 Swiss francs they make being tax-exempt either nobody's worried about
14:30
that surely we hear being said it's better to target the money that society
14:36
has on those who are deserving well yes but you have to think of the other side
14:41
of the story due to separate the deserving from the undeserving you need
14:46
to bureaucracy whose purpose is doodle at that bureaucracy tends to replicate
14:52
itself bureaucrats love to reproduce themselves and to reproduce their power
14:56
over society and to do so by creating a stigma attached to those whom they
15:01
considered to be undeserving it is very similar to psychiatry the moment he
15:07
introduced a three-member Michelle and the story about the madhouse you create
15:13
an additive original reason power structure the person who has the
15:17
certificate to be this psychiatrist decides Hussain who has the right to be
15:25
free citizen
15:28
the other argument which i think is also one that needs to be confronted is that
15:33
people should have a right to a job not a ride to basic income and ugly should
15:39
be promoting work not schloss well I think that there are two points here
15:43
that need to be made when physically nothing stops us as a society
15:48
century those who are idle why should we have them stuff I know that my kids
15:57
where I'd like I would be centering them but they will not be throwing them out
16:02 of the house
16:02
secondly and more importantly there I'd to turn down a job is essential for a
16:12
well-functioning labor market and for a civilized society and have that I a
16:17
genuine right to turn down a job you must have an alternative and outside
16:22
option because desperate beagle
16:25
accepted do desperate things I heard somebody here today are you talking
16:28 about
16:28
cleaner whose job is not respected whose name is not known I have a story to tell
16:39
about that works in a number of universities and I remembered in the old
16:42
days where cleaners at work for the university and they were like my boss
16:47
they would come into my office and they will they will know my family they would
16:54
know about my wife they would not about me that would tell me off that would say
16:58
the 8 o'clock at night got your wife what are you doing
17:02
yeah and they had a sense of belonging to an institution and being
17:06
institutional important and what happened we subcontracted the labor to
17:10
firms that hire by night people that are faceless were turned over all the time
17:17
but less were not institutionally connected to the place where this is the
17:21
University the National Gallery in London and so on and so forth and there
17:26
is but why did this process spin out of control it did because the cleaners had
17:33
no us outside option no right to say no to the subcontracted contact
17:40
now just so that we do not face only the negative arguments let me just before I
17:48
conclude that opened this after discussion let me mention what I think
17:52
essential aspects from a social perspective not just from a
17:56
macroeconomic perspective it is important to state the macroeconomic
17:59
case will be stabilizing the financial markets investment of an unlikely but
18:07
there are others at the level of the micro and sociological
18:15
democracy put forward the idea of a social safety net
18:21
remember that well we need to counter this let's have a good for catching you
18:27
when you're fully but when you're caught in it some time to get out of them
18:33
sometimes very easy to be trumped think of basic income as a foundation set a
18:41
floor on which to stand solidly and to be able to reach for the sky
18:45
exploitation libertarian economists political ghana's political game that
18:57
liberty is a driving force define liberty on in a negative sense in the
19:05
sense of the absence of constants of volunteerism if you said yes to some
19:10
contract that contract must by definition be free
19:14
contract therefore it must be some act of free will
19:21
well it's not the Mafia loves to give us options that we can't refuse to make us
19:29
offers to choose the fact that we say yes to them doesn't mean that they were
19:35
chosen free the fact that the government accepted the terms last summer of the
19:40
driver does not mean that was a voluntary transaction to have a three
19:45
contract to have a contract that he signed by both sides
19:50
presenting and exuding the freedom of both sides each side must have a
19:56
capacity to say no I said that before I'm saying this once more in his
20:01
innocence freedom in action requires it basic income finally again beyond the
20:17
macroeconomic will allow for creative work to replace the kind of routine
20:26
algorithmic work which is anyway being displaced by artificial intelligence so
20:34
even want to ameliorate for the ill effects of capitalism undermining its
20:41
producing gadgets that itself cannot survive then we need to create a system
20:47
whereby society stakes a claim to the returns to aggregate capital and this
20:55
claim becomes an income stream that goes to everyone I don't see why my children
21:02
and your children have an idea trust fund why Paris Hilton has a right to die
21:07
a trust fund when nobody else will very few people do singles basis in get basic
21:15
income as a trust fund for all of our children to be financed by dividends
21:22
from aggregate capital which was after all created collectively thank you
21:43
questions so R here
21:57
technology and politics do you think is it an unfortunate coincidence or is it
22:04
related I had a holistic approach organic of course there is the reason
22:13
why we've had the financialization drive of the nineteen eighties nineties and
22:19
the thousands which led us to where we are today has a lot to do with
22:24
technological change and this technological change now with 3d
22:28
printers and machines that can replace human intelligence at the level of the
22:33
service sector is going to be in a vicious feedback effect with the effects
22:40
of the combustion of financial capital so the answer is utterly interwoven
22:46
interconnected interrelate
22:58
iraq to be a little bit more radical and that is my question you said the reason
23:09
for the existence of a basic income in conditioner basic income is income in
23:16
any case it in the context of civilization of today is to do comes
23:21
from a collective labor that is organized by state investment in R&D
23:29
technologist come from the relationship between the public property in private
23:35
property with my dad equality says I think that the new tools to grow their
23:40
own technological transformation change the structure is a way your
23:45
virtualization reproducing of wells that means a very slogan way we can say that
23:49
life itself is put into labor
23:53
indisputably the radio but I really be the last sentence to life our life yes
24:00
he's put into labor into radio the reason exploitation of life it's sort of
24:07
subsection of lives it's gonna be home visit classical substitution between
24:11
real former subsection Maxon terms it is a new wave of labor organization
24:16
liberalization so I think that the baby is a good cultural shift is it we need
24:21
to do is to consider basic income as a sort of a remuneration of productive
24:28
life not only part of social security and soul so I think that there is
24:34
something that you go behind it affects there is a collective work some more
24:39
things it is very useful to stress about this topic just to give golfing to the
24:45
geological geophysical I don't see why we disagree I don't see why we disagree
24:50
or agree it is better to put it in my daughter to talk in terms of visiting is
24:58
a sort of a remuneration thanks to win the way I
25:03
I prefer to say is that we eat gives us an opportunity to reconsider the notion
25:10
that wealth is privately produced and collectively appropriated when the
25:16
reality is exactly the opposite and now with maintenance take Google they have
25:24
imposed take all the value creation by users the complete breakdown of the
25:32
distinction between consumer and worker so all these corporations are have huge
25:38
input from their own customers their customers value and then they are being
25:45
turned into father which has been sold to advertisers for vital to return
25:52
exchange value to be done directly to these corporations and exclusive users
25:57
global corporations especially given that these corporations baby hadn't tax
26:02
so basic income is a very simple way of ensuring that those who produce the
26:08
valujet a larger share of their thank you very much I have a customer has kind
26:18
of been bothering me all day concerning what you called the second earthquake or
26:22
the rise of the machines what about those jobs that are not being displayed
26:27
by our technological development but kind of evolving parallel to a bike
26:31
that's a digital sweatshops in the Philippines or i click working so I feel
26:37
like both some kind of myth that technological innovation is gonna
26:42
replace everything but isn't there also a job sector in New suck job sector
26:48
evolving where humans are you doing rather machining work to train
26:52
algorithms to cloak to do Facebook censorship but actually requires Sherman
26:59
work but every technological innovation
27:04
displaces jobs and create jobs what we're facing now is the first time in
27:10
the first moment in history where they was that are are about to be displaced
27:16
are far more numerous to the ones that work which are being created in the US
27:20
were being created a much much lower level jobs in any more badly immunity to
27:27
it than the ones that are being destroyed so yes right here right there
27:39
high C celebrates the question of course is tangential to universal PCI in combat
27:48
on your experience in government would you think the role of the state should
27:54
be in the transition to the each of automation and the digital economy and
28:00
how the state tries to reorient e skills agenda at present we have many countries
28:06
in Europe apprenticeship and scales agenda which actually embed the
28:11
structural weaknesses so how do you think she can perform a rule and
28:16
preparing the labor force automation that's a good question I don't I don't
28:22
have an answer to these Andrea we certainly need the state to guide the
28:32
process of not so much human capital formation but the formation of the body
28:43
of difficult knowledge which is necessary to the problem is that we have
28:48
an educational system in an apprenticeship system that creates human
28:55
capital of a lowbrow right both universities and we are jumping down
29:04
education system we are creating incentives for students to study that
29:10
which they're not good at and which is going to by the time they graduate will
29:14
be relevant anyway for instance by ensuring that they leave universities
29:19
with a great amount of debt we are pushing them at the age of 18 19 to make
29:23
choices as to what they study on the basis of their own conception of what is
29:27
repetitive which firstly doesn't prove to be a look at it and secondly which
29:32
forces them to do things that they're not good at and therefore depletes the
29:36
overall effect of Education Society regarding apprenticeships I think that
29:46
look in britain today even if fantastic apprenticeship system is not going to
29:52
work because of the level of investment solo so what jobs with these apprentices
29:56
get to say that you know the supply side story that if you could lead to good
30:02
advantage is good industries going to move to Britain is at its finest guys
30:07
material the level of investment is very low and it's not just in Britain I am
30:13
appalled by the statistics of Britain's that in Germany the most successful
30:18
European state economy we have the highest level of savings in the history
30:24
of Germany and the lowest level of investment since 1945 so unless you have
30:30
together and invest in aggregate investment policy and educational
30:36
settings and training set said things that are in sync with investment you're
30:44
going to fail as a site and
30:54
thank you very much a really interesting talk I just want a sort of push you a
30:59
little bit further maybe get some reflection cause I completely agree that
31:03
being able to say no to a job is a requirement but I also think the next
31:08
step needs to be there needs to be some kind of system that helps people figure
31:12
out what they want to walk towards what is it you want a self actualized that
31:17
was wondering do you have any ideas if we introduce a basic income what other
31:22
systems that the state should the state introduced in order to help people
31:25
figure out in the process I don't agree with you on this you know i mean I'm not
31:30
made
31:33
don't confuse me for a statist I don't want to stay to tell me what I should be
31:39
aspiring to I don't want the state to Delmas my daughter what you should be
31:44
become when she grows up indeed I have very little time for all these
31:50
professional orientation schemes whether their state or private you know
31:54
especially when they did they take thirteen year olds at school and they
31:58
give them these silly surveys and Delhomme you will become an engineer
32:02
you'll be able and you're going to be a musician this is all I have a very deep
32:09
belief in the capacity of human minds to work things out for themselves if they
32:16
don't have to live in terror that is amazing
32:23
let's please give a warm thank you

ヤニス・ヴァルーファキス ベーシックインカムは必要不可欠 (スペイン語字幕版) (Yanis Varoufakis Basic Income is a Necessity (subtitulos espanol))

ヤニス・ヴァルーファキスベーシックインカムは必要不可欠 (スペイン語字幕版) (Yanis Varoufakis Basic Income is a Necessity (subtitulos espanol))