20、 Obama
中級 英 1873 タグ追加 保存
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
動画の字幕をクリックしてすぐ単語の意味を調べられます！
単語帳読み込み中…
字幕の修正報告
In May 2014, the European Court of Justice ruled that internet users have the quote “right
to be forgotten”. They ordered Google to remove undesirable links to personal data
that is “inaccurate, inadequate, irrelevant or excessive” when asked to do so. However,
opponents of the ruling say that it is a form of censorship, and could have a chilling effect
on internet speech. So, should you have the right to be forgotten on the internet?
This idea is actually not a new legal concept. A decade ago, the 1995 European Union Data
Protection Directive set the stage for updated privacy rules in the digital era. With the
ubiquitous nature of internet record keeping, erasing information is not as easy as it used
to be. Many believe legal protections need to catch up with the 21st century.
The problem with the right to be forgotten is that it inherently contradicts the right
to free speech. A person cannot simply have information removed because he or she disagrees
with or dislikes its content. But when information fits the profile of “inaccurate, inadequate,
irrelevant or excessive”, courts will have to weigh how damaging the information is to
the person versus how relevant that information is to the public. Often the decisions are
made on a case-by-case basis. Examples would be arrest records, revealing photos, regrettable
tweets, and even false accusations or rumors.
However, critics of the ruling point to some controversial cases as examples of unnecessary
censorship. One news agency reports that a story about a Scottish man who strangled his
wife in 2002 was removed by Google as a result of the new ruling. Other stories, which may
be important to the public, pertaining to things likes tax evasion or theft, were also
deleted. Many feel that this kind of removal of information violates freedom of speech,
and public access to data. About a quarter million requests for Google to remove information
have already been made.
Currently, the ECJ ruling affects only search results on the European version of Google,
and the removed results still appear when searched on Google.com. No actual content
is erased, and the nature of the internet suggests it will exist indefinitely. So, unfortunately,
according to current laws, whether or not you have the “right to be forgotten”,
is mostly irrelevant.
Google, despite struggles is one of the most powerful companies in the world. To learn
more about how influential they really are… take a look at our video here. Click the link
in the description to see the whole thing. Thanks for watchin’ TestTube, don’t forget
to subscribe!
コツ：単語をクリックしてすぐ意味を調べられます！

読み込み中…

中級 英

Do You Have The Right To Be Forgotten Online?

1873 タグ追加 保存
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
Karen Chan 2015 年 11 月 15 日 に公開

お気に入り

loading

コメント

読み込み中…
お勧め動画

  1. 1. クリック一つで単語を検索

    右側のスプリクトの単語をクリックするだけで即座に意味が検索できます。

  2. 2. リピート機能

    クリックするだけで同じフレーズを何回もリピート可能！

  3. 3. ショートカット

    キーボードショートカットを使うことによって勉強の効率を上げることが出来ます。

  4. 4. 字幕の表示/非表示

    日・英のボタンをクリックすることで自由に字幕のオンオフを切り替えられます。

  5. 5. 動画をブログ等でシェア

    コードを貼り付けてVoiceTubeの動画再生プレーヤーをブログ等でシェアすることが出来ます！

  6. 6. 全画面再生

    左側の矢印をクリックすることで全画面で再生できるようになります。

  1. クイズ付き動画

    リスニングクイズに挑戦！

  1. クリックしてメモを表示

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯，不妨使用「俚語字典」，或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔