My name is Kate Simonds, and I'm 17.

Upon hearing me say this or seeing the title of this talk, "I'm 17",

I'm sure you're thinking:

since she's on the stage,

she must have done something incredible that she can teach me about.

Maybe she-- I don't know, what did she do to deserve a TED talk?

Did she accidentally make millions

from investing in a successful startup company at age 15?

Maybe she cured some disease accidentally while interning in a lab

or maybe she received a perfect score on her SATs at the age of 7.

Did I do any of those things?

No.

I haven't done any of these things unfortunately

so here's the reason why I'm talking today:

When I took this stage, you all assumed that I'm some child genius

or some accredited creator because I'm 17.

I must have done something worthy of your attention.

Yet, the only qualification to being a TED speaker is to have an idea.

An idea you think is worth spreading.

And that's the problem.

Because I'm 17 and I'm on this stage,

you're only respecting me because I'm on this stage.

Maybe it's because you like my extremely high heels

but I don't think that's the reason why I should have your respect.

I don't think that I should have to be a high school millionaire

or to have cured an epidemic to be worth listening to.

I think that any idea should be respected no matter the age of who it comes from.

My voice has been disrespected what seems like hundreds of times.

I've been told by adults that I'm not ready to vote

even though I keep up with politics, and I'm sure of my beliefs.

I've been told to stop fighting for equality

because I have a little voice, and it won't fix anything.

The difference is, no one would say those things to an adult.

Any adult that fights for a cause like that

would be deemed a courageous and dedicated hero

but because I'm 17, I'm naïve and ignorant.

I have years of experience of my voice not mattering and not being respected.

I'm even told, according to a Life Science article from 2008,

that because I'm a teenager, I can't experience empathy

which is defined as the ability

to understand and share the feelings of an other.

Now, without any quantifiable data or scientific evidence

I can prove that article wrong.

Here's how.

I did it about a minute ago

when I understood the assumptions you made when I took this stage.

Now with empathy because I can relate to you,

I understand your hesitations to my qualifications

because when I was picked for this TED talk,

I wondered the same thing.

I'm just a 17 year old, what do I know?

What can I teach you about?

But by this time, I hope I've gained your respect.

I say "gained" because unlike the other speakers, I didn't have it initially.

There was an inherent paradigm of doubt.

This surrounds all students.

The reason I'm so passionate about this is because of my work

with a local non-profit organization which is called One Stone.

One Stone is a student-run, official 501(c) non-profit,

and after joining as a sophomore in high school,

I learnt how to create a budget, to run an interview,

how to speak in front of large groups like this one

and most importantly, how to problem solve.

Surrounded by high school students,

no one ever questioned the validity of my thoughts.

Let me tell you, we've got stuff done.

But things would change the second I'd leave the building.

I'd try talking to an adult about something I'd be working on,

my research or a project, and they would ask me, "What do you know?"

All teens are asked this, "What do you know? How could you know this?

You're only a teenager."

We are asked this when we talk about politics, education,

even with what we want to do with our lives

because we're "Too young to understand."

Just because we have vertical driver's licenses

and you all have horizontal driver's licenses,

apparently, we don't know what love is.

We can't know what we should or shouldn't believe,

we don't get to deserve, we don't get to talk about education or politics

because we don't live in the equal real world.

We actually do not get to speak for ourselves.

Now at this point, you may have noticed that I'm not using slides.

Part of the reason why is that I don't really need them

but to be honest with you, the real reason why is that this is a really unique chance

for a student like me to have your attention,

so I'm going to strategically direct 100 % of it to myself.

(Laughter)

This problem is bigger than it sounds.

From my contrasting experiences at One Stone

and with the help of the amazing teachers I've had,

I've become fully aware of the constant belittling that occurs to student voices.

This problem is big.

Look at our education system; as students, we have no say

in what we learn or how we learn it, yet we're expected to absorb it all,

take it all in, and be able to run the world someday.

We're expected to raise our hands to use the restroom, then 3 months later

be ready to go to college or have a full time job,

support ourselves and live on our own.

It's not logical.

My mum is an elementary school teacher

and I always hear her and her colleagues talking about how kindergartners,

when asked a question, are thrilled to be raising their hands, all of them.

Yet, as you increase the grade level,

fewer and fewer hands are raised each year.

Now, in my senior classes in high school, it's common that, when asked a question,

no one raises their hand, and the teacher has to call out names from a roster.

I think this is because A, students aren't confident in their own answers,

B, students have been made fun of for answering too many questions correctly

or C, the students aren't listening.

Maybe they're texting in their lap

or most likely, just extremely disinterested.

These are all three really big problems.

Students have lost sight of their education's value

and have therefore stopped learning.

Because we're told, "You don't get it, you're 17.

You don't deserve to have the control over what you learn."

This statement and this mindset are toxic.

It's gotten to the point where we've begun to stop listening to ourselves.

Sometimes, I catch myself on a wild train of thought and stop myself thinking,

"Self, stop thinking about this.

You're only 17, you don't know anything about psychology.

What are you doing? Stop!"

and this is me, someone who totally believes in the validation of everyone's ideas

and is doing a TED Talk on the validation of everyone's ideas,

is discrediting my own because my thoughts don't come from an adult mind.

Last spring, my friend and I started a club.

Both of us are very outspoken, and we saw this as an opportunity

to make a difference in our school.

We anticipated it might take some work to convince the adults of our mission

but we didn't realize

that the real challenge would be convincing our classmates

that they could make a change as students.

When we tried to stand up for something,

they criticized us, they made fun of us for standing up for our beliefs.

And that's really, really bad.

Students question the validity of their own thoughts

because they don't come from adult minds,

yet what really separates adults and teenagers intellectually?

Is it an age?

Do we wake up on our 21st birthdays with everlasting knowledge?

Do we turn 18 and suddenly have ideas that are worth listening to?

Also, this magical age of adulthood is different in countries all over the world,

and it hasn't seemed to work so far, so who's right?

Or maybe it's from attaining a level of maturity which can come at any age

but I know a lot of high schoolers and college students

that are more mature than some adults I know.

So that's not logical either.

I think that it doesn't come with age or experiential maturity.

There's a definite biological difference between the two

but it comes instead with brain conformity.

Researchers at Stanford tested this a while back.

They looked at neurosignalling differences in the two ages

between adolescence and adults to see how brains were networked.

They ended up finding out adult pathways were much more constant

as if mapped than the younger subjects

whose pathways were more scattered or spontaneous or, dare I say, creative.

It's no secret that society has a lot of problems

that we just can't quite seem to solve.

And the adults behind them have conditioned attempts at solving them

which is why we haven't made any progress.

In my government class, my teacher has a really sarcastic poster that says,

"If you think our problems are bad, just wait until you see our solutions".

(Laughter)

Maybe this problem is that we're not thinking about these solutions creatively.

Teens, all the times are criticized for having rambunctiously inventive ideas.

But instead of making fun of these teenagers,

maybe the problem is that we should be harnessing these ideas,

we should be tapping into these spontaneous brain pathways

and using them to solve these problems.

This is my idea worth spreading:

a world of creative collaboration between adults and students.

It's a world where adults listen and respect student ideas,

and a world where students respect and listen to their own ideas.

The education system; it will improve dramatically,

students will care about learning

because they know that their education matters.

In the current status quo,

once you're educated past a certain point you've learned all about failure.

We're teaching our students right now

to lose belief in possible change or perfection.

In other words, we're teaching them

to stop thinking outside the box and to accept adequacy.

We're teaching them to conform to standards and to lose their creativity.

But before this happens, students don't think of logistics or limitations,

they're fearless.

Think of the kindergarteners; if we could harness this excited energy

before they lose it and foster it throughout their entire education,

think of the creative ideas that could come of it.

Possibly even more so, government could improve.

Once students know that their voices matter,

they'll feel obligated to participate.

They'll feel responsible for where policies are headed.

With improved efficacy comes progress across the board.

I'm not suggesting we extend suffrage to 5 year olds.

But I do think that we should encourage our 18 year olds to vote,

not discourage them, that so happens frequently.

Ask us about social security, ask us about environmental destruction,

ask us, ask us about anything.

Let us know that we matter because we do.

It's true that not all of us will understand these policies right away.

Just because we're teenagers doesn't mean that we don't understand politics

and similarly, just because you're an adult, doesn't mean that you do.

When you tell us that our votes don't matter, that we're not ready,

you lose, too.

Fewer and fewer people are voting each year, that's a fact.

And a loss of votes, to be dramatic, is a loss of democracy.

If you're not old enough, if you're 17 like me, 16, 15, 13, you still matter, too

even though you can't legally vote, and you aren't in college yet.

You are still valuable to society.

OK, if anyone has fallen asleep or something

or if you have found me completely disinteresting,

wake up, and listen to me now.

Students, we've been respectfully asking for student voice for years.

We've sat on representative seats at board meetings,

and we've protested standardized testing, but it hasn't been enough.

Look where we are.

We need to stop asking, and we need to start demanding.

More than student councils and board meetings, and clubs,

and representative seats.

We deserve to be trusted with more than setting up our parents' iPads.

(Laughter)

Our ideas matter.

But, unfortunately this will only work if it's a collaboration.

Adults, I'm asking you to work with us.