Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • >> Today I wanted to discuss nitrogen containing compounds

  • and the again what I want to continue with is the idea

  • of being able to recognize some patterns,

  • pick out important classes of compounds

  • and probably get mastery

  • of maybe two dozen different categories of compounds.

  • We'll also take a look,

  • at the end at a few more specialized examples

  • and see some things that you can tell with IR

  • and just a few neat things and ways it can talk to you.

  • But let's start with some basic nitrogen containing compounds,

  • so amides continue our discussion of carbonyl groups.

  • We talked about the amide carbonyl band and we said

  • of all the common functional groups

  • of all the common carbonyl compounds.

  • Amides have the lowest carbonyl stretching frequency at 1650

  • to 1690 and sometimes this is referred to as the amide 1 band

  • and we'll see in a moment what the amide 2 band is.

  • Now what's interesting is you often end up looking for things

  • in pairs, looking for sets of data that point

  • in a particular direction with IR spectroscopy

  • so the other thing for primary and secondary amides,

  • that is amides where you have either two hydrogens

  • or one hydrogen on the nitrogen is you're going

  • to have NH stretching frequencies.

  • So if primary amides, I'll write it as primary amide compounds

  • where you have NH2 groups have two NH stretches

  • and by now you should all now what are these NH stretches

  • in terms of of their type?

  • >> Symmetric.

  • >> Symmetric, NH symmetric and their frequency is going

  • to depend obviously it's going to be everyone by now knows

  • that that region above 3000 is where you get OHs and NHs

  • and so forth and it's going to fall in that general region.

  • Amides have just like carboxylic acids they're very prone

  • to hydrogen bonding and so often you'll see different behavior

  • with different states.

  • So for a primary amide in solution and I'll say dilute,

  • in other words not super-concentrated

  • so you don't have a lot

  • of hydrogen bonding those bands show up at

  • about 3520 and about 3400.

  • Remember my emphasis really has been on reading spectra,

  • in other words looking at a spectrum

  • and seeing patterns here and so when I look I sort of look

  • at that region below 3000 and I'd be seeing a band

  • and these bands tend to be kind of broadish, not as broad

  • as your typical alcohol bands but certainly not

  • as sharp as the CH band.

  • Hydrogen bonding weakens the NH stretch and so

  • in the solid state they're certainly hydrogen bonded even

  • when you grind up your molecules with KBr or grind them

  • with [inaudible] or grind with mineral oil

  • to make a mole the molecules are still in particles micron

  • in size and so forth, so they're all hydrogen bonded together.

  • So in solid, and I'll put parentheses hydrogen bonded,

  • the band shift to lower frequencies

  • and they typically broaden out I'll say about 3550, about 3350

  • and 3180 and the pattern changes a little bit.

  • I'll try to graph things on the same scale here

  • so now we fall below 3500.

  • The bands typically become a little bit broader

  • so you'll see this kind of like an alcohol stretch

  • over here becoming broader.

  • So just like we talked about carboxylic acids, amides,

  • particularly primary amides

  • and lactams can form these hydrogen bonded ring structures

  • and are quite prone to doing so.

  • And the reason, so primary amides are more prone

  • to doing this and as are lactams and the reason is

  • that by the time you get to a secondary amide,

  • that is where you have one R group on the nitrogen,

  • typically the hydrogen prefers to be transed [phonetic]

  • to the carbonyl group so it doesn't set itself

  • up as nicely performing ring structures.

  • You can still form chains but they don't tend

  • to form as extensively.

  • Secondary amides also have an N H stretch, so again what I drew

  • over on the other blackboard is the secondary amide

  • and typically you're talking about an NH stretch

  • from about 3400 to about 3500 and if you're hydrogen bonded

  • or about 3000 about 3300 if it's hydrogen bonded, so in addition

  • to these bands which are called the NH stretch bands,

  • as I said you also have for primary

  • and secondary amides what's called the amide 2 band.

  • The amide 2 band is an NH bend and that typically is

  • on the order of about 1500 to about 1650 and it may fall

  • on top of the amide 1 band in which case you wouldn't see it.

  • All right, I'd like to help us get in the habit

  • of the pattern recognition on these and start

  • to see the differences in these classes of compounds just

  • so you get good at seeing what's out there.

  • So let me pass out-- I've got some hand-outs here.

  • Let me send these down and we'll look at a few spectra.

  • You might need one more.

  • Send the extras back there.

  • All right, so this might be, might also be nice,

  • a nice time for a little bit of a question here.

  • So we're on the subject of amides

  • so we know we have an amide here.

  • The problem here, this was taken from a book.

  • The problem says, we have a compound

  • with a molecular formula, C6H13NO

  • and it contains the tert butyl group.

  • See if we can figure out the structure of this compound.

  • [ Silence ]

  • >> Anyone have an idea?

  • >> Just a guess.

  • There's a methylene group off [inaudible]

  • >> So a methylene group that's attached

  • to the tert-butyl group.

  • So we've used up our-- so what do we do with this?

  • So we have two spectra here.

  • We have one spectra in chloroform solution

  • and I'll tell you it's a concentrated spectrum

  • so this is-- you notice these numbers here

  • so we have one number at 3400 and another number at 3300,

  • so clearly, clearly we have at least one hydrogen bonded

  • at least something in our NH is hydrogen bonded

  • and they don't look quite like that

  • so is it primary or secondary?

  • It's got to be a secondary amide

  • so what do we do with the structure?

  • :6

  • [ Multiple responses ]

  • So it's CH3 and a tert-butyl and like so or the other way

  • and with this level

  • of information we can't tell the difference between it

  • and in fact this structure is the first one here.

  • Now there's one-- question.

  • >> Yes, so why are there two [inaudible]

  • >> Ah, okay.

  • So we have, so this is tert-butyl acetamide.

  • It's a secondary amide.

  • This is our free NH.

  • This is hydrogen bonded, so typically you'll be working

  • with like a 5 or 10 percent solution so many

  • of the molecules are monomeric and you see a band

  • for the NH stretch at about 3400.

  • You're also going to have some cases in which the molecules

  • or hydrogen bonded together like so either to form two

  • or more molecules and so the hydrogen bonded NH stretch is

  • going to be the one at about 3300 wave numbers.

  • [ Inaudible Student Question ]

  • For a primary amide?

  • >> Yeah.

  • >> They're a little bit different in size.

  • Usually the one that's the higher wave number is slightly

  • longer in length.

  • >> So how will we know if you have a high rate [inaudible]

  • and if it's concentrated?

  • >> Ah, okay so great question.

  • So what experiment could we do with this sample in chloroform

  • to determine whether the band at 3300 was associated

  • with hydrogen bonded dimer formation diluted

  • and what would you expect to see?

  • [Multiple speakers] The decrease in the 3300

  • or more specifically both bands would of course decrease

  • because it was diluted but the relative intensity

  • of the band at 3300.

  • [ Inaudible student question ]

  • Based on the spectrum alone if I looked

  • at this pattern here I'd say well this clearly doesn't look

  • like a monomeric primary amide because I said you'd expect it

  • at about 3,520 and about 3400 and it probably doesn't look

  • like a hydrogen bonded primary amide.

  • First of all this band at 3300 is a little bit high

  • and it's a little bit narrow.

  • Remember, I said typically 3180

  • but if you saw my steps you would sort of have broad

  • like an alcohol where it basically spanned

  • about 300 wave numbers.

  • So you might or might not be able to do this

  • with pattern recognition.

  • I mean, as you see more of these spectra you'll get better

  • and better.

  • Now what's happening here

  • in the solid state is you're only having the hydrogen bonded

  • bands so you're seeing just the hydrogen bonded NH.

  • Other thoughts and questions?

  • These are good ones.

  • >> Can you explain that little shoulder that's on the--

  • >> That little shoulder, right here.

  • >> Like you have a little shoulder that's

  • on the peak at 3268?

  • >> The peak, which spectrum?

  • >> On the second spectrum.

  • >> The peak at, the shoulder that's on there?

  • Probably different states of hydrogen bonding, probably some

  • with more hydrogen bonds for example,

  • you can have a bifurcated hydrogen bond

  • so it may be something like that.

  • It's something clearly that's characteristic

  • of the solid state.

  • Now we're dealing with and again this is what I was saying

  • for this sort of pedagogy of spectroscopy.

  • We're dealing with a relatively small molecule here.

  • It's only got six carbon atoms.

  • By the time you get to bigger molecules the relative intensity

  • of your NHs is relative to for example, to your CHs is going

  • to be less and this is where I said KBr is really bad

  • because you typically, it's hard to get out every last bit

  • of water and it doesn't matter so much for a molecule this size

  • but if you're dealing with a molecule say the size

  • of strychnine you're going to have almost ten times,

  • let's say five times the carbon to nitrogen ratio or carbon

  • to amide ratio so that peak's going to be a lot smaller.

  • You're really going to have trouble seeing it.

  • Okay the one other thing I wanted to bring up was just

  • about problem solving strategies on this

  • and I presume everyone's seen this but it's worth bringing

  • up the idea, so this molecule was C6H13NO

  • and the first thing you want to think

  • about when you're asking what's this compound is the

  • unsaturation number and you can do that mathematically.

  • In other words, how many double bonds and rings are in there?

  • That's an incredibly useful piece of information,

  • in fact molecular formula is probably the most useful

  • information that you can get for starting

  • with a compound followed by what functional groups are in it

  • which is why we're starting the course with IR and mass spec.

  • So there are a couple of ways you can do it.

  • Honestly, I never do it the way I'm about to write it.

  • The unsaturation number is the number

  • of carbons minus the number of hydrogens

  • over 2 minus the number of halogens over 2.

  • I hate formulas.

  • I don't even keep formulas in my head, plus the number

  • of nitrogens over 2 plus one and if you plug

  • in right that's 6 minus 13 over 2 plus 1 over 2 plus 1 is equal

  • to 1 which is one double bond of carbonyl group.

  • I never do things this way.

  • Basically, the way I think about it is

  • if a molecule has 6 carbons in it,

  • if it were an alkane it would be C6H14.

  • If it has halogens in it they just count as hydrogen

  • so in other words, C6H14 is saturated C6H13Cl is saturated.

  • Oxygens don't count toward unsaturation numbers.

  • Sulphurs don't count toward unsaturation number.

  • Nitrogens need one more atom in there one more hydrogen in there

  • to complete the valence,

  • in other words an alkane would have a formula C6H14.

  • If I go ahead and add a nitrogen it would have to be C4H15

  • and then I simply look and say, okay,

  • it's H 13 so there's one degree of unsaturation.

  • So that's how I think about unsaturation number

  • but then immediately you're saying wait a second we've got a

  • carbonyl here.

  • It can't be a lactam.

  • It can't be a ring compound for example,

  • we only have one degree of unsaturation.

  • I'll answer questions at this point.

  • >> Why is the carbonyl lower [inaudible]?

  • >> Why is the carbonyl lower here?

  • >> Yeah, is it-- ?

  • >> The hydrogen bonding, so the hydrogen bonding ends

  • up weakening the carbonyl.

  • What's kind of counter-intuitive

  • on hydrogen bonding is you can think of hydrogen bonding

  • as being an electrostatic phenomenon primarily and by

  • that I mean you think about your delta positive on the nitrogen

  • and you're delta negative on the oxygen

  • and you're pulling electrons away from the double bond.

  • You're weakening the double bond in forming a hydrogen bond,

  • in forming that electrostatic interaction.

  • Then you think about the NH stretching frequency.

  • You have electrons on the oxygen.

  • Those electrons are pushing the NH electrons toward

  • the nitrogen.

  • They're weakening the nitrogen-hydrogen bond

  • so that's stretching frequency drops to a lower number.

  • All right, so let's do another class

  • of nitrogen containing compounds and you'll notice

  • for the amides particularly in the solid state,

  • these stretches are a little different than alcohols.

  • I'll show you an alcohol in case you haven't seen it

  • in just a moment but alcohols tend to be less lumpy

  • than hydrogen bonded amides in the solid state.

  • They tend to be pretty ugly.

  • All right, let's take look at amines.

  • Amines are similar to amides but weaker

  • and obviously you don't have carbonyl

  • but in other words you have NH stretches.

  • You have NH bends but the bonds aren't as heavily polarized

  • and when you have less polarization

  • of the bond you have less change in dipole moment.

  • The carbonyl on the nitrogen is very electron withdrawing

  • so that increases the change in dipole moment.

  • It gives you a stronger band, so primary amines are NH 2.

  • You'd see two bands are symmetric

  • and asymmetric stretch.

  • The asymmetric typically is about 3500 free and about 3400

  • for the symmetric stretch.

  • In other words these are the,

  • I'll just write free here, not hydrogen bonded.

  • Amines don't hydrogen bond nearly as much as amides

  • or alcohols so in solution you're not going

  • to see them hydrogen bonded in the solid state or in neat,

  • meaning the pure liquid.

  • For example, sandwich is a film between self-plates, you will,

  • so a neat amine typically you'd have about 3400 and about 3300.

  • Secondary amines are 2 NH,

  • now you don't have the couple vibrations

  • so you see one band slightly lower in frequency.

  • Let's say approximately 3350 to 3310.

  • So when you're look at data

  • like this you're not necessarily going to have something scream

  • to you this is definitely an amine but what you're going

  • to have is this is definitely an amide but you're going

  • to be getting pieces of evidence

  • and saying wait a minute the data is pointing

  • in this direction.

  • A red flag is going up.

  • This seems to be consistent with an amide

  • because I'm seeing a carbonyl and an NH stretch

  • or 2 NH stretches and then you start to look for other data

  • or you perform additional experiments.

  • Let me give you an example here on an amine.

  • And so I wanted to just put contrast here

  • so I've taken both A, an amine here

  • and I'll tell you what these are this time.

  • This is butyl-amine and this is butanol, one butyl-amine,

  • one amino butane and one butanol and you'll see some differences.

  • So here's what we see for a typical alcohol OH stretch.

  • They're both neat.

  • The alcohol is hydrogen bonded, strong.

  • It's broad and again in terms of pattern recognition you sort

  • of see it coming up at 3500 and going down by about 3000.

  • The amine is weaker.

  • In this case because it's neat

  • and because it's primary we are seeing it hydrogen bonded.

  • I'll tell you secondary amines are often really hard to see.

  • They're often very weak and by the time you get to a molecule

  • that has more carbon and less amine in it they end

  • up being darn hard to see.

  • What's frustrating with secondary amines--

  • primary amines too but secondary amines in particular is often

  • in the NMR spectrum, particularly

  • in chloroform solution it's really hard to see that NH,

  • the NH band in the NMR spectrum so it can be really vexing

  • and if you're working say for your orals

  • and you know you have an amine because let's say you've carried

  • out a reaction, everything else is consistent,

  • the mass spec is consistent, you'll end up saying, oh,

  • my goodness I'm not seeing the NH resonance in the NMR.

  • I'm not seeing an NH stretch in the IR

  • and you might have to look really hard.

  • For if NMR you might want to dissolve it in DMSO which tends

  • to be a good solvent that avoids exchange.

  • All right thoughts or questions?

  • [ Papers rustling ]

  • So let's take ammonium salts.

  • If carboxylic acids are the ugliest thing you'll see,

  • ammonium salts are even uglier.

  • If carboxylic acids are pugs, ammonium salts are bulldogs.

  • So ammonium salts, the NH band is just huge

  • and misshapen is really the only way to describe it

  • and again here's my very simple-minded view

  • of an IR spectrum.

  • I'll put in a mark at 2000 here because I'll be drawing upon

  • that in a second, so for ammonium salts the NH,

  • I'm talking like RNH3 plus or of course you can have

  • like a secondary ammonium sulphur but basically

  • at about 3200 things come on

  • and you know you might see some CHs poking out

  • and then they'll come down at 2000 to 2500 so here you start

  • to inflect at about 3200

  • and of course then you'll have whatever else you have

  • in the spectrum but it's basically about 3200 to 2000

  • or 2500, very broad very ugly.

  • So one reason that this is so important to keep

  • in mind is one very common laboratory operation is

  • to isolate an amine by liquid-liquid extraction.

  • If you're teaching sophomore organic chemistry you'll

  • probably doing that, making a free-base

  • from a hydrochloride salt or taking an amine

  • into an acid layer and then taking it back

  • and it's very easy, even in a research project to end

  • up getting yourself fooled and think you made a free-base.

  • People will often use say sodium bicarb

  • which is just the bicarbonate or the conjugant acid

  • for bicarb is just matched to an ammonium group

  • so it's not a great way to free-base an amine.

  • You're much better off with sodium hydroxide

  • or sodium carbonate but I've seen this happen to people

  • where they get a product

  • and they say my amine doesn't dissolve in anything.

  • It doesn't dissolve in organic solvents.

  • Why isn't it dissolving?

  • I stripped it down.

  • I isolated it.

  • I precipitated it.

  • It's not dissolving.

  • It is because it's ammonium, an ammonium group

  • and that's something that would be hard

  • to tell by NMR spectroscopy.

  • If you knew exactly where to look you might say, oh,

  • the adjacent methylene is often chemical shift by a few tenths

  • of a ppm but an IR spectrum where you see something

  • like this, it's like oh,

  • my God clearly my compound is talking to me.

  • Let me show you an example and this is a cool one.

  • I pulled this last night.

  • I don't think I included this in the handout so I think I need

  • to give a separate handout.

  • [ Silence ]

  • We need to send a few more back here.

  • >> I have a question.

  • So when you have a primary amine and you said RH 2,

  • does the other have to be carbon or do the stretches change it?

  • It's like an oxygen.

  • >> Great question.

  • So the question that was just asked is if we're talking

  • about a primary amine what's going to happen

  • if we change the group here to like a hydroxyl amine?

  • It's should be pretty similar

  • because the first order approximation your reduced mass

  • is going to be the same for your NH bonds

  • and your bond strength will be very similar so your root K

  • over mU term in your harmonic oscillator is going

  • to be similar.

  • For specialized compounds like this, this is a great place

  • to look things up if you really needed

  • to know the exact frequency, the book you have

  • "The Pretsch Book" is really going for looking

  • at specialized compounds.

  • At the end of today's class I'll give you some general principles

  • of where to look for things because there's a lot of overlap

  • in other words, basically it doesn't change that much.

  • Heteroatom to hydrogen bond we saw all of our alcohols,

  • our carboxylic acids, our amides, our amines they're all

  • in that general region between about 3000 and about 3500

  • but if you needed something more subtle you could look that up.

  • All right, so the example that I picked here is phenylalanine,

  • so phenylalanine if you looked

  • at your sophomore organic chemistry text you'll see that's

  • the structure of phenylalanine but you'll also see

  • and not surprisingly since the pKa of a carboxylic acid is

  • about 5 and the pKa of an ammonium group is about 10

  • that you have an equilibrium that lies essentially completely

  • to the right toward the zwitterion and it might be hard

  • to see this by some other method but you've got this really,

  • really typically ugly pattern

  • where you're starting at about 3200.

  • You're coming through this lumpy region here

  • for all the different hydrogen bonded states

  • and in this case coming the down at about 2000

  • so it's really, really talking to us.

  • Thoughts or questions?

  • All right, I want to take a couple

  • of other nitrogen containing compounds and then maybe talk

  • about a few other things.

  • Nitriles are carbon triple bond and nitriles always surprise me

  • because I expect the carbon-nitrogen bond

  • to be highly polarized.

  • I expect it to be stronger and it really isn't.

  • The position ends up being very precise.

  • It's about 2250 wave numbers.

  • It doesn't vary a whole heck of a lot so it stands out it's

  • in that region between 2000 and oh,

  • about 2700 where don't normally see a lot of stuff.

  • It's sharp and typically it's weak to moderate in intensity

  • in other words, if you've got a big molecule

  • and you have a nitrile functionality

  • in it you'll see a little blip there

  • and it will be recognizable and sharp

  • but it won't be a big band like a carbonyl.

  • Let's take another class of compounds.

  • We'll take nitro compounds, so RNO2

  • or aromatic nitro compounds, I'll just draw the nitro group.

  • So we typically see two bands associated

  • with the nitro compounds, associated with the NO stretch

  • about 1500 to 1600 and about 1300.

  • They tend to be strong.

  • The one at 1500 to 1600 tends to be a little stronger.

  • What are the two bands?

  • >> Symmetric/asymmetric.

  • >> Symmetric/asymmetric.

  • Even though I'm writing one resonance structure

  • that doesn't mean there's one nitrogen-oxygen double bond

  • and one nitrogen-oxygen single bond.

  • There are two equal resonance structures contributing both

  • equally and so it's one and a half bonds a piece.

  • >> Is the asymmetric stretch always higher?

  • >> The asymmetric stretch is always higher in frequency.

  • It's just a higher energy stretch.

  • >> Same question?

  • >> Same question.

  • All right, so by way

  • of corollary let's see what you can do with ideas here.

  • So what do you think about carboxylates?

  • What do you think we'd see for those?

  • [ Inaudible student comment ]

  • >> It would be a little bit weaker carbonyl stretch?

  • >> You mean lower frequency.

  • Indeed it is and that's--

  • >> Is that because it has less of the double bond character

  • and more of the single bond character?

  • >> More single bond, in fact it's one

  • and a half bond character for exactly the same reason

  • as nitro groups and remember your reduced mass means you have

  • a square root term so if you're dropping your bond strength

  • to one and a half times is less your frequency is not going

  • to be one and a half times lower.

  • It's going to be like 1.2 times lower.

  • How many bands do you think you see for it?

  • Two or one?

  • How many think two?

  • Two for exactly the same reason so in other words,

  • you'll see about 1650 to about 1550 for the asymmetric stretch

  • and about 1400 for the symmetric stretch.

  • And again if you're thinking back to this issue

  • of making a free-base then if you're dealing

  • with a carboxylic acid and you're protonating it

  • and you're saying oh,

  • my carboxylic acid isn't dissolving in any solvent.

  • It does not dissolve in chloroform solution.

  • I can't get an NMR spectrum of it.

  • Why not? It might be that you have a carboxylate ion and even

  • if you dissolve it in DMSO you probably are,

  • since it's often you don't see carboxylic acids

  • in the NMR you're going to not be able to really tell

  • by NMR spectroscopy but you take an IR spectra and it's

  • like well, I know I should see a carbonyl for carboxylic acid

  • at about 1700 or just a hair above 1700.

  • I'm not seeing it.

  • Oh yeah, I see this funny band at about 1600 and you say, ah,

  • my carboxylic acid isn't protonated,

  • so again this is a case where IR really can shine.

  • Obviously we can't the talk

  • about every functional group known man

  • and if you're research project focuses

  • on a particular functional group so if your research project

  • for example, were to focus on making isocyanides say in some

  • of the Marine natural products you would probably go

  • to "Pretsch" and look up where the isocyanide functional group

  • showed up and then with when you're carrying

  • out the strategic reaction to introduce

  • that group you'd be able to look in the IR but at the same time

  • for reading an IR spectrum you can made some generalizations,

  • so here again is my little sketch.

  • I'll just put my marks at the key places I like to look.

  • We've already talked about this region here for NH and OH.

  • The region here from about 2000 to 2300 is an unusual region.

  • If you see anything other than a little bit of CO2 from breathing

  • in the spectrometer you probably should have your head perk

  • up because you have many triple bonds in this region,

  • so even though I don't know

  • where an isonitrile function shows

  • up I would expect it to be in that region.

  • You also have cumulated double bonds.

  • Cumulated means where you have two double bonds connected

  • to the same atom.

  • We saw carbon dioxide showing up in that region.

  • Another common functional group that's often used

  • in synthetic chemistry are halines.

  • Halines show up in that region as well.

  • I can't name every double bond but double bonds in general have

  • about the same strength.

  • You're dealing with typically elements

  • like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen.

  • All of those elements will give you a similar reduced mass.

  • So this region from 1800 to 1300 has many double bonds

  • in other words, your carbonyl stretches are there but also

  • if you're doing a project with emines [phonetic]

  • that would be the first place you'd expect to look for emines.

  • If you're doing a project with nitroso groups

  • that would be the first place I'd expect

  • to look for nitroso groups.

  • We've seen carbon-carbon double bonds in that region as well.

  • All right I'm going to mention couple

  • of more specialized pieces of information just as examples

  • of things you can see with IR spectroscopy,

  • so aromatics you have can combination bands involving the

  • carbon ring at about 1650 to 2000.

  • Those bands are weak and they tend to be a little bit

  • on the fat side and they often show up in patterns.

  • You'll also and you can be diagnostic

  • by pairing things have out of plane bends CH bends

  • at about 675 to about 900 and I'll just show you patterns

  • that have been documented.

  • I think this is part, can you check whether this is the last

  • page in your handout?

  • Two more pages, great, so the next to the last page

  • in the handout, so for example, phenyl groups are very common

  • and you'll see this pattern of four lines here

  • and you'll also see, so this is your combination

  • and this is your out of plane.

  • This pattern you'll see they look very different

  • than a carbonyl stretch.

  • They're much weaker.

  • You'll see this come up in a couple of your homework problems

  • in the four page sheet.

  • One of the homework problems says,

  • "Identify the functional group present

  • in the carbon-hydrogen oxygen containing molecules."

  • One of the molecules that you will encounter there is

  • ethyl-benzene or toluene.

  • I think it's ethyl-benzene and you will see this pattern there.

  • Another problem you'll have

  • which will be an interesting one is on polymers

  • and you'll see this pattern show up along with some other things

  • in that problem on identifying polymers.

  • So you can pick out different substitution patterns.

  • You could for example, pick out ortho xylene versus meta xylene

  • versus para xylene based on the patterns here.

  • All right, let's see, a couple of other especially topics here.

  • One thing that's really cool and again this will come back

  • to that homework problem on polymers,

  • so for CH3 groups there's a very, very,

  • sharp band at 1375 that's a CH bend.

  • That's the CH symmetric bend for methyl groups.

  • And remember how I talked about coupling?

  • If you have two methyl groups together you get a coupled

  • vibration so in an isopropyl group

  • or a gem dimethyl group you will see two bands one at 1370,

  • one at 1390 due to coupled CH bends symmetric

  • and asymmetric types of things.

  • That will actually help you in determining some

  • of your polymers apart.

  • The last thing I'll just show you for the heck of it

  • because it's on the last page of the handout

  • and then I think I'll wrap up on IR just one more sort

  • of special topic type of thing.

  • So hydrogen bonding, when it's enforced can be really,

  • really strong and so here we have the neat IR spectra

  • of two different isomers of ortho hydroxy-methyl benzoate,

  • the methyl salicylate and of the meta isomer and the one thing

  • that I thought was kind of cool is the difference the

  • between the two OH groups, so the OH stretch is at 3190

  • in the ortho compound and at 3370 in the meta compound.

  • So these are both hydrogen bonded OHs

  • but in the ortho compound you'll have enforcement

  • of hydrogen bonding through an intramolecular hydrogen bond

  • and that intramolecular hydrogen bond is really strong

  • and so you end up being even lower in frequency

  • than the meta compound where you just have intramolecular

  • hydrogen bonding.

  • [ Silence ]

  • All right well I think that's what I want to say

  • about IR spectroscopy.

  • We'll pick up next time talking about mass spectrometry

  • and we'll spend three lectures.

  • We'll start by talking a little bit about the theory

  • and the instrumentation and then some of the concepts. ------------------------------fcf221440058--

>> Today I wanted to discuss nitrogen containing compounds

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

ケム 203有機分光学講義 03: リングサイズの共役、電子吸引性基 (Chem 203. Organic Spectroscopy. Lecture 03: Ring Size Conjugation, Electron-Withdrawing Groups)

  • 61 4
    Cheng-Hong Liu に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語