Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Hey, Vsauce. Michael here.

  • When you call customer service

  • and hear this "to ensure quality service

  • your call may be monitored or recorded", they're not kidding.

  • Over the last year the Marchex Institute analysed more than 600,000

  • recorded phone conversations Americans made

  • to businesses in the United States.

  • Turns out, people from Ohio were the most likely

  • to use curse words - the 'A' word, the 'F' word and the 'S' word.

  • Washington state residents were the least likely to use bad words.

  • But what makes

  • a word bad?

  • Oh, be careful because etymologically speaking

  • even the word 'bad' can be considered a bad word.

  • It began in old English as a derogatory term

  • for an effeminate man. Eighty percent of swear words overheard

  • in public in 1986, 1997 and 2006

  • were essentially the same. One third of all counts included

  • the top two - the 'F' word and the 'S' word.

  • Slate's brilliant Lexicon Valley podcast purported that

  • these 10 words makeup about 0.7% of the average

  • English speakers daily vocabulary, which means

  • socially unacceptable words are used almost as often

  • as socially descriptive words. First person plural pronouns account for about

  • 1% of the words we say everyday.

  • When a bad word is bleeped, it is covered with a 1

  • kilohertz sine wave, which sounds like this.

  • Son of a ...

  • By the way, the symbols and squiggles that are used to represent

  • a bad word have a name. They're called grawlixes.

  • They were named by Mort Walker in his seminal

  • "The Lexicon of Comicana." He names a lot of things but most of

  • them show stuff, they don't hide stuff.

  • Why the need to hide bad words, especially if we all

  • pretty much know what's being said? Well, there is no one single reason bad words

  • are bad.

  • Steven Pinker in his excellent lecture on the topic delineates

  • five types of swearing. First of all, some words are bad

  • on purpose. They are created and/or used with the intent

  • to hurt others. He calls this "abusive swearing."

  • Using words to insult, humiliate, objectify

  • or marginalise disfavoured people.

  • Now, if that this disfavoured person is

  • God, we're talking about supernatural swearing,

  • which was particularly taboo in Victorian times.

  • It was believed that casually or vainly referring

  • to God would physically injure God himself,

  • literally. So, at the time people were forced to come up with euphemisms,

  • like "Zounds!" and "Gadzooks!", which originally meant

  • "God's Wounds!" and "God's Hooks!",

  • referring to the nails driven through the hands of Jesus.

  • Historically, swear words often came from things we were

  • afraid of, things we perceived as dangerous,

  • stronger than us and mercurial. Such as

  • death, disease and infirmity, sex

  • and sexually transmitted diseases, as well as body fluids,

  • germy, gross effluvia. Words

  • for those gross things became gross and bad in and of themselves,

  • uncouth

  • to speak.

  • But not all words for gross things are

  • socially unacceptable, which brings us to Pinker's

  • second type of swearing - emphatic swearing.

  • Emphatic swearing is where the taboo-ness of bad words

  • becomes quite practical. You wouldn't usually use those words but when you

  • really want to convey that your current emotions matter more to you than proper

  • social conduct,

  • you can use them.

  • Dysphemism.

  • A euphemism is kind, acceptable word that allows you to talk about something

  • unpleasant

  • while simultaneously letting everyone know you totally

  • get that it's unpleasant and want to respect that.

  • For instance, if you want to be professional, you wouldn't say s***.

  • You might say 'defecate'. If, on the other hand, you really want to drive home just

  • how unpleasant

  • the experience was, dysphemisms can help out a lot.

  • It wasn't a bag of canine defecation you found on your

  • front porch, it was a s*** bag of hot

  • dog s***. Both of these words refer to pretty much the same thing

  • but they have different levels of social acceptability and that's

  • very helpful. It means word choice allows us to not only

  • refer to things in the real world but also

  • to how we feel about them.

  • If both these words had the same level of social acceptance

  • we might even have to find new, badder words so as not to lose the power

  • language currently has to express

  • emotion,

  • repulsion and disgust.

  • But when it comes to two words referring to the same thing, but

  • with different levels of social acceptance, who decides which one's

  • good and which one's bad? Well, historically, many of the bad words we

  • use today

  • are the result of class differences.

  • In medieval England, the lower-class Saxons

  • spoke a Germanic tongue while the upper-class

  • Normans spoke a language related to French and Latin.

  • English, as we know it today, contains many consequences

  • of their differences. The lower class worked with animals and

  • from them we get animal names. The upper class

  • only ate the animals, which is where the names of the meat

  • come from. Today's swear words

  • are similar. Defecation stems from fancy pants

  • Latin, whereas the less classy s***

  • is Germanic. There's also idiomatic swearing,

  • where nothing is being emphasized.

  • No dysphemism is meant; instead, it's an easygoing type of

  • swearing that shows an atmosphere is casual.

  • Bad words can be used, we're all close here. It's okay to swear,

  • we're all cool.

  • Cathartic swearing

  • is a bit different. It gives us "lalochezia,"

  • the medical term for the relief swearing provides

  • when you're in pain. In the brain, swearing

  • seems to involve different regions than regular language,

  • which may explain why people with aphasia caused by brain damage

  • struggle to comprehend or construct spoken words

  • but yet are fluent at swearing.

  • Or why people with coprolalia control

  • normal language just fine, but involuntarily utter

  • profanity, an obscene words.

  • It turns out

  • swearing may be centralized in the limbic system,

  • along with the motions. Many animals make automatic

  • noises when in pain or threat to startle or intimidate

  • attackers, or to let others know what's going on.

  • In humans, bad words are great for this purpose.

  • Their taboo-ness makes them special. People wouldn't use them otherwise,

  • so they are great alarms. Swearing

  • is changing. Some bad words are being used more and more

  • frequently. Of the seven words, George Carlin said you could never say on

  • television.

  • Today, every second

  • 22 of them are sent out on Twitter.

  • So, what will swearing look like in the future?

  • It probably won't go away altogether, it's too useful.

  • But the words we don't like will likely change.

  • History has shown that as disease becomes less scary and sex and the

  • supernatural

  • more personal, words related to them become less taboo

  • and more common; whereas words that were common in the past

  • are increasingly unpleasant. Perhaps, in the future,

  • spurt not by runaway political correctness but by wider

  • knowledge, words like "schizo", "mental",

  • "aspy", or even "depressed" will take the square stage.

  • Or as John McWhorter ventured, words centered around class and the gap

  • between

  • opportunity and disadvantage will become more

  • taboo. Salt of the Earth, trash,

  • chav, pikey, urban as a pejorative.

  • When McKay Hatch started a "No Cussing Club"

  • at his school, his campaign became the target of so many online jokes and

  • insults for being lame or anti-free speech.

  • On his book, he literally subtitled his own name

  • "the most cyberbullied kid in the world."

  • People care about this stuff. Is it censorship

  • to tell us what we can and cannot say or

  • is it a safety seal, ensuring certain dysphemisms don't get worn down to a

  • quotidian

  • bluntness like every other word?

  • Or is that badness of bad words a

  • boundary, a moving boundary of we

  • reject - sometimes arbitrary,

  • sometimes irrational, but always moving in the direction of acceptance

  • moving forward?

  • Crime and inequality have existed ever since

  • they could. But when N.W.A released a reaction, in the form of a song with bad

  • word in the title,

  • "F*** the Police", the Federal Bureau of Investigations released

  • a statement against the song. It was the only time,

  • up until then and since, the FBI has ever issued an official statement

  • about a work of art.

  • Bad words have power.

  • If you wanna push for change you'll need something

  • to push. If everything's fine,

  • nothing's cool.

  • So, bad words are the precipitate of a larger

  • reaction - the process of us slowly becoming

  • what we want to become.

  • That's some deep s***.

  • And as always,

  • thanks for watching.

Hey, Vsauce. Michael here.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

なぜ悪い言葉は悪いのか? (Why Are Bad Words Bad?)

  • 6 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語