字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント hi and welcome to the Machine ethics podcast this month I'm talking with rod McCargow director of AI and PWC I met up with rod at PWC office in London and we chatted about modeling unintended consequences, AI ethics audits, working with dubious companies and intentions, what we should be teaching our children and future careers a recipe for AI future mitigating job displacement and other AI for good topics. If you like this podcast then check out the other episodes at machine-ethics.net or you can contact us at hello@machine-ethics.net you'll find us at Twitter, Instagram and YouTube, to support the podcast go to patreon.com/machineethics extended interviews reviews and more my thoughts on the episodes and AI topics and news of the month, thanks again to Rob and hope you enjoy Hi Rob thanks for joining me on the podcast thank you having week could you introduce yourself and what you do absolutely so I'm the director of artificial intelligence at PwC in the UK so our team is basically and tasked with applying the technology across the breadth of our organization on both internal projects but also working with that clients across all industry sectors on solving some of their hardest business problems as well using different forms of AI and a lot of the other things I'm involved with also involve working with governments around the world on the impacts on national strategy and policy and as part of our assets on the advisory board of the All Party Parliamentary Group on on AI amongst other appointments yes so it's been said that you're the nicest man in AI how'd you feel about that depends who said it well it's just first I've heard so on that point Robin to you kind of what is AI when you're talking about AI what are you talking about more specifically well I think it depends on the the audience that we're dealing with at the time and if we're working with clients across different corporate functions across HR for example and compliance maybe we don't necessarily get into a deep deepest of technological descriptions but for me I think it's a high level to differentiate from technology of old technology that falls into the AI domain of technologies that can sense think act and through an iterative feedback loop learn and they clearly sit as interesting bedfellows along more mature technologies such as robotic process automation for example but we tried to focus across the breadth of the main AI technologies but if I'm being candid the very first thing I do in any of these things is state that I keep the job title to get me into the room but the first thing I do is say they are doesn't really exist we have this assembly of really interesting technologies on the pinnate from machine learning and deep learning to natural language processing and generation and other techniques that make up this AI family yeah so so the AI of kind of science fiction doesn't exist necessarily but you've got this kind of suite of things which go under that banner at the moment indeed yeah great and we were talking briefly before but kind of how does PwC fit in with this how they're talking about a I and and what they're doing in anyway I guess as well well I think where right now is we've seen amazing breakthroughs of the technology in in consumer use cases in use cases of fascinating utility but not necessarily a huge amount of consequence on people's lives so there's fantastic things being served up through iron maps or movie recommendation engines and all sorts of ecommerce types of applications I think where we're starting to see businesses in for example heavily regulated industries healthcare financial services banking insurance et cetera criminal justice starting to wrestle with this technology realizing that this has a profound impact on their business they have to get moving on starting to embrace and adopt but by doing so this opens up this whole cupboard of new risks which I'm sure we'll get into over the course of the conversation today so for us I think because we're already working with just about every organization across the across the land it's some capacity are the auditing or advising them in some capacity we're often on-site there is the trusted advisor to help debunk some of the myths ology provide the right level of comfort and confidence around the tech and allow them to get started and start moving a pace with the innovation offered by AI so I see you a lot at these sorts of conversations that you mentioned the kind of what happens when you have these sort of technologies in those places in healthcare in the justice system oh there's something like top-level I mean obviously this machine at these forecasts and we took up a lot about this sort of things is there some of the things which you're keen on like things that you are interested in talking about in terms of those sorts of ethical issues yeah I mean I think be more led by the you know the explosion in these events that I get the privilege to go and speak at and and I think judging by the Q&A after them the two areas that seem to elicit by some comms severable distance the most interest and the most inquiry first of all I think is around the impact on the workforce through automation through human machine interaction and through education skills and future proofing of careers yeah I think that's one big category that always creates huge amount of interest and then anything else that falls into that AI ethics bucket is again of significant interest and and that's for me is is a fascinating area and as we start seeing this started to scale in in these use cases of significant consequence this brings a whole level of interest across the breadth of different corporate functions to make sure that people are fully conversant with the implications on their business yes II think it's really important that those business leaders are appreciate the technology and they might not have a low level understanding but if they're going to apply it then they better well know what they're applying yeah this this is now an absolute necessity rather than a nice-to-have this is a fundamental prerequisite for a four up for a executive C suite member of a board for example because this these specific use cases will more often not rear their head in their departments and I think the one that I found very interesting to look at and make sure that we're clear focused on are some of the the HR applications you and I monitor this the press and the media quite a bit around keeping up to date and what's happening and the ones that seem to constantly rear their heads like social media where we first met I think are are those sort of ones around recruitment for human performance type of monitoring systems and as a consequence you know people like HR directors absolutely have to get to grips with this technology and quickly yeah or and there's some stories there of how that's been negative or like done not necessarily really badly but like in a you know kind of good and evil sort of way but like dubiously something that maybe we don't want to promote thing and there's the Amazon example comes to mind about having you know promoting men in their CV machine learning tactics and things of that and because of past bias data than this little thing so it's really about getting around that sort of Missy misunderstanding maybe not the malicious use but like a stupidity in these high stakes arenas but yeah I'm a big believer that the substantial majority of people were configuring and deploying these systems are coming in with the best of intentions yes with with good values more often not but and we we I think we see where they don't always work out well they don't always leads to the best outcomes they often can lead to amplification of bias and discrimination for example and typically affecting vulnerable groups of they called us or all customers it is often because that there's not been the right mixture of people in the room to provide the right level of challenge and I think on the one hand we very well aware that there's a substantial issue around the homogeneity of the workforce you know it is very well noted that it's extremely white a male which there's a lot of great corporate ishutin cluding some of ours to try to address that imbalance but I think I'm also looking at the Disciplinary homogeneity as well and it's absolutely critical to out there are people in the room to give that level of challenge and and that go/no-go power of veto and for example when wherever configuring a specific use case in our team will always make sure we have the right subject matter experts in the room and and even beyond that in fact I've been talking about ethics and AI in business for quite a number of years now and I thought about it actually take some action on this and that we've just hired our first AI ethicist to the team months ago cool who we we know with the level of rigor we face as a organization and scrutiny we know that we're confident that we meet the high standards around data security and privacy around regulatory compliance around around you know the whole issues of risk and quality but specifically with regards to ethics that need to now think through not just secondary but tertiary unintended consequences it's now critical that giving people that power and freedom to explore investigates and model and challenge I think it is something really valuable now and and that's you know giving us that interesting new type of job they'll be talking about the jobs of the future what we've just created you know anyone for our organization so prove it's gonna happen yeah that's great they what's that kind of remit is it kind of like future rising or is it more like philosophy or people yeah this twenty word Lander in in the real life world of what's expected yeah which is actually that's what I mean yeah London in the kind of reality of what's happening on the ground I mean really we have the opportunity to meet some of these for a meet the world-class academics and philosophers and ethicists working on this and you know it's fascinating I've learned a lot in recent years but if you sitting there in business making random decisions to drive profit or to reduce cost or future prove the organization there's maybe not the same man you ship of deliberation that happens and if you think about ethics specifically with of course in this explosion of publication of new ethical principles in the last two years in particular I think at the last count we'd we'd come across the in excess of 70 if you add together the big tech companies the World Economic Forum the I Triple E the baking principles it having all these together yeah you've got a lot of material out there and we have reality of businesses going to be able to read all of those and discern which one is most appropriate for their particular geography and setting yeah and and acts accordingly and so what we what we have is we actually have read all these whole team on it and went in with a fine-tooth comb and built effectively a traceability matrix so what we can now be able to say to clients through what we call our responsible AI approved is okay we feel that with for the right governance in place around the project its had the right approach in terms of identification and the biasing of datacenters prior to training we're confident that it's appropriately scrutinized from a security and privacy perspective and for this particular use case it's got the appropriate level of interpret ability and explain ability now moving beyond that we can say it's got this relatively clean bill of health with the caveat to give you the confidence to move forward now there's a conscious decision to make as a leadership team running these projects to say what do we optimize this solution for is it to maximize profit performance is there a trade-off to be made that allows you to drive even further transparency into the system and you want to then optimize for fairness and the fairness today is fascinating I think even more fascinating than ethics there was a piece of work enough maybe you still could share the the link so you can share with you regionally we did a piece on this and we found that fairness is something that's constantly raised in all of these ethical principle documents yeah and the very high level ones are all very laudable and they stay on ethics so AI should be benevolent it should be good for Humanity it should be transparent it should be fair and inequitable eccentrics yeah but are you get to fairness there's in excess of 20 mathematical definitions of fairness so if you then just take that at all who's it fair to yeah you can't be fair universally to every single person in society yeah therefore do you have to define who it's fair to yes so when you get into those sort of conversations you can really make sure that the projects are proceeding with that level of rigor of conversation certainty buy-in and a conscious choice around what the project is is optimized to do yeah and there are sort of things that the our own ethicists will the ability to shape and starless conversations for our own projects and clients that we work with the fairness thing is really interesting I think that comes that's part of the ethical conversation because what you know like the morality of an individual like what is fairness to you does that actually warrior she told me about when we say fairness is a really interesting point if if a a company came to you and went oh this is so great but we actually trying to optimize for you know the the outcome the the monetary return and actually maybe the fairness is not on a high or an agenda well the sorts of conversations do you have there yes quite difficult I mean I think I don't think I don't think we've had them like that yet but I think it's an interesting question to raise alphabetically as as the market becomes more sophisticated I think there's two things there I think that there there may well get to the point where there's certain use cases and applications that it's simply not appropriate to go near the certain industries that might be more difficult than others to work with but I think we also have to respect the fact that to attract the very best talent the best talent want to be applying their skills to the you know the the appropriate use cases and with that in mind giving people the the right to to not have to time partake in certain projects is something I think that's getting slightly comfortable with yes oh and we've seen this haven't we in that last a year with how breaks of employee activism which i think is something which your organization's need to take into account around so what we want to be aligned with doing yeah and it's I mean for me it's look it's laudable that people who are taking these sorts of actions in the face of things which go against their principles they're you know internal I spoke to one of those people not so long ago actually who Jack Paulson I don't know yeah of young he quit Google because of the the arm stuff and one was the one of the first people to do so and then there was all this action afterwards so it's an interesting thing that's happening where people starting to take notice of how these technology applied and when it's appropriate to do so do you have any kind of like hardline ideas of what maybe isn't appropriate or having a specific yeah they think we've got for where it's kind of like you know a list of no go no go I mean personally this things that I you know don't feel comfortable with morally or that's or Thomas weapons for example those conversation coming back to that's a good point no coming back to your conversations that you might have in government with the AP PGA I'm do you have these little conversations about I mean obviously the general AI conversation has been hand there but do you have the kind of robotics conversation about where when isn't appropriate to use these sorts of technologies at the moment with the government you know what I think the thing that actually gives me a lot of optimism and and professional pride working in this part of the world around this topic is that we've got a really quite sophisticated community that's been active now for the best part of say two-and-a-half years or so so coming from the all party group I've been on the advisory board fastened to start that's then led through to the you know the the publication and the and the evidence taking of the house of all a committee with with law Clement Jones the the AI review with within wendyhall and drone Vicente and then now on to the AR set deal which is now led to this proliferation of new activities and the set of data ethics innovation the government office for yeah you know we've seen a huge array of quite tangible progress in the last two and a half years and for me that was counted number of times have been in Parliament you know hearing or giving evidence in excess of thirty maybe in the last a couple of years and yeah we've absolutely covered the broad spread of topics from regulation and you know geographical prominence and academia skills education ethics that the whole panoply of topics I think it has been well well looked into and some of these more contentious ones absolutely are are there yeah so you know in defense of politicians it's easy to guess sweep it all up and say I think I saw a tweet yesterday saying politicians don't get this actually reject that I think I think a number of individual ones that I've had the privilege of working with actually got a really good grasp of this so I think it's a nice case of lumping everyone in the same bucket here yeah nice great I was going to ask what the outcomes were I think you've nicely kind of well I think I think we as a not only have we seen the the launch of the the AR 60 I was part of industrial strategy and the launch of these new bodies you know the sense of data ethics of now you know publish their interim findings on a couple of key areas I would advise I think in criminal justice and I think the other thing is is how this now translates to the international picture and some of the best practice I think that we've started to put in place here I think he's being looked at with interest by a number of countries I get to go and visit as well and seeing how they can learn from other UK's doing this so yeah I think in terms outcomes in terms of international influence it I think it's been pretty well received yeah Matic Euler area so it's kind of a leadership role there that people are taking out of will it be something that if we put in together regulation in that way that people also take note of that well possibly and then taking it out of the AI out of the equation our legislative system and the legal profession is looked at by many parts of the world as as exemplar and many disputes are settled here for example so if we can map that across to AI then yes it's a good chance that must become one of the international benchmarks that people will try to ape the underworld awesome you did a TED talk a few years ago no two years ago no that's probably approaching two years here are phobia yeah and in that talk you you talked about your children and then that's very high on the agenda of the talk it's and that's how you tell the story of what a I should be doing in a positive way and you kind of glossed over this question but what is it that we should be teaching our children you know going forward in this for the future yeah I'm conscience fire I didn't know dispensed this specific times that I see the ends of fire I guess we only have like 70 or 18 minutes to shoehorn it all in and the time flew on that talk actually but um I think about it's a huge amount and I think the the thing I'm settling honest what you might kids now grow up and that the nine and eight and and three now it is there's so many of these reports we see dropping on an often weekly monthly basis you know there's gonna be explosion in the growth of both flows of growth in the need for phaser scientists or engineers get more people coding and programming you know gonna see exponential growth in this for a while yet so although forget all that we need to now focus on the liberal arts and soft skills and getting people focused on cognitive flexibility and emotional intelligence because the machines can't ape that and yeah you know that there's this there's plenty of arguments on both sides of the equation I think what I'm increasingly getting to the point of is just ensuring that they have an absolute joy of learning full stop whatever it is to a certain extent it doesn't matter I think maybe there are some core skills that are always useful and whether it's literacy and numeracy of course that debate mark or but but that the whole point of this is that the the formats and the assembly of careers in the future is going to radically change we we have done some research around that which you can talk about but whether it's some get a extra sense of jobs that change or you know it's a white person I think we can be certain it's people's career paths are going to look very different and one of the key requirements is not just education but this whole concept of learning how to learn and you're only going to want to constant continue to learn how to learn if you love learning yeah and been able to very comfortably pivot and adapt and change course at the drop of a hat I think it's just going to be par for the course for the workforce in the future so just an extent I'm not being prescriptive by trying to force them down a path that I'm just trying to invigorate and and celebrate you know anything that they seem to thrive off a particular month and not trying to sort of force them down a certain path because I think anyone that gives a very firm forecast about what's going to be in high demand in 10 20 15 years time well yeah I think they're smarter people than me right okay come on just we'll do a bet on it and just well I mean the first throwaway line up I uses is simply that we know that AI and and some of these techniques they do struggle with British sarcasm aha so nice people that can help and anyone leave they know there's another study I think but another organization I think looked at this that sort of AI explainer role I had to embed an in view technology with common sense and a real-world interpretation yeah so it gets it anything that falls down when you're faced with the kind of like hard English flat comedy yeah exactly right yeah great so we're okay for now I think so yeah I've got way to go yeah so you talked briefly about the workforce and and that's sort of thing in this conversation we're having about maybe how that's going to change in the future given you know the educational piece is there is there like a stark headline but you see though is it just kind of like you know over the last couple of ten tens of years there's jobs that never been known before like Kim I used to be a web designer that wasn't a thing you know 30 years ago and data science wasn't a thing more than ten years ago so we get these new jobs or new labels maybe found jobs and is is there some new jobs that are going to come in and everything's gonna be fine or is this gonna be this kind of precipice maybe that and that's normally the news angle they gamings head of the attention yeah I mean I'll follow the slap headlines and then walk back a bit against the nuance which the headlines never cater for okay so so the headlines I think if you look at the the the the most stark headlines around this probably the most influential report around this was the the guy at the frailes born guys at Oxford University who posited that 47% of jobs could be disrupted and removed by the work from the workforce in their 2035 time horizon the OECD zone figures suggest it could be a lot lower it's a 14% now that the PWC analysis we launched last year suggests we split the difference a bit and think it's about 30% of the existing jobs yeah now there's so many caveats to this of course first of all significant variance across gender sector educational attainment geography to start with then you're looking at the the other side of the equation which is around what AI we believe does in terms of driving the economy so another study we launched which was incorporated into the the government's industrial strategy was looking at the economic impact of AI so we did a global study and break that down by the UK which suggests that AI through first of all driving productivity growth but also through driving down the costs of goods and services and hyper personalising those services cease this consumption boost as well so the headline figure there was so we felt that my 20 30 a I could add an additional fifteen point seven trillion u.s. dollars to the world economy in that time frame in the UK we think adds about 10 percent of GDP by 2030 so if you have this fairly substantial economic boost as well that means through we think that as it drives down the cost of goods and services it also drives up labor demand so whilst you see certain roles disassembling and reallocating together with a new collection of different tasks and then through bias economic growth this new category of job potentially starts coming through so we think that if that happened and you see profound adaptations to the education system and you see employers for example and different institutions hardwiring this lifelong learning approach into inter people throughout their career not just at the start of their educational cycle we think we could mitigate and in fact neutralize job displacement with job creation there's many people that poopoo that they think that it's going to be much more pakka lipstick than that or it's not going to happen it'll be the same as previous revolutions but there's so many caveats in that and there's not much time on our side to start making those generational changes so so if rule this code like this possibility of moderate optimism about this at the same time as potentially the improving work removing gradually removing risk and danger from jobs the reassembly of highly cognitive tasks and and just making work good for larger numbers of people hey this can be debated all day long I think where we get to also is this other interesting debate around the shape of jobs in the future about where they're housed in the economy and something that we we had some fun doing last year was creating what we felt work four distinct worlds of work and thought what a quiz I'm going to share with you guys as well you know could you see corporates growing in strength so they have effectively bigger GDP than many smaller mid-sized countries do you see you know this massive disaggregation of corporates into a platform economy where the entire employee basis is on a contingent workforce basis zero hour contracts effectively do you see companies pushing much more into societal good and focused on purpose and environmental contribution so so you know did you see these different directions of travel and the way that people therefore engaged changes from simply that the nine-to-five permanent job contract forever a day and it resourced the entire workforce economy on the back of that so huge topics up for debate around this and and the people that attempt to be too precise but a fine a point on it I think sometimes don't always listen to the the prevailing disagreements on the other side of the fence and I simply say I think increasingly every time I've decided to become far less specific with my future gazing and simply boil it down to substantial substantial change is going to come it might not happen next year but a change will come because big change has always come at the back of industrial evolutions and we have a conscious decision about how we protect people in that process and and that is both the responsibility of governments of employers and to an extent individuals as well to be prepared they're not skilled and aware of this seismic shift that's likely to happen in the next 5 10 15 years or so yeah so it could be quite a nice seamless transition or it could be this kind of big coming together of being a big problem and it seems like you kind of have a good idea of how we can to get some of those things that you've looked at as being possible problems with a new saying the upskilling and life learning and the work there companies having more very kind of societal view and the government's doing some more in the education side of things so it's it's almost like you've got that you feel like you have the answer there well I mean I I've got I've got I've got an opinion that means that they get boxed into a corner too much and someone's gonna come take me to task in 15 years time but you know I'm on you know I know many people on different sides of the of this fence I'm carefully struggling and then if you've had for example Callum chase on the on the podcast you know he's yeah his view on this of course is a little different in terms of the possibility of significant technological and employability this very interesting developments happening with the u.s. presidential race at the moment with andrew yang the Democratic candidate is running on a basis of the universal basic income freedom dividend I think he calls it in his son and in his campaign messaging so that's interesting to see how that might come through and I think that he's a lot more work and research around how do we ensure that the the fruits of this technological revolution are are shared equitably across the broadest cross-section of society yeah I mean there's there's a response I have which is a personal response to that which is the the disassembling of capitalism right there's is that there is you you alluded to it earlier that there are companies that will have more you know turnover than a small country and so in the face of that and let's let's say that I think that's a problem and not everyone will grieve me there but is there a sense that maybe we should do something about the infrastructure of how we run our society is the the the commerce set that bit I think I think changes is absolutely necessary how that comes about and to what is that it's the exam question here so there's there's a great guy here if you've not spoken to you know on the podcast well I John havens who is the executive director of the I Tripoli's AI ethics initiative spoken to John John is great and so and I'm on the industry committee of that has been a great sir coming together of people across the world to put those principles in place and he's very much focused on this whole beyond GDP initiative for that's been the the stock measure of human progress or for many a generation now and appears to be ill suited to where this now goes how do we ensure that we have the right measures in place going forward that measure what he describes beautifully is human flourishing and well-being and all those best indicators rather than purely the block of economic growth by my country yes and there are a number of measures I think that investigation but it doesn't require entire rewiring and the focus upon corporate purpose and I see some interesting early signs there there's been some some really meaningful progress towards the interpretation and grasp of corporate responsibility embedding of purpose societal impact of corporate behavior very admirable efforts by for example at Paul Polman the outgoing CEO of Unilever around this topic and many much of this I think actually is driven by employees demands i think the generation coming into the workforce now want to feel that the lofty values espoused by companies genuinely are embedded and there's tangible action being taken towards that and you know for example we're very very much focused upon their carbon neutrality and and you know circular economy behavior of our organizations around the world but that's not certainly expect that to take place now so the signs but this is such a rapid technological shift isn't it it could come at is quite fast so yeah there is a need to focus minds on this and I think this for me this is why I mean a great hopefully your podcast reaches are quite broad cross-section of an audience and for me the opportunity to get this conversation out of the technology community all these kind of niche narrowly focused fora in to a mainstream conversation that is not just about frightening people with pictures of terminator you know front pages newspapers constantly it's like a drinking game you know every time you see a terminator or something like that in the news is absolutely right yeah yeah would you like to talk about anything else specifically yeah yeah this one area I think I'm quite excited about so for the that for the past three years we've been the the founding a corporate partner of what's been called the AI for good global summit just been based at the UN in Geneva and really the unity to start looking at how aie can be harnessed to help us accelerate progress towards achieving these sustainability goals is absolutely now a hot area we'll see some great applications there in terms of climate change with the number of reports on that happy to share some of our work on that so marrying up this technology is stove Grand Challenges I think's massive exciting empowers the staff it really wins hearts and minds over and we think can meet some tangible progress to move this with a dial on this as well so yeah the ARP good gender is really exciting for me I mean I think overall I'm much more excited about the the use cases that they put a requirement of explaining they're not ones that jump out on the headline but the ones that when you sit down and work through step by step and demonstrate the value they add aa third monthly valuable you know we're doing a lot of work around workforce well-being making sure the right people are doing the right jobs at the right time that suits their interests it means that their travels reduced and a carbon footprint needs increased but they're not stories that jump off the front page of the other top tech publications explained a lot a lot of explaining for quite some time so yeah the ones that I think are solving proper hard business problems and leading to tangible benefits and another SCYTL good yeah the ones that get me out bed in the morning nice and and those are sorts of things that you can communicate you know in your in your work as well to hopefully if we keep communicating the good side of things that that more good will come back and I think it inspires the next generation of people to want to come into this profession it's red hot is you know we're hiring people hand over fist we've just taken on in the UK 110 school leavers who were fully funding through university to build our AI workforce in the future so hopefully four years time I'll come out with no debt work experience and some terrific skills to get straight stuck into some of these interesting projects and and you know how we how we sort of demonstrate what they could put their skills towards I think you a really important selling point for business yeah great where were you 10 and a bit years ago it was I 14 years ago 50 yeah 15 year where are you 15 15 days Oh God yeah very long circuitous career path to end up here actually oh yeah I mean now you see with that sort of you know offer you know taking taking you know when I went for university oh around odd a bit the hand off if you could you know put me through university yeah you know fully funded with no doubt the end of its and work experience job offer great in the hottest area in the job market mister it's a no-brainer you did you did microbiology right yeah yes this testing the brain sounds interesting though he goes more looking at the the most horrific of profitable medical diseases madly so that was quite interesting but tipping you've could I mean that's fair lights but scientific so you must have led to you know possibly I mean standing that maybe yeah but I think having had a create much more focused on like that the people agenda and that's swayed me more towards that than the technology very candid yeah and so we're getting towards the end there's a question I always ask at the end the podcast which is probably somewhat already answered through our conversation but it's what excites you about AI and future and what is it something that scares you about that well this mr. Lester this shoot down this said that the fear one first of all shall we I don't think AI scares me what I think is really important that we get our act together with at the moment is the appreciation that yes there's some remarkably complicated long-range issues that some of the greatest minds are wrestling with with regards to existential risk the implications of artificial general intelligence and the singularity and AI safety in maintaining you know the issue and runaway intelligence fascinating stuff I love reading about with regards to how that matters to life today in business in society right now I think its wealth services hot that funding it can continue on but for me it's much more important to appreciate and demonstrate and illustrate people at you know in the society at large this is here it's already having profound impacts on people's lives whether it's a democracy or in their choices as consumers and citizens or in criminal justice or health care it's here it's happening it's making a profound impact today and therefore everyone has to now have start being brought up to speed about this participating in shaping how this is being evolved how its governed the standards around it and most importantly is providing access to the most diverse array of people possible to create AI that's fit for purpose to everybody in a positive way so there's a little bit of kind of like NIM enough to separate out the strands here of the longer range fascinating stuff with today and next year and getting me interact together around that now so so so it a part of that is is dispelling the fear and giving people positive confidence that this tech is wonderful if it's scrutinized and governed and trained and inspected and harnessed the right way it can solve amazingly positive things and just to finish on that positive note one of the things that personally keeps me engaged in this is the source of problems is now able to start solving so several years ago I I lost my very inspirational mother to one of the worst diseases possible which is motor neurone disease the terminal debilitating illness which is absolutely horrendous and the chink of light in this is that already this british-based AI accompany for Neverland a I'm I've heard of them again remember Mariners shields you might recall Cena speaking that they've already started making progress with their machine learning to start you know ingesting clinical studies at scale using that to identify potential new novel treatment regimens and compounds so in club discovery is really interesting around this field they can accelerate drug research you know significantly Swift a factor than the standard human research can do so all menteng the experts in that field to start solving really important problems that improve our lot in life and and rare diseases is one particular intractable problem that the system doesn't yet economically sustain and support the research into so yes for me it's less about how do we use this to sell more advertising and how do we harness it and hook it up and start applying it to the most important problems facing us is society at large yeah and we should be pointing ourselves in that direction nothing so yeah well Rob thank you it's fascinating at all control of your time today it's been a pleasure thanks left me off hi and welcome to the end of the podcast things get too rough for finding time for me in a schedule I think he's often out of the country so he had to slap me in two months in advance I think it was I think there's lots of stuff the executive kresk grew up further on I think maybe one of the things they asked about working with dubious companies companies that maybe are optimizing for things which are bad intentions or things which are more capitalist maybe in their way of looking at optimizing money over maybe social good that sort of thing I think we could have spent more time in there and I think that we could also spend more time on universal basic income Zoar what what future jobs might look like indeed but these things are all kind of hard to grapple with and we only had so much time unfortunately so so hopefully I find Rob in the future and tackle some of these things if you'd like to hear more of my thoughts on this podcast and some of the other news from the month in AI then go to the patreon patreon com4 slash machine ethics and thanks again for listening and please rate us on iTunes and wherever else you get your podcasts and hopefully see you again you
B1 中級 英 ロブ・マッカルゴと人間のためのAI (AI for Humans with Rob McCargow) 57 3 Lam Sze Hang に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語