Name: マンチェスター・シティのペップ・グアルディオラの最終的な後継者は誰になるのか？| サンデー・サプリ (Who will be Pep Guardiola's eventual successor at Manchester City? | Sunday Supplement | Full Show)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T09:39:49.000Z
Duration: 1 h 9 min 25 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

Good morning and welcome to Sunday supplement.

過去形

There was Maur, Veet or controversy in the Premier League yesterday.

Frank Lamp Pole has done the double over.

Joseph Marino will be discussing a big win for Chelsea.

It's our tester versus Angelotti when Arsenal face Everton on Super Sunday later.

But what impacts how the two managers had on their respective teams on in the final part of today's show?

We'll be discussing how the relationships between journalists and football clubs have evolved over the past few years, now joining us to discuss all these topics and a few more besides our Jeremy Cross, the chief sportswriter at The Daily Star.

Darren Lewis, football writer at The Mirror on Jonathan North Croft, football correspondent at The Sunday Times Don't forget to tweet the show at Sunday supper, and the best will play appear on screen over the next 90 minutes.

Also now, if I just give you one guess as to what is dominating about pages this morning, it's not particularly the rugby or athletics or even boxing, though there is a bit of that.

My Lord v a R, and there is quite a lot of it.

Well, the headline writers devastated that Jamie Vardy wasn't involved because that would have really topped it off.

But the sun has a bridge too far, the less also leg breaker.

As Frank Lampard described it, The fact that it wasn't a red card, it wasn't even a yellow card.

For goodness sake, we'll be talking about that.

The Sunday Times, which is Johnny North Crofts paper kind of making the point there.

That quite possibly maybe it should have been a red card, something that Sir Pgmol did admit later on during the game So soon.

Get top billing in terms of the beer, the V A R controversy in The Observer and a bit of football breaks out on the top there, with Olivier Giroud scoring for Chelsea and their win over top of them sour Cherries with warm earth and via off both Pgmol say they were the decisions in that particular game.

Something will be discussing best of city winning away at Sorry Man City.

Winning away at Leicester on DDE in the mail on Sunday Fury at V a r farce.

We've got a big red stamp on their via all the joy killer football.

James Sharp and Andrew Warshaw talking about football in the dock over concussions.

Sub delay because there was an issue in the Lester Man City game with being punched by goalkeeper on what should happen with that on Ali Holt's column.

Always worth a read at the best of times, particularly today.

If you agree, I am I allowed to say I agree with Implanted A dually completely agree with your a V A.

R is not perfect by any means, but it still makes more sense at the NASA in Bangor and his crazy idea, which was that?

Any parts off the attacking player being onside offside, Onside sees upside.

Now let's let's start by talking about this, because Johnny, it dominated football yesterday and we've still got another three fixtures today.

Well, I was at last the Manchester City game, and I've always tried Thio be a journalist that doesn't write about refereeing.

My brother's a referee in Scotland have always thought, Let's just try and focus on the match.

There's a really good game of football between last romance City City.

We're on more or less the best form, great possession play, lest of a really dangerous.

And moments have been lovely to write about that.

But, you know, there were three really contentious decisions involving the same V R that we've had who made a very contentious decision in the Spurs Chelsea game.

It started when James Madison had a free kick.

Kevin O'Brien basically puts hand in front of his face and batted it away.

Um, 20 minutes late in the second half, Good again.

Takes a short Dennis Pratt puts his hands up.

Most my evening on the train coming back from the forest game to Pgmol and in the view of the V A l.

Kevin deploying his arm was arms were tucked in on in an expected position for the action of jumping and protecting his face, which is allowed to do.

Andi says it looked like it might have hit its side first.

Not entirely short doted on that front, but was it natural position, or did he slightly push his arms out?

Well, it's a natural position if you want to put your hand in front of your face when the ball's coming towards it.

But I think I've always been a penalty since well began on that explanation from the P M r o l.

There's been there's been a sense ever since implementation of V R began.

I think that they've just been making things up on the hoof.

There was one the biggest problems that we haven't had a consistent vision of how it's gonna be applied for specific decisions.

Yes, they really felt like that when you had those two decisions which look very similar.

Different reasons for the prattle on his arms were further away from his body, weren't they?

Yeah, the prop one, he was turning his back on the ball and he had his arm out.

But it's not any less of a natural thing to do.

Then put your arm out in front of your face.

I think one of the one of the points is that way.

Because we thought that it might eliminate some of the inconsistencies and deafening on his Pep Guardiola's suggest ve ard's machine.

But the machine is run by human beings, and I think where we are is that we've seen that it hasn't eliminated any of the inconsistencies because human beings are at the heart of it.

So I thought, maybe that's always gonna be the way some I would question.

If we're no further forward, then is there any point to having?

I never really thought I would be sitting here saying that I wanted via when it came in.

I think you gotta move with the times, like if the World Games got, I think the English game should have it all that kind of stuff.

But yesterday was the first day I thought, you know, what if We're still going to get to the point where it's about human error.

It's a boat inconsistency that's always gonna happen when human being a place of ALS going through all the things that we've got to go through to get there may not be worth it.

It is only the first season they done that.

They've had it every week in the Premier League, thes officials who have learned their trade one way and now doing things differently.

And we're only in February in their first full season do we not need to give him a little bit more time for it to bed in and for the for the directives that come from P.

Manuel and ultimately from my fat for them to really seep in and become common practice.

And I think it's good that you've got the response and paid your bail.

And I think it's quite important that we don't use this for referee bashing because obviously they do have has always been said a very difficult job.

But there is a clear case, as you say, John, but it would appear that you just make it up as they go along, because within the space of 90 minutes.

Their position on the less also challenge had gone from.

He should have been set until for it the other.

字幕リスト動画再生

マンチェスター・シティのペップ・グアルディオラの最終的な後継者は誰になるのか？| サンデー・サプリ (Who will be Pep Guardiola's eventual successor at Manchester City? | Sunday Supplement | Full Show)

stuff

approach

situation

impact