Name: EXCLUSIVE!UEFA会長、マン・シティは禁止されているにもかかわらず、今大会では "資産 "として評価されていると主張 (EXCLUSIVE! UEFA President insists Man City remain a valued "asset" in their competition despite ban)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T08:58:31.000Z
Duration: 14 min 26 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

命令形

I never ever spoke with any of the members about the case, and I didn't see the case.

I saw the decision one hour before it was published, so I cannot calm in the Manchester City or any other case.

The initially said it was a flawed on a consistently leaked process.

As you wait for president, what's your response to that?

Independent bodies are independent, and with you journalists, it's always you say, don't touch independent bodies.

But when they decide you want us to comment the decisions of independent bodies, it's impossible and I really don't know.

They say that they are seeking an impartial judgment.

What are your thoughts on those comments?

They went to Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Have you spoken to anyone from Manchester City since the ban?

Only if maybe if they come to the finals where I come to a match at the Champions League.

How would you describe your relationship with the club at the moment?

I don't know the leaders of the club very well.

And I met the CEO maybe 45 times that of the different events.

But this process is a separate thing that I don't interfere.

Is that an option to you that you might get too excited out with again?

Do you expect the Court of Arbitration for Sport to listen to unruly before the start of next season?

Car to see as much as I heard, it's Ah, it's Ah big file, and I would have to ask our lawyers about the usual time off the decision decision.

Since cases like that, it's really impossible to say from myself.

You're a classic lawyer, your side staff.

You must have an opinion, knows that the process is not over.

So I'm experienced enough to know that if you don't know much about the case about the situation, you shouldn't have own opinion because I have my opinion when I know the case in and up.

You saw Manchester City's comeback against Real Madrid's What if they win the Champions League this season, yet can't defend it next season?

First of all, before Court of Arbitration of Sports decides, we shouldn't comment that.

But whoever wins Champions League, it's good any club wins.

I would like to see a fantastic finals in in Istanbul, and that's all I care.

Are you a fur up for a legal fight that's coming?

We professionally defend our position and I don't like that We speak about Manchester City only we, um punished 5 to 10 clubs per season.

It's let's see, it's financial fair play.

In its current form, fit for purpose depends what its purpose.

It was ah established toe to stop the losses in the European football and it was successful.

But in the future, I think we'll have to adopt.

Some things were already discussing about it.

It's a bit too early to share it with with you, but maybe we should modernize.

But when it will happen, I don't think very soon We will not even discuss concretely what the ideas are before they does.

The fact that you're looking at changes suggest that mistakes have been made.

I don't know if mistakes mistakes have been made.

The changes will be made if if if we will do it.

Because football is also changes as an industry, that moron more money's coming in, should we allow money to come in?

But what is the consequence if you allow more money to in Toto come in.

So it's not that we're changing something because it's not working, but the the purpose was met.

And now we have to see what we do about competitive balance.

Because financial fair play is not exactly competitive.

Balance people makes it from time to time and, uh ah, for competitive balance.

Probably we would need more and different measures.

What would you say to those who believe it has been the wrong way to apply the financial rules, it stifles investments into clubs which would stimulate communities.

It's hard, hard to say in a way, they're right.

In a way, they're wrong, you know, it's ah, it's Ah, we're also thinking about it a lot.

Is it right not to allow money to come in?

If you invest too much, then do you have to pay a tax on that and give it to the ones who can't invest and help solving the issue of competitive balance?

So it's it's it's a discussion that is going on, but it doesn't mean that you change the rules because the rules before we're failing you change the rules sometimes because you have to modernize because every industry, including football, is changing.

And, ah, I spoke with uh, owner of a football club who is also a big businessman.

EXCLUSIVE!UEFA会長、マン・シティは禁止されているにもかかわらず、今大会では "資産 "として評価されていると主張 (EXCLUSIVE! UEFA President insists Man City remain a valued "asset" in their competition despite ban)

字幕リスト動画再生

EXCLUSIVE!UEFA会長、マン・シティは禁止されているにもかかわらず、今大会では "資産 "として評価されていると主張 (EXCLUSIVE! UEFA President insists Man City remain a valued "asset" in their competition despite ban)

perception

process

tough

situation