Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS BEEN INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN

  • HAS BEEN INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS FROM THE VERY

  • THIS PROCESS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.

  • BEGINNING. >> OKAY.

  • >> OKAY. >> JUST READ GEORGE CONWAY’S

  • >> JUST READ GEORGE CONWAY’S TWEETS.

  • TWEETS. CHRIS MATTHEWS HERE, I’LL JUMP

  • CHRIS MATTHEWS HERE, I’LL JUMP OVER ALL THE GOOD MORNING.

  • OVER ALL THE GOOD MORNING. CHRIS, WHEN DONALD TRUMP WAS

  • CHRIS, WHEN DONALD TRUMP WAS STANDING IN FRONT OF THE LINE OF

  • STANDING IN FRONT OF THE LINE OF CARS AND HE WAS -- HE’S GIVING

  • CARS AND HE WAS -- HE’S GIVING HIS SPIEL.

  • HIS SPIEL. HE REMINDED ME OF ROBERT DUVALL

  • HE REMINDED ME OF ROBERT DUVALL IN "GODFATHER II" AFTER MICHAEL

  • IN "GODFATHER II" AFTER MICHAEL CORELEONE JUST GOT OFF.

  • CORELEONE JUST GOT OFF. NOT EXACTLY HOW YOU WOULD EXPECT

  • NOT EXACTLY HOW YOU WOULD EXPECT DONALD TRUMP TO RESPOND TO THE

  • DONALD TRUMP TO RESPOND TO THE NEWS.

  • NEWS. >> ANY TIME WE WATCH A CRIMINAL

  • >> ANY TIME WE WATCH A CRIMINAL CASE WE GET A VERDICT, THE GUY

  • CASE WE GET A VERDICT, THE GUY WHO GOT OFF SAYS I’M INNOCENT.

  • WHO GOT OFF SAYS I’M INNOCENT. I’VE BEEN.

  • I’VE BEEN. PROVEN.

  • PROVEN. INNOCENT.

  • INNOCENT. ACTUALLY HE’S BEEN ACQUITTED,

  • ACTUALLY HE’S BEEN ACQUITTED, HASN’T BEEN PROVEN INNOCENT.

  • HASN’T BEEN PROVEN INNOCENT. THEY ALDO THAT.

  • THEY ALDO THAT. I JUST TELL YOU, STUDIED LIKE

  • I JUST TELL YOU, STUDIED LIKE YOU.

  • YOU. I WATCHED THIS AT 5:00 ON

  • I WATCHED THIS AT 5:00 ON FRIDAY.

  • FRIDAY. CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON.

  • CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON. FRIDAY.

  • FRIDAY. ALWAYS THE DUMPING GROUND.

  • ALWAYS THE DUMPING GROUND. YOU DIDN’T HAVE 24/7 NEWS

  • YOU DIDN’T HAVE 24/7 NEWS COVERAGE.

  • COVERAGE. YOU COULD HIDE IT AND KILL THEM

  • YOU COULD HIDE IT AND KILL THEM IN THE SUNDAY PAPER.

  • IN THE SUNDAY PAPER. I THOUGHT THAT WAS SNEAKY.

  • I THOUGHT THAT WAS SNEAKY. THEN I SAW THE NEWS.

  • THEN I SAW THE NEWS. NO, IT WAS SHERLOCK HOLMES

  • NO, IT WAS SHERLOCK HOLMES DEDUCTION, THE DOG THAT DIDN’T

  • DEDUCTION, THE DOG THAT DIDN’T BARK.

  • BARK. NO INDICTMENTS OF ANY OF HIS

  • NO INDICTMENTS OF ANY OF HIS ASSOCIATES, FAMILY MEMBERS OR

  • ASSOCIATES, FAMILY MEMBERS OR HENCHMEN FOR COLLUSION FOR

  • HENCHMEN FOR COLLUSION FOR SUPPORTING THE INTERVENTION IN

  • SUPPORTING THE INTERVENTION IN OUR CAMPAIGNS.

  • OUR CAMPAIGNS. WHEN I HEARD THAT NONE OF THE

  • WHEN I HEARD THAT NONE OF THE KIDS REMEMBER NONE OF THE

  • KIDS REMEMBER NONE OF THE HENCHMEN, ROGER STONE, MANAFORT,

  • HENCHMEN, ROGER STONE, MANAFORT, NOBODY INVOLVED.

  • NOBODY INVOLVED. I GO WAIT A MINUTE, THERE’S NOT

  • I GO WAIT A MINUTE, THERE’S NOT EVEN GOING TO BE A HID ENCHARGE

  • EVEN GOING TO BE A HID ENCHARGE SOMEWHERE IN HERE AGAINST THE

  • SOMEWHERE IN HERE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT.

  • PRESIDENT. THERE’S NOT EVEN A STATEMENT

  • THERE’S NOT EVEN A STATEMENT ABOUT HIM.

  • ABOUT HIM. SO THEY DIDN’T HAVE HIM ON

  • SO THEY DIDN’T HAVE HIM ON COLLUSION.

  • COLLUSION. THAT MEANS THERE WILL NOT BE A

  • THAT MEANS THERE WILL NOT BE A CONVICT SHINE THE U.S. SENATE

  • CONVICT SHINE THE U.S. SENATE THIS YEAR.

  • THIS YEAR. THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

  • THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. I DOUBT -- I NOTE THAT IF

  • I DOUBT -- I NOTE THAT IF THERE’S A MAJORITY VOTE IN THE

  • THERE’S A MAJORITY VOTE IN THE HOUSE FOR IMPEACHMENT WILL BE

  • HOUSE FOR IMPEACHMENT WILL BE ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRATS.

  • ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRATS. YOU CAN MAKE A CASE FOR

  • YOU CAN MAKE A CASE FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. I MADE IT ON THE AIR.

  • I MADE IT ON THE AIR. IT’S ALL BROAD DAYLIGHT BEHAVIOR

  • IT’S ALL BROAD DAYLIGHT BEHAVIOR BY THE PRESIDENT.

  • BY THE PRESIDENT. FIRING COMEY.

  • FIRING COMEY. IT WAS A GOOD CASE FOR

  • IT WAS A GOOD CASE FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. REPUBLICANS ALREADY KNOW THAT.

  • REPUBLICANS ALREADY KNOW THAT. THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTING

  • THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTING IMPEACHMENT.

  • IMPEACHMENT. I THINK THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO

  • I THINK THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO WIN THE ELECTION.

  • WIN THE ELECTION. >> WHAT.

  • >> WHAT. >> THEY GOT WIN THE ELECTION.

  • >> THEY GOT WIN THE ELECTION. CAN’T WAIT FOR UNCLE ROBERT TO

  • CAN’T WAIT FOR UNCLE ROBERT TO TAKE CARE OF THEM.

  • TAKE CARE OF THEM. UNCLE ROBERT DID WHAT HE THOUGHT

  • UNCLE ROBERT DID WHAT HE THOUGHT HE DID WAS RIGHT AND BARR DID

  • HE DID WAS RIGHT AND BARR DID WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS RIGHT.

  • WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS RIGHT. YOU GOT TO DO YOUR OWN CASE.

  • YOU GOT TO DO YOUR OWN CASE. LOOK WE WATCHED KNICKS ON GO

  • LOOK WE WATCHED KNICKS ON GO DOWN ON EVIDENCE, THE JUNE 23rd

  • DOWN ON EVIDENCE, THE JUNE 23rd TAPE WHERE IT WAS CLEARLY

  • TAPE WHERE IT WAS CLEARLY INVOLVED IN OBSTRUCTION.

  • INVOLVED IN OBSTRUCTION. LEADING THE CASE FOR COVERING IT

  • LEADING THE CASE FOR COVERING IT UP.

  • UP. WE SAW THE CLINTON STUFF, HOW HE

  • WE SAW THE CLINTON STUFF, HOW HE LIED UNDER OATH.

  • LIED UNDER OATH. WE HAD HIM.

  • WE HAD HIM. WE LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, WE

  • WE LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, WE LOOKED AT THE FACTS.

  • LOOKED AT THE FACTS. RIGHT NOW THERE’S NO CASE FOR

  • RIGHT NOW THERE’S NO CASE FOR HIS REMOVAL ON COLLUSION.

  • HIS REMOVAL ON COLLUSION. THEN WE’LL ARGUE ABOUT

  • THEN WE’LL ARGUE ABOUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FOR A

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FOR A WHILE.

  • WHILE. THERE AGAIN, A JUDGMENT CALL.

  • THERE AGAIN, A JUDGMENT CALL. BARR MADE HIS JUDGMENT OVER THE

  • BARR MADE HIS JUDGMENT OVER THE WEEKEND.

  • WEEKEND. THE REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE THEIR

  • THE REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE THEIR JUDGMENT, YES, YES, YES, BUT

  • JUDGMENT, YES, YES, YES, BUT WE’RE NOT REMOVING HIM FROM

  • WE’RE NOT REMOVING HIM FROM OFFICE.

  • OFFICE. EVERYBODY WILL BE PARTISAN ON

  • EVERYBODY WILL BE PARTISAN ON THIS, LET’S FACE IT.

  • THIS, LET’S FACE IT. >> THE QUESTION IS, CHRIS, THAT,

  • >> THE QUESTION IS, CHRIS, THAT, OF COURSE, MAYBE HISTORIANS WILL

  • OF COURSE, MAYBE HISTORIANS WILL BE SORTING THROUGH, IS IF

  • BE SORTING THROUGH, IS IF THERE’S NO COLLUSION, IF THERE

  • THERE’S NO COLLUSION, IF THERE WAS NO IMPROPER CONDUCT, IF

  • WAS NO IMPROPER CONDUCT, IF DONALD TRUMP HAD NOTHING TO

  • DONALD TRUMP HAD NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT ALL ALONG WHY DID

  • WORRY ABOUT ALL ALONG WHY DID THE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT HIS

  • THE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA DURING THE

  • CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA DURING THE CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY, WHY DID THE

  • CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY, WHY DID THE VICE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT THEIR

  • VICE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT THEIR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA IN JANUARY

  • CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA IN JANUARY OF 2017.

  • OF 2017. WHY DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LIE

  • WHY DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LIE IN FRONT OF THE UNITED STATES

  • IN FRONT OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS?

  • SENATE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS? I MEAN WE CAN GO --

  • I MEAN WE CAN GO -- >> SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST LIARS.

  • >> SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST LIARS. >> THAT’S THING.

  • >> THAT’S THING. THEY WEREN’T LYING ABOUT TALKING

  • THEY WEREN’T LYING ABOUT TALKING TO RUSSIANS AND THE OTHER LIE

  • TO RUSSIANS AND THE OTHER LIE ABOUT TALKING TO VENEZUELANS AND

  • ABOUT TALKING TO VENEZUELANS AND ANOTHER TALK ABOUT TALKING TO

  • ANOTHER TALK ABOUT TALKING TO THE CHINESE.

  • THE CHINESE. THEY ALLIED.

  • THEY ALLIED. >> LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION --

  • >> LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION -- >> ABOUT TALKING.

  • >> ABOUT TALKING. >> THE WAY PEOPLE BEHAVE, THEY

  • >> THE WAY PEOPLE BEHAVE, THEY DON’T LIKE BEING INVESTIGATED.

  • DON’T LIKE BEING INVESTIGATED. WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN CLAIM HE

  • WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN CLAIM HE HAD ALL THESE WEAPONS AND THEY

  • HAD ALL THESE WEAPONS AND THEY GO HIDE IN A SPIDER HOLE.

  • GO HIDE IN A SPIDER HOLE. HE DIDN’T HAVE THE WEAPONS.

  • HE DIDN’T HAVE THE WEAPONS. >> HE WAS MORE AFRAID OF THE

  • >> HE WAS MORE AFRAID OF THE SHIA THAN THE UNITED STATES.

  • SHIA THAN THE UNITED STATES. I CAN EXPLAIN THAT A LOT BETTER

  • I CAN EXPLAIN THAT A LOT BETTER THAN I CAN EXPLAIN THIS, WHICH

  • THAN I CAN EXPLAIN THIS, WHICH IS WHY WOULD YOU CONTINUE LYING

  • IS WHY WOULD YOU CONTINUE LYING ABOUT YOUR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA.

  • ABOUT YOUR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA. >> TWO YEARS OF LOOKING INTO IT

  • >> TWO YEARS OF LOOKING INTO IT AND THEY CAN’T GET IT.

  • AND THEY CAN’T GET IT. I AGREE WITH YOU.

  • I AGREE WITH YOU. FIRST OF ALL THERE’S A LOT OF

  • FIRST OF ALL THERE’S A LOT OF PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THERE WAS

  • PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THERE WAS BACK AND FORTH MEETINGS.

  • BACK AND FORTH MEETINGS. ALL THE MEETINGS, CIGAR BAR AT

  • ALL THE MEETINGS, CIGAR BAR AT THE TRUMP TOWER.

  • THE TRUMP TOWER. >> HOW ABOUT THE MEETING ON AIR

  • >> HOW ABOUT THE MEETING ON AIR FORCE ONE WHERE DONALD TRUMP HAS

  • FORCE ONE WHERE DONALD TRUMP HAS EVERYBODY AROUND HIM SAYING OKAY

  • EVERYBODY AROUND HIM SAYING OKAY THIS IS HOW WE’LL LIE ABOUT OUR

  • THIS IS HOW WE’LL LIE ABOUT OUR MEETING WITH THE RUSSIANS.

  • MEETING WITH THE RUSSIANS. >> GET YOURSELF AS A JOB AS

  • >> GET YOURSELF AS A JOB AS SPECIAL COUNSEL BECAUSE IN THE

  • SPECIAL COUNSEL BECAUSE IN THE END --

  • END -- >> BECAUSE IN THE END THERE’S

  • >> BECAUSE IN THE END THERE’S MORE OF THAT ONION TO UNPEEL.

  • MORE OF THAT ONION TO UNPEEL. >> YOU CAN MAKE THAT ARGUMENT.

  • >> YOU CAN MAKE THAT ARGUMENT. IT WAS RESOLVED THIS WEEKEND

  • IT WAS RESOLVED THIS WEEKEND POLITICALLY.

  • POLITICALLY. >> WE HAVEN’T SEEN THE REPORT

  • >> WE HAVEN’T SEEN THE REPORT YET.

  • YET. THERE ARE PARTS OF THE REPORT

  • THERE ARE PARTS OF THE REPORT THAT SAID THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT

  • THAT SAID THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT EXONERATED.

  • EXONERATED. JOINING US FROM POLITICO

  • JOINING US FROM POLITICO SPECIALIZING IN LEGAL AND

  • SPECIALIZING IN LEGAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES, JOSH

  • NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES, JOSH GERSTEIN AND FORMER CIA DIRECTOR

  • GERSTEIN AND FORMER CIA DIRECTOR JOHN BRENNAN, SENIOR NATIONAL

  • JOHN BRENNAN, SENIOR NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE

  • SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST FOR NBC NEWS.

  • ANALYST FOR NBC NEWS. LET’S START WITH DIRECTOR

  • LET’S START WITH DIRECTOR BRENNAN.

  • BRENNAN. WHAT IS YOUR BIGGEST QUESTION

  • WHAT IS YOUR BIGGEST QUESTION THIS MORNING PERTAINING TO THE

  • THIS MORNING PERTAINING TO THE MUELLER REPORT AND ESPECIALLY

  • MUELLER REPORT AND ESPECIALLY THE ONE LINE THAT WAS QUOTED BY

  • THE ONE LINE THAT WAS QUOTED BY ROBERT MUELLER AND THAT THIS

  • ROBERT MUELLER AND THAT THIS DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM ON THE

  • DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM ON THE ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION.

  • ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION. >> WELL, GOOD MORNING, MIKA.

  • >> WELL, GOOD MORNING, MIKA. I THINK LIKE, VIRTUALLY EVERYONE

  • I THINK LIKE, VIRTUALLY EVERYONE ELSE I BELIEVE STRONGLY THAT AS

  • ELSE I BELIEVE STRONGLY THAT AS MUCH OF THE MUELLER REPORT AS

  • MUCH OF THE MUELLER REPORT AS POSSIBLE SHOULD BE RELEASED TO

  • POSSIBLE SHOULD BE RELEASED TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN

  • CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.

  • PUBLIC. WILLIAM BARR’S LETTER SUMMARIZES

  • WILLIAM BARR’S LETTER SUMMARIZES THAT REPORT AND--

  • THAT REPORT AND-- SHAKES SOME TANTALIZING MOMENTS

  • SHAKES SOME TANTALIZING MOMENTS IN IT.

  • IN IT. I ACCEPT ROBERT MUELLER’S

  • I ACCEPT ROBERT MUELLER’S DETERMINATION DESPITE THE PUBLIC

  • DETERMINATION DESPITE THE PUBLIC CALL BY DONALD TRUMP FOR THE

  • CALL BY DONALD TRUMP FOR THE RUSSIANS TO GO AFTER HILLARY

  • RUSSIANS TO GO AFTER HILLARY CLINTON’S E-MAIL AND MEETING AT

  • CLINTON’S E-MAIL AND MEETING AT TRUMP TOWER BY DON JR., LOOKING

  • TRUMP TOWER BY DON JR., LOOKING FOR DIRT ON HILLARY CLINTON, AND

  • FOR DIRT ON HILLARY CLINTON, AND THE REFERENCE THAT CHRIS MADE TO

  • THE REFERENCE THAT CHRIS MADE TO ALL THE OTHER MEETINGS THAT WERE

  • ALL THE OTHER MEETINGS THAT WERE TAKING PLACE, I ACCEPT THAT HE

  • TAKING PLACE, I ACCEPT THAT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO ESTABLISH AFTER

  • WAS NOT ABLE TO ESTABLISH AFTER HIS INVESTIGATION THAT THERE WAS

  • HIS INVESTIGATION THAT THERE WAS A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OR

  • A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OR CRIMINAL COORDINATION WITH THE

  • CRIMINAL COORDINATION WITH THE RUSSIANS IN THE INTERFERENCE OF

  • RUSSIANS IN THE INTERFERENCE OF THE ELECTION.

  • THE ELECTION. I THINK WE SHOULD BE RELIEVED

  • I THINK WE SHOULD BE RELIEVED THERE WAS NOT THIS ACTIVE

  • THERE WAS NOT THIS ACTIVE CONSPIRACY GOING ON BETWEEN U.S.

  • CONSPIRACY GOING ON BETWEEN U.S. PERSONS.

  • PERSONS. DOESN’T MEAN THEY DIDN’T DO

  • DOESN’T MEAN THEY DIDN’T DO WRONG THINGS OR UNETHICAL

  • WRONG THINGS OR UNETHICAL THINGS.

  • THINGS. ON THE ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION OF

  • ON THE ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, I THINK THAT REALLY IS

  • JUSTICE, I THINK THAT REALLY IS AN OPEN QUESTION.

  • AN OPEN QUESTION. AS WILLIAM BARR’S MEMO

  • AS WILLIAM BARR’S MEMO REFERENCES, BOB MUELLER SAID

  • REFERENCES, BOB MUELLER SAID THERE’S EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES

  • THERE’S EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES AND WE NEED TO HAVE A BETTER

  • AND WE NEED TO HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF EXACTLY WHAT IS

  • UNDERSTANDING OF EXACTLY WHAT IS UNDERLYING THAT STATEMENT.

  • UNDERLYING THAT STATEMENT. SO I DO THINK CONGRESS AND

  • SO I DO THINK CONGRESS AND AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED A BETTER

  • AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED A BETTER INSIGHT INTO THIS ISSUE.

  • INSIGHT INTO THIS ISSUE. >> TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE

  • >> TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S

  • ATTORNEY GENERAL’S INTERPRETATION HE WRITES IN THIS

  • INTERPRETATION HE WRITES IN THIS FOUR PAGE SUMMARY THE SPECIAL

  • FOUR PAGE SUMMARY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL DID NOT FIND ANY U.S.

  • COUNSEL DID NOT FIND ANY U.S. PERSON OR TRUMP CAMPAIGN

  • PERSON OR TRUMP CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL OR ASSOCIATE CONSPIRED

  • OFFICIAL OR ASSOCIATE CONSPIRED OR KNOWINGLY COORDINATED IN

  • OR KNOWINGLY COORDINATED IN RUSSIA’S EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE

  • RUSSIA’S EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

  • THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. IS THE WORD "KNOWINGLY"

  • IS THE WORD "KNOWINGLY" IMPORTANT THERE?

  • IMPORTANT THERE? >> WELL, I THINK IF YOU’RE

  • >> WELL, I THINK IF YOU’RE TALKING BEFORE, PEOPLE DO SOME

  • TALKING BEFORE, PEOPLE DO SOME THINGS UNWITTINGLY.

  • THINGS UNWITTINGLY. CLEARLY THERE WAS AN EFFORT BY

  • CLEARLY THERE WAS AN EFFORT BY RUSSIA TO TRY TO ENGAGING A

  • RUSSIA TO TRY TO ENGAGING A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY MAKING

  • CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY MAKING OFFERS TO SUPPORT THE ELECTION

  • OFFERS TO SUPPORT THE ELECTION PROSPECTS OF DONALD TRUMP.

  • PROSPECTS OF DONALD TRUMP. I’M GLAD THAT THERE WAS NOBODY

  • I’M GLAD THAT THERE WAS NOBODY WHO WAS ACTIVELY VETTING THAT AT

  • WHO WAS ACTIVELY VETTING THAT AT LEAST ACCORDING TO BOB MUELLER’S

  • LEAST ACCORDING TO BOB MUELLER’S INVESTIGATION.

  • INVESTIGATION. CLEARLY THERE WERE THINGS GOING

  • CLEARLY THERE WERE THINGS GOING ON THAT RAISED DEEP SUSPICIONS

  • ON THAT RAISED DEEP SUSPICIONS ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT AMERICAN

  • ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT AMERICAN PERSONS WERE ACTIVELY WORKING,

  • PERSONS WERE ACTIVELY WORKING, AGAIN WITTINGLY OR UNWITTINGLY

  • AGAIN WITTINGLY OR UNWITTINGLY WITH THE RUSSIANS.

  • WITH THE RUSSIANS. BUT BOB MUELLER SAYS NO.

  • BUT BOB MUELLER SAYS NO. >> JOSH, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S

  • >> JOSH, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S REPORT DOES HAVE THIS LINE IN

  • REPORT DOES HAVE THIS LINE IN IT.

  • IT. BARR’S INTERPRET JAFGS IT WHERE

  • BARR’S INTERPRET JAFGS IT WHERE HE QUOTES THE SPECIAL COUNSEL IT

  • HE QUOTES THE SPECIAL COUNSEL IT DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM.

  • DOES NOT EXONERATE HIM. I’M WONDERING THERE ARE A LOT OF

  • I’M WONDERING THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS THIS MORNING AS TO

  • QUESTIONS THIS MORNING AS TO WHETHER OR NOT BARR’S

  • WHETHER OR NOT BARR’S INTERPRETATION CAN BE TRUSTED.

  • INTERPRETATION CAN BE TRUSTED. BUT ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS INVOLVED

  • BUT ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS INVOLVED IN THIS.

  • IN THIS. THERE ARE A LOT OF REASONS TO

  • THERE ARE A LOT OF REASONS TO BELIEVE THAT HE’S WORK WITHIN

  • BELIEVE THAT HE’S WORK WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE LAW.

  • THE PARAMETERS OF THE LAW. >> I WAS DOWN AT THE JUSTICE

  • >> I WAS DOWN AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ALL DAY YESTERDAY AS

  • DEPARTMENT ALL DAY YESTERDAY AS THEY WERE GETTING READY TO SEND

  • THEY WERE GETTING READY TO SEND THIS INFORMATION OVER TO

  • THIS INFORMATION OVER TO CONGRESS AND IT WAS VERY CLEAR

  • CONGRESS AND IT WAS VERY CLEAR THAT BARR WAS TRYING TO HUG ROD

  • THAT BARR WAS TRYING TO HUG ROD ROSENSTEIN IN THIS LETTER

  • ROSENSTEIN IN THIS LETTER BECAUSE HE’S SAYING THESE ARE

  • BECAUSE HE’S SAYING THESE ARE DECISIONS THAT WE MADE JOINTLY

  • DECISIONS THAT WE MADE JOINTLY AND ASSESSMENTS THAT WE MADE

  • AND ASSESSMENTS THAT WE MADE JOINTLY.

  • JOINTLY. A LOT OF THEM ARE HIGHLY

  • A LOT OF THEM ARE HIGHLY TECHNICAL.

  • TECHNICAL. I MEAN SOUTHEAST THINGS YOU AND

  • I MEAN SOUTHEAST THINGS YOU AND JOE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS

  • JOE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS MORNING, THE FACT THAT THE

  • MORNING, THE FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT DID MANY OF THESE ACTS

  • PRESIDENT DID MANY OF THESE ACTS THAT SOME CONSIDER POTENTIAL

  • THAT SOME CONSIDER POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTION, IN PUBLIC, HE SAID

  • OBSTRUCTION, IN PUBLIC, HE SAID THAT WAS A FACTOR THAT LEANED

  • THAT WAS A FACTOR THAT LEANED AGAINST CHARGING THEM AS

  • AGAINST CHARGING THEM AS OBSTRUCTION.

  • OBSTRUCTION. THE FACT THAT THEY DIDN’T FIND

  • THE FACT THAT THEY DIDN’T FIND AN UNDERLYING CONSPIRACY ON THE

  • AN UNDERLYING CONSPIRACY ON THE OVERALL ISSUE OF WHETHER THERE

  • OVERALL ISSUE OF WHETHER THERE WAS COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS

  • WAS COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS IS ANOTHER THING.

  • IS ANOTHER THING. WHY WOULD SOMEBODY COMMIT A

  • WHY WOULD SOMEBODY COMMIT A COVER UP IF THEY DIDN’T COMMIT

  • COVER UP IF THEY DIDN’T COMMIT THE CRIME.

  • THE CRIME. SO THEY WENT THROUGH ALL THESE

  • SO THEY WENT THROUGH ALL THESE FACTORS AND SOME OF IT IS HIGHLY

  • FACTORS AND SOME OF IT IS HIGHLY TECHNICAL, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE,

  • TECHNICAL, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, THE BARR AND ROD ROSENSTEIN SAY

  • THE BARR AND ROD ROSENSTEIN SAY BECAUSE THE LAW HERE, THE

  • BECAUSE THE LAW HERE, THE UNDERLYING LAW ON OBSTRUCTION

  • UNDERLYING LAW ON OBSTRUCTION SAYS THAT THERE HAS TO BE AN

  • SAYS THAT THERE HAS TO BE AN ONGOING PROCEEDING.

  • ONGOING PROCEEDING. MOST PEOPLE THINK IT MEANS

  • MOST PEOPLE THINK IT MEANS OBSTRUCTING AN FBI INVESTIGATION

  • OBSTRUCTING AN FBI INVESTIGATION IS ILLEGAL.

  • IS ILLEGAL. IF YOU READ THE TECHNICALITIES

  • IF YOU READ THE TECHNICALITIES IN THIS LETTER, OBSTRUCTING AN

  • IN THIS LETTER, OBSTRUCTING AN FBI INVESTIGATION IS NOT

  • FBI INVESTIGATION IS NOT ILLEGAL.

  • ILLEGAL. ONLY OBSTRUCTING A GRAND JURY

  • ONLY OBSTRUCTING A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION.

  • INVESTIGATION. DID PRESIDENT TRUMP KNOW THERE

  • DID PRESIDENT TRUMP KNOW THERE WAS OBSTRUCTION ON A GRAND JURY.

  • WAS OBSTRUCTION ON A GRAND JURY. >> MIKA, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR

  • >> MIKA, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR DIRECTOR BRENNAN.

  • DIRECTOR BRENNAN. >> PLEASE.

  • >> PLEASE. >> MR. BRENT NARNGSNAN YOU SAID

  • >> MR. BRENT NARNGSNAN YOU SAID PAST YEAR YOU BELIEVE PRESIDENT

  • PAST YEAR YOU BELIEVE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S CONDUCT APPROACHES THE

  • TRUMP’S CONDUCT APPROACHES THE LEVEL OF TREASON.

  • LEVEL OF TREASON. DO YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT BASED

  • DO YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT BASED ON THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S

  • ON THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S LETTER?

  • LETTER? >> WHAT I SAID WAS THAT HIS

  • >> WHAT I SAID WAS THAT HIS PERFORMANCE IN HELSINKI WAS

  • PERFORMANCE IN HELSINKI WAS NOTHING SHORT OF TREASONOUS.

  • NOTHING SHORT OF TREASONOUS. WASN’T USING IT IN A LEGAL TERM

  • WASN’T USING IT IN A LEGAL TERM I WAS USING IT IN THE SENSE OF

  • I WAS USING IT IN THE SENSE OF WHAT HE WAS DOING WITH MR. PUTIN

  • WHAT HE WAS DOING WITH MR. PUTIN AS FAR AS HAVING A TWO HOUR

  • AS FAR AS HAVING A TWO HOUR ONE-ON-ONE MEETING WITH HIM

  • ONE-ON-ONE MEETING WITH HIM WITHOUT HIS ADVISORS PRESENT AS

  • WITHOUT HIS ADVISORS PRESENT AS WELL AS HIS GIVING VLADIMIR

  • WELL AS HIS GIVING VLADIMIR PUTIN A PASS DURING THAT

  • PUTIN A PASS DURING THAT CONFERENCE THAT BASICALLY SAYING

  • CONFERENCE THAT BASICALLY SAYING THE RUSSIANS DID NOT INTERFERE

  • THE RUSSIANS DID NOT INTERFERE IN THE ELECTION.

  • IN THE ELECTION. I FOUND THAT WAS FLOUTING AND

  • I FOUND THAT WAS FLOUTING AND TRAMPLING UPON THE ASSESSMENTS

  • TRAMPLING UPON THE ASSESSMENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

  • OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY THAT WERE NANCE.

  • THAT WERE NANCE. I STILL BELIEVE THERE ARE A LOT

  • I STILL BELIEVE THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE

  • OF QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED, QUESTIONS ABOUT WHY

  • ANSWERED, QUESTIONS ABOUT WHY HE’S LIED SO MUCH AND SO OFTEN.

  • HE’S LIED SO MUCH AND SO OFTEN. I DO THINK HE, DONALD TRUMP IS

  • I DO THINK HE, DONALD TRUMP IS CONCERNED THAT OPENING UP AN

  • CONCERNED THAT OPENING UP AN INVESTIGATION ON CRIMINAL

  • INVESTIGATION ON CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY ABOUT WORKING WITH

  • CONSPIRACY ABOUT WORKING WITH THE RUSSIANS WOULD OPEN UP A

  • THE RUSSIANS WOULD OPEN UP A PANDORA’S BOX OF OTHER TYPE OF

  • PANDORA’S BOX OF OTHER TYPE OF THINGS THAT COME PLY INDICATE

  • THINGS THAT COME PLY INDICATE HIM AND I THINK THE REFERRALS BY

  • HIM AND I THINK THE REFERRALS BY BOB MUELLER TO THE SOUTHERN

  • BOB MUELLER TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND OTHER

  • DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND OTHER PLACES DEMONSTRATE THERE’S A LOT

  • PLACES DEMONSTRATE THERE’S A LOT OF INVESTIGATIVE THREADS THAT

  • OF INVESTIGATIVE THREADS THAT COULD IMPLICATE MR. TRUMP.

  • COULD IMPLICATE MR. TRUMP. >> CHRIS, ON POLITICS I DISAGREE

  • >> CHRIS, ON POLITICS I DISAGREE THAT DEMOCRATS CAN WALK AND CHEW

  • THAT DEMOCRATS CAN WALK AND CHEW GUM.

  • GUM. BUT I TALKED TO A DEMONSTRATE ON

  • BUT I TALKED TO A DEMONSTRATE ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

  • THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WHO SAID THE FOG OF INDECISION

  • WHO SAID THE FOG OF INDECISION AROUND OBSTRUCTION STRENGTHENS

  • AROUND OBSTRUCTION STRENGTHENS THEIR ABILITY TO TAKE A LOOK AT

  • THEIR ABILITY TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE OBSTRUCTION REPORT IF

  • THE OBSTRUCTION REPORT IF NOTHING ELSE.

  • NOTHING ELSE. HOW DO YOU THINK THAT GOES?

  • HOW DO YOU THINK THAT GOES? WHAT SORT OF CAUTIONS WOULD YOU

  • WHAT SORT OF CAUTIONS WOULD YOU HAVE FOR THEM AS THEY EMBARK ON

  • HAVE FOR THEM AS THEY EMBARK ON THAT.

  • THAT. >> WATCH PELOSI.

  • >> WATCH PELOSI. SHE’S THE BEST.

  • SHE’S THE BEST. I’VE NEVER SEEN ANYONE CORRAL

  • I’VE NEVER SEEN ANYONE CORRAL MEMBERS OF EITHER PARTY.

  • MEMBERS OF EITHER PARTY. SHE GETS 100% TURNOUT.

  • SHE GETS 100% TURNOUT. MY OLD BOSS COULDN’T DO THAT.

  • MY OLD BOSS COULDN’T DO THAT. THE POWER SHE HAS TO BE FEARED

  • THE POWER SHE HAS TO BE FEARED BUT NOT HATED.

  • BUT NOT HATED. THAT’S THE TRICK TO BE FEARED

  • THAT’S THE TRICK TO BE FEARED BUT NOT HATED.

  • BUT NOT HATED. I WATCHED HER AND NADLER ON

  • I WATCHED HER AND NADLER ON "MEET THE PRESS" AND I WATCHED

  • "MEET THE PRESS" AND I WATCHED HIM VERY CAREFULLY TALK AS IF

  • HIM VERY CAREFULLY TALK AS IF SHE’S WATCHING.

  • SHE’S WATCHING. AND I THINK THE MESSAGE FROM HER

  • AND I THINK THE MESSAGE FROM HER IS DON’T BLOW THIS THE WAY THE

  • IS DON’T BLOW THIS THE WAY THE REPUBLICANS BLEW CLINTON.

  • REPUBLICANS BLEW CLINTON. DON’T DO THAT.

  • DON’T DO THAT. DON’T GO OUT THERE LOOKING LIKE

  • DON’T GO OUT THERE LOOKING LIKE YOU’RE USING THE METHODOLOGY OF

  • YOU’RE USING THE METHODOLOGY OF IMPEACHMENT FOR PARTISAN GAIN.

  • IMPEACHMENT FOR PARTISAN GAIN. DON’T GET CAUGHT DOING THAT.

  • DON’T GET CAUGHT DOING THAT. THE WAY THE SCORECARD ON THAT

  • THE WAY THE SCORECARD ON THAT WORKS IS UNFAIR IF REPUBLICANS

  • WORKS IS UNFAIR IF REPUBLICANS DON’T SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT IT’S

  • DON’T SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT IT’S PARTISAN BY DEFINITION.

  • PARTISAN BY DEFINITION. IF THEY HOLD TIGHT WITH THEIR

  • IF THEY HOLD TIGHT WITH THEIR 88% W-THEIR GRASSROOTS -- I WAS

  • 88% W-THEIR GRASSROOTS -- I WAS ON FIFTH AVENUE IN NEW YORK THE

  • ON FIFTH AVENUE IN NEW YORK THE OTHER DAY.

  • OTHER DAY. THEY ARE CRAZY.

  • THEY ARE CRAZY. THE DEMONSTRATORS ON FIFTH

  • THE DEMONSTRATORS ON FIFTH AVENUE ARE UNBELIEVABLE.

  • AVENUE ARE UNBELIEVABLE. END POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

  • END POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. ONE GUY SAW ME, I GUESS THIS GUY

  • ONE GUY SAW ME, I GUESS THIS GUY LIKED ME.

  • LIKED ME. THEY WERE ALL THERE YELLING

  • THEY WERE ALL THERE YELLING HAVING THE TIME OF THEIR LIFE.

  • HAVING THE TIME OF THEIR LIFE. I THINK THE DEMONSTRATE IN THE

  • I THINK THE DEMONSTRATE IN THE SUBURBS -- JUST REMEMBER, A LOT

  • SUBURBS -- JUST REMEMBER, A LOT OF THOSE PEOPLE ON THE LEFT ARE

  • OF THOSE PEOPLE ON THE LEFT ARE STARS.

  • STARS. NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.

  • NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. FROM MEDIA COVERAGE AND THE

  • FROM MEDIA COVERAGE AND THE EXCITEMENT.

  • EXCITEMENT. DEMOCRATS WON THE 2018 ELECTION

  • DEMOCRATS WON THE 2018 ELECTION IN THE BURBS WITH MODERATE

  • IN THE BURBS WITH MODERATE CANDIDATES AND THOSE PEOPLE HAVE

  • CANDIDATES AND THOSE PEOPLE HAVE TO RUN AGAIN AND AGAIN IN THOSE

  • TO RUN AGAIN AND AGAIN IN THOSE SWING DISTRICTS.

  • SWING DISTRICTS. >> THEY HAVE TO NOT WANT TO TALK

  • >> THEY HAVE TO NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT RUSSIA AND MUELLER IN THE

  • ABOUT RUSSIA AND MUELLER IN THE SUBURBS IN VIRGINIA, THE SUBURBS

  • SUBURBS IN VIRGINIA, THE SUBURBS OF PHILLY.

  • OF PHILLY. IT IS BREAD AND BUTTER ISSUES --

  • IT IS BREAD AND BUTTER ISSUES -- >> SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY, SAVE

  • >> SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY, SAVE MEDICARE AND DON’T GO SOCIALIST.

  • MEDICARE AND DON’T GO SOCIALIST. THAT’S THE MESSAGE.

  • THAT’S THE MESSAGE. SAVE OBAMACARE.

  • SAVE OBAMACARE. DON’T GO INTO MEDICARE FOR ALL.

  • DON’T GO INTO MEDICARE FOR ALL. >> CHRIS, YOU BROUGHT UP --

  • >> CHRIS, YOU BROUGHT UP -- >> BY THE WAY WHO GETS TAX WHEN

  • >> BY THE WAY WHO GETS TAX WHEN WE RAISE TAX.

  • WE RAISE TAX. THE GUY MAKING 150 AND HIS WIFE.

  • THE GUY MAKING 150 AND HIS WIFE. PAYING FOR COLLEGE.

  • PAYING FOR COLLEGE. THAT GUY AND WOMEN KNOW WHEN YOU

  • THAT GUY AND WOMEN KNOW WHEN YOU SAY SOCIALISM YOU’RE THINKING

  • SAY SOCIALISM YOU’RE THINKING ABOUT THEM.

  • ABOUT THEM. >> CHRIS, YOU BROUGHT UP THE

  • >> CHRIS, YOU BROUGHT UP THE CLINTON IMPEACHMENT.

  • CLINTON IMPEACHMENT. ISN’T IT SOMETHING, WE GOT IN

  • ISN’T IT SOMETHING, WE GOT IN OUR OWN WAYS WENT THROUGH THAT.

  • OUR OWN WAYS WENT THROUGH THAT. AND PEOPLE WOULD ALWAYS COME

  • AND PEOPLE WOULD ALWAYS COME BACK AND BE BREATHLESS.

  • BACK AND BE BREATHLESS. LINDSEY GRAHAM WOULD LOOK OVER

  • LINDSEY GRAHAM WOULD LOOK OVER EVIDENCE HE WAS IN A PURPLE

  • EVIDENCE HE WAS IN A PURPLE RAGE.

  • RAGE. TALKING ABOUT BILL CLINTON.

  • TALKING ABOUT BILL CLINTON. HE LOOKED HORRIBLE.

  • HE LOOKED HORRIBLE. THIS IS THE END OF HIM.

  • THIS IS THE END OF HIM. I HEARD IT WAS THE END OF BILL

  • I HEARD IT WAS THE END OF BILL CLINTON A THOUSAND TIMES.

  • CLINTON A THOUSAND TIMES. AND MIKA WILL TELL YOU

  • AND MIKA WILL TELL YOU THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE PROCESS,

  • THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, I SAID TO HER ALL ALONG WHEN

  • I SAID TO HER ALL ALONG WHEN SOMEBODY WOULD GO THEY ARE GOING

  • SOMEBODY WOULD GO THEY ARE GOING TO GET TRUMP.

  • TO GET TRUMP. I GO NOPE.

  • I GO NOPE. NOPE.

  • NOPE. >> THAT’S TRUE DE.

  • >> THAT’S TRUE DE. >> THERE’S A REPLAY OF CLINTON.

  • >> THERE’S A REPLAY OF CLINTON. ALWAYS -- IT ALWAYS SEEMS A LOT

  • ALWAYS -- IT ALWAYS SEEMS A LOT EASIER THAN IT IS, THEY ARE NOT

  • EASIER THAN IT IS, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO GET HIM.

  • GOING TO GET HIM. THERE ARE SO MANY PARALLELS,

  • THERE ARE SO MANY PARALLELS, EXCEPT YOU JUST CHANGE THE

  • EXCEPT YOU JUST CHANGE THE PARTIES.

  • PARTIES. >> YES.

  • >> YES. SELF-PROPELLED BELIEF.

  • SELF-PROPELLED BELIEF. >> SELF-PROPELLED BELIEF BY THE

  • >> SELF-PROPELLED BELIEF BY THE REPUBLICANS.

  • REPUBLICANS. >> TEETHICAL STUFF AND SEXUAL

  • >> TEETHICAL STUFF AND SEXUAL STUFF WHICH EVERYBODY IS TWO

  • STUFF WHICH EVERYBODY IS TWO FACED ABOUT.

  • FACED ABOUT. EVERYBODY.

  • EVERYBODY. YOU GET DEMOCRATS LAY OFF THE

  • YOU GET DEMOCRATS LAY OFF THE GUY.

  • GUY. MOVE ON.

  • MOVE ON. MOVEON.ORG DON’T TALK ABOUT THE

  • MOVEON.ORG DON’T TALK ABOUT THE SEX ANY MORE.

  • SEX ANY MORE. NOW IT’S THE PAYOFFS TO WOMEN.

  • NOW IT’S THE PAYOFFS TO WOMEN. PEOPLE HAVE FLIPPED 180 ON EVERY

  • PEOPLE HAVE FLIPPED 180 ON EVERY ARGUMENT.

  • ARGUMENT. YOU WERE TOUGH ON CLINTON.

  • YOU WERE TOUGH ON CLINTON. I WAS TOUGH ON CLINTON.

  • I WAS TOUGH ON CLINTON. I HAVE BEEN CONSISTENT ON THIS.

  • I HAVE BEEN CONSISTENT ON THIS. I DO THINK THE EVIDENCE OUR JOB

  • I DO THINK THE EVIDENCE OUR JOB IS NEWS FIRST, ANALYSIS SECOND

  • IS NEWS FIRST, ANALYSIS SECOND AND OPINION THIRD.

  • AND OPINION THIRD. ALL THREE OF THEM ARE JOBS.

  • ALL THREE OF THEM ARE JOBS. IF YOU DON’T DO THEM YOU DON’T

  • IF YOU DON’T DO THEM YOU DON’T HAVE A JOB.

  • HAVE A JOB. PEP WANT YOUR OPINION.

  • PEP WANT YOUR OPINION. FIRST THING THEY WANT IS THE

  • FIRST THING THEY WANT IS THE NEWS.

  • NEWS. THE NEWS IS TRUMP WON THIS

  • THE NEWS IS TRUMP WON THIS WEEKEND.

  • WEEKEND. >> THAT’S THE NEWS, MIKE

  • >> THAT’S THE NEWS, MIKE BARNICLE.

  • BARNICLE. >> HOLD ON A SECOND HE WON THE

  • >> HOLD ON A SECOND HE WON THE NEWS CYCLE, HE WON THE PR

  • NEWS CYCLE, HE WON THE PR BATTLE, HE WON THE BRANDING

  • BATTLE, HE WON THE BRANDING EXERCISE.

  • EXERCISE. WE DON’T KNOW WHAT’S IN THIS

  • WE DON’T KNOW WHAT’S IN THIS REPORT.

  • REPORT. >> THAT’S RIGHT.

  • >> THAT’S RIGHT. >> MIKE BARNICLE, LOOK AT THAT

  • >> MIKE BARNICLE, LOOK AT THAT HEADLINE.

  • HEADLINE. I WOULD ARGUE THAT HE NOT ONLY

  • I WOULD ARGUE THAT HE NOT ONLY WON THIS WEEK.

  • WON THIS WEEK. >> "WASHINGTON POST".

  • >> "WASHINGTON POST". >> "THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS"

  • >> "THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS" REPORTS NO COLLUSION AND FOR

  • REPORTS NO COLLUSION AND FOR DONALD TRUMP THAT’S NOT ABOUT

  • DONALD TRUMP THAT’S NOT ABOUT THIS NEWS CYCLE, THAT’S NOT

  • THIS NEWS CYCLE, THAT’S NOT ABOUT HIS SPEECH THIS WEEK, THAT

  • ABOUT HIS SPEECH THIS WEEK, THAT IS HIS CLOSING ARGUMENT IN 2020.

  • IS HIS CLOSING ARGUMENT IN 2020. THE DEMOCRATS TRIED TO COME

  • THE DEMOCRATS TRIED TO COME AFTER ME BECAUSE I’M A

  • AFTER ME BECAUSE I’M A DISRUPTER.

  • DISRUPTER. THE PRESS LIED ABOUT ME BECAUSE

  • THE PRESS LIED ABOUT ME BECAUSE I’M A DISRUPTER.

  • I’M A DISRUPTER. I’M NOT IN THEIR LITTLE CLUB.

  • I’M NOT IN THEIR LITTLE CLUB. >> IT’S A WITCH-HUNT.

  • >> IT’S A WITCH-HUNT. >> THEY PUT, WHAT ARE THE

  • >> THEY PUT, WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS, 500, 2,000 --

  • NUMBERS, 500, 2,000 -- >> IT’S LONG REPORT.

  • >> IT’S LONG REPORT. >> 2020 IS A LONG WAY AWAY.

  • >> 2020 IS A LONG WAY AWAY. THIS IS A MOMENT POLITICALLY FOR

  • THIS IS A MOMENT POLITICALLY FOR A DEMOCRAT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT

  • A DEMOCRAT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT SO STEP UP AND TALK TO THEIR

  • SO STEP UP AND TALK TO THEIR PARTY AND MOUNT A NEW ARGUMENT

  • PARTY AND MOUNT A NEW ARGUMENT IN A POST-BARR LETTER WORLD.

  • IN A POST-BARR LETTER WORLD. THE SPEAKER PELOSI IS THE

  • THE SPEAKER PELOSI IS THE STRATEGIST.

  • STRATEGIST. THEY ARE GOING AROUND IOWA AND

  • THEY ARE GOING AROUND IOWA AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

  • NEW HAMPSHIRE. WHO WILL HAVE A NATIONAL MESSAGE

  • WHO WILL HAVE A NATIONAL MESSAGE OF HOW TO TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP.

  • OF HOW TO TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP. >> THAT’S IT.

  • >> THAT’S IT. >> THAT’S THE QUESTION.

  • >> THAT’S THE QUESTION. MIKE BARNICLE.

  • MIKE BARNICLE. >> THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND,

  • >> THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA INDICATED HE HAS A

  • INDIANA INDICATED HE HAS A NATIONAL MESSAGE ON THAT.

  • NATIONAL MESSAGE ON THAT. THAT HEADLINE, YOU KNOW, I AGREE

  • THAT HEADLINE, YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH JOHN BRENNAN, THAT HEADLINE

  • WITH JOHN BRENNAN, THAT HEADLINE IS KIND OF -- A LOT OF PEOPLE

  • IS KIND OF -- A LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T WANT TO HEAR THIS, IT’S

  • DON’T WANT TO HEAR THIS, IT’S GOOD NEWS FOR THE COUNTRY

  • GOOD NEWS FOR THE COUNTRY BECAUSE BASICALLY IT SAYS THE

  • BECAUSE BASICALLY IT SAYS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

  • PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS NOT GUILTY OF TREASON.

  • IS NOT GUILTY OF TREASON. THAT’S ALWAYS A GOOD THING.

  • THAT’S ALWAYS A GOOD THING. >> THAT’S A GOOD DAY.

  • >> THAT’S A GOOD DAY. >> BUT, JOSH, LET ME ASK YOU

  • >> BUT, JOSH, LET ME ASK YOU WITH REGARD TO THE REST OF THE

  • WITH REGARD TO THE REST OF THE REPORT AND WE ONLY HAVE

  • REPORT AND WE ONLY HAVE FRAGMENTS OF IT SO IN ESSENCE

  • FRAGMENTS OF IT SO IN ESSENCE WE’RE ALL FLYING BLIND ON WHAT

  • WE’RE ALL FLYING BLIND ON WHAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR IS TALKING

  • ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR IS TALKING ABOUT, BUT ONE OF THE ELEMENTS

  • ABOUT, BUT ONE OF THE ELEMENTS IN THE LACK OF A SPECIFIC CHARGE

  • IN THE LACK OF A SPECIFIC CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION IN THE REPORT

  • OF OBSTRUCTION IN THE REPORT AND, AGAIN, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT

  • AND, AGAIN, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT WOULD LEAD UP TO BOB MUELLER’S

  • WOULD LEAD UP TO BOB MUELLER’S DESCRIPTION OF WHY THEY DIDN’T

  • DESCRIPTION OF WHY THEY DIDN’T WANT TO GO FORWARD WITH

  • WANT TO GO FORWARD WITH OBSTRUCTION.

  • OBSTRUCTION. HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK IT

  • HOW IMPORTANT DO YOU THINK IT WAS IN TERMS OF REASONING WHAT

  • WAS IN TERMS OF REASONING WHAT HE CAME TO WAS THE FACT THAT

  • HE CAME TO WAS THE FACT THAT THERE WAS NO SWORN SIT DOWN

  • THERE WAS NO SWORN SIT DOWN TESTIMONY AS TO STATE OF MIND BY

  • TESTIMONY AS TO STATE OF MIND BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED

  • THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WITH MUELLER AND HIS

  • STATES WITH MUELLER AND HIS INVESTIGATORS?

  • INVESTIGATORS? >> WELL, I THINK THAT WAS

  • >> WELL, I THINK THAT WAS IMPORTANT.

  • IMPORTANT. AND IT’S HARD TO SEE HOW YOU CAN

  • AND IT’S HARD TO SEE HOW YOU CAN MAKE A CASE WITHOUT THAT KIND OF

  • MAKE A CASE WITHOUT THAT KIND OF INFORMATION.

  • INFORMATION. ON THE OTHER HAND, IT SEEMS LIKE

  • ON THE OTHER HAND, IT SEEMS LIKE THAT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.

  • THAT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. AND IT DOESN’T HAPPEN IN MOST

  • AND IT DOESN’T HAPPEN IN MOST CASES.

  • CASES. I MEAN THE PRESIDENT -- THERE

  • I MEAN THE PRESIDENT -- THERE WAS A LOT OF TALK ABOUT

  • WAS A LOT OF TALK ABOUT DIFFERENT ISSUES HE COULD RAISE

  • DIFFERENT ISSUES HE COULD RAISE TO BLOCK THAT KIND OF TESTIMONY,

  • TO BLOCK THAT KIND OF TESTIMONY, BUT HE ALWAYS COULD HAVE TAKEN

  • BUT HE ALWAYS COULD HAVE TAKEN THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.

  • THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. PEOPLE SAY OH, THAT’S

  • PEOPLE SAY OH, THAT’S POLITICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

  • POLITICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. ABOUT 20 THINGS THAT ARE

  • ABOUT 20 THINGS THAT ARE POLITICALLY IMPOSSIBLE HAVE

  • POLITICALLY IMPOSSIBLE HAVE HAPPENED.

  • HAPPENED. SO I THINK PART OF WHAT’S

  • SO I THINK PART OF WHAT’S HAPPENED HERE WITH BARR IS THAT

  • HAPPENED HERE WITH BARR IS THAT HE’S TAKEN OUT KIND OF A BALLOON

  • HE’S TAKEN OUT KIND OF A BALLOON MORTGAGE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION,

  • MORTGAGE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION, RIGHT?

  • RIGHT? HE’S COME OUT WITH A TOP LINE

  • HE’S COME OUT WITH A TOP LINE FINDINGS THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY GOOD

  • FINDINGS THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY GOOD NEWS FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AND

  • NEWS FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AND PRODUCING THE KIND OF HEADLINES

  • PRODUCING THE KIND OF HEADLINES WE’RE SHOWING WHICH ARE STILL

  • WE’RE SHOWING WHICH ARE STILL ALMOST TWO YEARS AWAY FROM THE

  • ALMOST TWO YEARS AWAY FROM THE ELECTION.

  • ELECTION. BUT THE BILL WILL COME DUE.

  • BUT THE BILL WILL COME DUE. THE REST OF MUELLER’S EVIDENCE

  • THE REST OF MUELLER’S EVIDENCE WILL COME OUT.

  • WILL COME OUT. AND EVEN BARR ACKNOWLEDGED IN

  • AND EVEN BARR ACKNOWLEDGED IN THAT LETTER THAT THERE’S

  • THAT LETTER THAT THERE’S SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON BOTH

  • SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES ESPECIALLY ON THE

  • SIDES ESPECIALLY ON THE OBSTRUCTION ISSUES WITH RESPECT

  • OBSTRUCTION ISSUES WITH RESPECT TO EACH ALLEGED ACTION THAT THE

  • TO EACH ALLEGED ACTION THAT THE PRESIDENT TOOK THAT WAS

  • PRESIDENT TOOK THAT WAS OBSTRUCTION.

  • OBSTRUCTION. SO THERE WILL BE ANOTHER CHAPTER

  • SO THERE WILL BE ANOTHER CHAPTER TO THIS STORY.

  • TO THIS STORY. NOW WHETHER THAT’S IN 30 DAYS,

  • NOW WHETHER THAT’S IN 30 DAYS, 60 DAYS, 90 DAYS --

  • 60 DAYS, 90 DAYS -- >> THAT’S SUCH A GOOD POINT.

  • >> THAT’S SUCH A GOOD POINT. FOR BARR TO HAVEFVE SQUANDERED

  • FOR BARR TO HAVEFVE SQUANDERED POLITICAL CAPITAL ON THIS WHERE

  • POLITICAL CAPITAL ON THIS WHERE HE HAD DENT IN THE BODYWORK ON

  • HE HAD DENT IN THE BODYWORK ON OBSTRUCTION HE WAS ALREADY

  • OBSTRUCTION HE WAS ALREADY DOUBTED ABOUT WHETHER HE COULD

  • DOUBTED ABOUT WHETHER HE COULD BE A NEUTRAL ARBITER OF THE

  • BE A NEUTRAL ARBITER OF THE OBSTRUCTION CASE.

  • OBSTRUCTION CASE. HE TOOK ON MR. WATER.

  • HE TOOK ON MR. WATER. TRUMP MIGHT NEED HIM TO HAVE

  • TRUMP MIGHT NEED HIM TO HAVE MORE CREDIBILITY AND HAVE

  • MORE CREDIBILITY AND HAVE CREDIBILITY -- IT’S TRUMP.

  • CREDIBILITY -- IT’S TRUMP. YOU KNOW HE’S AN UNINDICTED

  • YOU KNOW HE’S AN UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRACY IN NEW YORK.

  • CO-CONSPIRACY IN NEW YORK. THERE’S 17 INVESTIGATIONS INTO

  • THERE’S 17 INVESTIGATIONS INTO HIM.

  • HIM. HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL JUST LOST

  • HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL JUST LOST HIS CREDIBILITY AMONG I WOULD

  • HIS CREDIBILITY AMONG I WOULD GUESS ALL DEMOCRATS AND MAYBE

  • GUESS ALL DEMOCRATS AND MAYBE EVEN SOME REPUBLICANS OR LIKE

  • EVEN SOME REPUBLICANS OR LIKE WOW TRUMP DID GOT IT.

  • WOW TRUMP DID GOT IT. SO BARR MIGHT NEED HIS

  • SO BARR MIGHT NEED HIS CREDIBILITY BACK.

  • CREDIBILITY BACK. ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS A WITNESS IN

  • ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS A WITNESS IN IT.

  • IT. I DON’T KNOW WHAT ROD ROSENSTEIN

  • I DON’T KNOW WHAT ROD ROSENSTEIN OF DOING ADVISING ON WHETHER OR

  • OF DOING ADVISING ON WHETHER OR NOT TO CATEGORIZE THE

  • NOT TO CATEGORIZE THE OBSTRUCTION CASE AS CRIMINAL OR

  • OBSTRUCTION CASE AS CRIMINAL OR NOT.

  • NOT. ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS THE GUY WHO

  • ROD ROSENSTEIN WAS THE GUY WHO WAS SO STRUNG OUT HE WANTED TO

  • WAS SO STRUNG OUT HE WANTED TO WEAR A WIRE TO CATCH TRUMP AS A

  • WEAR A WIRE TO CATCH TRUMP AS A RUSSIAN AGENT.

  • RUSSIAN AGENT. YOU COULDN’T FIND TWO MORE

  • YOU COULDN’T FIND TWO MORE DAMAGED ARBITERS OF THE MUELLER

  • DAMAGED ARBITERS OF THE MUELLER CASE WHICH WAS REALLY IN A LOCK

  • CASE WHICH WAS REALLY IN A LOCK BOX.

  • BOX. WE TRUSTED IT UNTIL BARR GOT HIS

  • WE TRUSTED IT UNTIL BARR GOT HIS MUDDY FINGERS ON IT AND ROD

  • MUDDY FINGERS ON IT AND ROD ROSENSTEIN WEIGHED IN.

  • ROSENSTEIN WEIGHED IN. THEY MIGHT WISH TO HAVE THEIR

  • THEY MIGHT WISH TO HAVE THEIR CREDIBILITY BACK.

  • CREDIBILITY BACK. >> WE HAVE A PREVIEW OF THE 4:00

  • >> WE HAVE A PREVIEW OF THE 4:00 SHOW.

  • SHOW. I KNOW WHERE HE’S GOING.

  • I KNOW WHERE HE’S GOING. >> IMAGINE IF YOU’RE BILL

  • >> IMAGINE IF YOU’RE BILL CLINTON RIGHT NOW.

  • CLINTON RIGHT NOW. HE SAID NO PRESIDENT IS GOING TO

  • HE SAID NO PRESIDENT IS GOING TO TESTIFY ONE OATH, HE’S NOT GOING

  • TESTIFY ONE OATH, HE’S NOT GOING TO LOOK FOR PERJURY TRAP OR SET

  • TO LOOK FOR PERJURY TRAP OR SET ONE.

  • ONE. CLINTON GOES IN, BEFORE A GRAND

  • CLINTON GOES IN, BEFORE A GRAND JURY AND SAYS WE ALL WATCHED

  • JURY AND SAYS WE ALL WATCHED THIS HUMILIATION.

  • THIS HUMILIATION. HE GOT IN TROUBLE DOING IT.

  • HE GOT IN TROUBLE DOING IT. WAS BOB BENNETT WRONG.

  • WAS BOB BENNETT WRONG. MR. PRESIDENT, BILL CLINTON,

  • MR. PRESIDENT, BILL CLINTON, TAKE FIFTH, YOU’LL NEVER BE

  • TAKE FIFTH, YOU’LL NEVER BE IMPEACHED.

  • IMPEACHED. >> IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME.

  • >> IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME. THAT’S THE LESSON THEY LEARNED.

  • THAT’S THE LESSON THEY LEARNED. >> WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO TAKES

  • >> WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO TAKES THE FIFTH.

  • THE FIFTH. DONE HURT HIS IMAGE.

  • DONE HURT HIS IMAGE. >> I TOTALLY AGREE.

  • >> I TOTALLY AGREE. >> I CAN TELL YOU THIS, IT WAS A

  • >> I CAN TELL YOU THIS, IT WAS A SURPRISE BY THE REPUBLICANS WHO

  • SURPRISE BY THE REPUBLICANS WHO ACTUALLY DID NOT LIKE THE FACT

  • ACTUALLY DID NOT LIKE THE FACT THAT WE MADE THE PRESIDENT OF

  • THAT WE MADE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SIT AND HE SAT

  • THE UNITED STATES SIT AND HE SAT THERE AND HE ANSWERED QUESTIONS

  • THERE AND HE ANSWERED QUESTIONS AND I WOULD ARGUE THAT IT HELPED

  • AND I WOULD ARGUE THAT IT HELPED HIM IN THE END EVEN THOUGH THERE

  • HIM IN THE END EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A CHARGE AND IT MADE US LOOK

  • WAS A CHARGE AND IT MADE US LOOK LIKE WE WERE ON A WITCH-HUNT.

  • LIKE WE WERE ON A WITCH-HUNT. IT’S PROBABLY WHY HE LEFT OFFICE

  • IT’S PROBABLY WHY HE LEFT OFFICE WITH A 60% APPROVAL RATING.

  • WITH A 60% APPROVAL RATING. >> HE GOT IMPEACHED IN THE

  • >> HE GOT IMPEACHED IN THE HISTORY BOOKS.

  • HISTORY BOOKS. >> AND ENDED UP TO BE A VERY

  • >> AND ENDED UP TO BE A VERY POPULAR PRESIDENT.

  • POPULAR PRESIDENT. >> AND HIS WIFE HAD A VERY --

  • >> AND HIS WIFE HAD A VERY -- >> ALL RIGHT.

  • >> ALL RIGHT. >> LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT THAT.

  • >> LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT THAT. >> SOSO, MR. BRENNAN, HOW

  • >> SOSO, MR. BRENNAN, HOW SURPRISED WERE YOU BY THE

  • SURPRISED WERE YOU BY THE FINDINGS YESTERDAY BY THE

  • FINDINGS YESTERDAY BY THE CONCLUSIONS THAT WERE DRAWN, AND

  • CONCLUSIONS THAT WERE DRAWN, AND I’M JUST CURIOUS DID YOU RECEIVE

  • I’M JUST CURIOUS DID YOU RECEIVE BAD INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THIS

  • BAD INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS LIKE SO MANY OF US DID

  • PROCESS LIKE SO MANY OF US DID THAT THERE WAS MORE THERE THAN

  • THAT THERE WAS MORE THERE THAN ENDED UP IN THE REPORT REGARDING

  • ENDED UP IN THE REPORT REGARDING COLLUSION?

  • COLLUSION? >> WELL, I DON’T KNOW IF I

  • >> WELL, I DON’T KNOW IF I RECEIVED BAD INFORMATION BUT I

  • RECEIVED BAD INFORMATION BUT I SUSPECTED THERE WAS MORE THAN

  • SUSPECTED THERE WAS MORE THAN THERE ACTUALLY WAS.

  • THERE ACTUALLY WAS. I AM RELIEVED THAT IT’S BEEN

  • I AM RELIEVED THAT IT’S BEEN DETERMINED THERE WAS NOT A

  • DETERMINED THERE WAS NOT A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WITH THE

  • CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WITH THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT OVER OUR

  • RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT OVER OUR ELECTION.

  • ELECTION. I THINK THAT’S GOOD NEWS FOR THE

  • I THINK THAT’S GOOD NEWS FOR THE COUNTRY.

  • COUNTRY. SO I STILL POINT TO THINGS THAT

  • SO I STILL POINT TO THINGS THAT WERE DONE PUBLICLY, OR EFFORTS

  • WERE DONE PUBLICLY, OR EFFORTS TO TRY TO HAVE CONVERSATION WITH

  • TO TRY TO HAVE CONVERSATION WITH THE RUSSIANS THAT WERE

  • THE RUSSIANS THAT WERE INAPPROPRIATE, BUT I’M NOT ALL

  • INAPPROPRIATE, BUT I’M NOT ALL THAT SURPRISED THAT THE HIGH BAR

  • THAT SURPRISED THAT THE HIGH BAR OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WAS NOT

  • OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WAS NOT MET.

  • MET. I AM SURPRISED THAT THAT SECOND

  • I AM SURPRISED THAT THAT SECOND PART OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

  • PART OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN TERMS OF HOW IT CAME OUT.

  • IN TERMS OF HOW IT CAME OUT. I DON’T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT

  • I DON’T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT ROBERT MUELLER WANTED THE

  • ROBERT MUELLER WANTED THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PRONOUNCE ON

  • ATTORNEY GENERAL TO PRONOUNCE ON THAT ISSUE OR WHETHER OR NOT

  • THAT ISSUE OR WHETHER OR NOT ROBERT MUELLER IT WAS UP TO

  • ROBERT MUELLER IT WAS UP TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC

  • CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE WEIGHT

  • TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE WEIGHT OF INFORMATION INDICATES WHETHER

  • OF INFORMATION INDICATES WHETHER DONALD TRUMP TRIED TO OBSTRUCT

  • DONALD TRUMP TRIED TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

  • JUSTICE. THERE ARE SOME SURPRISES THERE.

  • THERE ARE SOME SURPRISES THERE. I THINK THAT’S WHY GETTING TO

  • I THINK THAT’S WHY GETTING TO THE FULL MUELLER REPORT IS THE

  • THE FULL MUELLER REPORT IS THE BEST WAY TO GET SOME OF THESE IF

  • BEST WAY TO GET SOME OF THESE IF NOT ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS

  • NOT ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

  • ANSWERED. >> ALL RIGHTER.

  • >> ALL RIGHTER. JOHN BRENNAN, THANK YOU VERY

  • JOHN BRENNAN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING WITH US.

  • MUCH FOR BEING WITH US. JOSH, SAME THING, THANK YOU TOO.

  • JOSH, SAME THING, THANK YOU TOO. GREAT TO HAVE YOU HERE.

  • GREAT TO HAVE YOU HERE. NICOLE WALLACE, WE KNOW WHAT

  • NICOLE WALLACE, WE KNOW WHAT WE’LL SEE AT 4:00.

  • WE’LL SEE AT 4:00. HIS MUDDY HANDS.

  • HIS MUDDY HANDS. >> IT’S OVER.

  • >> IT’S OVER. THE COLLUSION QUESTION IS OVER.

  • THE COLLUSION QUESTION IS OVER. IT’S BEEN ASKED AND ANSWERED.

  • IT’S BEEN ASKED AND ANSWERED. ASKED AND ANSWERED.

  • ASKED AND ANSWERED. >> DEMOCRATS SHOULD MOVE ON.

  • >> DEMOCRATS SHOULD MOVE ON. >> THE WHOLE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

  • >> THE WHOLE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT COULD HAVE MOVED ON.

  • COULD HAVE MOVED ON. THEY COULD HAVE MOVED ON BY

  • THEY COULD HAVE MOVED ON BY LETTING MUELLER’S

  • LETTING MUELLER’S NONJUDGMENT JUDGMENT STAND.

  • NONJUDGMENT JUDGMENT STAND. >> ROBERT MUELLER COULD HAVE

  • >> ROBERT MUELLER COULD HAVE ALSO --

  • ALSO -- >> HE COULD HAVE CLEARED HIM.

  • >> HE COULD HAVE CLEARED HIM. >> HE COULD HAVE VERY EASILY

  • >> HE COULD HAVE VERY EASILY SAID THAT THIS IS A QUESTION FOR

  • SAID THAT THIS IS A QUESTION FOR CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

  • CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO DETERMINE.

  • TO DETERMINE. >> AS YOU’RE SAYING --

  • >> AS YOU’RE SAYING -- >> MAYBE DE.

  • >> MAYBE DE. >> WE HAVE THREE PARTIAL QUOTES.

  • >> WE HAVE THREE PARTIAL QUOTES. >> THIS IS THE TIME WHERE

  • >> THIS IS THE TIME WHERE EVERYBODY IS UNPRECEDENTED.

  • EVERYBODY IS UNPRECEDENTED. YOU COULD HAVE TAKEN MUELLER’S

  • YOU COULD HAVE TAKEN MUELLER’S WORK WHICH NO ONE ATTACKED AND

  • WORK WHICH NO ONE ATTACKED AND HANDED IT TO CONGRESS.

  • HANDED IT TO CONGRESS. IT’S LIKE A HALF MADE DINNER.

  • IT’S LIKE A HALF MADE DINNER. I DIDN’T FINISH THE SALAD.

  • I DIDN’T FINISH THE SALAD. >> DO YOU KNOW WHY HE DIDN’T DO

  • >> DO YOU KNOW WHY HE DIDN’T DO THAT?

  • THAT? YOU GOT TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT TALK

  • YOU GOT TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT TALK ABOUT SOURCES BECAUSE SOME

  • ABOUT SOURCES BECAUSE SOME SOURCES HAVE BEEN WRONG

  • SOURCES HAVE BEEN WRONG THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE PROCESS.

  • THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE PROCESS. TWO SOURCES I TALKED TO, AND ONE

  • TWO SOURCES I TALKED TO, AND ONE OF THE TWO SOURCE, A TRUMP

  • OF THE TWO SOURCE, A TRUMP SUPPORTER SAID THERE’S HIGHLY

  • SUPPORTER SAID THERE’S HIGHLY EMBARRASSING INFORMATION IN

  • EMBARRASSING INFORMATION IN THERE.

  • THERE. HIGHLY EMBARRASSING POLITICAL

  • HIGHLY EMBARRASSING POLITICAL INFORMATION IN THERE FOR DONALD

  • INFORMATION IN THERE FOR DONALD TRUMP.

  • TRUMP. SO THEY DON’T WANT TO RELEASE

  • SO THEY DON’T WANT TO RELEASE IT.

  • IT. THEY WANT TO KEEP AS MUCH OF IT

  • THEY WANT TO KEEP AS MUCH OF IT OUT AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE.

  • OUT AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE. >> THEY SHOULDN’T HAVE DONE WHAT

  • >> THEY SHOULDN’T HAVE DONE WHAT THEY DID.

  • THEY DID. >> I AGREE.

  • >> I AGREE. YOU KNOW ONE THING, EVERYBODY

  • YOU KNOW ONE THING, EVERYBODY AGREED INTEREST.

  • AGREED INTEREST. IT WASN’T FAIR OF COMEY TO LASH

  • IT WASN’T FAIR OF COMEY TO LASH AWAY AT HILLARY, EVEN THOUGH HE

  • AWAY AT HILLARY, EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN’T PROSECUTE.

  • DIDN’T PROSECUTE. I THINK PROSECUTORS SHOULD SAY

  • I THINK PROSECUTORS SHOULD SAY GUILTY OR NOT AND THEN

  • GUILTY OR NOT AND THEN SHOULDN’T.

  • SHOULDN’T. EITHER YOU PROSECUTE OR YOU

  • EITHER YOU PROSECUTE OR YOU DON’T.

  • DON’T. THE IDEA WELL WE HAVE SOME

  • THE IDEA WELL WE HAVE SOME THINGS.

  • THINGS. I DON’T HAVE THE GUTS TO

  • I DON’T HAVE THE GUTS TO PROSECUTE.

  • PROSECUTE. HE’S SORT OF GUILTY TOO.

  • HE’S SORT OF GUILTY TOO. HE THREAT DOOR OPEN FOR BARR.

  • HE THREAT DOOR OPEN FOR BARR. HE SHOULD HAVE SAID OFFER IN.

  • HE SHOULD HAVE SAID OFFER IN. >> CHRIS MATTHEWS, STAY WITH US

  • >> CHRIS MATTHEWS, STAY WITH US IF YOU CAN.

  • IF YOU CAN. STILL AHEAD ON "MORNING JOE" AN

  • STILL AHEAD ON "MORNING JOE" AN IMAGE FROM BACK IN 1989 WHEN A

  • IMAGE FROM BACK IN 1989 WHEN A PAST PRESIDENT MEAT FUTURE ONE.

  • PAST PRESIDENT MEAT FUTURE ONE. EARLIER THIS MONTH THAT PICTURE

  • EARLIER THIS MONTH THAT PICTURE WAS TWEETED OF RICHARD KNICKS ON

  • WAS TWEETED OF RICHARD KNICKS ON AND DONALD TRUMP.

  • AND DONALD TRUMP. TOM BROKAW JOINS US ON THE

  • TOM BROKAW JOINS US ON THE DIFFERENCE AND SIMILARITIES OF

  • DIFFERENCE AND SIMILARITIES OF THE 37th AND 45th PRESIDENT.

  • THE 37th AND 45th PRESIDENT. YOU’RE WATCHING "MORNING JOE".

  • YOU’RE WATCHING "MORNING JOE". WE’LL BE RIGHT BACK.

  • WE’LL BE RIGHT BACK. >> ALTHOUGH WE DID NOT FIND

  • >> ALTHOUGH WE DID NOT FIND CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT SECRETARY

  • CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT SECRETARY CLINTON OR HER COLLEAGUES

  • CLINTON OR HER COLLEAGUES INTENDED TO VIOLATE LAWS

THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS BEEN INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

クリス・マシューズ2020年には民主党が勝たなければならないということ｜モーニングジョー｜MSNBC (Chris Matthews: This Means Dems Have To Win In 2020 | Morning Joe | MSNBC)

  • 4 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語